Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ncpfs
While browsing the open rc bugs, I saw that for ncpfs the unblock is missing.
(I did not prepare the upload; the package is orphaned).
It fixes 4 RC critical
Processing control commands:
forcemerge -1 693243
Bug #696798 [release.debian.org] unblock: ncpfs/2.2.6-9
Bug #696798 [release.debian.org] unblock: ncpfs/2.2.6-9
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #693243 [release.debian.org] unblock: ncpfs/2.2.6-9
Merged 693243 696798
--
693243:
Control: forcemerge -1 693243
On 27.12.2012 09:56, Tobias Frost wrote:
Please unblock package ncpfs
While browsing the open rc bugs, I saw that for ncpfs the unblock is
missing.
It's not; there's #693243.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
merging...
sorry, I overlooked that it has already been filed.
coldtobi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 693243 696798
Bug #693243 [release.debian.org] unblock: ncpfs/2.2.6-9
Bug #696798 [release.debian.org] unblock: ncpfs/2.2.6-9
Bug #696798 [release.debian.org] unblock: ncpfs/2.2.6-9
Merged 693243 696798
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes:
Brian Potkin claremont...@gmail.com (26/12/2012):
I originally submitted this patch in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2012/10/msg00444.html
Mentions of volatile remain in Section B.4.9.
Oops, thanks for insisting. :)
I'm adding
Cc'ing Michael (maintainer of quota).
Thanks, I didn't know a freeze exception for quota was asked for.
Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
whole new release?
Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs in 4.01?
There are not a
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:29:30 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I see that the bug log says that the package in unstable won't be
granted a freeze exception, but I'm also not aware of anyone
actually having asked us about that; apologies if I simply missed
the discussion.
I've now unblocked
On 26.12.2012 09:25, Paul Wise wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: minor
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please binNMU gnome-contacts in experimental so it is installable again.
nmu gnome-contacts_3.6.1-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild for the libcheese ABI
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:00:53 +0100
with message-id 20121227130053.gb5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695973: unblock: im-config/0.20
has caused the Debian Bug report #695973,
regarding unblock: im-config/0.20
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:07:37 +0100
with message-id 20121227130737.gc5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#696112: unblock: simile-timeline/2.3.0+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #696112,
regarding unblock: simile-timeline/2.3.0+dfsg-0.1
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:08:18 +0100
with message-id 20121227130818.gd5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#696712: unblock: falconpl/0.9.6.9-git20120606-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #696712,
regarding unblock: falconpl/0.9.6.9-git20120606-2
to be marked as done.
I would like to make an upload to stable in order to fix bugs #636893
(drop yada using) and #653330 (configuration file ignored).
The full debdiff between this new package version and the version
0.5-3+squeeze1 currently in Squeeze is attached.
Sven, would you like to sponsor this upload?
diff
Hi,
On 27.12.2012 13:14, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
I would like to make an upload to stable in order to fix bugs #636893
(drop yada using) and #653330 (configuration file ignored).
In general, please file such requests as user-tagged bugs (e.g. via
reportbug); that makes them much easier to
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 05:14:39PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
Hi,
I would like to make an upload to stable in order to fix bugs #636893
(drop yada using) and #653330 (configuration file ignored).
The full debdiff between this new package version and the version
0.5-3+squeeze1
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:50:04 +0100
with message-id 20121227135004.ge5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695692: unblock: xen/4.1.3-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #695692,
regarding unblock: xen/4.1.3-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 15:03:58 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
unblock rhash/1.2.9-8
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:48:34 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
debian-edu-config (1.702) unstable; urgency=low
[ Mike Gabriel ]
* In gosa-create script: Invalidate libnss cache before applying chown
on new home directories. Fixes multiple failures during mass user
import into
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:18:32 +0100
with message-id 20121227141832.gh5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#695852: unblock: rhash/1.2.9-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #695852,
regarding unblock: rhash/1.2.9-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:22:59PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
+ * Drop yada build-deps, use debhelper to build (Closes: #636893)
Changing of packaging systems isn't generally appropriate for a
stable update. Assuming the package successfully builds in stable
and the build-dependencies
Processing control commands:
tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #696564 [release.debian.org] unblock: fusioninventory-agent/2.2.3-5
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
696564: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696564
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 23:21:51 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
Please unblock fusioninventory-agent/2.2.3-5, uploaded by Gonéri Le
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:36:53 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Le dimanche 25 novembre 2012 à 22:54 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 22:52:49 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:43:12 +0100
with message-id 20121227144312.gk5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#693243: unblock: ncpfs/2.2.6-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #693243,
regarding unblock: ncpfs/2.2.6-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:43:12 +0100
with message-id 20121227144312.gk5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#693243: unblock: ncpfs/2.2.6-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #693243,
regarding unblock: ncpfs/2.2.6-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:52:22 +0100
with message-id 20121227145222.gl5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Status of some open security issues in Wheezy
has caused the Debian Bug report #686868,
regarding unblock: pcp/3.6.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 22:35:33 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
It might be best to revert all the changes in unstable (since -1) that are not
suitable for wheezy, and try to get a version in unstable that fixes both RC
bugs in a non-intrusive way (based on -1). That way, the package could be
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
One further issue with this split: the gnome-themes-standard.mo files in
/usr/share/locale are gone, as far as I can tell.
This was intentional, as the PO files are only used at build time, not on
run-time. This has
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 21:58:12 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
One further issue with this split: the gnome-themes-standard.mo files in
/usr/share/locale are gone, as far as I can tell.
This was
Control: retitle -1 unblock: altos/1.1.1-1
Hi Bdale,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:21:45PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
Please unblock package altos. This version fixes RC bug #676739 which
was present at the time of wheezy freeze.
After this unblock was filed, altos 1.1.1-1 entered unstable.
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 unblock: altos/1.1.1-1
Bug #687583 [release.debian.org] unblock: altos/1.1-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: altos/1.1.1-1' from 'unblock: altos/1.1-1'
--
687583: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687583
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: qcontrol
Version: 0.4.2-7+wheezy1
Severity: important
Tags: d-i patch
Hi Ian,
thanks for your handling of qcontrol via t-p-u; unfortunately we
lost the architecture update from sid in the process, meaning we
only have qcontrol on armel (and not armhf) in testing.
Please find attached a
On 27.12.2012 14:21, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 01:22:59PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
+ * Drop yada build-deps, use debhelper to build (Closes: #636893)
Changing of packaging systems isn't generally appropriate for a
stable update. Assuming the package successfully
+Release updates provide more current versions for software that changes
+relatively frequently and where not having the latest version could
s/and/,/
+reduce the usability of the software. It also provides regression fixes.
s/software./ and fixes of security issues with minor severity./
Hi folks!
(Including debian-devel@ to let people know where we stand.)
I'm happy to report we're getting closer to a first release candidate
for the Debian Installer. I've still got a few packages on my radar,
but the list has been steadily shrinking during the last week.
That basically boils
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:23:12PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Modified from what to what?
For example, this garbage is part of debdiff for the latest security upload:
diff -u libapache2-mod-rpaf-0.5/debian/control
libapache2-mod-rpaf-0.5/debian/control
---
On 27.12.2012 17:02, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:23:12PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Modified from what to what?
For example, this garbage is part of debdiff for the latest security
upload:
[...]
-Build-Depends: apache2-threaded-dev (= 2.0.50-10), yada (= 0.54)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nwchem. This upload fixes #696349, which
unfortunately escaped us in the -4/-5 upload as the limited test suite
we run during package build did not expose the issue.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 05:12:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
If it's purely the yada build-dep, and to a version that's already
in stable, then that's preferable to the entire packaging rework;
particularly as the change abvoe is already in stable.
Ok, got it. Hope, we'll not enter this
On 27.12.2012 17:58, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 05:12:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
If it's purely the yada build-dep, and to a version that's already
in stable, then that's preferable to the entire packaging rework;
particularly as the change abvoe is already in
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:55:40 +
with message-id 1356634540.15533.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#696453: unblock: brltty/4.4-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #696453,
regarding unblock: brltty/4.4-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:52:53 +
with message-id 1356634373.15533.1.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#696819: unblock: nwchem/6.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #696819,
regarding unblock: nwchem/6.1-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 17:48 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
(Including debian-devel@ to let people know where we stand.)
Dropped again for unblock stuff.
### blindly trusting Samuel
unblock brltty/4.4-7
unblock-udeb brltty/4.4-7
Done in #696453.
### add preseeding support for
Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be writes:
Based on your report, I think the only possibility is to remove altos from
wheezy.
I'm not happy about it, but that would be a better choice than shipping
wheezy with 1.0.3.
Bdale
pgpRHXeh_Ch3r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + squeeze confirmed
Bug #696735 [release.debian.org] pu: package xen/4.0.1-5.5 - -5.6 (fix for Xen
clock bug: #599161)
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
--
696735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696735
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags -1 + squeeze confirmed
On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 23:30 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I have prepared an update for Xen for Stable, with the previous agreement
of Guido, who takes care of Xen updates in Debian Stable (Waldi doesn't
seem to care about Debian stable). The debdiff is
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:29:30AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 27.12.2012 00:47, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
bash (4.2-4wheezy0.1) testing; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* debian/bash.preinst-lib.c: pass F_[GS]ETFD, not F_[GS]ETFL,
to fcntl
to set FD_CLOEXEC flag,
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 20:37 +0100, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:29:30AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 27.12.2012 00:47, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
bash (4.2-4wheezy0.1) testing; urgency=low
[...]
However, was this upload discussed with anyone on the Release Team
Hi,
I am touching on this bug as part of the request by the RT [1].
Some remarks:
- I suggest explaining in more detail why this version of the package
deserves a freeze exception [2]. I don't see any RC or important bugs
fixed, or release goals achieved, so I DON'T expect the RT to grant
On Thu 27 Dec 2012 at 17:43:00 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
+Release updates provide more current versions for software that changes
+relatively frequently and where not having the latest version could
s/and/,/
+reduce the usability of the software. It also provides regression fixes.
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 15:33:36 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
I am touching on this bug as part of the request by the RT [1].
You might want to:
- send your review to the submitter/package maintainer so they can
comment/reply
- reply to the original thread instead of creating a new one.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:08:23PM +, Brian Potkin wrote:
On Thu 27 Dec 2012 at 17:43:00 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
+Release updates provide more current versions for software that changes
+relatively frequently and where not having the latest version could
s/and/,/
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
I am touching on this bug as part of the request by the RT [1].
Reading through the discussion of a later CVE bug in bind9 [2], my
expectation regarding the unblock bind9/1:9.8.4.dfsg-1 request is that
the answer will be no,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:44:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
From a very quick scan and with apologies if I'm missing something
due to unfamiliarity with the codebase:
-my @official_suites = qw(oldstable stable proposed-updates testing
unstable);
+my @official_suites = qw(oldstable
Hi Daniel!
(Trying to make Wheezy better.)
Dmitry Smirnov wrote (15 Dec 2012 10:57:10 GMT) :
I don't need to -- the original bug reporter (#688574) was not aware
of similar cases. He had a perfect example of a problem and I just
had a misfortune to discover another case of similar crash.
Two
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Piotr Pokora wrote (03 Oct 2012 11:02:22 GMT) :
We do not have access to NEW. Hence you'd need to provide us with
a debdiff for us to voice our opinion about it.
Attached.
The patch was too big, so it did not make it to the list, but it is
attached to the bug
Processing control commands:
tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #688966 [release.debian.org] unblock: midgard2-core/10.05.7.1-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
688966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 694378 unblock: apt-cacher-ng/0.7.11-1
Bug #694378 [release.debian.org] unblock: apt-cacher-ng/0.7.10-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: apt-cacher-ng/0.7.11-1' from 'unblock:
apt-cacher-ng/0.7.10-1'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (25 Nov 2012 08:39:49 GMT) :
intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:27:12 GMT) :
How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
current testing's gpa?
It seems that this is part of upstream Git commit 61e00549 [1].
I'm not fluent at C, but the relevant part of
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
Osamu Aoki wrote (26 Dec 2012 13:13:26 GMT) :
Please unblock package maint-guide
maint-guide (1.2.31) unstable; urgency=low
Thank you for this update.
Could you please attach the proposed debdiff to this bug report?
Bonus points if the diff has the noisy
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #696722 [release.debian.org] unblock: maint-guide/1.2.31
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
696722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696722
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing control commands:
tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #689147 [release.debian.org] unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
689147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689147
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 16:53:48 GMT) :
On 12/12/2012 03:41 PM, intrigeri wrote:
Which means we can now get back to why this update of an embedded
library should be unblocked. Why is this update needed? Is the version
embedded in testing / in
Hi,
Ivo De Decker wrote (14 Dec 2012 15:07:06 GMT) :
I would like to ask pre-approval for a TPU upload of redhat-cluster.
I did not check the exact files list is correct,
but otherwise the diff looks good.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 12/27/2012 10:48 PM, intrigeri wrote:
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 16:53:48 GMT) :
On 12/12/2012 03:41 PM, intrigeri wrote:
Which means we can now get back to why this update of an embedded
library should be unblocked. Why is this update needed? Is
Hi,
Holger Levsen wrote (23 Dec 2012 17:12:57 GMT) :
I've finally uploaded 2.0.6-2 to sid, the full debdiff to 2.0.6-1
is attached.
Holger: thanks!
Release team: I closely monitored this update, as in bug triaging,
testing patches, pointing Holger to the stuff I felt was needed and
acceptable
Hi,
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote (26 Dec 2012 09:58:31 GMT) :
unblock fuse/2.9.0-2+deb7u1
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 16:07:06 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I would like to ask pre-approval for a TPU upload of redhat-cluster. It
removes files from the rgmanager package,
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (27 Dec 2012 22:02:54 GMT) :
On 12/27/2012 10:48 PM, intrigeri wrote:
I'm absolutely not sure what is the best thing to do now:
1. unblock the embedded python-gnupg copy to the current copy of
Wheezy's python-gnupg + small change that supposedly improves
On 12/28/2012 12:05 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (27 Dec 2012 22:02:54 GMT) :
On 12/27/2012 10:48 PM, intrigeri wrote:
I'm absolutely not sure what is the best thing to do now:
1. unblock the embedded python-gnupg copy to the current copy of
Wheezy's python-gnupg
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 21:58:12 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
One further issue with this split: the gnome-themes-standard.mo
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 11:57 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Ah, thanks. Unblocked.
Sorry, but I don't think it's actually unblocked yet.
adsb@franck:~$ dak ls gnome-themes-standard
gnome-themes-standard |
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Please unblock package liferea/1.8.6-1.1
All of the changes to the application's code comes from upstream.
Liferea is ranked rather high in popularity
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 11:57 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Ah, thanks. Unblocked.
Sorry, but I don't think it's actually
[recipient list trimed]
On 28.12.2012 07:16, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 11:57 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Julien Cristau
75 matches
Mail list logo
