Jakub Wilk wrote (11 Nov 2012 00:38:28 GMT) :
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-10, 11:28:
debian/watch contains only a single line version=3? Is that intentional?
As far
as I can see, this change is not documented in the changelog.
Yes file is introduced to suppress the
On 09:20 Sun 11 Nov , intrigeri wrote:
Jakub Wilk wrote (11 Nov 2012 00:38:28 GMT) :
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-11-10, 11:28:
debian/watch contains only a single line version=3? Is that
intentional? As far
as I can see, this change is not documented in the
Hello David,
David Prévot wrote on 2012-11-10 17:40:
Please use 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 as a version number (and eventually directly
“wheezy” instead of “testing-proposed-updates”). Since packages meant to
testing-proposed-updates should be acknowledged by the release team
prior to the upload,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 11/11/2012 09:00, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit :
David Prévot wrote on 2012-11-10 17:40:
Please use 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 as a version number (and eventually directly
“wheezy” instead of “testing-proposed-updates”).
That's confusing me.
Let me
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package liferea
* Package name: liferea
Version : 1.8.6-1.1
Upstream Author : Lars Windolf lars.lind...@gmail.com
* URL : http://liferea.sourceforge.net
*
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 687620 RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-3 [ITP]
Bug #687620 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-3 [ITP]' from 'RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-1
[ITP]'
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:20:35 +
with message-id e1txagx-0003nu...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: ptop/3.6.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #675701,
regarding RFS: ptop/3.6.2-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Le 10/11/2012 17:10, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit :
RTC support (solves #642209 for version 1.24). Closes: #642209
It should be “Closes: #691340”.
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
control: retitle -1 RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2
control: severity -1 normal
Downgrading the severity of this request since an nmu was uploaded to
fix the rc issue.
Before further review, the package will need to be updated to
incorporate the nmu, and at this point the upload should probably
target
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2
Bug #691893 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2 [RC]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2' from 'RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2 [RC]'
severity -1 normal
Bug #691893 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2
Severity set to
this is only a test
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1352692693.2676.9.camel@vulcan
Hello, I am new here. Be gentle.
What I would Like to do:
a. create a .deb from a directory of 3rd party paid software.
b. be able to install the .deb on debian server.
I have looked at all the documentation I could stand about howto go
about it, seems rather complicated, and I'm sure it is,
I remember seeing a question similar to this on a mailing list, but I can't
seem to find it at the moment. However, [1] might be of interest to you. It
shows how to package simple binaries without the intent of publishing them
into the official Debian archives. It creates a very bare-bone package
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:59 AM, AllowOverride wrote:
a. create a .deb from a directory of 3rd party paid software.
Which software do you want to package?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 692737 by 683184
Bug #692737 [suckless-tools] suckless-tools: newer slock versions prevents
unwanted exposure of passwords
692737 was not blocked by any bugs.
692737 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 692737: 683184
thanks
Some of the programs are java installed and stem from rpm's or at least
built for redhat/centos systems.
Are you aware you can use alien to convert rpms to debs? It's not
ideal, but it has worked for me in the past and it's rather easy to
do..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Ping again since 9 days passed.
Expected at least a pong.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
17 matches
Mail list logo
