On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 05:57, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Ondrej Certik (05/02/2009):
>>> Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
>>> Ubuntu user that he will rather consider compiling it for Ubuntu's PPA
>>> hims
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Ondrej Certik (05/02/2009):
>> Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
>> Ubuntu user that he will rather consider compiling it for Ubuntu's PPA
>> himself, because he cannot use debian experimental. Of course.
Ondrej Certik (05/02/2009):
> Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
> Ubuntu user that he will rather consider compiling it for Ubuntu's PPA
> himself, because he cannot use debian experimental. Of course.
>
> So he needs to invest his time in the package, I need t
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 17:21, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> 3) upload to experimental
>> 3a) keep the sphinx docs (sphinx is in experimental)
>
> I'd recommends this.
Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
Ubuntu user
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 17:21, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> 3) upload to experimental
> 3a) keep the sphinx docs (sphinx is in experimental)
I'd recommends this.
Cheers,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org
>> > hence no reason to allow for a transition to testing. Moreover, I
>> > promise that pymvpa will not attempt such thing ;-)
>>
>> What about Sphinx 0.4.3? Does it mean we will not try to unblock it?
>
> Sphinx 0.4.3 is the classic example: It causes more trouble than it
> fixed. For example try
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-26]
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:47:02AM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > What about Sphinx 0.4.3? Does it mean we will not try to unblock it?
>
> Sphinx 0.4.3 is the classic example: It causes more trouble than it
> fixed. For example try building pymvpa's docs with it --
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:47:02AM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Michael Hanke, 2009-01-26]
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:15:47AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > * Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]:
> > > > I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually
> > > >
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-26]
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:15:47AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]:
> > > I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually
> > > build-depend on sphinx. Does anyone know a way to quickly determine
> > >
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:15:47AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]:
>
> > I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually
> > build-depend on sphinx. Does anyone know a way to quickly determine
> > that -- it might provide some facts
* Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]:
> I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually
> build-depend on sphinx. Does anyone know a way to quickly determine
> that -- it might provide some facts about the situation we are
> speculating about.
% zcat /org/ftp.debian.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:47:06PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25]
> > To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable?
> > This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems
> > which prevent successful building of docs (e.g.
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > if you will help me convince release managers to unblock it, I will
> > upload 0.5 to unstable (if Mikhail will not protest).
>
> So release managers are blocking any uploads of sphinx to unstable?
no - *I'
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25]
>> To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable?
>> This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems
>> which prevent successful building of docs (e.g. image/figur
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25]
> To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable?
> This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems
> which prevent successful building of docs (e.g. image/figure handling
> bug) -- and at least this one is solved in 0.5.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build
>> without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's
>> a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that this
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:36:09AM -0800, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi Piotr, Kumar and Matthias,
>
> thanks for all the replies, I'll reply one by one:
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > [Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
> >> There is a problem with documentation, that it de
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build
> without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's
> a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that this is
> what unstable is for. Otherwise people will have to move from u
Hi,
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build
> without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's
> a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that this is
> what unstable is for. Otherwise people will have to move f
Hi Piotr, Kumar and Matthias,
thanks for all the replies, I'll reply one by one:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
>> There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on sphinx-0.5,
>> which is currently only in experimental. And also ups
Ondrej Certik schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I finally packaged the newest uptream and committed all fixes into our
> svn repo for numpy. Kumar (or others), do you think you could please
> test the package?
numpy becomes big. see https://launchpad.net/bugs/309215. In the past the parts
depending on external
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:53:05AM -0800, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally packaged the newest uptream and committed all fixes into our
> svn repo for numpy. Kumar (or others), do you think you could please
> test the package?
> There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on sph
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
> There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on sphinx-0.5,
> which is currently only in experimental. And also upstream doesn't
> have it in the tarball. I originally fixed that by
> adding a new target into debian/rules, that downloaded the upstream
> tgz,
23 matches
Mail list logo
