On 9/17/23 10:41, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
Hello,
maybe it depends on my non-nativ English that I'm not able to make
myself clear.
On 2023-09-17 09:56 Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
What do you expect?
As I told. Information just in time. Within in a delay of 1 or 2 hours
the tracker/dashboard s
On 10.09.19 16:14, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi IOhannes,
>
> I have basically the same problem, funnily with almost the same subject:
which was entirely intentional :-)
i decided to start a new thread because i'm not sure whether the problem
is really the same.
but i guess, i'll just file a bug a
updating one of my packages (python-can), the test-suite started to
fail, with an error-code 5, indicating that "no tests have been run".
since there *are* tests to be run, i investigated and - after scratching
my head - found that 'pybuild' did not fully copy the test-directory
from the source-di
On 02/09/2018 05:19 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>> I'd encourage you to work with the upstreams to deconflict the namespace.
>> This isn't really a problem Debian should solve.
>
> Good point, I've contacted them via email and will file ticke
thanks for taking the lead.
On 2018-02-08 15:16, Ondrej Novy wrote:
>
> But I don't think all DD are masters in our team. This is true only
> for 'Debian' team. Even if you are DD, you need to join team or
> subteam to have commit access to it.
i think this is true.
at least i had to request memb
On 01/19/2018 12:45 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 at 14:25:57 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>> I think for new packages it is better to use gbp-pq based workflow:
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ
>
> Is there consensus that the gbp-pq workflow is now allowed? I on
On 06/08/2017 01:08 PM, Brian May wrote:
> CCing to correct mailing list. debian-python@lists.debian.org
>
> I don't actually understand the issue.
jessie: python-pip_1.5.6-5
stretch: python-pip_9.0.1-2
no backports.
i guess the OP has problems using pip as packaged in jessie with newer
repositor
On 2017-02-18 09:16, Simone Rossetto wrote:
> One of the module is specific for Raspberry Pi, it adds some
> functionalities, but
> the daemon itself doesn't require a Pi hardware and can still do its job
> without that module even on a Pi. What I want to do is to split the modules
> in two deb pac
On 2017-01-18 07:46, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> +··named·django_packagename·upstream.··These·are·then·packaged·as
> +··python3-django-package·and
please use "package" vs "packagename" consistently.
e.g. an upstream named "django_packagename" should be packaged as
"python3-django-pa
On 11/16/2016 06:07 AM, chrysn wrote:
> Should git-dpm be used even though no patches are present?
how do you make sure that you will never need patches? (unless this is a
native package)
gfmards
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
message was also forwarded to
> debian-python@lists.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> (after having been given a Bug report number, if it did not have one).
>
> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
> w...@debian.org
> IOhannes m zmölnig (De
On 2016-09-03 10:18, Marcos wrote:
> I'm migrating Gufw [1] from python2 to python3 and honestly I'm stuck
> with an error from the setup.py: Python module controller not found:
>
> costales@dev:~/Desktop/16.10$ sudo python3 setup.py install --prefix=/usr
> ERROR: Python module controller not fo
On 08/13/2016 12:39 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> just wish it had something like
> `pull-and-update-all-branches` since it's a bit of a PITA to update the
> pristine-tar branch.
isn't this what `gbp pull` is supposed to do?
gfdsar
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/09/2016 09:27 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>
> FYI: I just uploaded pypi2deb 1.20160809 which initializes all the git-dpm
> stuff if you invoke py2dsp with --profile dpmt option
OMG: i just discovered pypi2deb and its wonderful.
unfortunately i missed this mail when it was sent (or - more lik
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
* Package name: python-bottle-sqlite
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Marcel Hellkamp
* URL : http://bottlepy.org/docs/dev/plugins/sqlite.html
* License : MIT
Programming La
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)"
* Package name: python-bottle-cork
Version : 0.12.0
Upstream Author : Federico Ceratto
* URL : http://cork.firelet.net/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
D
On 2015-11-26 09:32, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> PS I didn't "kick" him,
i think the kick in question is not your disapproval of the current
affair, but referring to past action <560c3acd.9000...@debian.org>.
fgmasdr
IOhannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-22 11:30, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> i have to admit i'm not totally used to an reviewing git patches
>> per mailinglists, and in this case i got lost a little bit what
>> the current draft is. would it be possible to put a complete
>> draf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-21 15:54, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Hopefully, the latest changes (see previous follow up) are both
> more concise and coherent.
maybe.
i have to admit i'm not totally used to an reviewing git patches per
mailinglists, and in this case i got
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-20 22:53, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> +Any·Debian·developer·who·wishes·to·integrate·his·packages·in·the·team
·can·do
>
>
+so·without·requesting·access·(as·the·repository·is·writable·by·all·DD).
·If·one
> wants·to·be·more·involved·in·the·team,·w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-20 22:53, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> +Any·Debian·developer·who·wishes·to·integrate·his·packages·in·the·team
·can·do
>
>
+so·without·requesting·access·(as·the·repository·is·writable·by·all·DD).
·If·one
> wants·to·be·more·involved·in·the·team,·w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-21 02:17, Ben Finney wrote:
> "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" writes:
>
>> thanks a lot for preparing all this.
>>
>> On 10/20/2015 10:53 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> +DPMT requires upst
thanks a lot for preparing all this.
On 10/20/2015 10:53 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> +DPMT requires upstream tarballs; releases cannot be made from upstream git
> +repositories directly. This is because PyPI contains upstream tarballs, and
> +tarballs are what we upload to the Debian archive.
i fi
On 10/16/2015 11:53 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> (it still clearly states we use SVN only, though!)
since you have already mentioned this a few times: how about changing
the policy then, to clearly state that we use GIT only?
as you haven't done that yet, i guess there is some catch; but since i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-12 08:56, Brian May wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why are packages missing from anonscm.debian.org which are on
> git.debian.org?
>
> e.g.
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/django-model-u
tils.git
>
>
> https://anons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-07 14:18, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> I no longer think requiring contribution (the 3 months thing) is a
> good idea for DPMT (might be for a new team).
>
> I assume you all like other ideas, like no team in Maintainer,
> right?
if that's t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-05 23:24, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Oct 05, 2015, at 10:36 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>
>> How about: We move away existing repositories, and put the
>> migrated ones in the /packages/ path. If people have existing
>> repositories, that t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-02 10:30, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> it's 3 months to contribute to other packages (the ones where
> you're not listed in Maintainer).
hmm.
if i - hypthotically, because i really currently do not - cared a so
much about e.g. 30 DPMT package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-04 23:06, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Sandro (2015.10.04_21:31:07_+0200)
>> sorry, i forgot to ask another question: how will the packages
>> already maintained in git be handled?
>
> Up to their maintainers (assuming they're following tea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-02 18:12, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Oct 02 2015, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> I think that the main problem of our team is that we have over
>> 300 members and only few people contribute to packages they
>> didn't inject to the repo (some pe
hi all,
while toying around with managing a few python packages in git, i
noticed that the post-receive hook installed by the "setup-repository"
script is not working as advertised.
for one thing, it complains that "dam.homelinux.net:9418" is unreachable
(and indeed that name cannot be resolved
hi all,
i would like to join the python modules team, mainly to maintain a few
python-modules (who would have guessed that?), that I need as
dependencies for other packages I maintain.
I'm a long-term Debian user, and have become involved in packaging as
late as ~2010, when I joined the pkg-multi
32 matches
Mail list logo