On 2024-02-19, Elliana May wrote:
> You can see a failure here:
> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/714820377/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-arm64.duckdb_0.10.0_BUILDING.txt.gz
That build log is pointing to a missing debhelper build-dependency.
/Sune
On 2023-12-18, Tobias Frost wrote:
> - Updating the SONAME of a library requires this procedure to be followed:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions
> Comparing the symbols file does not make it obvious why you are
> bumping SONAME, but I did not check with abi-complicance-c
On 2023-11-07, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I noticed that catch2 does not contain the header file catch.hpp any
> more. There is now some catch_all.hpp. So I replaced this header file
> in a patch[1] but obviously this problem can't be solved by pure wild
> guessing since this has lead to
>
>/us
On 2023-10-08, xibowen wrote:
> * URL : https://gitee.com/openkylin/qt5-ukui-platformtheme
I think we should try to not add more c++ code that forces ancient c++
standards in their build systems.
/Sune
On 2023-07-11, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Unfortunately, it turns out fields were added to some class (of which
> size thus increased) in the shared library, so that binaries built
> against a previous version of it now segfault as they are not allocating
> enough space.
Either you need to do a pac
On 2019-02-25, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
>> heaptrack (1.1.0+20180922.gitf752536-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>>
>> * Non-maintainer upload.
>> * Update description to make heaptrack more discoverable to users.
>> (Closes: #915241)
>>
>> -- Nicholas D Steeves Sun, 24 Feb 201
On 2019-01-22, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> akqml - full featured webcam capture application - qml module
shouldn't this be called qml-module-something instead ?
> libavkys-dev - full featured webcam capture application - dev
Who are the consumers/users of this ?
> webcamoid-plugins - f
On 2019-01-21, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Is there any way to make cmake more verbose where it is seeking for files
> to include?
cmake --trace
at least give you more debugging info than you could ever wish for.
/Sune
On 2019-01-09, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> As usual: reading the code, debugging, printfs. Address sanitizer and/or
> valgrind may or may not help too.
I just tried throwing some tools at it.
Apparantly you need a three step thing to get to it.
address-sanitizer. First issue. The command to cre
On 2017-12-03, Andreas Tille wrote:
> code from Qt4 to Qt5[2] which enabled to **build** the package.
The patch looks right for a start.
> $ clonalorigin-gui
> QMetaObject::connectSlotsByName: No matching signal for
> on_actionGelman_Rubin_test_activated()
connectSlotsByName is unfortunately
On 2016-01-03, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote:
Hi
A brief look over it:
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kbibtex/kbibtex_0.6+git7fdc0cd97c093f-1.dsc
There is a patch to the desktop file. Where is it forwarded to ? Has it
been merged?
kdelibs5-dev is qt4 based. No need i
On 2014-07-17, Scarlett Clark wrote:
> Hello!
> I have been doing alot of packaging over at Kubuntu and enjoy it thoroughly.
> I am seeking assistance in getting bits over into Debian as requested. With
> that said I have been requested to get packaging for
I've over irc adviced Scarlett to g
On 2014-07-14, Eric Maeker wrote:
>>> Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions.
>>> - should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4?
>>
>>Both. for now.
>
> Ok. How can I manage this? Is it possible inside one unique source
> package? Debhelper does only have a qmake_qt
On Saturday 05 July 2014 23:36:12 Tymon Radzik wrote:
> I have just uploaded to mentors my package - it is called apg-gui and is
> complex Graphical User Interface for Automated Password Generator. It
> supports all it functions. I have made it in C++ Qt. I think it should be
> put into Debian arch
On 2014-06-13, Eric Maeker wrote:
> Please, Mentors, help me with these unlying questions.
> - should libquazip be build inside debian using Qt5 and/or Qt4?
Both. for now.
> - for Qt4 projects (as some projects still not ported to Qt5), how can
> we provide a compatible Qt4 libquazip?
> * Shou
On 2014-04-04, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> It's a pkgkde-symbolshelper(1)'s (from the pkg-kde-tools package) thing.
> But AFIACS pkgkde-symbolshelper doesn't have any documentation, so the
> “is not explained” still holds. :/
http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/symbolfiles.html
> Hopefully it's a matter
On 2014-04-03, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to migrate bamtools (not yet released package!) at
>
>git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/bamtools.git
>
> to d-shlibs but it ended up by
What's d-shlibs and why do you use it?
Isn't it just much easier to use a install file pointing the
On 2014-03-18, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> The complete version of the packages are currently available on
> mentors (for those who would like to have a look a little deeper about
> what's wrong):
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libnxml
> and
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/libmrss
>
> The w
On 2014-03-04, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> developers -- of which I am one). This now leads to a discrepancy
> involving missing symbols, apparently detected by comparison to the
> 1.5.1 symbols file created by Andreas quite some time ago for me (thanks
> btw!). According to the policy, this is a co
On 2014-02-08, Roelof Wobben wrote:
> DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_libcjs0c = -Xusr/lib/cjs-1.0/ -V'libcjs0c (>=
> $(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION)), libcjs0-$(LIBMOZJS)' -- -c4
I don't see anything wrong here. It is not in the 'beginners end' of
library packaging, and library packaging is not in the 'beginner
On 2014-01-22, Sylvain Pineau wrote:
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> checkbox-ng - Simple replacement for CheckBox
What's CheckBox?
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
On Wednesday 07 August 2013 15:45:37 Etienne Millon wrote:
> There are tarballs containing the full distribution at:
> http://www.coin-or.org/download/source/CoinAll/
>
> It seems to be a a little older (the last release is from january
> 2012), but it would be massively easier to maintain than ha
On 2013-02-12, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Can I guess what's next? 664092 is a bug against the metapackage wnpp.
> So my message is supposed to be:
> package wnpp
> retitle 664092 ITA: blt -- the BLT extension library for Tcl/Tk -
> run-time package
> owner 664092 pauljoh...@freefaculty.org
yes. the '
On 2012-11-19, Arno Töll wrote:
> That said, I'd be very glad to have some mailing list Debian service
> different to lists.d.o for such lightweight list management purposes.
wasn't there a teams.dn ?
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 2012-08-10, Felix Geyer wrote:
> On 10.08.2012 16:47, Jakub Adam wrote:
>>> debian/patches/gammaray-probe-versioned-soname.patch:
>>>
>>> Why do you set a SONAME for gammaray_probe?
>>> When gammaray changes the ABI custom plugins will break anyway
>>> since you can't install different versions
On 2012-05-26, Benjamin Eltzner wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qpdfview"
>
> * Package name: qpdfview
>Version : 0.2.2-1
>Upstream Author : Adam Reichold
> * URL : https
On 2012-05-11, Boris Pek wrote:
> kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:
> * select themes for Gtk 3.x applications
> * preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications
> * custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications
> * select icon themes for Gtk applications
> * download and a
On 2012-05-09, Boris Pek wrote:
> My regular sponsor is very busy now and I am looking for a sponsor for my new
> package "kde-gtk-config".
> Description : KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style
> selection
first, kde configuration modules are packaged as kde-config-foo
On 2012-05-02, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to fix the problem in the jellyfish package but the general
> hints given did not helped me really. Any more precise help to fix
> this problem:
>
> parse_dna.cc:97:3: error: narrowing conversion of '-3' from 'int' to 'const
> uint_t {aka con
On 2012-01-01, Thomas Müller wrote:
[about a non-free file]
> Or wget'ing it within postinst?
erm ?!?
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnj
On 2011-12-14, Sebastian H. wrote:
> I've made a quick build.
>
> qastools-common_0.16.1-1_all.deb 23988 bytes
> qastools-qasconfig_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 61768 bytes
> qastools-qashctl_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 274986 bytes
> qastools-qasmixer_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 309520 bytes
>
> versus
>
> qastool
On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> So? It's difficult for me to get your point when you're asking questions
> without making any statement. I'd be grateful if you could clarify.
Hi
Depending on the answers, my statements would be different. In general,
I see to 'primary' reasons for a package
On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> Sebastian H. wrote:
>> > Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
>> > better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
>> > improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
>> > the choice. But
On 2011-11-01, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Am 01.11.2011 14:14, schrieb Sebastian H.:
>
>> In the progress of separating localizations for QasMixer into a separate
>> package qasmixer-l10n I've stumbled over the following linitan warning:
>>
>> W: qasmixer-l10n: desktop-command-not
On 2011-09-21, onlyjob wrote:
> * Is it true that whoever happen to create an ITP first gets the
> monopoly for packaging?
> * If ITP always have priority, aren't we sending a wrong message
> for ambitious maintainers who might be tempted to create ITP early in
> order
>to secure
On 2011-09-13, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:17:12PM +0200, Innocent De Marchi wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gentoo".
>>
>> * Package name: gentoo
>>Version : 0.19.11-1
>>Upstream Author : Emil Brink
>> * URL : http://www.
On 2011-08-22, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Bernhard R. Link" writes:
>> * Russ Allbery [110822 19:59]:
>
>>> That's a fascinating point. I have never done that with any -dev
>>> package, since essentially every -dev package would require that, which
>>> seems rather silly. (There are almost no non-
On 2011-06-29, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Will it be better if I provide .ts text-format source for translations
> and compile them during build? This will add a big build-dependency on
> Qt.
the Qt linguist tools have recently been split out from the qt dev tools
to make it easier to just require
On 2011-06-28, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> btw: Without looking at the source: Architecture dependent symbols are e.g.
> all methods with size_t (or its sibling ssize_t) or va_list as parameter.
and qreal if kst is what I think it is.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@l
On 2011-05-26, Arno Töll wrote:
> a) Without haing further looked on your package you may want to
> reconsider package name and description to something more useful.
There might actaully be a naming policy for such addons that one should
adhere to.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men
On 2011-05-26, Filip Brcic wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25. May 2011. 0.29.07 Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> On 2011-05-24, Filip Brcic wrote:
>> > libghc6-qt-dev - Haskell bindings for Qt GUI library for GHC
>> Is it only bindings for QtGui, or for other parts as well ?
>
>
On 2011-05-26, Ludwin Alduvi Hernández Vásquez wrote:
> It builds these binary packages:
> undo-closed-tabs-button - This add-on allows you to undo closed tabs via a
> toolbar button
addon to ?
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
On 2011-05-24, Filip Brcic wrote:
> It builds these binary packages:
> libghc6-qt-dev - Haskell bindings for Qt GUI library for GHC
Is it only bindings for QtGui, or for other parts as well ?
> libqws - Haskell bindings for Qt GUI library for GHC
Is this thing actually called libqws?
QWS i
On 2011-05-18, Marco Cornolti wrote:
> It builds these binary packages:
> libiwtan - meta-package for the IWTAN Wireless Topology Analyzer library
I think I asked it before: whath's the prupose of this binary package?
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
On 2011-03-18, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Is upstream always right?
The general answer here is 'no, upstream is never right, but often they
can be educated'
(when coming to packaging ideas and such)
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
On 2011-03-16, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/libqtwebkit-dev
>
> It is only available in:
> - unstable
> - on amd64/i386
well... that's just a matter of time.
>
> I need to specify something like: B-D on libqtwebkit-dev only if
> libQt4-dev does not provide libqtwebki
On 2011-02-23, Marco Cornolti wrote:
> Dunno actually. Mainly because dh_make made it for me, so I thought it
> was the way things are done. Isn't it needed to keep libiwtan up to date
> even when libiwtan0 moves to libiwtan1?
well.. who needs a library? the apps dependencies should be enough to
On 2011-02-24, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> Do you intend to maintain this library in Debian if/after this fix for
>> akregator is uploaded?
>
> I will made the fix myself. It is a medium term fix. Long term fix it
> to reimplement akregator using akonadi but it a huge work (see kmail).
> I plan to
On 2011-02-23, Marco Cornolti wrote:
> * URL : http://iwtan.sourceforge.net
> * License : GPL v3
hmm.. gplv3 for a library. kind of aggressive. but well.
> It builds these binary packages:
> libiwtan - meta-package for the IWTAN Wireless Topology Analyzer library
why such
On 2011-02-21, Steven wrote:
> What would be the best approach to deal with this?
> Note that I'm fairly new at creating Debian packages and developing qt
> applications (I do have experience in Java, but not with Debian in
> mind).
two tarballs is a v3 source format?
There is nothing special ab
On 2011-01-24, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
>> btw is this theme specific to GNOME or can it be used with other desktop
>> environments?
>
> Specific for GNOME.
Last I looked, it was following the FDO icon spec, so theoretically it
would work anywhere that supports that spec.
Practically, last I looked, f
On 2010-12-08, Paul Rufos wrote:
> muon - package manager for KDE
> muon-dbg - Muon debugging symbols
> muon-installer - Utility for browsing, installing, and removing applications
> muon-notifier - update notifier for KDE
> muon-updater - update manager for KDE
> qapt-batch - Batch packag
On 2010-10-26, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/26/2010 04:53 PM, Michael Shuler wrote:
>> An existing source name conflict example I found:
>>
>> libsage2 - Source: sage
>> xul-ext-sage - Source: sage-extension
>>
>> -extension sounds a little cleaner to me. ;)
>
> I'd like
On 2010-10-11, Zvi Dubitzky wrote:
> I am having a package for libraries (several)
Speaking as a maintainer who has been having library packages that
contained several libraries (Qt, kdelibs, kde4libs, kdepimlibs,
kdebase-workspace and ) - we have ended up splitting everything so
that 1 libra
On 2010-07-13, Taylor LeMasurier-Wren wrote:
> --0016364ecb64f571dd048b48701a
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wacom-source".
>
> Package name: wacom-source
> Version : 0.8.8-1
> Upstream Author : Ping
On 2010-06-15, Lloyd Standish wrote:
> It did not occur to me to check for gtkdialog in Sid (it is available
> in Lenny http://packages.debian.org/lenny/gtkdialog). So, until
> there is a gtkdialog package in Sid, snap2 cannot run. This is a
> great disappointment - I put a lot of effort into
On 2010-06-15, Paul Wise wrote:
> This isn't the only misuse of DMUA that exists, some people set it in
> their package instead of asking the sponsor to set it. Others go
I guess it is unimportant who exactly writes the lines to
debian/control. But the sponsor should definately agree on it being
On 2010-06-09, Lorenzo De Liso wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a simple debian contributor: I'm trying to get my work in debian
> through a sponsor [1] [2]. The problem is that I'm waiting for a sponsor
> since 7 days+ (and not only me, in mentors.debian.net there are 20+
> pending packages) [3]. Why are
On 2010-06-09, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> b) Let both modules packages provide desktopnova-module and conflict
> with each other. Then let desktopnova depend on desktopnova-module. So
> the user will have to choose the module package to install. IMO this is
> a common solution.
This is definately no
On 2010-03-12, j.wuttke wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lmfit".
>
> * Package name: lmfit
>Version : 3.1-1
>Upstream Author : myself (Joachim Wuttke
> * URL : http://www.messen-und-deuten.de/lmfit/lmfit.html
> * License
On 2010-01-12, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> This package is necessary to build FPC/LCL Pascal applications against Qt4.
> It would make lots of FPC apps able to be compiled for the KDE/Qt platform
> and fix some bugs depending on this.
> The package was previously known as "libqtintf4" and had some pr
On 2009-12-18, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> The package is lintian-clean. There were some concerns about the
> build-script, but because it's a really small lib there should be no
> problem in building this.
The way it is built, it takes around 1G of memory to build. This *needs*
to be fixed. it mig
On 2009-11-26, George Danchev wrote:
> * start with learning how Debian Bug Tracking System is manipulated
> (which is one of the most valuable Debian assets)
> * look for neglected bug reports, eventually in packages you are using
> * try to submit patches and/or helpful comments to these bug r
On 2009-11-10, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Makefiles just serve to finally create calls to gcc,
And I think the way the gcc calls are made requires a amazing amount of
RAM for no apparant reason.
> these calls I wrote by hand (there was no qmake in qt2)
> to more easily configure which Qt to use o
On 2009-11-07, Harry Rickards wrote:
> 2009/11/7 Sune Vuorela :
>> On 2009-11-07, Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I sent an email to new-maintai...@debian.org about a week ago, and
>>> haven't received a response yet. It's only b
On 2009-11-07, Harry Rickards wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent an email to new-maintai...@debian.org about a week ago, and
> haven't received a response yet. It's only been a week, so I'm still
> hoping to get a reply soon. However, I just found
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1999/07/msg01270.html,
On 2009-11-07, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> http://users.telenet.be/Jan.Van.hijfte/qtforfpc/fpcqt4.html
> * License : GPL
Looks like lgpl
> It builds these binary packages:
> libqt4intf-dev - Qt4 interface bindings
> libqt4intf5 - Qt4 interface bindings
For which language?
> - dget
> http:
On 2009-11-03, Don Armstrong wrote:
> It's fairly rare for someone to laboriously create multiple versions
> of icons at different resolutions in PNG. [I know I certainly haven't
> done it since about 1992.]
Yes and no. Some icon artists create it in svg and then export to png
and does pixelmanip
On 2009-10-31, Lukasz Janyst wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have been using Debian for a couple of years now. I really
> appreciate the great work you're doing and I would like to help. I
> have read some docs and faqs on contributing to the project and
> decided to start with this simple package that I
On 2009-10-16, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 21:36 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
>> Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
>> >> You are trying to hijack kvm, this is not the way to do it appropriately.
>> >
>> > I'm trying to make it to work.
>> > And to my shame, I don't know how to do t
On 2009-10-05, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I have repened the Policy bug where the renaming policy was decided, and hope
> to get it reverted.
Don't expect it to happen, but you are free to hope.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
On 2009-09-06, Rogério Brito wrote:
>> - I doubt that many sponsors will be happy DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
>>on a NEW package.
>
> While I understand that you mentioned this regarding a NEW package, I'm
> a slightly bit confused about the "best current practices" of the DMUA
> field.
I
On 2009-08-19, Ben Finney wrote:
> Sune Vuorela writes:
>
>> On 2009-08-19, Ben Finney wrote:
>> > That's interesting, thank you for that perspective. What do you
>> > propose, then, for a maintainer who wants to get a new package into
>> > D
On 2009-08-19, Ben Finney wrote:
> Sune Vuorela writes:
>
>> For example, I would be very reluctant to sponsor a first package of a
>> person that was a new library without any application using it,
>> whereas a interesting kde application might easier catch my eye.
>
On 2009-08-18, Leinier Cruz Salfran wrote:
>
> --=-+HFkoxaqb4DFPsQ5uB2y
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> why is so hard to find a sponsor?
>
> I have a package online since 2 weeks ago, I sent 3 RFS and I have found
> no sponsor yet.
>
> why
It depe
On 2009-07-10, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
> --ibTvN161/egqYuK8
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Adrian Stel wrote:
>> And my question is: can i remove from rules f
On 2009-06-08, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> * how can I build the dependencies of the -dev package in a sane way? I'm=
>=20
> sure creating them by hand is not optimal. (And I'm sure I've read at some=
You need to create it by hand by looking at what includes is in *your*
public headers.
> time
On 2009-06-04, Ben Finney wrote:
> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre writes:
>
>> I've applied the suggested changes to the files, and pushed it back on
>> mentors.debian.net. It's using the same version number as before, just
>> overwrote the files. Not sure if this is the preferred way to do this.
>> I'm
On 2009-05-29, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> PS2: for DD's, is it customary to upload a new version to unstable even
> if it only fixes a small issue? Or should small issues be batched into
> one update? Couldn't find an answer on this in the Debian policy.
It depends.
Especially it depends on the
On 2009-05-25, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The new version of the library is no longer exporting its internal
> portability functions. This is good -- libraries should not export
Only lurker is using this library.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
>>> wrote:
>>>> I have a problem building a library, starting with a d
On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> I have a problem building a library, starting with a dh_make template.
>> The basic problem seems to boil down to files don't get moved from
>> DESTDIR (debian/tmp) into the actual packages, so the fi
On 2009-05-22, John Stamp wrote:
> On Friday 22 May 2009 11:12:36 am Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>> an updated package of kde-plasmoid-yawp has been uploaded to
>> mentors.debian.net, the new dgetable URL is:
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-plasmoid-yawp/kde-pl
>>a
On 2009-05-19, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Barry deFreese writes:
>
>> Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>>> I'm not a DD, but I think the correct way is to ping MIA team about it
>>> and then after 2 weeks time you ping them again and they do a little
>>> chat and come up with a solutions usally in your favo
On 2009-05-19, Matthias Julius wrote:
> I just noticed that he actually cross-posted his messages to
> pkg-kde-talk. There seems to be a little more human presence. Next
> time I'll post there.
That's *NOT* a sponsering list, but sending sponsoring requests there is
the straight road into getti
On 2009-05-19, Matthias Julius wrote:
> I would really appreciate if someone could either help me to get my
> krecipes package into Debian.
>
> I am just not quite sure whether it is OK to hijack a package like
> that from an unresponsive packaging team. Should I ask QA to orphan
> the package?
On 2009-05-08, LI Daobing wrote:
> there is a proposed copyright format in [2], you also can use that format.
>
> [2] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
Note that this is just a proposal and many people don't like it, so
please don't take it too serious.
And some people won't sponsor packages with
On 2009-04-25, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>
>> I intend to maintain libmimelib1 as a seperate source package now that
>> kdepim 3.5.9 has been removed from debian/unstable.
>
> What does lurker link against on other distros that have moved to KDE4?
Ub
On 2009-04-17, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "katimon".
>
> * Package name: katimon
> Version : 1.0.2-2
> Upstream Author : me
> * URL : http://www.v13.gr/proj/katimon/
> : also available from
On 2009-03-21, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:42:43 +0900
> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>> > So instead of adding a package to be removed soon after it is clear of
>> > NEW, I suggest not adding it at all.
>>
>> So, it's been two weeks, is there a working kde4?
>
> How's about korundum
Hi!
After a discussion on #debian-mentors and other places, I will not
sponsor packages using the copyright file format described on
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
It is a too complex, overengineered solution to a very minor issue.
It is not easy readables for humans
It is ugl
On 2009-03-15, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> On dim, 15 mar 2009 13:57:40 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> Hello,
>
> Hello,
>
>>
>> I am not sure what to fill to "Section" in control file for my new package I
>> am building.
>> Program is small easy CLI utility generating sound (pink and white noise)
On 2009-02-09, Antonio Radici wrote:
> Hi,
> as part of ITP #497701 I'm packaging libv8, a high-performance
> java script library written by Google and used in Chrominum, the
> open source version of the Chrome browser.
>
> The source code is taken directly from the SVN tags here:
> http://v8.goog
On 2009-01-19, Ben Finney wrote:
> * When fixing bugs that prevented a previous release (e.g. one made to
> mentors.debian.net) from making it into Debian (e.g. because the
> sponsor requires further changes), recommended practice is to
> increment the release number and make a new changelog
On 2008-12-29, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>> It needs more work than just change the dependencies to make it work
>> with korundum4
>
> Are we talking about a package which only exists in experimental
> replacing the version in sid?
Yes. and the replacement is planned ASAP.
> Let the version which
On 2008-12-28, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
>>> How about kde4?
>>
>> KDE4 has nice ruby bindings, currently available in experimental.
>
> Oh, thanks.
> When kde4 has entered in sid, kita2 should depend on korundum4 package.
> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/korundum4
It needs more work tha
On 2008-12-28, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> On 2008-12-27, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
>>> Upstream Author: Hideki Ikemoto
>>> * URL: http://kita.sourceforge.jp/
>>
>> Looking at this page, without much japanese k
On 2008-12-27, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
>
> Upstream Author: Hideki Ikemoto
> * URL: http://kita.sourceforge.jp/
Looking at this page, without much japanese knowledge, it looks like a
kde3 application
> * License: The MIT License
> Section: net
> Language: Ruby
> Description: Ruby based
On 2008-12-09, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I doubt that - merely adding a new symbol is NOT a bug, let alone
>> release-critical.
>
> Right, but not bumping shlibs at the same time is an RC bug AFAIK.
I agree.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
On 2008-11-09, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn
> revisions?
> Right now I have something like +svn.
If it is a snapshot after a release, I also do that.
If it is a snapshot leading up to a release, I would
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
