GNOME 3.34 transitions smoother, IMO it would
be fine to remove libgtk2-perl and its reverse-dependencies from
testing. Some might see this as a heavy hammer approach, but this was
announced a year ago to all affected maintainers; either way, it will
happen during the Bullseye cycle, eventually.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi release team!
gregor herrmann:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 11:33:26 +0200, intrigeri wrote:
>> I need help to understand why libgnupg-interface-perl 0.52-3 has not
>> made its way into testing yet.
>> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libgnupg-interface-perl
>>
.15-2 migrate to testing, which should in
turn fix the root cause of this co-installability problem.
Thanks again!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi!
I've uploaded mat 0.5.2-3+deb8u1 by mistake to the "jessie-security"
distribution on ssh.upload.debian.org, while it should have gone to
security-master.d.o. Looks like it has therefore landed in stable-new.
Please reject/remove it, and sorry for the burden!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
past the deadline for accepting new packages, given the
10-days migration delay.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/11/msg2.html
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
sts for
some packages of "mine"), but IMO this shouldn't block the Stretch
release, so a stretch-ignore tag would seem suitable to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
remature at this point,
> and I can come back to it in a month if you prefer.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
re; it works fine for us :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi Niels & others,
Niels Thykier:
> intrigeri:
> Apologies for the late reply on our part.
That's totally fine; thanks for caring! :)
> At this point we have now announced our planned release date as June
> 17th (https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/05/msg
Hi,
intrigeri:
> Tails 3.0 will be released either on June 13 or on June 17.
We've decided to release Tails 3.0 on June 13: we have to release
_something_ on that day anyway (Firefox security update), so moving
the Tails 3.0 release to June 17 would have added a substantial amount
of wor
fixes to such serious bugs. Currently that branch has one single
commit, that fixes the root cause of the aforementioned issues. One of the
affected users (X-Debbugs-Cc'ed) has tested it and confirms the fix works
for him.
Can I upload to stretch-pu with the attached debdiff?
Cheers,
--
intr
Adam D. Barratt:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
> On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 12:00 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Please go ahead.
> Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.
Thanks!
uts to
+the on-screen keyboard (Closes: #926452)
+
+ -- intrigeri Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:23:31 +
+
+gnome-shell (3.30.2-5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Team upload
+ * Really create a suitable temporary XDG_RUNTIME_DIR for the unit tests
+ * Clean up debian/home with d/clean, not a dh_cl
atures
+introduced in recent kernels.
+
+ -- intrigeri Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:04:05 +
+
apparmor (2.11.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix CVE-2017-6507: don't unload unknown profiles during package
diff -Nru apparmor-2.11.0/debian/features apparmor-2.11.0/debian/features
--- a
Adam D. Barratt:
> Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the window for getting fixes into
> the 9.3 point release closes during this weekend.
Thanks, uploaded.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
nfinement becomes weaker,
but the application keeps working.
> since
> both the AA config file itself and the feature set file are conffiles,
> overriding is not easily possible without conffile modification.
Right. Sorry I did not think about this Debian derivative use case.
> I'l
Hi again Fabian & release team,
Fabian Grünbichler:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 03:28:03PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>> > it potentially breaks systems using a custom/backports/newer kernel
>> > and AA profiles requiring features not supported by the pinned 4.9
>> >
intrigeri:
> At first glance this very much looks like a bug in the custom kernel
> you're using.
According to #883703 this bug affects the mainline Linux kernel as
well so this stretch-pu may break as many use cases at it'll repair
when running Linux 4.13+ on Stretch :/
Dear r
ould remove the "confirmed" and/or "pending" tag
so in doubt I'll leave it to you to do the right thing.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
; We're likely to be looking at freezing p-u for the next point
> release in a couple of weeks time.
I've been following the Stretch 9.4 scheduling thread with this in
mind. My current plan is to prepare an updated stable p-u around
February 24-25.
Thanks for the ping! :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Adam D. Barratt:
> # Broken Depends:
> onionshare/contrib: onionshare
So I guess Jessie should first get the fix we applied to onionshare in
testing/sid, i.e. move torbrowser-launcher to Recommends.
stuff for Stretch users running an outdated Linux 4.14.x).
May I upload (with s/UNRELEASED/stretch/ of course)?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
diff -Nru apparmor-2.11.0/debian/apparmor.install apparmor-2.11.0/debian/apparmor.install
--- apparmor-2.11.0/debian/apparmor.install 2017-03-28 12:23:08.0
#x27;m attaching 2 updated debdiffs: one from the version in Stretch and
the other one from the version that's already in stable p-u.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
diff -Nru apparmor-2.11.0/debian/apparmor.install apparmor-2.11.0/debian/apparmor.install
--- apparmor-2.11.0/debian/apparmor.install 201
Adam D. Barratt:
> Please feel free to upload.
Uploaded, thanks.
ches on Jessie as well.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
load-linux-correct-type.patch
+- 0006-load-linux-protected-mode.patch
+
+ -- intrigeri Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:21:55 +0200
+
syslinux (3:6.03+dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Moving source lintian-overrides to newer location.
diff -Nru syslinux-6.03+dfsg/debian/patches/0005-load-linux-correct-
Adam D. Barratt wrote (19 Aug 2015 15:41:26 GMT) :
> Please go ahead; thanks.
Uploaded. Thanks!
red to the one Guido submitted
initially, is that Allow-access-to-libnl-3-config-files.patch now does
not include these changes, that are unrelated to #786650, that this
patch as meant to fix.
I've just built and tested on Jessie, and could successfully start
a VM with AppArmor enforced.
C
ry to keep it in the archive.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
at first
glance, but I didn't tested this yet.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi,
Holger Levsen wrote (06 Dec 2015 10:17:48 GMT) :
> On Freitag, 20. November 2015, intrigeri wrote:
>> Holger Levsen wrote (20 Nov 2015 13:10:46 GMT) :
>> > * Tor Browser Lanucher no longer attempts to auto-update, now that
>> Is Tor Browser's self-upgrade feature
Hi,
I've a hard time understanding what the current status of this
transition is. Anyone willing to sum up?
(I'm interested in it as it blocks #619602 - ITP: theunarchiver.)
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
I'm requesting removal of vserver-debiantools from Wheezy.
Background is at #693275.
Maintainer's approval is in message #22 there.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG k
Ola Lundqvist wrote (12 Dec 2012 05:35:25 GMT) :
> Please remove vserver-debiantools as well.
Requested in #695755, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.deb
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (14 Nov 2012 23:58:44 GMT) :
> Simon Kelley wrote (12 Nov 2012 21:05:35 GMT) :
>> I'd strongly suggest moving to 2.63-4, rather than backporting.
>> The changes for the security fix are not trivial, and probablity of
>> introducing a bug backporti
t get how this satisfies the current freeze policy:
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
Also, any pointer to the place where I can learn about the
"testing-updates" suite?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
|
does not, why this package should be treated differently.
[1] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
(Cc'ing the maintainer, who may have his opinion on the matter.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerpr
his update of an embedded
library should be unblocked. Why is this update needed? Is the version
embedded in testing / in unstable (based on) the same as the one
packaged in python-gnupg?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fin
ion then becomes: as the upcoming maintainer
of kismet in Debian, do you want to commit to maintain 2008-05-R1-4.3
in stable once Wheezy is released? (as in: dealing with security
issues, fixing RC bugs through stable updates, answering bug
reports, etc.)
Cheers,
--
intrige
Hi,
Nick Andrik wrote (12 Dec 2012 15:18:54 GMT) :
> 2012/12/12 intrigeri :
>> OK. I think the key question then becomes: as the upcoming maintainer
>> of kismet in Debian, do you want to commit to maintain 2008-05-R1-4.3
>> in stable once Wheezy is released? (as in:
he freeze policy, no?
Yes. But it's better to leave room in unstable for potential bugfixed
packages that are meant for Wheezy (at least so that they can mature
in there, get some exposure to testing, before the unblock request is
considered).
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| Gnu
to enabling bitmapped fonts: just
+removing the no-bitmaps.conf symlink is not enough, the corresponding
+symlink for yes-bitmaps.conf needs to be added too.
+Thanks to Andreas Metzler for the patch.
+Closes: #684923.
+
+ -- intrigeri Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:09:54 +0100
+
fontconfig
Hi,
Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 22:40:05 GMT) :
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:30:14 intrigeri wrote:
>> Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 01:16:15 GMT) :
>> > There were no reply from maintainer in #688574 so perhaps it would
>> > be better to set Daniel as owner of t
Hi,
(Disclaimer: I'm neither part of the release team nor speaking on
behalf of it.)
> Therefore I would like to seek preapproval of grml-debootstrap/0.54.
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fin
y comment on Adam's reasoning about how the fix is sub-optimal,
and about his suggestions to improve it? (Related question: what's
the upstream status of this patch, by the way?)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.as
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Piotr Pokora wrote (03 Oct 2012 11:02:22 GMT) :
>> We do not have access to NEW. Hence you'd need to provide us with
>> a debdiff for us to voice our opinion about it.
> Attached.
The patch was too big, so it did not make it to the list, but it is
attached to the
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (25 Nov 2012 08:39:49 GMT) :
> intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:27:12 GMT) :
>> How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
>> current testing's gpa?
It seems that this is part of upstream Git commit 61e00549 [1].
I'm not fluent at
noisy indentation changes filtered
out. These, and a few others changes I noticed while having a first
glance at the diff, are not documented in debian/changelog.
This makes the reviewers life quite harder.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 16:53:48 GMT) :
> On 12/12/2012 03:41 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>> Which means we can now get back to why this update of an embedded
>> library should be unblocked. Why is this update needed? Is the version
>> emb
Hi,
Ivo De Decker wrote (14 Dec 2012 15:07:06 GMT) :
> I would like to ask pre-approval for a TPU upload of redhat-cluster.
I did not check the exact files list is correct,
but otherwise the diff looks good.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
sual"
unblock request reviews.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Hi,
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote (26 Dec 2012 09:58:31 GMT) :
> unblock fuse/2.9.0-2+deb7u1
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (27 Dec 2012 22:02:54 GMT) :
> On 12/27/2012 10:48 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>> I'm absolutely not sure what is the best thing to do now:
>>
>> 1. unblock the embedded python-gnupg copy to the "current copy of
>> Wheezy's p
Hi,
(I'm not part of the Release Team, just trying to help them.)
Michael Biebl wrote (20 Dec 2012 23:33:19 GMT) :
> retitle 696116 unblock: systemd/44-7
The diff looks good to me, and the resulting packages have been
working fine on my main system for a week.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
age build time, or what?
Other than that, the diff looks good to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-r
gregor herrmann wrote (29 Dec 2012 00:02:17 GMT) :
> Exactly (neither shipped nor used).
Thanks, removing the moreinfo tag.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.deb
Hi David,
David Smith wrote (28 Dec 2012 06:30:46 GMT) :
> Please unblock package liferea/1.8.6-1.1
Hint to increase the chances of seeing the proposed changes more
promptly reviewed by the Release Team: attach the debdiff from the
version in testing to this bug report.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
as part
of 2.0.4, and the other (new) changes to emacs-package-install look
good to me, so I recommend the Release Team ACKs this
pre-unblock request.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardn
Hi,
(disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team, merely trying to help.)
Matthias Klumpp wrote (12 Dec 2012 12:47:07 GMT) :
> +packagekit (0.7.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
> + * Removed some unused build dependencies
I'm not sure the build dependencies changes qualify for an unblock
reque
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Noël,
Bob Bib wrote (20 Dec 2012 21:05:32 GMT) :
> Please unblock package hwdata.
> [...]
> unblock hwdata/0.234-1
First, I guess it would be useful to hear from the maintainer:
do you think this update is fit / needed for Wheezy?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
three formats supported by vite).
Thanks.
No reverse dependencies, priority: optional, leaf package.
I don't feel I'm qualified to review the actual code changes,
but they are indeed non-intrusive, relatively short,
and to the point as far as I can tell.
Cheers,
--
intrige
it's
getting less clear to me. Steve, what's your take on that regression?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-
Hi,
Christian Perrier wrote (02 Jan 2013 06:03:19 GMT) :
> The NMU I uploaded yesterdaty includes 3 upstream patches
> cherry-picked by Jérémy Bobbio to fix #673042 (loses 'legacy BIOS
> bootable' flag on GPT disks).
I've tested the updated package and can confirm it does fix the RC bug.
I'm not
Hi,
(Disclaimer: I'm not a member of the Release Team,
merely trying to help with some unblock requests.)
Alessio Treglia wrote (02 Jan 2013 13:59:00 GMT) :
> unblock accountsservice/0.6.21-8
Thanks.
The debdiff looks good, but it seems that 0.6.21-8 somehow did not
make it into the archive yet
the file /tmp/virt_, it will hang
> the
> instalation.
>From a remote point-of-view, this is worrying: do you mean something
during the installation will access or create a file with a fixed name
in /tmp? May it have security implications?
Cheers,
--
intriger
Hi,
José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote (02 Jan 2013 20:22:43 GMT) :
> intrigeri
>> From a remote point-of-view, this is worrying: do you mean something
>> during the installation will access or create a file with a fixed name
>> in /tmp?
> Yes.
>> May
> wheezy).
Fair enough.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &qu
ser (Closes: #698449).
+
+ -- intrigeri Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:34:54 +0100
+
pidgin-otr (3.2.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Add missing Homepage control field
diff -Nru pidgin-otr-3.2.1/debian/patches/fix-French-translation.patch pidgin-otr-3.2.1/debian/patches/fix-French-translation.patch
--- pidgin-otr-3.2.
hentifie" here; which is
> correct?
Upstream uses the infinite form "Authenticate" in English, which seems
more adequate to me when describing the action clicking the button
results in. The proposed patch does the same.
I've just suggested the upstream's last translato
annot check right now,
but no, it does not look like openmotif is on the list.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-r
st this patch and confirm if
it fixes #697639 for you?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
y tight for (re-)adding packages into testing, so if
you're still interested into having wims in Wheezy, I suggest
acting soon.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/o
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (27 Dec 2012 20:55:46 GMT) :
> (Trying to make Wheezy better.)
> Dmitry Smirnov wrote (15 Dec 2012 10:57:10 GMT) :
>> I don't need to -- the original bug reporter (#688574) was not aware
>> of similar cases. He had a perfect example of a problem and I j
ian stable release.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
then php5-midgard2 might break.
>> Also, you should include the debdiff between both versions in this bug
>> report.
> Sure I can do this.
Any news on this side?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint
Hi Eduard,
intrigeri wrote (27 Nov 2012 10:58:28 GMT) :
> Eduard, given the apparent brokenness of the version currently in
> testing, the size of the delta, and the fact we've been frozen for
> months, have you considered preparing a minimal fix meant to fix these
> bugs
the severity of
#677638 to normal in June, which means fixing does not fit the current
freeze policy. However, given the many user reports I can see on that
bug, and the fact you request an unblock to change this knob, I guess
you may have changed your mind, so perhaps you want to raise the
severity
se this bug.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
ream release at this stage of the freeze.
If one of the RC bugs fixed by 2.8-2 applies to the version in
testing, you might want to prepare an upload for t-p-u with minimal
changes, though.
(I'm not part of the release team, just trying to help a bit.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @
Hi Nico,
Nico Golde wrote (28 Dec 2012 19:52:38 GMT) :
> Oh that's a good point, I didn't notice that earlier. Ok, I will push to spu
> later.
(I assume you meant s/spu/t-p-u/ here.)
Do you still intend to do so?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.pt
`/usr/share/doc/' in order to function).
> - There's a debian/patches/upstream-fix-backport.diff that doesn't look
> like it's listed in debian/patches/series, making it pointless.
Ivo, Gonéri: ping. What's your plan to get the bugfixes into Wheezy?
Cheers,
--
gressions coming from alsa-utils, so ACK.
>> [...]
>>
> Added the unblock-udeb, thanks.
I see 1.0.25-4 has migrated to testing, so it's unclear to me if/what
there's still something to do wrt. this unblock request, or if it can
be closed.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuP
his unblock request: I think the Perl maintainers
are still waiting for an answer from the release team about the
inclusion of 5.14.3 in Wheezy that was initially discussed on #691185,
and asked here early in November.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/in
d unblock would not look
completely insane to me, considering the package has been living for
two months in unstable and the world did not explode yet.
(Disclaimer: I'm no member of the release team.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.as
posed changes look good, and I recommend the
release team grants the requested unblock.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
ng a debdiff and explaining in more
details what the changes are, what specific bugs they fix, and why it
satisfies the current freeze policy.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
opose a package for
testing-proposed-updates, or get them as 1.3.5-3 into sid with minimal
changes, depending on whether the 1.3.4-1 to 1.3.5-2 delta itself
meets the freeze policy?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
e team closes this
unblock request.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &quo
Hi,
Eduard Bloch wrote (27 Jan 2013 13:14:53 GMT) :
> * intrigeri [Sat, Jan 26 2013, 10:33:35PM]:
>> intrigeri wrote (27 Nov 2012 10:58:28 GMT) :
>> > Eduard, given the apparent brokenness of the version currently in
>> > testing, the size of the delta, and the
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote (26 Jan 2013 13:41:14 GMT) :
> Intrigeri, we should go through this list, and see which bugs will be
> closed/are duplicates and we should list them in the changelog:
Agreed.
> - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667032
> - http://bugs.debian
; keyring if necessary.
The diff is way out of my comfort zone to review, but FWIW I've
upgraded to the sid version (and asked a few other people to do so
too) in order to bring some first-hand real world testing reports and
ease the decision. I'll report back in a week.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
n", etc.
(No, I'm not volunteering for anything more than testing these user
stories once before they're published.)
But perhaps I'm making it too much of a deal and the release team
would be happy to unblock this package without all these efforts that
might be better spen
y the Debian Live
maintainers, so given live-tools does not seem ready for Wheezy
yet [1], I see little benefit to unblocking 3.0.1x now, only to see it
unsupported in testing, and eventually having to unblock 3.0.2x or
something again for Wheezy in a few weeks.
[1] http://live.debian.net/devel/rf
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (12 Dec 2012 14:33:28 GMT) :
> (Cc'ing the maintainer, who may have his opinion on the matter.)
It's been a month and a half since I wrote this, and I can see no
indication that Michael thinks this version of synaptic should be
unblocked for Wheezy, so I recommen
their side, but quite some time has passed since then so I'm
not sure what I would decide if I were in their position.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gst-plugins-bad0.10, which fixes #681652 (mp4 files
produced with ffmpeg no longer supported in Wheezy), that affects Totem and
minitube (#666773, #696210 and #667012)
+1,10 @@
+gst-plugins-bad0.10 (0.10.23-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add 0030-really-fix-h264-parsing.patch from upstream (Closes: #681652)
+
+ -- intrigeri Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:42:40 +0100
+
gst-plugins-bad0.10 (0.10.23-7) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/patches
her appears to be apply cleanly)?
FWIW, I've asked about the same on the Monkeysphere mailing-list last
October, see dkg's answer there:
https://lists.riseup.net/www/arc/monkeysphere/2012-10/
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrig
. I did not notice any issue
with it.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &
current freeze policy before uploading to t-p-u.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
1 - 100 of 281 matches
Mail list logo
