On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Thibaut GIRKA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package looks good otherwise.
Thanks :)
One more thing: the package is arch any, but there don't seem to be
any architecture-specific files in it. I guess this is a mistake?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Thibaut GIRKA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more thing: the package is arch any, but there don't seem to be
any architecture-specific files in it. I guess this is a mistake?
Yes, it was.
The change to arch all added some lintian info messages, please setup
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 18:14 +0200, Thibaut GIRKA wrote:
The change to arch all added some lintian info messages, please setup
your build environment to always run lintian -i -I on successful
builds or on dupload/dput.
Sorry. It's now ok.
Just noticed that the copyright file is missing
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Thibaut GIRKA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just noticed that the copyright file is missing information for one of
the .po files and at least one of the python files, please check all the
files for differing copyright information and document them in
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You seem to be missing Ľubomír Remák from src/plugins/gajim/__init__.py
Correction: you are misspelling his/her name.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution :)
For the next upstream version, there appear to be several typos in the
manual page, including a couple in the command-line options.
In addition, the lauch script appears to contain no bashisms, so it
should use /bin/sh instead of /bin/bash, please get
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution :)
Forgot to say: for future uploads, please contact this list and I'll
upload if I have time, or someone else will. Hopefully Patrick will
soon be a DD so he can do the same.
--
bye
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody will assign you tasks.
I disagree, getting people to ask you to do stuff is easy (world peace
please), deciding which task(s) to do is the hard part.
You need to find in what area you will be
able to help
Another hacky solution would be to get the Debian libnet maintainer to
build two variants of libnet, one with the patch (for dhcp-probe) and
one without (for everyone else).
Ultimately the proper solution is for libnet to get a new upstream
release; please work with libnet upstream to make this
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Laurent Guignard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw that libnet has no official maintainer so i think i will download
upstream code (RC version) and i will package it (even if it's my first
package and it isn't recommended).
Actually David Paleino intends to adopt
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Brandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, xevil is a dead project. The latest release was years ago, and
Satan doesn't respond to email. Would you guys recommend not having a
watch file? Even if so, I would really like to know how I would solve
this problem, if it
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Noel David Torres Taño
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just want somebody to revise the new version of my package, which I've
moved from the traditional version 1.0 to the new 3.0 (quilt) one since it is
better for the sources I have to work with. I've posted an
Usually this warning is produced because of an incorrectly named
orig.tar.gz - foo-1.2.orig.tar.gz (bad) vs foo_1.2.orig.tar.gz (good).
Perhaps that is the issue?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I expect it to be found at '../tarballs/foo_1.2.3.orig.tar.gz'?
That's where 'dpkg-buildpackage' and other tools seem to expect it.
Is 'pbuilder' different in this regard? I'd rather not have the same
file needing to
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug i need to declare is a dependency of a specific patched version
of libnet0 package that is under an ITA procedure ?
I have found a block command of the BTS but i don't know where to find
the bug number of ITA of
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Stefanos Harhalakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've sent the 3rd version to mentors but it didn't show at the web interface.
Looking at ftp://mentors.debian.net/ I see that there are other packages left
in the same condition too. Is this expected behaviour ?
IIRC the removals from testing should happen automatically or
semi-automatically.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Diego Fernández Durán [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
quick-lounge-applet is in freeze, the version in testing is 2.12.1 and in
unstable 2.12.5. The new version doesn't fix any major bug.
Must I contact debian-relase to request the package update?
They are
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Fabian Pucciarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have never built a package in my life, I'm trying to build a package
called dcc (anti spam software
http://www.rhyolite.com/dcc/INSTALL.html#envtbl). Does anyone know of a
guide that I can use, the new maintainers
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Michael Renner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Architecture: any
Use 'all' not 'any'.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:49 PM, S'orlok Reaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good afternoon everyone,
I am writing this email to request a sponsor for
the brand new package, scim-waitzar.
The scim-waitzar project provides an IMEngine for
SCIM that supports the Burmese language. In
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:21 PM, S'orlok Reaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd suggest that you CC the Debian SCIM packaging
list for future RFS mails.
Absolutely. I couldn't find any SCIM-related lists on
lists.debian.org... could you point me to the Debian
SCIM packaging list archives, or
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Alessio Giovanni Baroni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a base question: when one compile a package, often are enabled the debug and
low level optimiziation. For Debian, how must I to do it? -g/none -O1/-O2/-O3
?
Always enable -g and use -O2 unless noopt is set in
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:14 PM, S'orlok Reaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/
Some comments:
debian/rules contains lots of commented out stuff and other unnessecary parts.
debian/docs shouldn't distribute the NEWS file until it contains
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please read the best practicies for package descriptions
Here are the URLs for that:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-control
http://web.archive.org/web/20070915131707/http
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Kruti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone help me regarding how to install a package in any user defined
folder other than /usr using apt-get?
Your question lacks detail, can you please give some more infomation
so it can be answered correctly?
--
bye,
pabs
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Kruti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i mean when you do apt-get install package, all the files of the package
are installed in /usr.for eg: packge binary in /usr/bin.
but if i want the package n all its files to be installed in a directory
other than /usr for eg in
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Alessio Giovanni Baroni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where are stored the global variables? I must always add it to /etc/profile
and /etc/bash.bashrc.
There is a global location?
This is not the appropriate list, please contact debian-user or one
that is specific
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The correct solution is for the warning to go away. Either this *is*
something that needs attention, or it is not. In the former case, what
is the problem and what is the solution? In the latter case, why is
the warning there
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Jann Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've got a problem with dpkg-buildpackage and get the following error
when I start it (sorry, it's German):
Please run this:
export LANG=C
Then rerun the command and paste the english output.
--
bye,
pabs
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 12:12 -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the package 'tnef'.
Thanks for adopting this.
Thank you in advance for reviewing this package
Some comments:
* debian/control: need an extra space before Homepage (see the
devref 6.2.4), may
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 21:55 +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
I think gaupol is popular enough to be included in Debian.
Thanks for packaging this. BTW, once it is uploaded, check out the
popcon results for the package:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?popcon=gaupol
I'm confused because I
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 10:53 +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
I registered a weeks ago but... I didn't receive confirmation mail yet (sic!)
I have even send a bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but no reply till today :(
Hopefully he will fix this soon.
Believe me, I was searching for it in
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 03:34 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
swfmill is an xml2swf and swf2xml processor with import functionalities
Some comments:
* debian/watch: only needs 2 lines - version and url. may want to
allow uscan to auto-run uupdate - add debian uupdate to the
end
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 15:19 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
W: libswfmill0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libswfmillxslt0 libswft0
What's the standard way of solving this?
It was suggested to me that the lintian warning should be overridden.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 23:43 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
* Package: rhinote
Some comments:
* debian/control: add a Homepage as per devref 6.2.4
* debian/copyright: misses the years in which the copyright
applies
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 13:02 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Gnash is not ready for uploading to SID yet, I'm considering putting
it into experimental.
Please do! Thanks for taking on this package.
The last packages I've made are available at
http://baby.yi.org/packages/gnash/
Some comments:
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 02:31 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Some comments:
* debian/copyright:
I forgot to point out this mail:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 00:49 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
* debian/control: gnash is not binNMUable due to libgnash-dev
strictly depending on libgnash0 (= ${Source-Version}).
What should I do in this case? just depend on libgnash0 without the version?
wasn't they going to solve
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:59 -0400, Ian Ward wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the python-urwid debian packages I have
created.
WNPP submitted on November 30, 2005:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341344
You will notice that I retitled that RFP bug to ITP. I've created
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 15:58 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I have packaged versions for python2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, and I've
made them available in an apt repository on excess.org.
I think a better option would be to use python-support to make a single
deb that supports all python
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 12:03 -0400, Ian Ward wrote:
The tutorial.html file has been restored to urwid-0.9.3.tar.gz
I know this might not be good form (I imagine I could have made a new
release), but it was just a build problem that caused it to appear as a
zero length file, and the file is
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 11:28 -0400, Ian Ward wrote:
I've never tried using setup.py to generate documentation. Could you
point me to an example of a module that does this?
I don't really know enough about distutils or of any modules that do
this. I think it would be fine to distribute both
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:48 +0200, Le_Vert wrote:
spcaview : package review needed
The convention is RFC: package -- package description
http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-package/spcaview/spcaview_20051212-1.dsc
Best to just specify the dsc/diff so we can go dget -x url.dsc for a
more
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 16:14 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
I'm using dpatch right now, pretty nice, thanks :-)
FYI many people are now starting to use quilt.
For good reason, it rocks!
* debian/watch: please add one (read uscan(1) for more info)
Added. Looks great but is it usefull
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 09:29 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Just use
Depends: probcons (= ${Source-Version})
Please don't use Source-Version - from the dpkg-gencontrol manual:
The source package version (from the changelog file). This variable is
now deprecated as its meaning is different
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 08:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Thus proving that the real solution is to get rid of the Homepage bit
completely and instead add a real field to dpkg, since people won't even
agree on and follow the syntax for the hack of putting it in the long
description so that
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 02:36 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
only linda is unhappy about non-free font in the upstream
tarball
If linda is correct about there being a non-free font in the upstream
tarball, then you will need to repack the upstream tarball and document
that you have done so.
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 13:31 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
I kept the same version.
You should instead change the upstream version to 1.0.14.dfsg.1, the
other option is to rename the source package to pyepl-dfsg, but that is
generally not preferred, since renaming source packages can be
Hi all,
Would anyone be able to sponsor templayer? It is a python module that I
need for urwid in order to be able to generate the tutorial. It uses
cdbs and python-support for building at the moment.
dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/templayer/templayer_1.2-2-1.dsc
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 11:13 -0400, Kit Peters wrote:
At my job, we would like to use apt to distribute certain packages,
such as WWW applications written in PHP, to certain other of our
machines.
Your question has been answered by others, but I would like to suggest
that you join the
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 22:57 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
An URL to *.dsc file will suffice and is actually more suitable to grab (i.e.
dget) debian source packages from sites, then dpkg-source -x .dsc.
Agreed. Extra tip for dget users:
dget -x http://foo.bar.com/foo_1.0-1.dsc
--
bye,
pabs
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:27 +0100, Conall O'Brien wrote:
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/queuegraph/queuegraph_1.1.0-1.dsc
There is a strange error in your diff.gz:
$ dget -x
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 04:57 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
I am searching for a sponsor for OptiPNG.
Hmm, I thought you would have a permanent sponsor by now.
It's an updated package (new upstream release).
Linda and lintian clean and builds OK on pbuilder.
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 13:49 -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.05b3-7 of my
package bottlerocket. It was recently orphaned and since I use
the package in my home to control lights, I filed an ITA in order to
keep it in Debian.
Excellent, always good
No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. You should assume that people don't
want a CC unless they indicate that they do in some way.
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 22:00 +0100, Conall O'Brien wrote:
dpkg-source: failure: patch gave error exit status 1
Hmmm, I'm not sure how to investigate this. All I did
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 02:58 +0100, Conall O'Brien wrote:
I've rebuild my package now (and it seems to be 3.7.2 complient). I've
uploaded it to mentors.debian.net again. Hopefully the updated packages
will be moved from incoming/ to the pool soon.
I tried to do your dget -x test and I'm
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 14:08 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Curently I have over 480 packages to custom applications to maintain...
If any of them are free software, please consider uploading them to
Debian or filing bugs in the BTS for customised versions of existing
packages. Not sure if you
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 22:33 +0100, Matej Kosik wrote:
SPECULATION
Major part of the orignal binary is compiled from OCAML sources so maybe
there is some specific error behavior of dh_strip related to these kind
of binaries.
/SPECULATION
Read the ocaml policy, but you are correct, dh_strip
On 5/3/07, Raphael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
php4-ffmpeg - ffmpeg support for php4
php4 will be removed from sid soon, please remove this package:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/04/msg00816.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On 5/18/07, Rudi Cilibrasi, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for somebody willing to have a look for problems in a
new version of my biggest package that I split up recently.
Please post a URL to your split package.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On 5/26/07, John Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All problems solved, except the following when running lintian:
E: lbadmin: package-contains-xvpics-dir var/www/lbadmin-1.0/images/.xvpics/
Get upstream to make sure it won't be put into future tarballs they
release and change debian/rules to
On 5/29/07, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, packaging it for Debian looks like a momentuous task.
SAGE, as it stands right now, distributes its own versions of a number
of other free software packages that are already in Debian
I'd suggest finding out what
On 6/13/07, Philipp Benner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: prolog-el
http://www-lehre.inf.uos.de/~pbenner/debian/prolog-el_1.14-1.dsc
Some comments:
* You might want consider configuring your server (if you are the
sysadmin) to allow people to view the diff.gz in their browser (or
switch
On 6/13/07, Francesco Cecconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Package name : kopete-otr
Some comments:
- yr upstream probably shouldn't be including a debian/ dir, if only
for the reason that it results in incomplete reviews by drive-by
reviewers such as myself.
- why is the library installed
On 6/13/07, Jeremiah Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xnee - an X evironment emulator and recorder
Some comments:
- xnee is already in Debian and has a maintainer. There are no RFA or
O bugs either.
- you didn't preserve the debian/changelog history from the existing
xnee package
-
On 6/11/07, Michael Mende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wackamole - Daemon to make a cluster highly available
Some comments:
- Why do you need to add /usr/lib and /usr/include to the configure
arguments? Those are standard dirs.
- May want to use debhelper compat level 5
- May want to contribute
On 6/14/07, Jeremiah Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been requested to maintain this package by the developer - the
DD he was working with has stopped all work on the package and is not
answering emails. Furthermore the version in debian is 1.8x and the
new version is 2.06 with lots of
On 6/14/07, Richard A Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kicad - Electronic schematic and PCB design software
A drive-by diff review:
Perhaps add descriptions and your name to the dpatches.
Have you sent the patches and the .desktop file upstream?
is 02_debpaths.dpatch really needed?
Might
On 6/15/07, Richard A Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As of last week I now have write access to the kicad dev svn
repository (in fact it's only as of about 2 weeks ago that there was
an upstream dev repo at all). So patches have gone upstream, except
the debpatchs one (see below).
Excellent.
On 6/15/07, Richard Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problem, thanks for your time. If you know anyone that would be
able to help please point them in my direction.
There are some tips for this sort of thing in the mentors FAQ. Perhaps
someone on debian-science might be interested.
--
bye,
On 6/28/07, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using a datestamp because that seems to be the best way to handle
the 'version' of the icons pack.
To prevent the need for an epoch if upstream decides to use versions,
you might want to go with something like 0.0.20070625-1 or
On 7/1/07, Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ampache- A web based audio file management system written in PHP
I attended the debian-security talk at debconf. Lets just say that PHP
isn't popular with them :) Have you audited the code so that the
security team don't have to do it when you
On 7/7/07, Nicholas Jefferson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/inferno/inferno_0.0.20070510-2.diff.gz
No time to sponsor, but some comments:
* consider putting the patches into quilt (or maybe dpatch)
* that is a lot of patches to the font stuff, what are
On 7/6/07, LIU Qi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unalz/unalz_0.61-1.diff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
Send manpages, patches upstream if you haven't already.
Might want to convert the patches to quilt (or dpatch/cdbs-simple-patchsys)
In
On 7/7/07, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/thwab-lib/thwab-lib_1.1.2-1.diff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
New upstream release for a package not yet in debian?
Please file an ITP and close it in the changelog
What happens
On 7/5/07, William Vera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ninja/ninja_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
I see the security issues mentioned in the ITP have been fixed, am I correct?
debian/rules contains unused configure target,
On 7/4/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.diff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
Why the changes from /bin/sh to /usr/bin/wish? The wish manpage says
using what upstream has is better.
Might want to
On 7/8/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason for using debhelper 4 instead of 5?
I used dpkg-buildpackage to build package secpanel 0.5.2-1
Should I avoid dpkg-xxx and prefer debhelper tools ?
By debhelper 5, I mean debian/compat 5 and debian/control
Build-Depends:
On 7/10/07, Bruno Costacurta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a newbie as maintainer : I suppose I can close this bug #305135 once this
package is uploaded to Debian repos by a mentor ?
Usually one would put something like this in the changelog:
* New upstream release (Closes: #305135)
If it
On 7/18/07, Rogério Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made a package for creating and checking HFS(+) filesystems. The basic
information about this package is here
What is the relationship between hfsprogs and the existing hfsplus and
hfsutils packages? Perhaps all three could be consolidated
On 7/20/07, Rogério Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is quite nice that you have shown some interest in hfsprogs. I will
explain what you have asked.
I don't really have any interest in them (don't interact with Macs at
the moment), my motivation for the question was to perhaps get those
On 7/25/07, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#sponsor
Content seems to be missing?
? I see alot of content.
In galeon I am unable to scroll down and see the sponsoring
guidelines, which are clearly there when looking at the source code.
Probably
On 7/25/07, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In galeon I am unable to scroll down and see the sponsoring
guidelines, which are clearly there when looking at the source code.
Nothing wrong with galeon at this end - it is my default browser!
H, perhaps some of my settings broke it.
On 7/27/07, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There needs to be some way of indicating which packages have been
reviewed but which are not ready for upload.
Maybe mentors.debian.net could have some kind of wiki (or links to
pages on wiki.debian.org) to track the status of such packages
On 7/27/07, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if anyone could tell me what features REVU has that m.d.n is lacking
then I'll consider adding them in the next release. I'm not active in
Ubuntu so I can't tell how things work there. I just see the commenting
feature and colorful icons
On 7/28/07, Rogério Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you happen to have the link to this video? I would love to watch it
and learn more about the process of packaging programs.
My memory is sketchy, but I think it was the debconf7 debian-games BoF:
On 7/28/07, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish there were an easy way to parse the NEW queue. Perhaps I'll need
to use BeautifulSoup and just parse that page.
Perhaps the links on this page can help?
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~ajt/new/
Otherwise BeautifulSoup looks like a good
On 8/4/07, Francesco Namuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to make a package that depends on xmame that is in non-free,
the program under GPL and so I think it can uploaded to main, but how to
manage the dependency on xmame?
Packages in main cannot depend on things outside main. If it is
On 8/4/07, Deepak Tripathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nikto/nikto_1.36-1.dsc
I don't do any sponsoring, but I have some comments:
You should close #410495, probably on the New upstream release. line
#383050 is trivial to fix, perhaps you could
I am subscribed, no need to CC me.
2012/1/1 Jiří Janoušek:
I forgot to mention I am the upstream author and all patches will be included
in the next release.
I see, that makes some things easier.
Done. I've added also optional header Forwarded: Author of this patch
is the upstream author.,
One more thing that I noted but completely forgot to mention:
docs/code-browser.chm is a documentation file that cannot be built
without proprietary, Windows-specific software. It is not acceptable
to have it in the source package or upstream VCS really. Please ask
upstream to create it at build
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for new version 1.10-1 (new upstream release)
of my package xiterm+thai.
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution.
Some things you might want to look at:
The package isn't particularly popular according to
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
It's not popular as it's still used by some group of users only.
The xiterm+thai provides the TIS-620 encoding which now rarely used by
Thai users, mostly superseded by UTF-8 but it's good as the later is
the international standard.
I
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Olе Streicher wrote:
I want to adopt the package tktable2.9 but I found me confronted with
some problems:
1. The package name contains the version, and since the upstream version
is now 2.10, I would need to give a new name.
I'd suggest removing the version
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
- s/remove threading, to fix these/remove threading to fix these/,
- s/problems with the threading/problems with threading/.
(Though I'm not sure about the last two. Can a native speaker of English
confirm?)
I confirm this.
--
bye,
pabs
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Savvas Radevic wrote:
drwright - Known as typing break in GNOME 2
No need to mention GNOME 2 in the short description, since the package
is unrelated to GNOME 2.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:17 AM, bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
A new version of autoconf-archive.
At the very least you should be linking to the dsc file.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Andreas Rönnquist
mailingli...@gusnan.se wrote:
I am making a package (which I am upstream of) translatable using
gettext - It is using a simple Makefile as build system, no autotools.
Is there a way to come around the necessity to get LOCALEDIR (Which
is
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Slavko li...@slavino.sk wrote:
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Try reading your emails before you send them.
--
bye,
pabs
601 - 700 of 2536 matches
Mail list logo
