Re: PGX64 driver issue - was: Re: Bullseye planned on sparc64?

2021-08-27 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi, Phillip Stevens wrote: > I can only comment on mach64 on 32 bit Sparc, it was working fine. The > desktop was reasonably responsive. Did you try the mach64 driver that was reintroduced to the Debian package archive? Not yet. How are things with it? I think I use it

Re: Bullseye planned on sparc64?

2021-08-27 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> On Aug 25, 2021, at 10:18 PM, James Bond wrote: > > 1). The Intenso CDRs are crap. I burnt a new disc and this one started Grub Yes, good quality CD-Rs are important. > 2). Before retrying to reinstall Debian I had booted into Solaris and thought > rit would be a good moment to give Debia

Re: PGX64 driver issue - was: Re: Bullseye planned on sparc64?

2021-08-27 Thread James Bond
Hi Riccardo, ok, so where could we "hire" a graphics driver developer that would be willing (will get paid) to support the SPARC community? At least with a "decent" X support we can do most of the things. And the more people can use it on SPARC we may attract more people to return to the platfo

Re: Bullseye planned on sparc64?

2021-08-27 Thread James Bond
Hi Adrian, ok, just let me know if you want an XVR-1200 to investigate (if you even have the time to do it) and the required hardware to fit the XVR-1200. Strange thing, yes, I had /boot with a size of 512MB (as I had in the screenshot). https://ibb.co/P9FfdwS Cheers Iggi Am 27.08.21, 19:0

Re: Bullseye planned on sparc64?

2021-08-27 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> On Aug 27, 2021, at 8:03 PM, James Bond wrote: > > Strange thing, yes, I had /boot with a size of 512MB (as I had in the > screenshot). https://ibb.co/P9FfdwS That’s a rather unusual partition layout. I would suggest letting the installer determine the partition layout. Your disk is eith