-numbers. But this creates a 1.8M -doc package for libxmpp4r-ruby,
while the library itself is only 36K...
My libxmpp4r-ruby package in the pkg-ruby-extras SVN repository does
multipackaging and generates rdoc at package build time. We an use it as
a basis for discussion.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL
is for developers. And developers want the doc if
it is useful. So I think we should definitely generate them.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 24/11/05 at 10:45 +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:31:39PM +, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:43:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
After thinking about it for a while, I came to the conclusion that we
have
already been generated in convert_to_png().
[1] http://ox.blop.info/bazaar/diagram.rb.diff
To make this possible:
- the patch removes the label from the graph
- the patch removes the alt attribute of the img tag in the
generated HTML.
Can this patch be integrated into rdoc ?
Thank you,
--
| Lucas
if appropriate ? Let's wait for
Ian Jackson to actually release something before making any decision
about a better handling of tests.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
.
librmagick-ruby is quite useful too, especially for those doing web
development. The pkg-ruby-extras could adopt it and team-maintain it
too. (I'm willing to do the initial work)
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D
On 28/01/06 at 13:39 +1100, Mike Williams wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Ok, here are my changes :
- now uses cdbs.
- bug 347401 should be fixed by only rebuilding the package. I don't
think that using pkg-config is really needed.
- I added the rdoc documentation using dh_rdoc.
- Removed
/mylib', use the search path
etc
What do you think ?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On 01/04/06 at 09:12 +0900, akira yamada wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Questions :
- Is it really a good idea to build-dep on ruby1.9 currently ? Shouldn't
we just build for ruby1.8 ?
It is ftpmaster's choice. For example libdb*-ruby1.9 was rejected by
ftpmaster.
(ruby1.9 and libdb
, no problem.
Thank you,
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of overlapping issues here, I am just
trying to sort them out and am at a loss where to begin. I would very
much appreciate any pointers and suggestions.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
[ Cc to debian-ruby@ re-added ]
On 08/03/07 at 13:18 -0500, Bakki Kudva wrote:
On 3/8/07, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08/03/07 at 08:56 -0500, Bakki Kudva wrote:
Hi Rubyists,
I just upgraded one of my machines to etch to see what impact it would
have on Ruby
the same and left my
/home volume undisturbed. It seems to have worked for most other
apps. Wonder if that's causing a problem.
No, that shouldn't be a problem.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
it into the ruby1.8 source package ?
Also, what are the opinions of the ruby1.8 maintainers about that ?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 18/10/07 at 21:11 +0200, Mathieu Blondel wrote:
Hi
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- library installation paths (see #446220):
a common complain heard about Debian's ruby is that we install all
libs in /usr/lib/ruby/1.8, mixing stdlib and third party libs. It
would be a good idea to move
that we already have (as degemified libs).
So it's probably better to package some libs as gems, especially when
other gems use it. It's basically what the python folks do with Python
eggs.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED
? 1.9.1? 2.0?
on Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:04:36 +0900, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
|Do we already know if we will have an 1.8.7 release, a snapshot of the
|1.9 tree, or even a stable release (2.0?) of the 1.9 development tree?
|
|In 2008, what will be the official ruby release?
|Or is all
29th.
matz.
- End forwarded message -
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
,
deleted /var/lib/gems, installed rubygems again, changed permissions
as described above).
Any idea why rubygems is trying to touch /usr/bin ? Has anyone else
noticed this?
Hi Tim,
Please file a bug about that, it's better than reporting problems on
mailing lists.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL
has different interpreter versions, and
also other interpreters, such as pysco)
I'll propose a BOF about all the Ruby issues in debconf. Co-organizers
wanted :)
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
will be implemented by 25 Sep? What will not?
* How about the improved version of transcode?
* What platforms should be supported?
* How about OS/2?
* How about VMS? Can anyone build the trunk version on VMS?
--
Yugui [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://yugui.jp
- End forwarded message -
--
| Lucas
(since all the
ruby1.9-depending packages are also building packages for ruby1.8, it's
going to be painful to remove the ruby1.9 binaries).
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hi,
It has almost been a week, with no answer from the release team. I'm
very concerned that this will reduce the time this package will be
tested before the release.
The question is:
can I prepare and upload 1.8.7p72?
Thank you.
On 02/09/08 at 18:50 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi
in the archive)
So, comments? :-)
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
, for
example, would be all of my pure-Ruby packages)? Say
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby?
Oops, I really meant /usr/share/ruby/vendor_ruby here. It's really
past time we stopped violating FHS and moved .rb files out of
/usr/lib.
This should be pushed upstream, not by Debian.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
Hi,
I've started a wiki page to discuss what ruby-support, the tentative to
provide something similar to python-support to manage 1.9.X-1.9.(X+1)
transitions (and maybe more).
See http://wiki.debian.org/RubySupportDesign . Don't hesitate to modify
and add ideas.
Thank you,
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
for that. Also, we have to decide whether
we want to use ruby-support (at least partially) for that. Even if the
symlink farm is useless, it could still be useful to provide some common
commands, for example to enumerate the ruby versions.
Any opinions?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http
On 06/04/09 at 10:47 +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
2009/4/6 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net:
[A] Ruby libraries must support as many as possible of the Ruby versions
available in Debian. That currently includes Ruby 1.8, Ruby 1.9.0
(soon 1.9.1), JRuby 1.0, and JRuby 1.1. (Should
by a package
such as ruby-default.
Having packages use /usr/bin/ruby is a problem when we want to switch
from ruby1.8 to ruby1.9 for /usr/bin/ruby. We should check that every
package using /usr/bin/ruby works with ruby1.9 first.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas
1.9.0 to 1.9.1.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Hi,
OK, let's do the following:
- pkg-ruby-maintainers@:
+ Maintainer/Uploaders: field
+ machine-generated emails (dak, etc) about packages
+ short discussions about package-specific issues, especially when they
originate from a machine-generated email. If they generalize, they
on multiples servers
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 500275
The package can be found on the pkg-ruby-extras SVN server:
- URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ruby-extras/trunk/capistrano/
Can't be uploaded without the others.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas
,
and the plans for squeeze seems to be to freeze in february. We have to
decide whether we want to push things a lot, and do it before squeeze,
or postpone them and do them for squeeze+1.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
shape, do not hesitate to
fix others' packages: some of the maintainers have not been very active
lately, and might not have time to work on their packages.
Thanks!
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D
, ujihisa and who seem to
commit many patches into RubySpec to support 1.9
(Very sorry if I overlook)
Thanks,
--
Yusuke ENDOH m...@tsg.ne.jp
- End forwarded message -
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
. transition wiki page.
So maybe I've missed something.
No, it was just a suggestion. I ran into some packages where the 1.9.0
support was added without testing it, so I thought that it was a good
idea to push for more tests.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net
-gitorious/deb-gitorious-rubygems.git
You can either do it on your own (and use mentors.debian.net and
debian-mentors@), or join the team.
To join the team, follow the instructions on
http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas
-controlfields.html#s-f-Version
Well, it is better to avoid introducing an epoch if possible (i.e if the
problem is only transient), since, once the epoch is introduced, it will
always be there.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
On 22/04/10 at 00:11 +0200, Tobi wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
3) Instead of providing several libfoo-ruby1.{8,9.1} packages, we
provide only one when it is possible (pure ruby packages), named
libfoo-ruby.
When this is not possible (case of packages that contain native extensions),
we
to execute them during the
build (for every ruby implementation), as this will allow to detect
regressions.
MRI's test-all has some stress test.
Yes, and we run them during build. But I was talking about test suite
shipped by libraries.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net
'. Maybe we should have our own private copy of just
rubygems/format for that.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
On 22/04/10 at 23:00 +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
(2010/04/22 22:32), Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 22/04/10 at 19:40 +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
0) We try to provide as much support as possible for all ruby interpreters
(well, at least 1.8 and 1.9.1, but maybe also jruby). However, we
decide
.
+ various QA scripts, including one to grep for require 'rubygems'
Suggestion: Such a script should also look for 'bundler' and other
gem-specific dependency handling as well. For example, merb has
'dependency' methods.
Good idea.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http
On 23/04/10 at 08:16 -0600, Joshua Timberman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 23, 2010, at 2:10 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
No, we can't install packages ourselves (that are not in the
build-depends) during the build.
Is the point actually that we can't
On 10/05/10 at 18:26 +0200, Laurent Vallar wrote:
wget -O libsinatra-ruby_1.0.realy1.0.orig.tar.gz \
http://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/tarball/1.0
thanks, uploaded
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG
-missing-file ohai:8
/usr/share/doc/ohai-doc/rdoc/*
Thanks
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
/svn/pkg-ruby-extras/trunk/capistrano
Uploaded, thanks
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
it been filed as a launchpad bug?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
it has its
own package. I've fixed this in the backport, can you please upload it?
Done
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ
On 15/08/10 at 15:11 +0200, Tobi wrote:
Hi!
There seems to be an issue with the latest ruby1.9.1 causing a bunch auf
auto-bugs by Lucas' latest rebuild:
While this works:
$ touch /tmp/test.rb ; ruby1.9.1 -e require '/tmp/test'
This doesn't:
$ touch test.rb ; ruby1.9.1 -e require
Hi,
Here is a sponsorship request I don't have time to address currently.
Could someone do it?
Lucas
- Forwarded message from Deepak Tripathi apenguinli...@gmail.com -
From: Deepak Tripathi apenguinli...@gmail.com
To: lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:55:41 +0530
Hi,
I have updated the team(s) documentation on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby
- Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 10/10/10 at 04:23 +0200, Vincent Carmona wrote:
2010/10/9 Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
I think that it would be better to have a separate tool that does the
gem2tgz conversion properly. That tool could then be used by gemwatch.
Ok
On 08/01/11 at 00:07 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
The pkg-ruby-extras group has existed for a long time. It serves an
important purpose - but it has grown a bit crufty. This means, we have
several people listed who are not active in the group anymore, and we
have many packages nobody
Hi,
After quite some work together with Antonio Terceiro, we now have a mostly
working gem2deb implementation. It can handle everything needed to package
ruby applications and libraries inside Debian, and is much better than the
current cdbs-based tool:
- does almost everything automatically
-
On 16/01/11 at 23:49 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
5) Something I forgot to add is dependencies on ruby interpreters.
With gem2deb, we will get a single ruby-foo package that is supposed to
work with all Ruby implementations (ruby1.8, ruby1.9.1, jruby,
rubinius).
I think that this ruby-foo
On 17/01/11 at 00:05 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:43 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 16/01/11 at 21:22 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
3) Should we change our packaging workflow? Using gem2deb, it would be
quite
easy to use git-buildpackage with:
- an upstream
On 17/01/11 at 09:43 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 09:28 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 17/01/11 at 00:05 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:43 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Sure. However, there's quite a lot of guessing going on in dh-make-ruby
On 18/01/11 at 12:32 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:25:33AM +0100]:
5) Something I forgot to add is dependencies on ruby interpreters.
With gem2deb, we will get a single ruby-foo package that is supposed to
work with all Ruby implementations (ruby1.8
On 18/01/11 at 12:26 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
2) How should the packages be named? Since all the packages are going
to be modified anyway, it's the perfect time to change the naming.
I'd like to go with:
+ ruby-foo for pure ruby libs
+ ruby1.8-foo, ruby1.9.1-foo, and ruby-foo (common
On 18/01/11 at 10:52 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 09:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 17/01/11 at 12:55 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 19:26 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 17/01/11 at 09:43 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 09:28
On 19/01/11 at 01:05 -0700, Joshua Timberman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Ohai!
On Jan 18, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
The default ruby version should still be 1.8 at least for some
time, given that most libraries are not supporting 1.9 yet.
On 19/01/11 at 11:14 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:44 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 08:33:02PM +0100]:
How is the compatibility between implementations right now? If a
package works across interpreters (it should be human-tested
On 19/01/11 at 12:56 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 08:27:22PM +0100]:
Heh, not the first time you push that way :)
Still, I think the libfoo-ruby makes more sense when we are talking
about libraries. If an unexperienced user sees (picking
Hi,
On 24/01/11 at 12:28 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
So I'm looking to add ruby binary packages to the gearman-interface
source package (its a SWIG binding that produces python, python3, lua,
and ruby wrappers for libgearman).
It requires a number of little things to build that are
On 20/01/11 at 22:08 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote:
There is also draft for our new [Git Workflow][GW]. You can patch it
with your ideas :)
On the Git vs SVN debate, I think that we should experiment with Git as
a volunteer basis. Yes, it means that some packages will be in SVN,
while some
Hi,
Heh, thank you for your mail. I have a very clear memory that you were
my first sponsor in Debian more than 5 years ago.
(http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/feed2imap/news/20050816T174321Z.html)
And it has always been a pleasure to work with you (we need to have some
beers in FOSDEM).
I think I
On 29/01/11 at 08:03 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
Hi,
I have consolidated the discussion on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyInWheezy
Please review it carefully.
Cosmetic changes and clarifications are welcomed directly on the wiki
page
On 30/01/11 at 22:20 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
a) only native code:
Packages: ruby1.8-foo, ruby-1.9.1 etc
All of them must provide ruby-foo
b) both pure-ruby and native code
Packages:
ruby-foo - contains pure
On 08/01/11 at 00:07 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
1) Team members
We currently have 52 team members listed on alioth, which is a lot
considered the number of active members.
So, if you want to stay a member of the team (which is fine, I
encourage you to continue to contribute to the team
On 16/02/11 at 20:16 +0100, Vincent Carmona wrote:
2011/2/16 Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org:
Vincent Carmona escreveu isso aí:
I have updated the svn repository:
the package now depends on libgtk2-ruby1.8,
README is not anymore installed.
The updated package look good.
Hi,
I'm resurecting this subthread to discuss the naming of packages.
On 19/01/11 at 12:56 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Agree. And maybe it's overkill to separate just the library from an
eight line long program (the case of haml, sass, html2haml, css2sass,
...) to keep things clean. But OTOH,
On 27/02/11 at 14:07 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
On 25/02/2011 01:10, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
On 30/01/11 at 22:20 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
a) only native code:
Packages: ruby1.8-foo, ruby-1.9.1 etc
All
On 27/02/11 at 16:31 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 27/02/11 at 14:07 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
On 25/02/2011 01:10, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
On 30/01/11 at 22:20 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
a) only native code
Hi,
We are planning a rather large set of changes in Ruby packaging for
Debian wheezy, and would appreciate some external feedback on our
proposals.
Our plans are described on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyInWheezy
Don't hesitate to ask for details if needed.
- Lucas
--
To
On 28/02/11 at 11:02 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
Hi,
I'm resurecting this subthread to discuss the naming of packages.
On 19/01/11 at 12:56 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Agree. And maybe it's overkill to separate just the library from an
eight
On 04/03/11 at 22:54 -0500, Christopher Lunsford wrote:
gem2deb is not installing for me. The issue is on line 65 and 218 of
lib/gem2deb/dhruby.rb. The find_files functions uses Dir::chdir twice in the
same block which presents errors. Is it possible to use the glob and index
methods to
On 05/03/11 at 16:01 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
OK, but then we have a problem: gem2deb currently generates source
packages named like the gem. This might be OK as a default, but I think
that we should have an option to switch to ruby-* source naming
Hi,
I've done some work yesterday on the interpreter packages.
ruby1.8 (1.8.7.334-2~experimental.1) experimental; urgency=low
* Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format
* Add a 'nordoc' option for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
* Switch to alternatives to manage ruby, rdoc, ri, ...
* Add a
Hi,
It seems that using mr[1] is the way to go to maintain our packages in
git instead of SVN, according to a thread on debian-devel@[2].
Is something willing to investigate how the Games and OCaml use it, and
adapt the necessary stuff?
There's already a git repo on alioth[3] that can be used
On 07/03/11 at 17:06 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote:
Hello, Lucas.
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 10:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
ruby-defaults (4.6) experimental; urgency=low
* Remove the Ruby policy from the package. It is no longer applied to ruby
packages anyway.
* Make all
On 07/03/11 at 13:00 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Antono Vasiljev escreveu isso aí:
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 10:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Note that we have two alternatives trees (one for ruby, one for gem).
It's not
convenient to have a single one with alternatives. I think
On 09/03/11 at 22:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum writes (Ruby changes for Wheezy):
We are planning a rather large set of changes in Ruby packaging for
Debian wheezy, and would appreciate some external feedback on our
proposals.
Our plans are described on
http
On 10/03/11 at 12:00 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2011-03-10, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
On 09/03/11 at 22:27 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum writes (Ruby changes for Wheezy):
We are planning a rather large set of changes in Ruby packaging for
Debian wheezy
On 10/03/11 at 18:12 +0100, Vincent Carmona wrote:
Hi.
There is a new upstream version of libglobalhotkeys-ruby.
Should I package it using the old fashion way (svn+cdbs) in sid ?
Should I try git and gem2deb ? in experimental ?
Should I do both? One package in unstable and one in
On 10/03/11 at 23:28 +0100, Vincent Carmona wrote:
2011/3/10 Vincent Carmona vinc4...@gmail.com:
2011/3/10 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net:
On 10/03/11 at 18:12 +0100, Vincent Carmona wrote:
Hi.
There is a new upstream version of libglobalhotkeys-ruby.
Should I package
On 12/03/11 at 01:57 +0100, Vincent Carmona wrote:
2011/3/11 Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
On 10/03/11 at 23:28 +0100, Vincent Carmona wrote:
2011/3/10 Vincent Carmona vinc4...@gmail.com:
2011/3/10 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net
from Raphael Hertzog:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
What is the correct way to override what dpkg-shlibdeps detects?
Either you replace the dependency associated to the interpreters'
libraries by providing debian/shlibs.local (or any other file that you
indicate with -L) or you tell dpkg
On 24/03/11 at 20:16 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
On 22/03/11 at 19:43 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I fixed a few minor things in gem2deb tonight. Current debian/TODO items
that should be fixed before we can make the switch:
1
On 28/03/11 at 14:08 +0530, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
At Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:59:47 +0100,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Lucas/Antonio,
Thanks for all your good work, going through all mail thread and wiki, I have
couple of questions.
1) All existing packages will be renamed or only new packages
On 29/03/11 at 10:02 -0700, Steven Baker wrote:
My package is waiting for my mentor to check it over.
I suppose I could make a repository and publish that.
I suppose that would be a good idea, yes. But maybe you could contribute
to Antono's packaging effort instead?
Also, please don't
On 29/03/11 at 11:36 -0700, Steven Baker wrote:
My package is waiting for my mentor to check it over.
I suppose I could make a repository and publish that.
I suppose that would be a good idea, yes. But maybe you could contribute
to Antono's packaging effort instead?
Why would I
On 28/03/11 at 13:23 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Hi there,
I've just updated our wiki page that documents the needed changes for
Ruby packaging in Wheezy to reflect our latest definitions:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyInWheezy
It would be nice if someone could review the
On 29/03/11 at 12:20 -0700, Steven Baker wrote:
I have been waiting for about a month for mentor to check over most recent
stuff. I will ping him today and see if I should try something new.
Why don't you put the package on mentors.d.n or somewhere on the web?
Unless your secret mentor is
On 28/03/11 at 12:22 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
I've uploaded a new version of gem2deb with the current git version,
this time to unstable.
Before that, I also made a change to allow to build only for specific
ruby versions. I haven't added any tests
On 31/03/11 at 10:52 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Hi,
I need one DD to upload ruby-mocha. It is in our new set of git
repositories, more specifically at:
git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-mocha.git
I will be able to do further uploads on my on as a DM.
After the
On 02/04/11 at 17:14 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
On 31/03/11 at 10:52 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Hi,
I need one DD to upload ruby-mocha. It is in our new set of git
repositories, more specifically at:
git+ssh://git.debian.org
On 30/03/11 at 11:39 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
On 28/03/11 at 12:22 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
I've uploaded a new version of gem2deb with the current git version,
this time to unstable.
Before that, I
On 03/04/11 at 14:24 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
I think that the only correct Debian way to ensure clean upgrades is to
provide transition packages, unfortunately. Of course, we should also
ensure that r-deps use the ruby-foo packages, but there are many
On 04/04/11 at 10:34 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
We still need to update the tracking UDD scripts to ignore the
transitional packages in migrated packages.
I'll do that when the packages are accepted, so there's a way to test
that it works
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
