Re: Bug#1065325: morph's abandoned packages (list)

2024-05-12 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 11:54:29PM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > Yes do please. i finished migrating to dh13 and pushed to salsa > Le sam. 11 mai 2024 à 20:51, Nilesh Patra a écrit : > > > > Quoting Alexandre Detiste : > > > I would pick-up matplotlib I

Re: morph's abandoned packages (list)

2024-05-11 Thread Nilesh Patra
Quoting Alexandre Detiste : > I would pick-up matplotlib I guess, I have some special connection to it, > It was one the packages that enabled me to escape > my horrible SAS-Insitute powered previous job/life. > > It's a big one. > > Help is appreciated, I already cherry picked some

Re: Suggesting change in DPT Policy

2024-03-09 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2024-02-27 03:05, Andreas Tille wrote: > I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of > the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science packages to > DPMT[1][2]. I happily followed this suggestion and moved >30 packages > from the Blends teams to DPT. I

Re: Remaining numpy 1.24 issues on 32bit architectures

2023-01-30 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:12:57AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I made some tiny steps forward ("only" 84 failures instead of 89 when I > wrote my first mail) in the numpy 1.24 migration for 32bit architectures > but I'm facing issues I do not have a real clue for. In > > >

Re: librcsb-core-wrapper: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: initialization of CorePyWrap raised unreported exception

2022-12-08 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi again, On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:05:35PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 22:26:31 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > Source: librcsb-core-wrapper > > Version: 1.005-10 > > We are in the transition of adding python3.11 as a supported Python > > version [0

Re: librcsb-core-wrapper: (autopkgtest) needs update for python3.11: initialization of CorePyWrap raised unreported exception

2022-11-28 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi all, On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 22:26:31 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: librcsb-core-wrapper > Version: 1.005-10 > We are in the transition of adding python3.11 as a supported Python > version [0]. > [...] > [0] https://bugs.debian.org/1021984 > [1]

Re: compreffor FTBFS with Python 3.11 as supported version

2022-11-16 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Python team/Stefano, On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 20:34:36 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: compreffor > Version: 0.5.1-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=compreffor=0.5.1-2%2Bb2 > > ... > src/cython/_compreffor.cpp:196:12: fatal error:

Re: zope.testrunner: FTBFS: AttributeError: 're.Pattern' object has no attribute 'replace'

2022-10-01 Thread Nilesh Patra
reassign -1 dh-python 5.20220924 stop Hi, On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 08:02:58 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: zope.testrunner > > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > > dh_python3 --shebang=/usr/bin/python3 -X tests > > I: dh_python3 tools:114: replacing shebang in > >

Re: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13

2022-02-24 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2/24/22 6:10 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Sorry for dragging you into this - the experimental branch was way advanced which I learned in bug #995675. This leaves the question how we can proceed. It makes probably sense to run ratt or something like this to learn about packages that are broken.

Re: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13

2022-02-24 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2/24/22 6:00 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote: One really odd thing I noticed is that there is no dh_auto_build is overridden but not triggered inside it again, and so dh_auto_build happening at all. ^ Wow, in a hurry I wrote really sloppy english there I meant

Re: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13

2022-02-24 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2/24/22 3:36 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Please consider releasing rdflib v6 which in my brief testing is compatible with pyparser v3. I tried to follow your suggestion to upgrade rdflib to version 6 in Git. Unfortunately I'm stumbling upon a different issue in the new test suite[1]. One

Re: Salsa python-team write access for tiledb-py ?

2022-02-18 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2/18/22 9:33 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: Hi debian-python, [...] I cannot write to https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/tiledb-py so I created a (temporary ?) copy at https://salsa.debian.org/edd/tiledb-py If you're ok with me updating the team repo, I can reset origin and push to

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2/18/22 2:23 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: I admit I'm hesitating a bit for different reasons. While I agree that direct commits are better than MRs I found several DPT packages with very sensible changes in Git but no uploads following these. For instance fixing VCS fields and Maintainer name

Re: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x

2022-02-05 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2/6/22 12:20 AM, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:27:59PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote: [...] _mistune.py within the Debian package, and have nbconvert do "import nbconvert.filters._mistune as mistune" (see /usr/lib/python3/dis

Re: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x

2022-02-04 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2/4/22 9:33 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote: _mistune.py within the Debian package, and have nbconvert do "import nbconvert.filters._mistune as mistune" (see /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nbconvert/filters/markdown_mistune.py). That seems like an eminently sensible solution to this problem. But

Re: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x

2022-02-04 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2/4/22 9:18 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote: Basically, the mistune upstream author has completely messed up on this by making what is essentially a completely different package with superficially similar functionality but the same name. True. [...] _mistune.py within the Debian package, and

Re: Please enable me transfering python-bioblend to Debian Med team

2022-01-15 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Stefano/Ondřej, On 1/11/22 8:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, I think we sorted out that the request to move python-bioblend to Debian Med is valid. I'm CCing Debian Python team maintainers to get this finally done. Could you process this transfer please? Moving python-bioblend from

Re: Transfering packages from Debian Med to DPT (Was: Please enable me transfering python-bioblend to Debian Med team)

2022-01-01 Thread Nilesh Patra
Before you/someone else makes a move, some of these packages are bioinformatics and are better suited for med team: * indexed-gzip - This one is mainly for NIFTI image files * python-anndata - For gene annotation * python-fitbit - For FITBIT API (more in med domain) * python-cooler - For genomic

Re: Transfering packages from Debian Med to DPT (Was: Please enable me transfering python-bioblend to Debian Med team)

2021-12-23 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 12/23/21 1:54 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi again, by chance I learned that I do not have permissions to create repositories in salsa:python-team/packages thus moving packages would be not as simple as transfering the projects. Please grant me maintainer permissions to enable moving packages

Re: Please enable me transfering python-bioblend to Debian Med team

2021-12-22 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Pierre-Elliot, On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 08:06:01PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > >> I'm sorry but pressuring to take over a package is not really fine. If > >> you're not happy with the time it takes for an answer, you can try to > >> fill an ITS and if the procedure goes to its end then

Re: [RFH] Bug#1000812: pyrle: import fails on Python 3.10

2021-12-04 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Stefano, On 12/4/21 9:00 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote: Hi Nilesh (2021.12.04_15:15:05_+) Would you have any hint on this? Is it a bug with the python3 package itself? You're waiting for python3-tabulate to be patched for Python 3.10 support. Indeed. I was just being silly as it seems. I

[RFH] Bug#1000812: pyrle: import fails on Python 3.10

2021-12-04 Thread Nilesh Patra
Dear Python team, Would you have any hint on this? Is it a bug with the python3 package itself? Let me know. Regards, Nilesh On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:02:59 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 20:35:40 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote: > > Am Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:36:33PM +053

Re: xcffib update for qtile packaging

2021-11-27 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Jérôme, On 11/27/21 3:44 PM, Jérôme wrote: Hello, In the absence of a reply, I have worked on xcffib package to update it to the last upstream release as well as Debian standards. I intend to adopt it[1] but I am looking for a sponsor - or moving this package to DPT? - in order to upload

Re: Bug#997772: python-cogent: FTBFS: You must configure the bibtex_bibfiles setting

2021-11-03 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 11/3/21 1:30 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Control: tags -1 pending Hi Stuart, Am Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 09:43:40AM +1100 schrieb Stuart Prescott: Extension error: You must configure the bibtex_bibfiles setting make[2]: *** [Makefile:40: html] Error 2 this is sphinxcontrib-bibtex saying that

Re: platform.machine() on salsa i386 build?

2021-10-30 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Ole, On 10/30/21 5:50 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: Hi, https://salsa.debian.org/debian-astro-team/pyraf/-/jobs/2130878#L2062 How can one find out the correct machine here? I just committed something to salsa -- sort of a hack, but it works (i386 pipeline passes). I do this for one of my

Re: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

2021-10-24 Thread Nilesh Patra
(U) piuparts (U) python-fedora (U) python-limits (U) python-pyramid-chameleon (U) Nilesh Patra cyvcf2 (U) h5sparse (U) nitime (U) python-xopen (U) seaborn (U) Nilesh Patra python-spectra (U) umap-learn (U) Noah Meyerhans python-boto (U) Nobuhiro Iwama

Re: Why is isal limited to just three archs?

2021-10-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Thomas, On 10/16/21 4:07 PM, Graham Inggs wrote: Hi, Did you look into the source package? isal is written in assembly language... I see at least an erasure_code/ppc64le directory. I did a quick test build in Ubuntu and the package built and passed its tests on armhf, ppc64el and riscv64,

Why is isal limited to just three archs?

2021-10-16 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Ondřej, I see that isal package is limited to amd64, arm64 and kfreebsd-amd64. Is there a particular reason for this? -- Is it possible to extend support to other archs? Actually, a -med team package fastp has started to depend on libisal-dev, and this now is limited to the few archs isal

Re: request to join python-team/packages group on salsa

2021-10-10 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 11 October 2021 4:17:48 am IST, Emmanuel Arias wrote: >El dom, 10 de oct. de 2021 a la(s) 17:36, Afif Elghraoui (a...@debian.org) >escribió: >Hi, > >You need to be patient. >that a good exercise to understand the "upload process", also some DD >prefer >use mentors. Hi, Afif is already a

Re: RFS: python-mockito/1.2.2-2 -- Spying framework for Python - documentation

2021-09-19 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 9/19/21 2:29 PM, Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly wrote: > python-mockito (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Source-only upload. Hi, I do not see these changes in salsa. Still the old changelog. can you push? I'll happily sponsor Cheers, -- Nilesh Patra Debian Developer,

Re: Python style guide checker (formerly called pep8)

2021-09-12 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Geert, On 12 September 2021 1:53:25 pm IST, Geert Stappers wrote: >Hello Debian-Python, > >In which package is a pep8 code style checker? Is this what you seek? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/autopep8 Corresponding binary package is python3-autopep8 Nilesh -- Sent from my Android

Re: RFS: python-click-log/0.3.2-1 -- Logging integration for Click - Python 3.x

2021-06-05 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 6/5/21 8:04 PM, Emmanuel Arias wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not DD, but I send you some review, to gain time: > > * d/changelog says: `Bump debhelper from old 10 to 12.` but actuall> > debhelper-compat version is 13. > * Please use UNRELEASED instead of unstable, that can be confused. Fixed > *

Re: Bug#985102: RFS: jupyter-packaging/0.7.12-1 [ITP] -- tools to help build and install Jupyter Python packages

2021-03-12 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, I uploaded the one on salsa. It looked nice to me. I am closing the RFS bug, then. Thanks a lot for your work on this! PS: Next time, please consider to first import, and then commit all your changes systematically - for example, adding autopkgtests, modifying copyright et. al. rather than a

Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-" prefix?

2020-11-26 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, Currently src:python-babel provides 3 binaries: * python3-babel * python-babel-doc * python-babel-localedata of which python3-babel is the main binary, -babel-doc is for the documentation and -babel-localedata is for storing locale data files used by python3-babel. Should this be renamed

Re: Issues when reading mailboxes from alioth-lists.debian.net

2020-08-19 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "./test_mbox.py", line 6, in >if mbox_file.items() != []: > File "/usr/lib/python3.8/mailbox.py", line 132, in items >return list(self.iteritems()) > File "/usr/lib/python3.8/mailbox.py", line 125, in iteritems >value = self[key] >

[RFS] djangorestframework-gis

2020-06-13 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, djangorestframework-gis reports failing tests and has RC bug: #961901 filed against it. I've fixed this, and this builds in a clean chroot with passing tests. My changes have been pushed to the team repo here[1]. (Many thanks to Utkarsh for granting access to this repo \o/) This Needs review

Re: Request for joining DPMT

2020-06-13 Thread Nilesh Patra
Pardon me, I've read and accept the policy: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst#maintainership On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 15:32, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > > On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 15:31, Nilesh Patra wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm intere

Re: Request for joining DPMT

2020-06-13 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 15:31, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi, > I'm interested in joining DPMT - I fix bugs for debian-python team and > also help package a few modules. > I've fixed RC bugs for DPMT packages before: #950050 and #952172 being > recent ones. > I also maintain sever

Request for joining DPMT

2020-06-13 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, I'm interested in joining DPMT - I fix bugs for debian-python team and also help package a few modules. I've fixed RC bugs for DPMT packages before: #950050 and #952172 being recent ones. I also maintain several python packages under the debian med team I've a couple of more RC bug fixes for

Re: [RFC] python-cobra, python3-sbml5

2020-04-05 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020, 15:50 Andreas Tille, wrote: > On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 03:40:56PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > > > '_libsbml' file which corresponds to libsbml (with python3-sbml5 as a > > > > provide) package. When I dug into looking at libsbml, I noticed that

Re: [RFC] python-cobra, python3-sbml5

2020-04-05 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi On Sun, 5 Apr 2020, 11:43 Andreas Tille, wrote: > Hi Nilesh, > > On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 06:53:55PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > > > >From the logs, in the last message[2] it looks like an import-error for > > '_libsbml' file which corresponds

[RFC] python-cobra, python3-sbml5

2020-04-04 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, Currently python-cobra FTBFS reported here [1]. >From the logs, in the last message[2] it looks like an import-error for '_libsbml' file which corresponds to libsbml (with python3-sbml5 as a provide) package. When I dug into looking at libsbml, I noticed that the relevant file (libsbml.py)

Re: [RFS] django-oauth-toolkit

2020-03-15 Thread Nilesh Patra
> Are you sure that debian/tests/pkg-python/import-name has the correct value? I guess yes. > What does `cat debian/tests/pkg-python/import-name` show? [debian/master][~/packages/oauth-toolkit/django-oauth-toolkit]$ cat debian/tests/pkg-python/import-name oauth2_provider Seems correct. I'm not

Re: Re: [RFS] django-oauth-toolkit

2020-03-15 Thread Nilesh Patra
> just a quick glance at the commits: you do not need to replace autopkgtest-pkg-python with home-grown code, just tell it what to import: > echo oauth2_provider > debian/tests/pkg-python/import-name Thanks, I didn't know about that. However, when I added that in, autopkgtest seems to fail

[RFS] django-oauth-toolkit

2020-03-15 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, Currently django-oauth-toolkit FTBFS with python3.8. I have fixed it, and build + autopkgtest pass. My changes have been pushed here [1]. Needs review and sponsorship. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/django-oauth-toolkit Thanks and regards Nilesh

[RFS] pytds

2020-03-14 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, Currently pytds FTBFS with python3.8. I have fixed it, and build + autopkgtests pass. It is also lintian-clean. There are however, a few build warnings which I am not sure how to fix: I see a lot of: Setting up python3-roman (2.0.0-3) ... /usr/lib/python3.8/subprocess.py:838: RuntimeWarning:

Re: Help for issues with lazyarray needed

2020-03-05 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, 14:16 Andreas Tille, wrote: > Control: tags -1 pending > > Hi, > > I have updated lazyarray in Git[1] (by moving it to Debian Science > team). The old package was lagging way behind upstream and a Python3 > port is available by upstream so I just create the python3-lazyarray