Re: Migrating custom rails assets smoke test to use gem2deb

On 8/2/24 12:57 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: Though it looks this can't work during build when the asset is a link. We can track this in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063478 Meanwhile I got this method working with ruby-rails-assets-markdown-it-diaspora-mention which had

Re: Migrating custom rails assets smoke test to use gem2deb

On 7/2/24 9:13 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi team, We used to duplicate a dummy rails app to create a smoke test for rails assets pipeline, but this meant when there is a change in dependencies or dummy app, every package needs change. In gem2deb 2.2 we now have a single place to manage

Migrating custom rails assets smoke test to use gem2deb

Hi team, We used to duplicate a dummy rails app to create a smoke test for rails assets pipeline, but this meant when there is a change in dependencies or dummy app, every package needs change. In gem2deb 2.2 we now have a single place to manage the dummy app and we only need to mention the

Re: RFS: ruby-flores 0.0.8

On Fri, Dec 15 2023 at 12:32:17 +05:30:00, Abhijith PA wrote: Hello o/. On 12/12/23 01:49 AM, Ajayi Olatunji O. wrote: Hi, I just packaged ruby-flores 0.0.8, a build dependency for arr-pm 0.0.12, which is a build dependency for gitlab 15.11.6 Kindly check the package out at

Re: [RFS] ruby-activerecord-import 1.5.0-1

On 15/10/23 9:58 AM, Ravish BC wrote: Hello Pirate Praveen, Looks like you have disabled the patch in https://salsa.debian.org/ravish0007/ruby-activerecord-import/-/commit/6e03aa382d26622f6487755a3263b162e143cb71 If this patch is no longer required, you should remove it. The patch has

Re: [RFS] ruby-activerecord-import 1.5.0-1

On 3/10/23 5:49 PM, Ravish BC wrote: Hi, The following package is updated to 1.5.0 and ready to uploaded. Could you please sponsor the following new package? ruby-activerecord-import 1.5.0-1 (https://salsa.debian.org/ravish0007/ruby-activerecord-import/) Thank you! Looks like you have

Re: [RFS] ruby-duo-api 1.3.0-1

On 14/9/23 4:47 PM, Ravish BC wrote: Hi, The following package are ready to be uploaded and it is required for gitlab 16.1.0 Could you please sponsor the following new package? ruby-duo-api 1.3.0-1 (https://salsa.debian.org/ravish0007/ruby-duo-api/) Uploaded, congrats on your first

Re: state of ruby-celluloid-* packages

On 21/9/23 5:53 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Dear all, I wanted to have your opinion on the status and the future of the ruby-celluloid(-*) packages. My understanding is that the project is unmaintained for several years (since 2016 it seems), and most project using that moved away to

Re: RFS: ruby-flores 0.0.8

On 25/7/23 5:31 AM, thegodtune wrote: Hi, I just packaged ruby-flores 0.0.8, a build dependency for arr-pm 0.0.12, which is a build dependency for gitlab 15.11.6 Kindly check the package out at https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-flores Please review and sponsor. Thank you! 1.

Re: Faraday 2 transition (was Re: Many ruby library transitions for gitlab reupload to experimental)

On Mon, Jun 19 2023 at 03:21:54 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Sat, Jun 17 2023 at 06:50:02 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Pirate Praveen wrote: I'm using this pad to track the reuploads https://storm.debian.net/shared/KsibMVg-48Iaa_ooNGxsMxaFisv74u1tDeH_jX00GWJ Since

Faraday 2 transition (was Re: Many ruby library transitions for gitlab reupload to experimental)

On Sat, Jun 17 2023 at 06:50:02 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Pirate Praveen wrote: I'm using this pad to track the reuploads https://storm.debian.net/shared/KsibMVg-48Iaa_ooNGxsMxaFisv74u1tDeH_jX00GWJ - ruby-countries - it built fine locally, but failed on the buildd so help is welcome

Re: Many ruby library transitions for gitlab reupload to experimental

On Wed, Jun 14 2023 at 09:22:24 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote: On 13/06/23 1:16 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: I'm using this pad to track the reuploads https://storm.debian.net/shared/KsibMVg-48Iaa_ooNGxsMxaFisv74u1tDeH_jX00GWJ about 32 packages have been re-uploaded

Many ruby library transitions for gitlab reupload to experimental

Hi, Bookworm is out and I am trying to reupload all gitlab dependencies staged in experimental during freeze to unstable. I'm using this pad to track the reuploads https://storm.debian.net/shared/KsibMVg-48Iaa_ooNGxsMxaFisv74u1tDeH_jX00GWJ Some reuploads are breaking changes and we will need

Re: Comments regarding ruby-ruby-openai_3.7.0-2_amd64.changes

On Thu, May 11 2023 at 05:45:36 PM +00:00:00 +00:00:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Hi, ruby-ruby-... as package name is really intentional? Yes, we had problems when multiple gems only differ in ruby prefix in there names. There was parser and ruby_parser gem which made things even more

Re: RFS: ruby-digest-crc 0.4.0-1

On Sat, Apr 8 2023 at 05:39:35 AM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Ravi Dwivedi wrote: Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). It is required for gitlab 15.9.2. Could you please

Re: [RFS] ruby-app-store-connect

On Sat, Apr 1 2023 at 03:58:30 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, Requesting sponsorship for the new package ruby-apps-store-connect [1] required for Gitlab. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-app-store-connect please remove debian directory from the gem file

Re: RFS: ruby-google-apis-cloudbilling-v1 0.21.0-1, ruby-google-apis-iam-v1 0.36.0-1

On Thu, Apr 6 2023 at 12:52:02 AM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Ravi Dwivedi wrote: Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). Both of them are required for gitlab 15.9.2 Could you

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk-core-3.170.0-1

On Wed, Apr 5 2023 at 08:28:52 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Ravi Dwivedi wrote: Forgot to give the repository link. Here it is https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/mentors/ruby-aws-sdk-core Uploaded, thanks for your work. Next time use ruby-team/mentors only for new packages. For updates, you

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-google-apis-cloudresourcemanager-v1

On Wed, Apr 5 2023 at 07:17:52 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, Requesting sponsorship for the new package ruby-google-apis-cloudresourcemanager-v1 [1] required for gitlab 15.9.2 [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-google-apis-cloudresourcemanager-v1

Re: [RFS] ruby-et-orbi (1.2.7)

On Mon, Mar 27 2023 at 07:12:07 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, Requesting sponsorship/upload access for the package ruby-et-orbi [1], have updated it to v1.2.7 (targeting experimental) Required for GitLab 15.9.2 [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-et-orbi

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-recaptcha v5.12.3

On Thu, Mar 9 2023 at 12:37:55 AM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-recaptcha [1], updated it to latest upstream version 5.12.3 required for GitLab 15.8.4. Uploaded, thanks for your work. [1]

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-google-apis-sqladmin-v1beta4

On Sun, Mar 5 2023 at 04:10:03 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, Requesting sponsorship for the new package ruby-google-apis-sqladmin-v1beta4 [1] ( targeting experimental) Required for GitLab 15.7.6 Uploaded, thanks for your work. [1]

Re: RFS: ruby-google-apis-pubsub-v1 0.7.0-1

On Sun, Mar 5 2023 at 04:11:23 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Ravi Dwivedi wrote: Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). Reason: this gem is required to package gitlab. See

Re: [RFS] ruby-aws-sdk-s3 (1.117.2)

On Sun, Feb 19 2023 at 10:22:25 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, Requesting Sponsorship for the new package ruby-aws-sdk-s3 (1.117.2-1) This gem is listed here [2] and is a dependency of Gitlab 15.7.6 Uploaded, thanks for your work. [1]

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-i18n-data 0.13.0

On Wed, Mar 1 2023 at 01:00:15 AM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-i18n-data [1] required for GitLab 15.7.6 Have updated it to the version 0.13.0 Please merge the UNRELEASED entry with the latest entry in changelog. [1]

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-i18n-data 0.13.0

On Tue, Feb 28 2023 at 07:49:16 PM -03:00:00 -03:00:00, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Hi, On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 01:00:15AM +0530, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, Requesting sponsorship for the package ruby-i18n-data [1] required for GitLab 15.7.6 Have updated it to the version 0.13.0 [1]

Re: RFS: ruby-google-apis-iamcredentials-v1 0.16.0-1

On Wed, Feb 15 2023 at 08:19:58 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Ravi Dwivedi wrote: Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). I pushed it here

Re: [RFS] ruby-google-apis-dns-v1

On 4/2/23 12:23 PM, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, Requesting Sponsorship for the new package ruby-google-apis-dns-v1 (0.12.0) [1] This gem is listed here [2] and is a dependency of Gitlab 15.6.1 [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/mentors/ruby-google-apis-dns-v1 [2]

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-google-api-client 0.53.0

On 5/2/23 8:31 AM, Vivek K J wrote: Hi,     I've updated ruby-google-api-client fromt 0.50.0 to 0.53.0. The updated package should be uploaded to experimental as it has dependency on ruby-google-apis-core which is on experimental. The updated package is available at

Re: new restriction in rubygems: installing symlink pointing to parent path not allowed - causes ruby-handlebars-assets to ftbfs

On Fri, 03 Jun 2022 21:52:17 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > May be we can copy during build and replace it by symlink in install? This fixes the earlier issue, but now some tests fail # Running: ..E.E..E Finished in 18.138080s, 1.5437 runs/s, 2.4810 assertions/s.

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-asciidoctor-kroki

On Sun, Jan 15 2023 at 07:45:53 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J wrote: Hi Team, I've updated ruby-asciidoctor-kroki from 0.5.0 to 0.7.0. I've verified that the package is lintian clean and this package doesn't have any reverse (build) dependencies. Updated package is available at

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-google-api-client

On Thu, Jan 12 2023 at 07:30:32 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J wrote: Hi Team, I've added a patch in ruby-google-api-client to use latest version of ruby-googleauth gem (Which is in experimental). With the latest version, the package builds fine, and no errors were reported. This

Re: RFS: ruby-fog-aws

On 28/12/22 1:22 PM, Caleb Adepitan wrote: Hello, I just updated ruby-fog-aws from 3.14.0 to 3.15.0 Here is the repo that contains the changes made; https://salsa.debian.org/calebpitan/ruby-fog-aws May be you forgot to push or the repo is private? Cheers, Caleb

Re: RFS: ruby-kaminari

On 28/12/22 3:55 AM, Caleb Adepitan wrote: On 12/27/22 21:53, Pirate Praveen wrote: On 27/12/22 10:20 PM, Caleb Adepitan wrote: Done Please push the tags as well (upstream/1.2.2 tag is missing). upstream/1.2.2 tag pushed Uploaded, thanks for your contribution! On 12/27/22 13

Re: RFS: ruby-kaminari

On 27/12/22 10:20 PM, Caleb Adepitan wrote: Done Please push the tags as well (upstream/1.2.2 tag is missing). On 12/27/22 13:41, Pirate Praveen wrote: On 27/12/22 3:47 PM, Caleb Adepitan wrote: Hello, I just updated ruby-kaminari from 1.2.1 to 1.2.2 Here is the repo that contains

Re: RFS: ruby-kaminari

On 27/12/22 3:47 PM, Caleb Adepitan wrote: Hello, I just updated ruby-kaminari from 1.2.1 to 1.2.2 Here is the repo that contains the changes made; https://salsa.debian.org/calebpitan/ruby-kaminari Please change UNRELEASED in changelog. Cheers, Caleb

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-googleauth 1.3.0

On 26/12/22 8:59 PM, Vivek K J wrote: Hi Team,         I've updated ruby-googleauth package from 0.13.0 to 1.3.0. As its a major version upgrade, The following reverse(build) dependencies fails to rebuild against latest version. grpc grpc-java ruby-google-api-client

Re: [RFS] telesign,request-store,view-component,fog-local,aws-sdk-s3,fogbugz

On 23/12/22 7:04 PM, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, I have packaged the following new packages required for 15.6.1 1.  ruby-telesign 2.2.3 https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/mentors/ruby-telesign Moved repo to ruby-team and uploaded. Please upload to bullseye-* as well. I have updated the

Re: [RFS] ruby-oj 3.13.23.2

On 26/12/22 10:18 PM, Vinay wrote: On 26/12/22 16:20, Pirate Praveen wrote: On 24/12/22 11:37 PM, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, I have updated ruby-oj(3.13.23.1  -> 3.13.23.2 ) .The updated package is available at [0]. The versions here are 3.13.23-1  -> 3.13.23-2 ruby-oj (3

Re: [RFS] ruby-oj 3.13.23.2

On 24/12/22 11:37 PM, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, I have updated ruby-oj(3.13.23.1  -> 3.13.23.2 ) .The updated package is available at [0]. The versions here are 3.13.23-1  -> 3.13.23-2 ruby-oj (3.13.23 ) is required for the new gem of gitlab oj-introspect

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-signet

On 23/12/22 7:13 PM, Vivek K J wrote: On 23/12/22 18:49, Pirate Praveen wrote: On 23/12/22 6:13 PM, Vivek K J wrote: Hey team,     I've updated ruby-signet to 0.17.0. I've verified the package is lintian clean and reverse dependencies are building perfectly. I'm a DM, but I don't have

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-signet

On 23/12/22 6:13 PM, Vivek K J wrote: Hey team,     I've updated ruby-signet to 0.17.0. I've verified the package is lintian clean and reverse dependencies are building perfectly. I'm a DM, but I don't have access to upload this updated package. This package is updated for updating gitlab

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-redis-namespace

On ബു, ഡിസം 21 2022 at 07:01:52 വൈകു +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J wrote: Hey team, I've updated ruby-redis-namespace to 1.9.0. I'm a DM, but I don't have access to upload this updated package. This package is updated for updating gitlab to 15.5.1 [1]. Uploaded, thanks for your

Re: [RFS] ruby-oj 3.13.23

On വ്യാ, ഡിസം 22 2022 at 12:52:28 രാവിലെ +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay wrote: Hello Team, I have updated ruby-oj(3.13.21-> 3.13.23) .The updated package is available at [0]. ruby-oj (3.13.23 ) is required for the new gem of gitlab oj-introspect could not push to

Re: RFS: ruby-oauth2 2.0.6

Hi Tunji, Did you verify if the upload breaks any reverse dependencies in unstable? $ reverse-depends ruby-oauth2 Reverse-Depends * gitlab * ruby-asana * ruby-github-api * ruby-omniauth-oauth2 Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in: all, amd64, arm64, armel,

Re: [RFS] ruby-ipaddr , ruby-cvss-suite

On Sat, Nov 12 2022 at 10:50:53 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay Keshava wrote: Hello Team, I have packaged ruby-ipaddr and ruby-cvss-suite The package is available at [0] and [1] Please review the packages and sponsor it. Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the packages are listed in

Re: [RFS] ruby-toml-rb , ruby-marginalia , ruby-rack-proxy

On Sat, Nov 5 2022 at 05:51:32 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay Keshava wrote: On 31/10/22 17:14, Vinay Keshava wrote: Hello Team, I have updated ruby-toml-rb (2.1.0 -> 2.2.0) and ruby-marginalia (1.11.1 | 1.10.1) .The updated package is available at [0] and [1] Reason for sending an RFS

Re: RFS ruby-version-gem

On Sat, Nov 5 2022 at 01:11:48 AM +01:00:00 +01:00:00, Ajayi Olatunji O wrote: Thank you Praveen, I have made the necessary changes as advised and the project still exist in the same repository, kindly checkout the work I have done. Looks like you did a git push --force or recreated the

Re: RFS ruby-version-gem

On Mon, Oct 31 2022 at 06:16:02 PM +01:00:00 +01:00:00, Ajayi Olatunji O. wrote: Hey, With the assistance of Vinay Keshava I was able to undo the issues with ruby-version-gem. Kindly check it at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-version-gem and help sponsor. Please remove

Re: [RFS] reuby-view-component 2.74.0

On ശ, ഒക്ടോ 8 2022 at 12:30:13 വൈകു +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay Keshava wrote: Hello Team, I have updated ruby-view-component (2.69.0 -> 2.74.0) .The updated package is available at [0]. Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package ruby-diffy is listed in this issue

Re: [RFS] ruby-diffy 3.4.2

On ശ, ഒക്ടോ 8 2022 at 08:56:36 രാവിലെ +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay Keshava wrote: On 08/10/22 02:05, Pirate Praveen wrote: On വെ, ഒക്ടോ 7 2022 at 10:46:14 വൈകു +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay Keshava wrote: Hello Team, I have updated ruby-diffy (3.3.0 -> 3.4.2) .The updated pack

Re: [RFS] ruby-diffy 3.4.2

On വെ, ഒക്ടോ 7 2022 at 10:46:14 വൈകു +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay Keshava wrote: Hello Team, I have updated ruby-diffy (3.3.0 -> 3.4.2) .The updated package is available at [0]. Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package ruby-diffy is listed in this issue

Re: RFS: ruby-version-gem 1.1.0

On ബു, സെപ്റ്റം 21, 2022 at 4:54 വൈകു, Ajayi Olatunji O wrote: Hi, In order to update git lab to version 15.3.0, ruby-oauth2 must be updated from version 1.4.4 to version 2.0, and ruby-oauth requires a ruby gem version-gem, but because of the absence of version-gem in the Debian archive I

Re: RFS: ruby-version-gem 1.1.0

On ബു, സെപ്റ്റം 21, 2022 at 4:54 വൈകു, Ajayi Olatunji O wrote: Hi, In order to update git lab to version 15.3.0, ruby-oauth2 must be updated from version 1.4.4 to version 2.0, and ruby-oauth requires a ruby gem version-gem, but because of the absence of version-gem in the Debian archive I

Re: [RFS] ruby-redis-actionpack

On Fri, Sep 2 2022 at 12:19:49 AM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay Keshava wrote: Hello Team, I have updated ruby-redis-actionpack (5.2.0 -> 5.3.0) .The updated package is available at [0]. Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package ruby-redis-actionpack is listed in this issue

Re: [RFS] ruby-oj

On Mon, Aug 29 2022 at 02:00:21 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vinay Keshava wrote: Hello Team, I have updated ruby-oj(3.13.19 -> 3.13.21) .The updated package is available at [0]. Reason for sending an RFS mail is that the package ruby-oj is listed in this issue

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-rails-i18n 7.0.5

On Sun, Aug 28 2022 at 06:38:39 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J wrote: Hi Team, I've updated the package ruby-rails-i18n from 6.0.0 to 7.0.5. The package is lintian clean and the updated package is available at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-rails-i18n. This package have

Re: RFS: ruby-yajl 1.4.3

On വ്യാ, ഓഗ 25, 2022 at 11:34 വൈകു, Ravi wrote: Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). The reason I am sending this RFS mail is that the package ruby-fog-aws is

Re: [RFS] ruby-truncato ,ruby-kubeclient

On ബു, ഓഗ 24, 2022 at 12:56 രാവിലെ, Vinay Keshava wrote: Hello Team, updated ruby-truncato with changes available at https://salsa.debian.org/vinay-keshava/ruby-truncato Uploaded, both! thanks for your contribution.

Re: RFS: ruby-gpgme 2.0.20-1

On ഞാ, ഓഗ 14, 2022 at 2:04 രാവിലെ, 'Tunji wrote: Hello, I made recommended changes to this package and it is now Lintian clean. I seek sponsorship for it to be uploaded to the archive. Uploaded, thanks for your contribution!

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-grape-path-helpers 1.7.1

On ബു, ഓഗ 24, 2022 at 7:00 വൈകു, Vivek K J wrote: On 24/08/22 18:19, Pirate Praveen wrote: On ഞാ, ഓഗ 21, 2022 at 6:06 വൈകു, Vivek K J wrote: Hi Team, I've updated ruby-grape-path-helpers package from 1.7.0 to 1.7.1. The updated package is available at https://salsa.debian.org

Re: RFS: ruby-fog-aws 3.14.0

On ബു, ഓഗ 24, 2022 at 1:59 രാവിലെ, Ravi wrote: Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). Could you please sponsor them? ruby-fog-aws 3.14.0 (it is at

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-grape-path-helpers 1.7.1

On ഞാ, ഓഗ 21, 2022 at 6:06 വൈകു, Vivek K J wrote: Hi Team, I've updated ruby-grape-path-helpers package from 1.7.0 to 1.7.1. The updated package is available at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-grape-path-helpers. The package is lintian clean and all reverse dependencies are

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk-s3 1.114.0-1, ruby-aws-eventstream 1.2.0-1, ruby-aws-sigv4 1.5.1-1

On ശ, ഓഗ 20, 2022 at 8:52 വൈകു, 'Tunji wrote: Hi, thank you for informing me of the oversight. Kindly check again, I have now pushed the packed to the right repository (https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-aws-sigv4). Uploaded both! Thanks for your contribution! Next time try to

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk-s3 1.114.0-1, ruby-aws-eventstream 1.2.0-1, ruby-aws-sigv4 1.5.1-1

On ശ, ഓഗ 20, 2022 at 4:33 രാവിലെ, 'Tunji wrote: Hi, I just updated the packages ruby-aws-sdk-s3 from version 1.48.0-3 to 1.114.0-1, ruby-aws-eventstream from version 1.1.0-1 to 1.2.0-1, and ruby-aws-sigv4 from 1.1.0-3 to 1.5.1-1 Please note that ruby-aws-sdk-s3 requires ruby-aws-sigv4

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk-core 3.132.0-1

at https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-aws-sdk-core and I still need sponsorship for it, thank you. On 8/18/22 12:03, Pirate Praveen wrote: On ബു, ഓഗ 17, 2022 at 7:03 വൈകു, 'Tunji wrote: Hi, I just updated the package ruby-aws-sdk-core from version 3.104.3-3 to 3.132.0-1 Please

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk-core 3.132.0-1

On ബു, ഓഗ 17, 2022 at 7:03 വൈകു, 'Tunji wrote: Hi, I just updated the package ruby-aws-sdk-core from version 3.104.3-3 to 3.132.0-1 Please update minimum versions of ruby-jmespath and ruby-beaneater in Depends/Build-Depends. Also please doublecheck the line length of changelog entries

Re: RFS: ruby-jmespath 1.6.1-1, ruby-beaneater 1.1.1-1

On ബു, ഓഗ 17, 2022 at 4:37 രാവിലെ, 'Tunji wrote: Hi, I just updated the packages ruby-jmespath from version 1.4.0-3 to 1.6.1-1 and ruby-beaneater from version 1.0.0-2 to 1.1.1-1 Kindly check them out at https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-jmespath and

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-graphql 2.10.0

On Sun, Aug 14 2022 at 06:58:56 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J wrote: Updated to 1.13.15. https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-graphql Uploaded, thanks! Can you also update in bullseye-backports-staging too for gitlab in bullseye-fasttrack? See https://wiki.debian.org/FastTrack

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-graphql-client 0.18.0

On Mon, Aug 15 2022 at 10:13:25 AM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J wrote: On 10/08/22 17:28, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Mon, Aug 1 2022 at 05:58:53 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J wrote: Hi Team, I've updated the package ruby-graphql-client from 0.16.0 to 0.18.0. The package

Re: RFS: ruby-aes-key-wrap 1.1.0-1

On Sat, Aug 13 2022 at 11:59:11 PM +01:00:00 +01:00:00, 'Tunji wrote: Hi, I have made all observed changes to this package and I am seeking sponsorship. Uploaded, thanks for your contributions! thanks. On 8/11/22 15:09, Pirate Praveen wrote: On ഞാ, ഓഗ 7, 2022 at 2:44 രാവിലെ, 'Tunji

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-partitions 1.618.0-1

On Sun, Aug 14 2022 at 12:50:43 AM +01:00:00 +01:00:00, 'Tunji wrote: Hi, I just updated the package ruby-aws-partitions from version 1.598.0-1 to 1.618.0-1 Kindly check it out at https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-aws-partitions I ensured that the package is Lintian clean

Re: RFS: ruby-grape-logging 1.8.4-1

On Fri, Aug 12 2022 at 11:39:07 PM +01:00:00 +01:00:00, 'Tunji wrote: Hello, I just updated the package ruby-grape-logging from version 1.8.3-2 to 1.8.4-1 Kindly check it out at https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-grape-logging I ensured it is lintian clean. Could you please

Re: RFS: ruby-aes-key-wrap 1.1.0-1

On ഞാ, ഓഗ 7, 2022 at 2:44 രാവിലെ, 'Tunji wrote: Hi, I just updated the package ruby-aes-key-wrap from version 1.0.1-2 to 1.1.0-1 Kindly check it out at https://salsa.debian.org/thegodtune/ruby-aes-key-wrap Could you please sponsor it? ruby-aes-key-wrap 1.1.0-1 Please make sure the

Re: RFS -- ruby-bootsnap 1.12.0

On Thu, Aug 11 2022 at 06:05:34 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Mohd Bilal wrote: Hello team, I've updated ruby-bootsnap to 1.12.0. The package is lintian clean and was successfully built using sbuild. Requesting someone to review and sponsor my changes or you may consider granting me DM access

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-graphql-client 0.18.0

On Mon, Aug 1 2022 at 05:58:53 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J wrote: Hi Team, I've updated the package ruby-graphql-client from 0.16.0 to 0.18.0. The package is lintian clean and the updated package is available at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-graphql-client. All

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-graphql 2.10.0

On Mon, Aug 1 2022 at 05:35:14 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J wrote: Hi Team, I've updated the package ruby-grahql from 1.11.10 to 2.10.0. The package is lintian clean and the updated package is available at https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-graphql . While building

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm 1.3.0

On Mon, Aug 1 2022 at 07:29:38 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J wrote: Hi Team, I've updated the package ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm from 1.2.0 to 1.3.0. The package is lintian clean and the updated package is available at

Re: RFS: ruby-ipynbdiff 0.4.7-1

On തി, 2022-07-04 at 00:04 +0200, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote: > Hi, > > I prepared an update of ipynbdiff Ruby gem from 0.4.6 to 0.4.7, as > required for GitLab update to 15.0.4. > The update is ready to be pulled from my fork on Salsa: > https://salsa.debian.org/vv221/ruby-ipynbdiff > > The

Re: Clarification for package naming policy

On ചൊ, ജൂലൈ 12, 2022 at 7:40 വൈകു, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote: Quack, (sorry for the big lag) On 2022-05-27 01:39, Daniel Leidert wrote: What about a Provides: ruby-deckar01-task-list ? It already does that but apt search does not look at this field, so I did not find it. Ideally

Re: Gitlab packaging project funding status changed.

On ചൊ, ജൂൺ 28 2022 at 06:13:32 വൈകു +00:00:00 +00:00:00, Georg Faerber wrote: Hi, On 22-06-28 18:37:27, Pirate Praveen wrote: <https://opencollective.com/debian-gitlab> tells: [...] Gitlab Inc sponsored work on this project for 6+ years until recently. Now we are l

Re: Gitlab packaging project funding status changed.

We have started an Open Collective to ask Free Software community to donate to continue maintaining gitlab and dependencies. Spread the word.

coffeescript 2, rails, sprockets, and execjs

Hi, Recent major update of coffeescript broke rails build and now I'm stuck with https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013218 coffeescript 2 produces ES6 by default but execjs don't support ES6 yet. I tried with newer sprockets, but it seems not enough. In the short term, may

Re: RFS: ruby-rack-proxy 0.7.2-1+nmu1

On വ്യാ, ജൂൺ 16 2022 at 04:48:09 വൈകു +0200 +0200, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote: Hi! I’m willing to help with the packaging of Ruby gems required for packaging GitLab for Debian, so here is my first contribution. thanks for your interest and happy to see the first contribution. I’m

Gitlab packaging project funding status changed.

Hi Ruby team, A bit of disappointing news: Gitlab Inc is stopping their funding for the packaging work. So we will have to find other sources of funding or reduce the scope of the Debian Packaging project (we will have to depend on rubygems.org more and stop updating ruby dependencies) or find

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-omniauth-alicloud

On തി, ജൂൺ 6 2022 at 06:41:28 വൈകു +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Vivek K J wrote: Hi Team, I've packed ruby-omniauth-alicloud which is a dependency of gitlab package. The package is available at mentors repository (https:// salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/mentors/ruby-omniauth-alicloud ).

Re: Proposing to replace ruby-uglifier with ruby-terser and remove ruby-uglifier

On ബു, ജൂൺ 1 2022 at 07:32:00 വൈകു +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Pirate Praveen wrote: Looks like upstreams moved already https://github.com/rails/sprockets/pull/713 https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/main/Gemfile#L33 $ reverse-depends -b ruby-uglifier Reverse-Build-Depends * open-build-service

Re: new restriction in rubygems: installing symlink pointing to parent path not allowed - causes ruby-handlebars-assets to ftbfs

On വ്യാ, ജൂൺ 2 2022 at 08:58:37 വൈകു -03:00:00 -03:00:00, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 06:03:47PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: Em 01/06/2022 15:42, Pirate Praveen escreveu: > On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 08:59:18 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum > wrote: > > During a re

new restriction in rubygems: installing symlink pointing to parent path not allowed - causes ruby-handlebars-assets to ftbfs

On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 08:59:18 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. > > > Relevant part (hopefully): > > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > > mkdir -p vendor/assets/javascripts > > ln -s

Re: Proposing to replace ruby-uglifier with ruby-terser and remove ruby-uglifier

On ബു, ജൂൺ 1 2022 at 07:25:14 വൈകു +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Pirate Praveen wrote: * rails (for ruby-uglifier) I'm uploading a fix. Looks like upstreams moved already https://github.com/rails/sprockets/pull/713 https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/main/Gemfile#L33

Re: Proposing to replace ruby-uglifier with ruby-terser and remove ruby-uglifier

On ബു, ജൂൺ 1 2022 at 06:21:34 വൈകു +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: $ reverse-depends src:ruby-uglifier Reverse-Recommends * nanoc (for ruby-uglifier) This needs update. Reverse-Depends * diaspora (for ruby-uglifier) * gitlab

Proposing to replace ruby-uglifier with ruby-terser and remove ruby-uglifier

We have a long standing rc bug (we have not updated to latest upstream for long) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=981224#10 Also it caused autopkgtest regression for node-source-map update https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/ruby-uglifier/22232351/log.gz

Proposal to remove ruby-rack-mount from the archive

Hi, ruby-rack-mount had last upstream release in 2011 and its only reverse build dependency was ruby-addressable which did not use it anymore (I update the package to remove this build dependency). There is autopkgtest regression with ruby-rack 2.2.3 so if anyone is still interested to keep

Re: Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?

On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 08:09:19 വൈകു +0100 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: Am Sonntag, dem 23.01.2022 um 14:31 -0300 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 03:18:36PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 08:20:38 രാവിലെ +0100 +0100, Cédric Boutillier >

Re: Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?

On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 02:31:29 വൈകു -0300 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 03:18:36PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 08:20:38 രാവിലെ +0100 +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi Praveen, > > Thanks for all the converted packages! &g

Re: Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?

On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 03:18:36 വൈകു +0530 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 08:20:38 രാവിലെ +0100 +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Hi Praveen, Thanks for all the converted packages! So many packages just for gitaly, and I think gitlab will have even more packages

Re: Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?

On ഞാ, ജനു 23 2022 at 08:20:38 രാവിലെ +0100 +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote: Hi Praveen, Thanks for all the converted packages! So many packages just for gitaly, and I think gitlab will have even more packages to convert. So more hands to convert the remaining ones welcome. I will

Re: Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?

On ശ, ജനു 22 2022 at 06:11:08 വൈകു +0530 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: On ശ, ജനു 22 2022 at 04:33:05 വൈകു +0530 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi, I noticed gitaly is failing to build now as bundle install --local is failing to find locally installed gems. It is trying to install some

Re: Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?

On ശ, ജനു 22 2022 at 04:33:05 വൈകു +0530 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi, I noticed gitaly is failing to build now as bundle install --local is failing to find locally installed gems. It is trying to install some gems now which are not using the gem-install layout. Is this expected

Change in bundler behaviour for gems installed in vendor_ruby directory?

Hi, I noticed gitaly is failing to build now as bundle install --local is failing to find locally installed gems. It is trying to install some gems now which are not using the gem-install layout. Is this expected? Then we will have to update all gems using old layout to use the new

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >