Hello,
| DMUA removed now.[2]
I guess Steffen somehow missed the memo? (*hint hint*)
:) I'll go for it when I am back with my key tonight. I hope you have all
played with Yixuan's nice BOINC (http://wiki.debian.org/BOINC) packages, too.
Cheers,
Steffen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 10/26/2012 02:17 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 23:47 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote:
Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc
quote src=README.source
Debian GCC maintainers kindly provide required documentation patches under
debin/gcc/patches/ directory in the Debian gcc-X.Y source
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 13:15 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote:
On 10/26/2012 02:17 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 23:47 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote:
debin/gcc/patches/ directory in the Debian gcc-X.Y source package. This
[...]
s/debin/debian/ ;-)
Oh, just fixed in git repo.
[...]
Do
,
|
| Perhaps the DMUA field adds some security concern. However currently,
| neither Samuel nor I am a DM. In later versions, I'll just drop DMUA
| field and ask my sponsor, Steffen, to use the new DM permission
| interface (after I become a DM).
|
| The DMUA field is in the process
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:11 -0400, root wrote:
,
|
| Perhaps the DMUA field adds some security concern. However currently,
| neither Samuel nor I am a DM. In later versions, I'll just drop DMUA
| field and ask my sponsor, Steffen, to use the new DM permission
| interface (after I
On Oct 24, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:11 -0400, root wrote:
,
|
| Perhaps the DMUA field adds some security concern. However
currently,
| neither Samuel nor I am a DM. In later versions, I'll just
drop DMUA
| field and ask my sponsor,
On 10/13/2012 11:46 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 13.10.2012 16:24, Guo Yixuan wrote:
于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道:
Why is the package's Maintainer field set to someone who has no obvious
connection with the package?
This is because Samuel did most of the packaging work half a
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 05.10.2012 16:47, Guo Yixuan wrote:
Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc
Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into
wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo,
gcj
and gnat) in manpages, info, html and pdf.
Why
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #689726 [release.debian.org] unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
689726: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689726
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 05.10.2012 16:47, Guo Yixuan wrote:
Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc
Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into
wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo, gcj
and
On 13.10.2012 16:24, Guo Yixuan wrote:
于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道:
Why is the package's Maintainer field set to someone who has no
obvious
connection with the package?
This is because Samuel did most of the packaging work half a year
ago, and I just updated it to match current
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc
Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into
wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo, gcj
and gnat)
12 matches
Mail list logo
