Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz (23/06/2009):
Package: nosql
Severity: serious
Version: 4.0.14-4
User: glibc-bsd-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
current version have hardcoded dependency on libc
as Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.3-1).
This cannot be satisfied on some
Package: agsync
Version: 0.2-pre-10
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
this package FTBFS because it tries to link using -lhal without
explicitly Build-Depending on libhal-dev. It might have gone unnoticed
if/when others B-D pulled it. It at
Package: lineakd
Version: 1:0.9-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
in a clean sid amd64 cowbuilder chroot:
| dpkg-source: info: building lineakd in lineakd_0.9-4.dsc
| debian/rules build
| dh_testdir
| test -r /usr/share/misc/config.sub \
| cp
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org (28/08/2009):
Hi Petr,
thanks for your email.
(For those wondering, I had it privately some days ago, but the reply
I was writing got lost.)
Since everyone can do QA uploads (it's not only the QA team ;) I
think this is a perfect task for any perspective
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org (28/08/2009):
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 14:19, Cyril Bruleboisk...@debian.org wrote:
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org (28/08/2009):
Since everyone can do QA uploads (it's not only the QA team ;) I
think this is a perfect task for any perspective maintainer to do
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (28/08/2009):
#322207 audiooss: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
I think that one is mostly OK, but I wanted to double-check
something too.
Uploading.
Also, people wanting to work on those packages may want to join
#debian-kbsd (OFTC) to coordinate and avoid double
Christoph Egger deb...@christoph-egger.org (11/09/2009):
I have now a patch that makes it build again.
ACK.
However Barry deFreese said he has another fix to pick from. Just to
let the random bugfixer know there are some patches for this.
And your AM that you're doing a good job,
Christoph Egger deb...@christoph-egger.org (28/08/2009):
Hi!
Hello one month later! (hrm :/)
The admin/config.{guess,sub} not found can apparently be
solved by copying the version in /usr/share/misc in the configure
target. However thereafter these packages will all fail to build
Package: hydrogen
Version: 0.9.3-6
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD[1,2]. Please find attached a patch to
fix this.
1.
Package: gpsk31
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD given there's no MSG_MORE there.
Please find attached a suggestion, keeping MSG_MORE as flag in send()
if it's defined, and passing no flags
Package: trousers
Version: 0.3.2-7
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-*. I'm attaching a patch which almost
fixes it, but I'm now getting:
| ps_inspect.c: In function ‘main’:
| ps_inspect.c:342: error: format
reopen 557556
found 557556 0.3.2-8
retitle 557556 trousers: FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386
thanks
Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org (23/11/2009):
It looks like it doesn't FTBFS on asdfasdf.debian.net with this
patch
Hi,
thanks for applying it, but it still FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 which is a
32-bit
Package: prokyon3
Version: 0.9.6-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD because $QT_LIBS aren't used on this
platform yet. Please find attached a patch to fix this in acinclude.m4,
you only have to
Package: opencryptoki
Version: 2.2.8+dfsg-3
Severity: important
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD due to some includes: linux/limits.h
isn't found, PATH_MAX is not defined, etc.
The attached prospective patch fixes that in several files,
Package: and
Version: 1.2.2-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD because it needs a little
buildsys-related porting. I did so by using a variable to gather all CC
settings for architectures supported by
Package: defoma
Version: 0.11.10-3
Severity: grave
Justification: Fucks up fontconfig (at least), then buildds.
Hi,
dh_installdefoma leads to this kind of code in maintainer scripts:
test -x `which foo` foo bar baz
The trick being that if foo isn't found by which, “foo bar baz” gets
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com (30/12/2009):
I'm about to QA-upload defoma with this change in the various
debhelper-files/* files, but I wanted to open this bugreport for
reference.
Fortunately, I didn't do so, that wouldn't have helped (yay for
sleeping before uploading :)).
Here's a
YOSHINO Yoshihito yy.y.ja...@gmail.com (31/12/2009):
Hello,
Hi,
test -x `which foo` foo bar baz
returns status 1, which comes to an error if a script executed this
as the last command. E.g. like #563121, prerm will exit with status
1 if defoma not found unless explicitly writing the last
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (31/12/2009):
Current/common practice within debhelper seems to be:
| if [ -x `which foo 2/dev/null` ]; then…
I think I'm going to upload with such a change once I'm up (for
real, not vaguely opening eyes).
Hi again,
I've just checked that fontconfig 2.8.0-1
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com (31/12/2009):
Check out the 'bash' manual -- set -e explicitly excludes precisely
this case from causing early termination of the script:
[…]
Alrighty. I must confess I'm not really keen on checking what happens
in the various shells, but that seems to be true
Package: src:songwrite
Version: 0.14-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS.
Hi,
looks like there's some missing/wrong B-D:
| running build_script
| creating
/build/buildd-songwrite_0.14-6-amd64-CyZU2x/songwrite-0.14/build/scripts-2.5
| copying and adjusting songwrite -
Hi,
glew is almost OK, so I've just asked ftpmasters to decruft it, meaning
those binaries were removed from unstable:
libglew1.6 libglewmx1.6
Broken packages (in unstable): arb/non-free openmsx rlvm spring tulip
The following packages are marked as bad on the tracker[1]:
- arb/non-free,
Hi again.
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (25/02/2012):
Broken packages (in unstable): arb/non-free openmsx rlvm spring tulip
The following packages are marked as bad on the tracker[1]:
- arb/non-free, missing libmotif-dev on other platforms, so not
binNMU'd.
Building non-free issue
Hi Mark,
Mark Purcell m...@purcell.id.au (10/03/2012):
I will be proposing a transition to libccrtp2, however sflphone FTBFS
with the following error:
checking for CCGNU2... yes
checking for CCEXT2... yes
checking for CCRTP... no
configure: error: Missing ccrtp development package:
Package: python-extractor
Version: 1:0.5-8.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
due to the new libextractor (#672117), your package is no longer
installable, since it has:
| Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, libextractor1c2a
Mraw,
KiBi.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Source: tix
Version: 8.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*:
| make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-tix_8.4.3-2-kfreebsd-amd64-66eoU3/tix-8.4.3/build-shared'
| rm -f
José Manuel Santamaría Lema panfa...@gmail.com (04/06/2010):
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Format: 1.8
| Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:51:09 +0200
| Source: filelight-l10n
| Binary: filelight-l10n
| Architecture: source all
| Version: 1.9~svn1069736-2
| Distribution: unstable
Source: sqlrelay
Version: 1:0.39.4-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
(Chris X-D-Cc'd to make sure this bug gets attention.)
Hi,
this package FTBFS on some architectures:
| find debian/tmp -name '*.so*' -type f \
| | xargs chrpath --keepgoing --delete
| : # libsqlrelay-java
|
Jeffrey B. Green j...@kikisoso.org (07/08/2010):
I'll reassign it to uwm since I have another machine with uwm
installed and it misbehaves identically. Also that machine is
running kdm and so the dm doesn't have anything to do with it.
Indeed, the display manager has little to do. :)
That'd
Source: db4.7
Version: 4.7.25-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package no longer builds on mips:
| […]
| checking for char... no
| checking size of char... 0
| checking for unsigned char... no
| checking size of unsigned char... 0
| checking for short... no
| checking size of
Source: db4.7
Version: 4.7.25-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package no longer builds on sparc:
| Modified test suite run started at: 21:23 01/11/2011
| Berkeley DB 4.7.25: (May 15, 2008)
| Running environment tests (21:23:37)
| Running archive tests (21:25:19)
| Running
Source: gnome-pilot
Version: 2.32.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
this package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*:
| checking for HAL... no
| configure: error: HAL/DBUS Library requirements (dbus-glib-1 = 0.31, hal =
0.5.4)
| not
at it, recompiling xpvm with debug info is not enough, I
might have to build debug-enabled tcl/tk...)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
PS: Of course, any experience with working/non working xpvm is welcome.
pgpY6ui2Muubh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
attached an patch for debian/rules, but I guess that you
might want to install the /usr/share/doc/plotmtv directory before and
write the file directly there.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
--- plotmtv-1.4.4t/debian/rules 2007-03-09 13:50:05.82522 +0100
+++ plotmtv-1.4.4t/debian/rules 2007-03-09
/pcpar.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/cbmlink-0.9.6/src'
make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2
Full build logs are available at
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=kfreebsd-i386pkg=cbmlink.
Please find attached a tiny patch to fix this.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
Just FTR, this happens also on GNU/kFreeBSD (kfreebsd-i386 here),
although I didn't dig much.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpHs3fjCyFtw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.)
Once applied, autoconf has to be run in the directory containing the
patched file.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
--- nbio-2.0/seda/src/seda/nbio/jni/configure.in2007-03-16
04:41:59.578489000 +0100
+++ nbio-2.0/seda/src/seda/nbio/jni/configure.in2007-03-16
04:42:20.0 +0100
look like Linux, which allows at least a fine build on
GNU/kFreeBSD.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
--- vcg-1.30debian/Makefile 2003-02-20 22:06:27.0 +0100
+++ vcg-1.30debian/Makefile 2007-03-20 16:41:33.0 +0100
@@ -24,6 +24,10 @@
SHELL = /bin/sh
+# GNU/kFreeBSD and GNU
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
# QA upload being reviewed
tags 414082 pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-D is not sufficient, you also have to change the asm/io.h
include, and replace it by an sys/io.h include in:
./debian/patches/03_toshsat1800-irdasetup.dpatch
Once that done, your package builds fine; tagging accordingly.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
PS: Cc'ing my AM for RC bugfix
at the last changelog entry (1.72-4) for an example of the formatting
of a QA upload changelog.
OK, didn't notice that, I'll prepare a QA upload and ping for a sponsor
on #-bugs (and thanks for the pointer but I already did some QA
uploads ;-)).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpPax7JDege2.pgp
tag 441190 patch
thanks
Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (07/09/2007):
at_pam.c:166: error: 'PAM_UPDATE_AUTHTOK' undeclared (first use in this
function)
Missing security/pam_modules.h include; builds fine once the attached
patch applied, tagging accordingly.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
tag 454863 patch
thanks
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] (07/12/2007):
Package: gnome-apt
Version: 0.4.9-4
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
Hi,
please find attached a patch to fix this FTBFS.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
--- a/src/childprocess.cc
+++ b/src/childprocess.cc
@@ -33,6 +33,8
tags 454866 patch
thanks
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] (07/12/2007):
Package: lineak-defaultplugin
Version: 1:0.9-4
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
Hi,
please find attached a patch to fix this FTBFS.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
--- a/default_plugin/defaultplugin.cpp
+++ b/default_plugin
tag 455154 patch
thanks
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] (08/12/2007):
Package: pouetchess
Version: 0.2.0-1
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
Hi,
please find attached a patch to fix this FTBFS.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
--- a/src/sxmlgui/XMLUtils.h
+++ b/src/sxmlgui/XMLUtils.h
@@ -56,6 +56,8
tag 455178 patch
thanks
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2007):
Package: unalz
Version: 0.55-4
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
Hi,
please find attached a patch for this FTBFS.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
--- a/UnAlz.h
+++ b/UnAlz.h
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@
#include cstdlib
#include vector
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags 455126 removed-package
thanks
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] (08/12/2007):
Package: madman
Version: 0.94beta1.20060611-2
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
Package removed, tagging accordingly.
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
tags 417078 patch
# I'll take care of the upload.
tags 417078 pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello (back) Peter,
sorry for the messy-looking mail, but people still didn't get how the
BTS work; that's why I'm fully quoting the mail.
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (03/01/2009):
For every presentation I try to start (sample.mpg, sendmail6.mpg,
v6.mpg), mgp dies with an X error. I've
green greenfreedo...@gmail.com (2014-09-17):
Package: sleepd
Version: 2.07+b1
Severity: normal
My system is swapping, and the culprit appears to be sleepd.
In top, sleepd is listed with:
VIRT: 12.655g
RES: 2.132g
SHR: 1272
%MEM: 56.0
Thank you for maintaining sleepd.
FWIW:
|
=apache2 [Not found]
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp1m8qVHV8Y7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
no early adopter WRT several-package-build-breaking tools or
features, I skipped that part.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpDxVLKaUec8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpbNs95DsQp5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/unstable/latest/
2. http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/unstable.php
The idea is to use those diffs to try and trigger give-backs for
packages that FTBFS'd because of B-D being uninstallable.
TIA. Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpknwalwprj0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
comparisons, and feed
that data into a database tracking the (un)installability of the build
dependencies.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp8xsGa7Ayi7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. From my (very humble) point of
view, that'd help speed up the (automatic) give-backs.
I'm currently testing my scripts in a “real environment” with
kfreebsd-*, although more work is still needed.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpVWSZBbPr0D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
be Architecture: all.
Hm, what about checking their *content*? What about listing *binary*
packages?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpUJCSRAnypb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
package…
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpnLpdLvfZDx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
there's usually a reason/bug
causing the package to be listed).
Maybe there's rather a bug in your process. Instead of speaking of
“plenty of greps”, you might want to expose the code / algorithm you
used.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpZsXlXzkGjZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
Depends line.
After a third thought, I still fail to see what that has to do with
being Architecture: all or any.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpTQTr7Qidre.pgp
Description: PGP signature
: (or
maybe even Suggests:)? By using e.g. Recommends: you ensure every
package is installed in the normal/default/whatever_you_call_it case,
but still leave the possibility to the user to only install what s/he
really needs.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpPoTF1gGbMC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 09/01/2008, Robert Vogel wrote:
Couldn't find this link...Is it ok ?
Uploaded already:
| Subject: Accepted zynaddsubfx 2.2.1-4.1 (source i386)
Keeping only lists in To:, list policy blah blah.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpxH6VuOSzfM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
]
grub (U)
Again…
Masahito Omote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libuim-data
Sounds reasonable.
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
grub (U)
Jason Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
grub (U)
Again…
As usually, feedback is welcome.
Reiterating…
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpeKtkuFhZHz.pgp
Description: PGP
this from the very beginning).
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpepixF2jE2I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
and/or from extra Libs
in pkgconfig files (or similar), now moved to Libs.private?
Note that xmlrpc-c is in a strange shape (build states), I'm contacting
seanius through private mail about that.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpBUZFBDTfcJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. But then, please do not call it 'more' again... ;)
Indeed, it's a quite good overview of build states.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpwPIPG45NKF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
all packages of a given maintainer.
But I really love Jeroen's.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp7ge3sTBnhd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
,
--
Cyril Brulebois
On 26/02/2008, David Montanes wrote:
Bonsoir,
Bonsoir,
je vous écris en tant que jeune étudiant en Master informatique dans
le cadre d'un projet de Logiciel Libre.
cette liste est anglophone, merci de bien vouloir rédiger un message
en anglais la prochaine fois. ;-)
Mon but est
| 5.0.42 |stable | source, all
debhelper | 6.0.5 | testing | source, all
debhelper | 6.0.10 | unstable | source, all
So, unless you're backporting for oldstable, that's quite safe.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp79HWW8qJ1K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (03/07/2008):
I will upload them as soon as ftp-master is back.
Just in case, you can always use the DELAYED/* queues on gluck.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Georges Khaznadar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13/07/2008):
Here are the two wrong assertions:
1- ktechlab (source, i386, alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, ia64, mips,
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) has new bugs!
The link points to
Francesco Namuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] (20/07/2008):
The upload would fix these bugs: 455021, 489619
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
As former NM, I'd advise Cc-ing the RFS to the package maintainers. Some
will veto the NMU, and it's better if they do so in reply to the
Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (26/07/2008):
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2a-3
(QA upload) of package cmatrix.
Uploaded, thanks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] (27/07/2008):
Riku Voipio kindly uploaded my NMU, so there is no reason to rush the
adoption. If Camm does not veto the idea in the next few (2? 3? 4?)
weeks, I propose take over as maintainer (along with anyone who wants
to help) under the umbrella of
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/10/2008):
[1] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]comaint=yes
See http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Leidert, it very much
looks like something's wrong, given the “Packages overview for ”.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/11/2008):
Except for qtparted the popcon numbers are all pretty low.
I just had a very quick look upstream, and last activity seems to have
happened in 2004.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30/11/2008):
Why? Uploaders are probably subscribed to the PTS, *or* the
maintainer is a mailing list.
not always.
dpkg-reconfigure $user, then. Not a PTS bug, at least seen from here.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Submitter put back in recipient list…
Steve Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] (06/12/2008):
xwhois.h:
#define BUFSIZE 1024
struct serverent {
char *name;
char *comment;
} servers[256];
get_servers():
/*
* Set all struct members to NULL.
*/
Hello,
context: debian/shlibs.local can be used to work around broken shlibs
files (Policy §8.6.5). Bugs are supposed to be filed, then fixed, and
shlibs.local files should then disappear.
I'm wondering whether it might be a good idea to track those in source
packages, so as to make sure bugs
Loïc Minier l...@dooz.org (21/12/2008):
I'm all for it; over time I came across a bunch of broken packages
due to shlibs.local files, or simply with the risk of these files
bitrotting and causing issues later.
OK, since it doesn't look like useless, I'll look into it and report
back in a
Raphael Geissert atomo64+deb...@gmail.com (28/01/2009):
So, what exactly should be checked? and what's the status of this
proposal?
Dunno for others, but I for one am busy processing NMs and fixing RC
bugs, I don't think any immediate action is needed at this point.
(But moving on would be
jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com (16/04/2009):
What about some possibility for the QA software to recognise multiple
email addresses as belonging to the same person? Every DD that
switches to using a @debian.org address must have this irritation.
login=Surname usually
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org (18/04/2009):
I wonder why you filed these bugs with severity normal:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=edos-relation-warning;users=trei...@debian.org
Looking at this list:
- #468423 and #468425 got minor, rationale was given.
- #404339 is
Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu (11/05/2009):
Hi.
o
Is there any docs about the Debian qa sf redirector that can be used
in debian/watch (apart from man uscan) ?
I'm looking for a way to state which package must be selected...
For instance, for mantis, using
Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu (12/05/2009):
Le lundi 11 mai 2009 à 12:33 +, Bart Martens a écrit :
Not that I know of. DD's can read the source code.
And non-DDs ? ... something available somewhere in SVN on alioth by any
chance ?
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu (29/05/2009):
I realised that cimg-dev package was not updated since nearly two
days.
OH MY! :D
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz (23/06/2009):
Package: nosql
Severity: serious
Version: 4.0.14-4
User: glibc-bsd-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
current version have hardcoded dependency on libc
as Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.3-1).
This cannot be satisfied on some
Jan Hauke Rahm i...@jhr-online.de (30/06/2009):
That would be an idea, low popcon and so on... I can provide a (hopefully)
fixed package, tough. If anyone of the QA team is willing to upload it, find
it here:
http://downloads.jhr-online.de/qa/
Got uploaded, and built properly, thanks!
“rm -f Makefile” instead of “rm Makefile” in the
+clean target (Closes: #533965).
+ * debian/control: Move the Homepage where it belongs.
+
+ -- Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:30:22 +0200
+
xcb (2.4-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Applied patch from CVS (http
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (31/07/2009):
On 30/07/09 at 17:16 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
IMHO it would be nice to aim at a release without oraphaned packages.
That's totally unrealistic.
Indeed. Quick examples which may come to mind:
- xulrunner and all gecko-based pakages.
-
Thomas Viehmann t...@beamnet.de (02/08/2009):
The packages are still on archive.d.o if they ever made a release (and
soon more finely grained on snapshots). The typical package did not
get nontrivial updates in a release cycle before it was removed, so
the version on archive.d.o will be just
Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org (02/08/2009):
This seems to be a recurring proposal. I raised it 1 year ago (IIRC,
sorry I'm too lazy right now to look the reference) and Raphael
Hertzog pointed out to me that way before he advanced the same
proposal.
Sorry for that, missed it/them.
The
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (05/08/2009):
Actually, the counter-argument is that we don't want to make it
*harder* to do a QA upload. Currently, it's apt-get source ; make
change ; dput. If we used a VCS, we would have to create: - a process
to auto-import orphaned packages into
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info (11/08/2009):
Anyone interested in co maintaining that? Upstream is non existent,
there are quite some bugs in the bts and the package is priority
standard. Doesn't sound like a package someone should adopt all alone.
If time permits, yes.
David Bremner brem...@unb.ca (13/08/2009):
I guess two of the NMUs are internationalization issues, so I don't
really how indicative they are of lack of maintanence. On the other
hand, the package has 22 lintian warnings, and sits at policy 3.7.2,
which makes it likely to have some RC bugs.
Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org (05/12/2009):
For the last week or more, the exp buildd link at
packages.qa.debian.org doesn't work since experimental.debian.net is
not responding. I don't know if experimental.debian.net is just
temporarily down or whether there has been some change to the
Hi,
please investigate removal of adolc, which has been RC-buggy since
August 2008 (#496490), without any single reply from the maintainer,
even though Neil Williams tried to give him a hand.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Barak A. Pearlmutter ba...@cs.nuim.ie (15/12/2009):
even though Neil Williams tried to give him a hand.
He did? I'd be happy to have a co-maintainer.
He did: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496490#8
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org (08/04/2010):
I believe our webpages should be self sustained and understandable
without external parties.
Like by typing “ITP” in the “search” box on http://www.debian.org/
which leads to http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.*.html pages?
That makes me
Mark Brown broo...@sirena.org.uk (28/04/2010):
I'm orphaning the package. What part of that makes you think I'm
going to be interested in fixing random lintian warnings?
Random lintian warnings (and errors) like the ones you're generating
by orphaning the package in an improper manner? If
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
