Unfortuantly, I cannot find a link to the mailinglist archive for
pkg-virtualbox-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-virtualbox-devel/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hello mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package cxxtest.
CxxTest is a lightweight xUnit-like testing framework for C/C++ applications.
Writing test is easier and simpler than others C/C++ testing frameworks because
it is not required to
Hi,
I need create a package from a git repository (specifically
libraries/sla from http://starlink.jach.hawaii.edu/starlink.git).
What are the best options to do this?
Best
Ole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi,
I fixed the error isues
Could you please sponser a upload?
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.0-3.dsc
Van: Bas van den Dikkenberg
Verzonden: maandag 6 februari 2012 16:08
Aan: 'Bartosz Feński'
CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Onderwerp: RE: RFS: burp -- A cross
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Olе Streicher wrote:
I need create a package from a git repository (specifically
libraries/sla from http://starlink.jach.hawaii.edu/starlink.git).
What are the best options to do this?
One of the following in decreasing preference:
Ask upstream to perform
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package burp.
* Package name: burp
Version : 1.3.0-4
Upstream Author : Graham Keeling keel...@spamcop.net
* URL : http://burp.grke.net/
* License : AGPLv3
Section : utils
It builds those binary
Dear mentors,
Prior to submitting a standard RFS I wanted to clean my package[1] to the
most.
It seems my package is clean. Lintian raises no warning, debuild builds the
package successfully. However debexpo[2] raises strange errors regarding files
changed and insertions
Yes i did they use the AGPLv3 license and it states in de copyright file:
Linking:
As a special exception to the AGPLv3, the Burp Project gives permission to link
the code of its release of Burp with the OpenSSL project's OpenSSL library
(or with modified versions of it that use the same
Your message dated Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:25:32 +0100
with message-id 20120207132532.ge4...@belanna.comodo.priv.at
and subject line Re: Bug#658900: RFS: hiredis/0.10.1-4 [RC] -- Minimalistic C
client library for Redis
has caused the Debian Bug report #658900,
regarding RFS: hiredis/0.10.1-4 [RC] --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To fix some isues addressed bye a mentor I have uploaded an updated version
without lintian errors.
Can you please upload.
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/burp
W dniu 07.02.2012 13:43, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze:
Hi,
I fixed the error isues
Could you please sponser a upload?
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.0-3.dsc
Did you contacted upstream about that SSL linking and this is their
statement that you put
Your message dated Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:33:17 +0100
with message-id 20120207133317.gf4...@belanna.comodo.priv.at
and subject line Re: Bug#658902: RFS: xclip/0.12+svn84-1 [ITA] -- command line
interface to X selections
has caused the Debian Bug report #658902,
regarding RFS: xclip/0.12+svn84-1 [ITA]
W dniu 07.02.2012 14:22, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze:
Yes i did they use the AGPLv3 license and it states in de copyright file:
Linking:
As a special exception to the AGPLv3, the Burp Project gives
permission to link the code of its release of Burp with the OpenSSL
project's OpenSSL
On 02/07/2012 08:15 AM, Vincent Hobeïka wrote:
[1] :http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vera++/vera++_1.1.1-3.dsc
[2] :http://mentors.debian.net/package/vera%2B%2B
How did you build that source package? It has a diff.tar.gz file but no
debian.tar.gz.
--
Stephen M. Webb
On 02/07/2012 08:15 AM, Vincent Hobeïka wrote:
[1] :http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vera++/vera++_1.1.1-3.dsc
[2] :http://mentors.debian.net/package/vera%2B%2B
How did you build that source package? It has a diff.tar.gz file but no
debian.tar.gz.
--
Stephen M. Webb
Thanks for the tip, i corrected the changelog and uploaded a new version
Van: Bartosz Feński [mailto:bart...@fenski.pl]
Verzonden: dinsdag 7 februari 2012 14:35
Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg
CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Onderwerp: Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore
Also, might I ask why are there three changelog entries? Or has there been
*three* uploads in a two day period?
Cheers!
Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes:
On 02/07/2012 08:15 AM, Vincent Hobeïka wrote:
[1] :http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vera++/vera++_1.1.1-3.dsc
[2] :http://mentors.debian.net/package/vera%2B%2B
How did you build that source package? It has a diff.tar.gz file
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 658959 RFS: phpvirtualbox-4.1/7-1 [NEW] -- web based interface for
administering virtualbox
Bug #658959 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: phpvirtualbox-4.1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: phpvirtualbox-4.1/7-1 [NEW] -- web based interface
for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 658772 RFS: burp/1.3.0-4 -- backup and restore program [ITP]
Bug #658772 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup
and restore program.
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: burp/1.3.0-4 -- backup and restore program [ITP]'
tag 658835 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
I have no intention of sponsoring this package, but as I did take a
brief look at it before:
| my $config_file = /home/jabber/aspsms-t/etc/aspsms-web-notify.xml;
Not really useful for programs in /usr/bin.
| use lib ./;
Not really useful for programs in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 658835 + moreinfo
Bug #658835 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: aspsms-t (try 4) [NEW] -- sms transport
for your xmpp/jabber server
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
658835:
Hi everybody,
as Thomas is non responsive since about two weeks I'll try to find somebody
that uploads the package for me.
* Package name: policyd-weight
Version : 0.1.15.2-2
Upstream Author : Robert Felber
* URL : www.policyd-weight.org
* License :
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 02:25:32PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:08:50 +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package hiredis, since my previous
sponsor is not responding to my emails.
Uploaded, thanks for your quick bugfixes.
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 02:33:17PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:14:57 +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the package xclip.
Uploaded, thanks for your work.
Thanks.
Cheers
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;inidehG
Three uploads,
The initial, the one you gave some comments.
Today a second one, then I notisid that there was no watch file so created one
en uploaded a new version.
Bas
Van: Daniel Martí [mailto:danielmarti.deb...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 7 februari 2012 15:04
Aan: Bas van den
Good morning mentors,
I’m in the process of packaging a GObject–based library[1] which
provides gobject-introspection support.
While preparing the gir1.2- package I stumbled upon the
gobject-introspection mini–policy[2] and found out that .typelib files
are supposed to be installed in the
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Ondřej Žára ondrej.z...@gmail.com wrote:
v8cgi itself is implemented in C++ and has libv8 as its only
dependency. It is developed at Google Code
(http://code.google.com/p/v8cgi/) under New BSD Licence. Ubuntu
packages are available from a Launchpad PPA
Thank you for your quick answers,
Andrey Rahmatullin (wRAR) told me on #debexpo to ignore this message.
Yet, I have added the debian/source/format file and the errors have
disappeared.
Thanks a lot for your help.
--
Vincent Hobeïka
This message and any attachments are the property of The
If I look at my package thru debian packaging:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libswe.html
It thinks my ITP #635672 is still open.
However the changelog file contains a entry like this:
.
libswe (1.77.00.0001-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #635672) 635672 is
Le 07/02/12 16:59, Paul Elliott a écrit :
If I look at my package thru debian packaging:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libswe.html
It thinks my ITP #635672 is still open.
However the changelog file contains a entry like this:
.
libswe (1.77.00.0001-1) unstable; urgency=low
Hi!
Am 07.02.2012 17:11, schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
Why does packaging not see this? Have I made a mistake?
Was this initial version actually uploaded to the Debian archive?
.. or the uploaded package build with -v to include older changelog entries?
Best regards,
Alexander
--
To
* Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com, 2012-02-07, 09:59:
If I look at my package thru debian packaging:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libswe.html
It thinks my ITP #635672 is still open.
However the changelog file contains a entry like this:
.
libswe (1.77.00.0001-1) unstable;
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:59, Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com wrote:
If I look at my package thru debian packaging:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libswe.html
It thinks my ITP #635672 is still open.
However the changelog file contains a entry like this:
.
libswe
Hello List:
what is the status of an orphaned package but that is waiting for an sponsor to
be uploaded ?
Thanks,
Jerome
On 07/02/12 16:59, Paul Elliott wrote:
If I look at my package thru debian packaging:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libswe.html
It thinks my ITP #635672 is still
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
NMU for package goplay is looking for a sponsor.
(See attached debdiff output)
#
GoPlay! is a Graphical User Interface (GUI) that uses DebTags for easily
finding games in Debian. The program uses FLTK for handling the widgets,
Greetings,
Last year I packaged cluebringer (version 2.0 of policyd for doing
greylisting and other anti spam controls) as postfix-cluebringer. In my
initial packaging I used dbconfig-common to handle the database
installation and configuration, however when I did an RFS the sponsor
pulled it all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 659045 +wontfix
thanks
On 07.02.2012 17:58, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
NMU for package goplay is looking for a sponsor. (See attached
debdiff output)
...
+ compat and debhelper to version 9 + default hardening (with the
exception of fortify) +
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 659045 +wontfix
Bug #659045 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: goplay (NMU)
Added tag(s) wontfix.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
659045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659045
Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package rpg.
* Package name: rpg
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Vladimir Stavrinov vstavri...@gmail.com
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/rpg/
* License
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package rpg.
* Package name: rpg
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Vladimir Stavrinov vstavri...@gmail.com
* URL :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Bas,
On 07.02.2012 19:02, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package rpg.
please do not send out both, a RFS bug against the sponsorship-package
and a traditional RFS mail to debian-mentors. For now, you may
Hi,
* Package name: rpg
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/rpg/
[...]
rpg - Readable Password Generator
Does this offer anything over password generators already in Debian such
as pwgen, apg or gpw?
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
It is easy to customize with config file,
I find this password very good and better then the other 3 you mentiond.
For example you can exclude letters and numbers that look like each other.
Just like name says it make your password Readable
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Ansgar
Hi everyone,
Continuing the theme of excessive noise in the mailing list, we can look at
simple statistics for the first 7 days of this month:
$ curl -q http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02/maillist.html 2
/dev/null | \
grep 'listrong' | wc -l
191
$ curl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07.02.2012 19:56, Boris Pek wrote:
I.e. 13% of messages are useless for most subscribers. Is it good
reason to filter these messages?
Try your luck: #658498
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID:
I.e. 13% of messages are useless for most subscribers. Is it good
reason to filter these messages?
Try your luck: #658498
I haven't seen it. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Oke ,
Won't do that again, my idea was tathe was the correct procedure.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Arno Töll [mailto:deb...@toell.net]
Verzonden: dinsdag 7 februari 2012 19:23
Aan: Debian Mentors; Bas van den Dikkenberg
Onderwerp: Re: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko yo...@debian.org wrote:
I will try to look sometime soon, but can't promise when.
Hello Samuel
The gcc-doc thing you've done looks great, however it is incomplete.
Complete solution consists of gcc-doc-defaults package [contrib], and
W dniu 07.02.2012 15:51, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze:
Three uploads,
The initial, the one you gave some comments.
Today a second one, then I notisid that there was no watch file so
created one en uploaded a new version.
Did you try to build it under pbuilder/cowbuilder?
I tried, without
What advantages does this program have over pwgen (which has been around
for a long time and is already package)?
--
Richard
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Van: Bartosz Feński [mailto:bart...@fenski.pl]
Verzonden: dinsdag 7 februari 2012 21:20
Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg
CC: Daniel Martí; debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Onderwerp: Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program.
W dniu 07.02.2012 15:51, Bas van den Dikkenberg
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Richard Laager [mailto:rlaa...@wiktel.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 7 februari 2012 21:26
Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg; 659...@bugs.debian.org
Onderwerp: Re: Bug#659047: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator
What advantages does this program have over pwgen
Dear Fabio,
I've noted, that the debian package phpldapadmin is out of date
compared to upstream. The recent squeeze implementation of openldap uses
the cn=config scheme which is supported in newer upstream versions
(compared to the debian version which is 1.2.0.5).
I've created a debian
Hi Arno,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 04:10:48 Arno Töll wrote:
+ compat and debhelper to version 9 + default hardening (with the
exception of fortify) + standards to 3.9.2 + ept-cache replaced
with apt-xapian-index in Depends
We don't do such things in NMUs.
*Sometimes* we do.
The options
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I have made a few other changes to apt-build, please view changelog:
apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
* Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
* Allow
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
Last year I packaged cluebringer (version 2.0 of policyd for doing
greylisting and other anti spam controls) as postfix-cluebringer. In my
initial packaging I used dbconfig-common to handle the database
installation and configuration,
Le Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:10:55AM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov a écrit :
The options are:
* QA : Not in this case since the package is
team-maintained.
* Team : Looks like best option, but I'm not the
team member
On 02/08/2012 02:12 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
Last year I packaged cluebringer (version 2.0 of policyd for doing
greylisting and other anti spam controls) as postfix-cluebringer. In my
initial packaging I used dbconfig-common to handle the
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:
Of course I can. I have just forwarded you (Paul) the mail exchange
pertaining to that case that should shed some light on the initial
problems, but the gist of it is that I could not get the dbconfig-common
stuff to run reliably, while the
Hello List:
I understand that it can take some time to get a package sponsored.
Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned,
it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact
it is indeed orphaned, but also on the way to be adopted:
a kind of limbo status.
Thanks.
hth,
Hi Charles,
have you actually tried to contact the team ? I do not see messages from
you in January or February on their mailing list.
I did just before I noticed this message of yours, but I wrote to them after I
placed the sponsorship request. :(
Probably that's wasn't the best choice
Hi Charles,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:51:19 Charles Plessy wrote:
have you actually tried to contact the team ? I do not see messages from
you in January or February on their mailing list.
How could I forget, I did contact them thought the Alioth request to join the
team, where I mention the
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I understand that it can take some time to get a package sponsored.
To say the least.
Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned,
it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact
it is indeed orphaned, but also
Le Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:36:08PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov a écrit :
How could I forget, I did contact them thought the Alioth request to join the
team, where I mention the prepared NMU.
Alioth requests are a mess: when one admin answers, there is no notification
to the other admins. As a
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:28:52 +0100
Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
Hello List:
I understand that it can take some time to get a package sponsored.
Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned,
it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact
it is indeed
Hi Charles,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:51:42 Charles Plessy wrote:
Alioth requests are a mess: when one admin answers, there is no
notification to the other admins. As a consequence, it can happen that
everyone expects the others to have answered. I recommend to contact the
team on its mailing
Hello List:
I understand that it can take some time to get a package sponsored.
Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned,
it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact
it is indeed orphaned, but also on the way to be adopted:
a kind of limbo status.
Thanks.
hth,
Hello List:
On 08/02/12 03:42, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned,
it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact
it is indeed orphaned, but also on the way to be adopted:
a kind of limbo status.
Do you mean something like:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:40:40 +0100
Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
Hello List:
On 08/02/12 03:42, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned,
it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact
it is indeed orphaned, but also on
Hi !
On 08/02/12 05:04, Dean Evans wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:40:40 +0100
Jerome BENOITg62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
Hello List:
On 08/02/12 03:42, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned,
it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package auralquiz:
Package name: auralquiz
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Jan Kusanagi janjab...@gmail.com
URL : https://jancoding.wordpress.com/category/projects/auralquiz/
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:13:58 +0100
Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote:
You should use the existing wnpp bug report #525921 to state your
intention to adopt instead of creating a new one. Please add a note
to #525921 that you are intending to adopt the package, retitle it
from O:
Dmitry Smirnov schrieb am Wednesday, den 08. February 2012:
I think proposal regarding managing sponsorship through bug tracker was to
encourage usage of bug tracker.
To me forwarding BTS activity for sponsorship-requests to mentors mail list
appears to be against the spirit and the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package nestopia.
* Package name: nestopia
Version : 1.40h+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Martin Freij and R. Belmont
* URL : http://rbelmont.mameworld.info/?page_id=200
*
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 559563 with 659082
Bug #559563 [wnpp] ITP: nestopia -- advanced emulator for the Nintento
Entertainment System
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 559563: 659082
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
76 matches
Mail list logo
