Re: managing transitions

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:03:54PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 10/06/2015 01:02 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 08:39:48AM +, Brian May wrote: > >> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 18:46 Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > >> > >

Re: Git migration schedule

ebian.org arch.debian.org anonscm.debian.org HostName alioth.debian.org User mapreri-guest so you avoid fiddling with every git remote. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapr

Re: managing transitions (was: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental)

n before > > having them committed to our git. > > > > Sounds like an interesting thing to discuss/test after we move to git... Moreover, jenkins.debian.org is happening right about now, guess it would help quite something (and I'd be happy to host such tests there). -- regards,

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

ve you might not be aware of. Isn't this the whole point of unstable→testing? Ok, the debian testing migration might do really few checks compared to ubuntu's, but still it's the same thing, and I believe RT would like to add more checks (at lest dep-8 tests) someday. -- regards,

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 05:26:38PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Oct 05, 2015, at 09:16 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > >Isn't this the whole point of unstable→testing? > > I guess, although it seems a lot of people run unstable so breakages affect > more people. I run u

Re: removing p9m4 from PAPT

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:41:09PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Mattia Rizzolo, 2015-12-14] > > Given that looks like nobody is interested in it, shall I do a QA upload > > of the package kicking it out of the team? > > yes please (and thanks) OK, uploade

Re: Bug#746741: release.debian.org: dh-python2 transition

ask for RM: RoQA for a couple of packages without feeling too guilty... PS: let me guess, should this bug be reassigned to ftp-master for RM? since you already stated -release is not the right place for this, and a transition tracker is not really needed in this case. -- regards,

removing p9m4 from PAPT

ore uploading. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: ht

about kicking python-uniconvertor out of the team

, but didn't upload, so I'm just holding off a dput. Please tell me what I should do with this :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org

Re: about kicking python-uniconvertor out of the team

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:30:09PM +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote: > 2015-12-14 19:17 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org>: > > Turned out Luca already did the pysupport→dh-python migration back the > > time we were on svn, but didn't upload, so I'm just holding off a

packages without any uploaders

don't need to feel bound to a package. Anyway, this lead to a package rejection back this summer for some package of the X team, where there are a lot of packages with this "issue" (even if actively maintained). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF

Re: packages without any uploaders

Uploaders was removed in the > first place?!) dunno, I just noticed it while doing my shift for removing pysupport. If you guys tell me so I'm happy to send an O bug, move the repo to collab-maint and doing a QA upload orphanizing it. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG

Re: Updating python-jsmin

on keybase) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.

Re: Updating python-jsmin

it, and the md5sum > coincided > > thanks! I learned something today :) cool, uploaded. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad

Bug#812117: RM: simpletal -- RoQA; unmaintained; low popcon

. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https

Re: Bug#812117: RM: simpletal -- RoQA; unmaintained; low popcon

control: tag -1 moreinfo On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 07:00:01PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org > > The maintainer (jenner) seems MIA (even if not declered officially by > the mia team), nobody in the DPMT stepped

python-support is dead, long live dh-python \o/

the parties involved :D (especially to the maintainers who switched promptly and didn't wait for the last time, and to the maintainers who actually maintain their packages avoiding more work from QA guys who had to NMU them :P) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A

Re: nose2 reverse dependancies

e any packages that require nose2, which I find somewhat > confusing. So probably will upload anyway. Hopefully I cleared some. FYI, I don't know of a nice way to build a dependency graph, like sometimes I see somewhere, with graphiz -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Ke

Re: pep8 python module is now in python-pep8 - triggers FTBFS

ntained in the python teams somebody could have gone through them and fixing them in little time). But be assured, if you don't do that yourself somebody else will do them in one of the several efforts/projects that involves rebuilding packages and checking they don't FTBFS :) -- regards,

Re: django-pipeline

-- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/develop

Re: Removing me from Uploader field of html5lib

such a mail already next week, much less in some months. > Btw, the docs on the wiki documents how to be added/contribue, but not > really how to stop ;-) A person usually just remove himself from the Uploaders field, from my experience. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo

updating python-tidylib for libtidy5

. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https

Re: Bug#834768: RFS: codicefiscale/0.9-1

nk it would make sense to include in the binaries, as it provides quick documentation (I think) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad u

Re: Bug#834768: RFS: codicefiscale/0.9-1

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:47:37PM +0200, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > On 2016-08-18 at 22:27:42 +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > * Files-Excluded in d/copyright doesn't list all the files that are > > removed (at least according to `git diff --stat > > upstream/

Re: on keep providing python 2 packages

uld be a plain waste of time. I'm curious: what triggered this email of yours? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad u

Re: on keep providing python 2 packages

; packages, though. I'd not encourage people to do so but also not > forbid it, Thanks for having some trust in your fellow package maintainers... -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

accept the email, and discard it. Mattia, whom suffers from this for the debian-science-maintainers ML. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :'

Re: can we disable the bounce kicker? Re: confirm

list, which appears to be jwilk. I find that particularly interesting, given that afaik he left the team some time ago. I don't know whether anybody else knows the administration password other than him. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B

Re: RFS: python-jsonref 0.1

ou sure that's not under a different copyright/license? (if so upstream might be at fault here, and this package might not be redistributable) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''

Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16

under another license * I: python-patch: new-package-should-not-package-python2-module python-patch + right, I was about to forget about this... * I: python-patch source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package python-patch -- regards,

Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16

Hey Paolo, any news of this package? (explicitly CCing you to be extra sure it'll reach you) (And this is why I prefer RFS bugs, btw, saving me from digging in my mail archive to find this one…) On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 06:17:40PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08

Re: [Python-modules-commits] [python-cpuinfo] 02/02: Import Debian changes 3.0.0-1

her python-sphnix nor python3-sphinx ship anything in /usr/bin, so bad example. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user

Re: [Python-modules-commits] [python-cpuinfo] 02/02: Import Debian changes 3.0.0-1

or now). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page:

Re: [Python-modules-commits] [python-cpuinfo] 02/02: Import Debian changes 3.0.0-1

who would consider moving the file back to python3-cpuinfo a step backward… -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: ht

Re: Moving a package from collab-maint to python-modules

remove the old repository from collab-mainnt -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri

Re: python-modules-commits-ow...@lists.alioth.debian.org bounces

ot any response yet. JFTR python-modules-commits-owner@ currently goes to stratus at users.alioth.debian.org, piotr at users.alioth.debian.org, bzed at users.alioth.debian.org, kitterman at users.alioth.debian.org, barry at users.alioth.debian.org -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo

Re: PAPT git migration

ral, it pushes branches > available on both sides and tags. I have recently discovered the config push.followTags=true, which pushes all tags which reference objects that are being pushed. That should save the '--tags' flag :) -- regards,

Re: PAPT git migration

lways quit patches. Sure if somebody uses pq and somebody else doesn't it would end up with some diff noise due to the import/export, but imho nothing worth concerning about. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540

Re: How to switch python-pysam package from nosetest to pytest

ted lines after). I think you should try and see whether pybuild's autodetection works fine, as it usually does. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://ma

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#901621: src:python-gnutls: please support python3

member to sponsor it. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: h

Re: Help proposed for migration of PAPT repos to Salsa

YES, please. On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:46 PM Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Scott (2018.02.23_12:09:20_+0200) > > Yes. I was planning on running the old scripts again. I'll do that > > today. > > OK, I think I've got something that's ready. > > I think I'll just push them

Re: sphinx-build vs. Python 3

r one to me. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debia

Re: Bug#909239: lintian: ancient-python-version-field is wrong

lintian suggests. > > Lintian should not tell us to remove fields that then cause warnings in build > tools. Or those tools should be fixed. CCing the dh-python maintainers, as it's dh_python{2,3} that deals with those fields... -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG K

Re: Numpy migration?

eral people in a later moment… For sure it's not just "fix your bugs" but more like "fix your bugs AND all your rdeps", in fact you'd expect the maintainer of the package breaking everything to be a tad more proactive, but in many cases like this, it's not. -- regards

Re: Numpy migration?

n3-astropy from unstable as the broken version from testing would not be installable using the numpy from unstable. > So, how to handle this? No action needed once both astropy and numpy are "fixed". :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52

Re: Numpy migration?

s should not hinder > numpy to migrate. I don't understand this, I don't see any python2-related issue right now. Could you please expand? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 4096R/B9444540 http://goo.gl/I8TMB more about me: http://mapreri.org Launchpad User: https://launchpad.net/~mapr

Re: Numpy migration?

s that regularly (Except these last few weeks when it was on vaction). I think he said complete automation would miss too many things that he is filtering out by hand for now. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about

Re: Numpy migration?

uild to be retried. However there is after that a different RC bug (that I can fix once the build is confirmed to be fixed as well). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more abo

Re: Dropping Python 2 support for web.py before buster

3 * drop the py2 package -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA pa

Re: Dropping Python 2 support for web.py before buster

'll upload web.py without Python 2 support then. > If someone has strong interest in rebuildd, they has to make a > Python 3 version anyway. If the package is not in buster, there > can still be a backport. > > Thanks for your input, Julien, Julien, and Mattia! -- regards, Mattia

Re: Upcoming pytest-4 problems

em to migrate their codebases. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian Q

Re: Mass commit: Rename d/tests/control.autodep8 to d/tests/control

Go for it! (I just hope that you check for any conflicting d/tests/control before moving that file over) On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, 9:42 p.m. Ondrej Novy Hi, > > because of: > >- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908272 >- > >

Re: [RFC] Dropping Python2 support for my package

nbts binary, without doing any kind of strange migration, and keep the name python3-debianbts for the python3 package, as the Debian Python Policy states. As Andrey wrote, don't touch the source package name either. Sorry if I spread confusion accidentally… -- regards,

Re: [RFC] Dropping Python2 support for my package

on-debianbts the new default package > name for Python3? just drop the python-debianbts binary, without doing any kind of strange migration, and keep the name python-debianbts for the python3 package, as the Debian Python Policy states. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG

Re: Removing py2 support from python-xattr

from testing without the maintainer saying anything, open an RM bug for the rdep. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad

Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing?

Considering that this is bzr we are talking about, a package that is already entering the graveyard, I think it would be easiest to just disable the test suite and move on. But I would be happier it Thomas at least checked the rdeps before dropping packages, at least evaluating if breaking things

Re: What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies?

Hi, On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, 1:59 am Louis-Philippe Véronneau, wrote: > What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies? I feel the > DPMT policy is pretty good and I feel the PAPT policy could copy a bunch > of stuff from there. > I wonder, I think the historical reasons for papt and

Re: Request for sponsor: pytest-bdd

oaded! Just, please do not push debian/ tags unless you are completely sure that's what is going to be uploaded. In this case I would have liked to run wrap-and-sort, and add a R³ header, but hold back just for that. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA1

Re: Request for sponsor: pytest-bdd

ed any upload since ~11:20 AM UTC today. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~m

Re: Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 12:53:23PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I wonder whether this is safe for backports and backports-sloppy. Yes, stretch-backports already supported it, so clearly buster-bpo and stretch-bpo-sl support it. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 6

Re: getmail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

151542154628352=2 uh. meh. I haven't looked at the code, but if you made the effort, how improbable would it be for you to just keep the patches for py3 support yourself in the packaging for the time being? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52

Re: Severity bump script

On Mon, 2 Dec 2019, 10:25 pm Paul Gevers, wrote: > Hi, > > On 02-12-2019 22:15, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > the blocks are only between py2removal packages, so if a package > > un-related to the py2removal effort > > depend/recomments/b-deps/autotest-triggers a py2removal *application*, > that > > is

Re: Bug#945775: python-sponge: should this package be removed.

Debian, if noone disagrees I will likely convert this bug to a > removal request in the not too distant future. Sure, let's do this already! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://ma

Re: Non-migration of cssutils

ils dropped its python2. calibre from unstble is not migrating because of missing builds in arm64 and mipsel. I reckon the way forward is to fix those two FTBFS in calibre. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`

Re: Non-migration of cssutils

s also removing calibre. At the same time, bothering the release team for such minor matters feels somewhat exaggerated. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: http

Re: Separate lib and executable packages?

binary package makes sense for almost all cases I can think of packages shipping executables under /usr/bin/. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org :

Re: RFS: PAPT: gui-ufw 20.04.1-1

regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?log

Re: Force pushing on salsa?

frowingly* accept, is force-pushing a tag because you are doing it again. Having said that, I usually just append a number if I need to re-repack again an upstream tarball (+dfsg1, +dfsg2, etc). But you mentioned only pristine-tar, so I suppose that's not your case. -- regards,

Re: python-requests: adding a documentation package python-requests-doc

On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, 7:42 pm Daniele Tricoli, wrote: > Hello Fabrice, > thanks for pinging I did not notice the MR :( > Please next time can you assign it to me? I should reveive some sort of > notification I hope! :) > I recommend you enable notifications for all packages in you are interested

Re: Help with interpreting piuparts error

There was a temporary bug in piuparts (after a migration from py2 to py3). The bug has been fixed yesterday, and failed tests will be retried automatically after a time. There are probably hundreds of failed tests like that. On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, 4:15 am Chow Loong Jin, wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30,

Re: py2removal: drop python-pytest by not running tests for python2 packages

> updating all its rdeps and not run unittests for the python2 binary > > > (so dropping pytest and the other b-d* only used for tests). > > > > Go for it. > > +1 from me too. Yeah, +1! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F5

Re: Move python-libusb1 from NEW/Unstable

ot always!), if it's a small packages it is processed quite quickly, but poking the ftp team before not even a month has passed without a good reason (for example, it's blocking an RC bug fix) is just inappropriate. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18

Re: Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog

it makes sense to converge on a single solution for the whole team, and honestly I don't have much of a strong preference towards either one. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More abo

Re: Bug#938076: python-pymetar: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

the freeze policy. > Is this something the Debian Python Team could take over? I'll keep a tab open to review and sponsor the nmu (but anybody feel free to beat me). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3

Re: Fwd: My deep mistake with the python-absl package

think there is any gain whatsoever in rolling back to 0.11.0 at this point. Lastly, I'll ask the salsa admins to remove the repository you created in the /debian/ space. If you are interested in this package I recommend you join the DPT then :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo

Re: Moving forward with more Python 2 removal, plus upgrading to markupsafe 2.0, jinja2 3.0, werkzeug 2.0 and flask 2.0

er autopkgtest breaks before said breaking upload. https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html That ought to prevent plenty of headaches we would otheriwse have. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540

Re: Fwd: keyman-config is marked for autoremoval from testing

to do? I suppose in this case it's easier to just wait for gevent's maintainer to fix it. I don't think you need to worry of this not happening in time for the bookworm release. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .

Re: Difference between "python-debian team" and "Debian Python Team"

that: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-debian The first one (python-team) is probably the one you are looking for. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: http