Hello Jason,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:56, Jason Holt credential...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package googlecl.
i'm going to give it a look. In the meantime, could you please
evaluate to maintain this package under the Debian Python Apps
umbrella [1] ?
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:21, Jason Holt credential...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you! Obey Arthur Liu graciously offered to sponsor the package. But
I'm always happy to have more feedback :)
Obey,
next time please alert the mailing list you're already working on it.
it will help not wasting
Thank you! Obey Arthur Liu graciously offered to sponsor the package. But
I'm always happy to have more feedback :)
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
Hello Jason,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:56, Jason Holt credential...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello Jason,
here's my comments
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:15, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
Hello Jason,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:56, Jason Holt credential...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package googlecl.
debian/changelog
- given it's a NEW
söndag den 13 juni 2010 klockan 01:46 skrev Tim Retout detta:
On 4 June 2010 10:45, Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se
wrote:
I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
I'm afraid it seems you're stuck with me. ;) At DebConf we (the
This pleases me!
project)
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:21:20AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.11-1
of the package tina.
And here goes my second attempt to adopt tina - nothing changed
since the first one, just resending the RFS :)
This is an adoption
* Paul Wise p...@debian.org, 2010-06-15, 10:14:
I'd personally like to see DMUA move from source packages to a mail bot
or LDAP or something else.
Same here. While I endorse the concept of Debian Maintainers, I am very
unhappy with the way it is currently implemented.
--
Jakub Wilk
On 06/15/2010 12:46 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
debian/googlecl.manpages
- why manpage is called so generically 'google.1' and not googlecl.1'
given it's for the executable 'googlecl'
In fact the package installs /usr/bin/google not /usr/bin/googlecl.
As a not-so-experienced person, I shouldn't
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:00, Umang Varma umang...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/15/2010 12:46 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
debian/googlecl.manpages
- why manpage is called so generically 'google.1' and not googlecl.1'
given it's for the executable 'googlecl'
In fact the package installs /usr/bin/google
Le Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:57:57AM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
* Paul Wise p...@debian.org, 2010-06-15, 10:14:
I'd personally like to see DMUA move from source packages to a mail bot
or LDAP or something else.
Same here. While I endorse the concept of Debian Maintainers, I am very
unhappy
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Paul Wise p...@debian.org, 2010-06-15, 10:14:
I'd personally like to see DMUA move from source packages to a mail
bot or LDAP or something else.
Same here. While I endorse the concept of Debian Maintainers, I am
very unhappy with the way it is
Hello,
2010/6/15 Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.11-1
of the package tina.
And here goes my second attempt to adopt tina - nothing changed
since the first one, just resending the RFS :)
Thanks for the reminder! :-)
Of course, I realize
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0.0~svn4035-1
of my package n2n.
It build these binary package:
n2n- Peer-to-Peer VPN network daemon
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
The field should go away and be replaced with an out-of-band setting
that only a sponsor can change.
Looks like there is the possibility of changing this:
Ganneff feel free to give us dak patches making DM saner.
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:14:54 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
toli...@debian.org wrote:
I noticed that recently some people seem to seek first time sponsors
while asking for setting the DM-Upload-Allowed: yes flag at the very
same time.
[I am a DM]
Hi there,
Even this is against the spirit of Debian Maintainer Concept, I
believe this is because people are pragmatic.
Speaking of experience I had to re-upload 5 times the exact same
packages (GDCM) because in between each upload:
- HPPA uploaded a Java package with dangling
Hello Alexander,
2010/6/14 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org:
So I think asking for DMUA:Yes while seeking an initial sponsor is just
plain wrong, as convincing a DD shouldn't be a one timer. I therefore
ask DMs not to ask to set this flag on the first upload, and DDs not to
do
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:14:54AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
This isn't the only misuse of DMUA that exists, some people set it in
their package instead of asking the sponsor to set it. Others go
further and do not mention that in debian/changelog nor in their RFS
mail.
That is generally
Hi!
Am 15.06.2010 12:16, schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
[..]
[ uploading a package multiple times without DMUA:Yes]
Thankfully I was under the debian-med umbrella, otherwise I would
have gone mad, if every time I would have had to search for a DD.
[..]
Uhm... Why? I guess it's more the rule
Hi!
Am 15.06.2010 12:16, schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
Speaking of experience I had to re-upload 5 times the exact same
packages (GDCM) because in between each upload:
Why 5 times?
- HPPA uploaded a Java package with dangling symnlink,
- arm/armel updated the java package and libraries
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.3~20100601-2
of my package projectcenter.app.
It builds these binary packages:
projectcenter.app - IDE for GNUstep Development
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 585978
The package can be
On 2010-06-15, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
This isn't the only misuse of DMUA that exists, some people set it in
their package instead of asking the sponsor to set it. Others go
I guess it is unimportant who exactly writes the lines to
debian/control. But the sponsor should definately
[Mathieu Malaterre, 2010-06-15]
Thankfully I was under the debian-med umbrella, otherwise I would
have gone mad, if every time I would have had to search for a DD.
well, it is hard indeed (if you want a new DD for every upload).
Hint: try to ask previous sponsor first!
I completely
[Simon Richter, 2010-06-15]
I don't think it needs to be reflected in the changelog either, as it
doesn't really concern the packaging as such, but only upload
permissions (also, if I should set it, then I'd have to write the
changelog entry, no?).
what about other DDs? I want to have a
Hello All,
My previous RFS for this package was premature because I had not prepared the
Debian source files. Even though the package contains no compiled code, this
was a gross omission, for which I apologize. I have carefully built the Debian
source files according to the documentation.
On Di, 15 Jun 2010, Lloyd Standish wrote:
Debian source: http://files.lstandish.com/snap2-source
The package appears to be lintian-clean.
How do you come to that idea?
I unpacked your package, built it with dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot,
and run lintian on the resulting package:
$ ls
Dear Norbert,
Thank you for your help with my snap2 project.
The package appears to be lintian-clean.
How do you come to that idea?
Of course I came to that idea by running lintian (Lintian v1.24.2.1+lenny1)
against the binary deb. It reported nothing (clean). I think the problem is
David Paleino da...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:14:54 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
toli...@debian.org wrote:
I noticed that recently some people seem to seek first time sponsors
while asking for setting the
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org writes:
[..]
[ uploading a package multiple times without DMUA:Yes]
Thankfully I was under the debian-med umbrella, otherwise I would
have gone mad, if every time I would have had to search for a DD.
[..]
Uhm... Why? I guess it's more the
On 2010-06-15, Lloyd Standish ll...@crnatural.net wrote:
It did not occur to me to check for gtkdialog in Sid (it is available
in Lenny http://packages.debian.org/lenny/gtkdialog). So, until
there is a gtkdialog package in Sid, snap2 cannot run. This is a
great disappointment - I put a lot
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 05:42:43 Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:
The field should go away and be replaced with an out-of-band setting
that only a sponsor can change.
Looks like there is the possibility of changing this:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
The field should go away and be replaced with an out-of-band setting
that only a sponsor can change.
Looks like there is the possibility of changing this:
Ganneff feel free to give us dak patches making DM
Dear mentors,
I have already posted this earlier but since I haven't yet found a
sponsor for my package, I'll give it another try since I think that
this software will proof very useful for a lot of users.
qhimdtransfer is part of the software developed by a couple of people
around me within the
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:55:00 -0500
Chris rac...@makeworld.com wrote:
Hi folks -
Per the inspection from Paul, I mailed the folks at Partners In Rhyme
about the use of the audio files from the email titled:
Re: RFS: marave - 2nd Attempt
There was some questioning about the copyrights
On Di, 15 Jun 2010, Lloyd Standish wrote:
Of course I came to that idea by running lintian (Lintian v1.24.2.1+lenny1)
against the binary deb. It reported nothing (clean). I think the problem is
that I am running the Debian stable (Lenny) version of dpkg-dev, and you are
probably running
Norbert,
Thanks very much for pointing out how lintian is used to check a source
package. I would have seen this if I had read the lintian man page carefully.
I looked at zenity. From the man page which describes the command line
options, I don't think it is capable of a complex dialog with
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Adrian Glaubitz
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de wrote:
qhimdtransfer is part of the software developed by a couple of people
around me within the linux-minidisc project [1].
You might want to join the multimedia team:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia
--
37 matches
Mail list logo
