Hello,
i would like to propose a project to make sure our teams (DPMT/PAPT)
repos are being used correctly; it has a broader set of requirements
than the pristine-tar one (and so it's more complex), thus a separate
message.
The checks i have in mind for now, are:
* packages in DPMT/PAPT need to h
Hello,
i would like to propose a project to make sure our teams (DPMT/PAPT)
repos are using pristine-tar properly.
The checks i have in mind for now, are:
* pristine-tar branch must exist, if not -> it's a bug
* pristine-tar + upstream branch must produce the same tarball as
downloaded from the a
Hello,
this email is to inform the maintainers of the reverse dependencies of
mercurial of the plan to upload to unstable the python3 version next
Thursday. We want to be extra-safe with the switch, hence this email.
In To: to this email the maintainers mailing list + key other MLs and
addresses,
Hi Scott, devel, and Python team,
Nicholas D Steeves writes:
> Control: block -1 by 962574
>
> Tomlkit seems to be required for self-tests.
>
Thank you for taking care of tomlkit so quickly! I wish I had more time
and energy to make faster progress with DepHell. Today I discovered it
appears
Hello,
I was in the DPMT back when it was on Alioth and I would like to join
it again to backport python-flasgger and help with other packages as
the need arises.
My Salsa login is "federico".
I have read the policy and I accept it:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/m
Hi
On 09-07-2020 21:16, peter green wrote:
> All of the reverse dependencies of python-numpy have already been
> removed from testing. So IMO
> it makes sense to remove python-numpy from testing at this point, do
> other people agree?
I think it makes sense, so I added a removal hint.
Paul
si
Hi,
čt 9. 7. 2020 v 21:25 odesílatel peter green napsal:
> python-numpy* is no longer buildable in testing due to the removal of the
> "cython" binary package.
> The maintainer has requested removal of python-numpy from unstable but the
> ftpmasters have not yet
> actioned it, presumably because
Hi,
čt 9. 7. 2020 v 15:27 odesílatel Matthias Klose napsal:
> Describing here a solution which is implemented for Ubuntu focal (20.04
> LTS). A
> new source package what-is-python (-perl-dont-hurt-me) ships binary
> packages
> python-is-python2, python-dev-is-python2, python-is-python3 and
> py
python-numpy* is no longer buildable in testing due to the removal of the
"cython" binary package.
The maintainer has requested removal of python-numpy from unstable but the
ftpmasters have not yet
actioned it, presumably because there are still reverse-dependencies in
unstable. A rc bug is
pre
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 04:55:33PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> I don't follow your logic there. Why is it hard to explain? Python
> was a programming language, and its last interpreter (2.7) is no
> longer developed or supported. Python3 (formerly Python3000) is also
> a programming language, si
On 2020-07-09 15:26:47 +0200 (+0200), Matthias Klose wrote:
> As written in [1], bullseye will not see unversioned python
> packages and the unversioned python command being built from the
> python-defaults package.
>
> It seems to be a little bit more controversial what should happen
> to the pyt
As written in [1], bullseye will not see unversioned python packages and the
unversioned python command being built from the python-defaults package.
It seems to be a little bit more controversial what should happen to the python
command in the long term. Some people argue that python should neve
On 7/9/20 1:45 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:21:45 AM EDT Matthias Klose wrote:
>> The removal of packages still depending on Python2 looks good [1], however
>> we have a bunch of packages that still require Python2, and where
>> maintainers explicitly asked to keep those
On Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:21:45 AM EDT Matthias Klose wrote:
> The removal of packages still depending on Python2 looks good [1], however
> we have a bunch of packages that still require Python2, and where
> maintainers explicitly asked to keep those in the distro [2]. Among those
> are pypy and
The removal of packages still depending on Python2 looks good [1], however we
have a bunch of packages that still require Python2, and where maintainers
explicitly asked to keep those in the distro [2]. Among those are pypy and
pypy3 which need Python2 for bootstrapping. I'm going to keep the Pyt
15 matches
Mail list logo
