Hi,
I finally packaged the newest uptream and committed all fixes into our
svn repo for numpy. Kumar (or others), do you think you could please
test the package?
There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on sphinx-0.5,
which is currently only in experimental. And also upstream
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on sphinx-0.5,
which is currently only in experimental. And also upstream doesn't
have it in the tarball. I originally fixed that by
adding a new target into debian/rules, that downloaded the upstream
tgz,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:53:05AM -0800, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
I finally packaged the newest uptream and committed all fixes into our
svn repo for numpy. Kumar (or others), do you think you could please
test the package?
There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on
Ondrej Certik schrieb:
Hi,
I finally packaged the newest uptream and committed all fixes into our
svn repo for numpy. Kumar (or others), do you think you could please
test the package?
numpy becomes big. see https://launchpad.net/bugs/309215. In the past the parts
depending on external
Hi,
Ondrej Certik wrote:
I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build
without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's
a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that this is
what unstable is for. Otherwise people will have to move from
Ondrej Certik wrote:
I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build
without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's
a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that this is
what unstable is for. Otherwise people will have to move from
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
Hi,
Ondrej Certik wrote:
I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build
without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's
a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
I really want it in unstable.
I want unstable not to be affected by testing freeze as well, but that's
all what I will say in this topic before Lenny's release.
For now, if we want to give maintainers, whose packages are depending on
our packages, a possibility to
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25]
To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable?
This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems
which prevent successful building of docs (e.g. image/figure handling
bug) -- and at least this one is solved in 0.5.
if
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25]
To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable?
This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems
which prevent successful building of docs (e.g.
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
if you will help me convince release managers to unblock it, I will
upload 0.5 to unstable (if Mikhail will not protest).
So release managers are blocking any uploads of sphinx to unstable?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
I really want it in unstable.
I want unstable not to be affected by testing freeze as well, but that's
all what I will say in this topic before Lenny's release.
For now, if we want to give
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:47:06PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25]
To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable?
This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems
which prevent successful building of docs (e.g.
* Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]:
I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually
build-depend on sphinx. Does anyone know a way to quickly determine
that -- it might provide some facts about the situation we are
speculating about.
% zcat
14 matches
Mail list logo
