On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
Done waiting from your side
>
> On 16/02/18 14:30, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, roucaries bastien
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:02 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick
>> Control: severity -1 normal
>>
>> On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote:
&
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 transition: imagemagick
> Control: severity -1 normal
>
> On 24/08/17 17:21, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just landed an imagemagick version
BTW feel free to NMU imagemagick during a short break I take in the
next two days.
Bastien
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:22 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:29 PM, roucaries bastien
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:28 PM, roucaries bastien
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
>>> wrot
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:29 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:28 PM, roucaries bastien
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/12/16 22:37, roucaries bastien wrote:
>>>> control: forw
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:28 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> On 09/12/16 22:37, roucaries bastien wrote:
>>> control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/320
>>>
>>&
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 09/12/16 22:37, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/320
>>
>> Dear realease team,
>>
>> What is the next step?
>
> In whi
an ABI break.
>
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 at 15:55:02 +0100, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> * struct _DrawInfo (1) is not a problem from a C point of view because
>> it should be set and destry by API function. It is a opaque object. So
>> no need to so bump for this
>> * _ElementR
-- Forwarded message --
From: Antonio Terceiro
Date: Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Pkg-gmagick-im-team] Bug#846385: imagemagick: Potential
ABI break upstream (without SONAME change)
To: roucaries bastien
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan , 846...@bugs.debian.org
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 13/10/16 09:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 12/10/16 17:13, roucaries bastien wrote:
>>> Uploaded new version waiting for green light
>>
>> Go ahead.
>
> Can you look at pythonmagick
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:14 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 07/10/16 17:15, roucaries bastien wrote:
>>> I have tried and it seems so.
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 07/10/16 17:15, roucaries bastien wrote:
>> I have tried and it seems so.
>>
>> Due to perl transition I get some transient problem but it seems ok,
>> ex
I have tried and it seems so.
Due to perl transition I get some transient problem but it seems ok,
except package only available under unstable
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertags 838242 transition
> thanks
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
