Re: Packages wrongly marked as FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20

2023-10-31 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/31/23 15:41, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: dh_sphinxdoc looks for either the new way of loading searchindex.js: or the old way: jQuery(function() { Search.loadIndex("searchindex.js"); }); Looking at openstackdocstheme's search.html, it does have one of these lines (the second one):

Re: Packages wrongly marked as FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20

2023-10-31 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/31/23 13:52, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: On one of the closed bugs, I replied to you (#1043075). FYI, before reading it, I finished my work on version 3.2.0 of openstackdocstheme, that I uploaded today. So everything should be fine, hopefully. What other bugs did you close? Will you mind

Re: Packages wrongly marked as FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20

2023-10-31 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 10:47:45PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Thanks for the hint. I found it out myself: I mistakenly removed these lines > trying to remove the search thingy and all the external references (ie: JS > files hosted in some CDNs and the like). > > I mentioned all that because I

Bug#1055085: (some kind of) transition: add python3.12 as a supported python3 version

2023-10-31 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-CC: debian-python@lists.debian.org Please setup a tracker to add python3.12 as a supported python3 version. This is non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once

Re: Packages wrongly marked as FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20

2023-10-31 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Thomas! On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 01:27:22PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > See this message: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042585;msg=7 > and this comment from Dmitry Shachnev: > # Dear Maintainers, I am going to upload Sphinx 7.2.6 to unstable next > weekend. > # That

Packages wrongly marked as FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20

2023-10-31 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, I'm not really sure what's going on, but I saw many packages marked as RC buggy with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20, however, both are still in Experimental, not in Unstable. I tried rebuilding those, and in built fine. I therefore closed the bugs. I'm not sure if I was right doing so, and

Re: Packages wrongly marked as FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20

2023-10-31 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Thomas, On 31/10/23 at 13:08 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not really sure what's going on, but I saw many packages marked as RC > buggy with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20, however, both are still in > Experimental, not in Unstable. I tried rebuilding those, and in built fine. > I

Re: Packages wrongly marked as FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20

2023-10-31 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/31/23 13:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi Thomas, On 31/10/23 at 13:08 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I'm not really sure what's going on, but I saw many packages marked as RC buggy with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20, however, both are still in Experimental, not in Unstable. I tried

Re: Packages wrongly marked as FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20

2023-10-31 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 02:57:37PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > BTW, I closed the OpenStack related bugs, but I believe upgrading > python3-openstackdocs will fix it. The new theme builds, but when using it, > I get: > > dh_sphinxdoc -O--buildsystem=python_distutils > dh_sphinxdoc: error: >