> One cloud storage provider, Backblaze, regularly publishes reports on
> harddisk reliability (they obviously have a lot of data on that :-)
All of them seem to be 3½" as well.
Interesting.
It actually looks like the 2½" HDD market has been abandoned: 5 years
ago, the largest HDD were 5TB for
All passwords need to be written and secured. First by being part of a
book or being in a specific place in a hard copy file. Second, encrypted
before written down. For anyone to be able to use any of those passwords
even if found they'd have to know the encryption system you used.
On 4/8/21 10:03, Douglas McGarrett wrote:
a Master Password. What is it, and where is it, and should I need it?
go: edit|preferences|privacy& Security
and on my screen 'Passwords' is close to the bottom before you start
scrolling
--
All the best
Keith Bainbridge
On 7/19/21 1:15 AM, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
On 19.07.2021 05:13, w...@mgssub.com wrote:
I installed tbird 78.12.0 (64-bit)
and it can't find my email passwords. I have browsed signons.sqlite
and the passwords seem to be there in the middle of the db. I have
tried to install a prior
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:16:12 +0100
basti wrote:
> As I can see now timedatectl seems *not*
> using the NTP Server provide by DHCP. I have configure a NTP server
> in LAN.
Are you using NetworkManager? Out of the box, it does not pick up the
relevant information from the dhcp client. There are
Yup. That too.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 7:42 PM IL Ka wrote:
>
>> That cpu was normally paired with the Intel 945 chipset that can’t
>> support more than about 3.25GB whether or not it’s 32/64 OS
>>
>
> Yes, and even worse: this CPU doesn't support 64bit OS
>
>> model name : Intel(R) Atom(TM)
>
>
> That cpu was normally paired with the Intel 945 chipset that can’t support
> more than about 3.25GB whether or not it’s 32/64 OS
>
Yes, and even worse: this CPU doesn't support 64bit OS
> model name: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N280 @ 1.66GHz
>> address sizes: 32 bits physical, 32
That cpu was normally paired with the Intel 945 chipset that can’t support
more than about 3.25GB whether or not it’s 32/64 OS
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 7:24 PM wrote:
> Thank Andy! my cpu is 32bit
> i have thought pae can support more than 4G memory
> but in fact it can't use full 4G memory
Thank Andy! my cpu is 32bit
i have thought pae can support more than 4G memorybut in fact it can't use full
4G memory hardware
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 28
model name : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N280 @ 1.66GHz
On Sun 01 Aug 2021 at 21:55:15 (+0200), Kamil Jońca wrote:
> David Christensen writes:
>
> [...]
> >
> > A 500 GB boot partition would be enough for several kernels, etc., on
> > Debian 10 amd64.
>
> OP wrote about 500 _M_ bytes (0.5G), and I can confirm, this is rather
> little, when trying
Any idea where i can look? top doesn't show anything and I dont know
which process i should trace.
Attached the last few lines of /var/log/messages before the freeze.
On 7/31/21 8:53 AM, Sylvain Archenault wrote:
> Hi
>
> Recently, my gnome session has been freezing a bit randomly - but it
>
> Second, the price of spinning disks is such that it makes no
> sense to buy anything smaller than 4TB, which will fit all this,
> and 6-8 TB are often a reasonable idea even for single users.
You seem to assume a 3½" form factor which either requires a "large"
desktop or an external enclosure.
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:11:16PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
[...]
Nice line up.
> I wonder what kind of drives are used nowadays in big datacenters (and
> whether the prices they pay for them looks anything like the ones
> above).
One cloud storage provider, Backblaze, regularly publishes
Stefan Monnier writes:
Peter Ehlert [2021-08-03 08:27:26] wrote:
> On August 3, 2021 8:17:58 AM Stefan Monnier
wrote:
>>> Second, the price of spinning disks is such that it makes no
>>> sense to buy anything smaller than 4TB, which will fit all this,
>>> and 6-8 TB are often a reasonable
On 8/1/21 12:55 PM, Kamil Jońca wrote:
David Christensen writes:
[...]
A 500 GB boot partition would be enough for several kernels, etc., on
Debian 10 amd64.
OP wrote about 500 _M_ bytes (0.5G),
Please see:
> On 8/1/21 3:29 PM, David Christensen wrote:
>> I see a typo in my post --
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> That makes 3½" form factor even more dead than I thought (two 4TB 2½"
> drives should offer better performance than one 8GB 3½" drive and use
> less space, not sure about power consumption).
Erm. You just doubled your failure rate. There are times when
that's
Peter Ehlert [2021-08-03 08:27:26] wrote:
> On August 3, 2021 8:17:58 AM Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> Second, the price of spinning disks is such that it makes no
>>> sense to buy anything smaller than 4TB, which will fit all this,
>>> and 6-8 TB are often a reasonable idea even for single users.
>>
Hi,
On 2021-08-03 12:55 p.m., Gunnar Gervin wrote:
> I read a bit of my "questions" put before. WOW, what a MESS!!?!! Is it
> possible to understand 5%?
> Hardly. Sorry & trying to improve
> Gunnar
>
I've been explaining you this from the beginning and it didn't change much.
Maybe saving your
David Christensen writes:
[...]
>
> A 500 GB boot partition would be enough for several kernels, etc., on
> Debian 10 amd64.
OP wrote about 500 _M_ bytes (0.5G), and I can confirm, this is rather
little, when trying updating kernels.
KJ
--
http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html
I read a bit of my "questions" put before. WOW, what a MESS!!?!! Is it
possible to understand 5%?
Hardly. Sorry & trying to improve
Gunnar
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, 07:53 Gunnar Gervin, wrote:
> Hi beautiful ideals!
> Decided to install Virtual Machine & Docker in this 14 year old ex-Macbook.
> In
Dan,
thx for the best laugh of... me.
Bullseye! I'll try my very best.
Gunnar
PS.
The machine seems to recover.
DS.
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021, 15:58 Dan Ritter, wrote:
> Gunnar Gervin wrote:
> > I meant
> > "& run it all;
> > VM, Docker containers, websites in/via a 24/7 Cloud service storage &
> >
For me, testing distros in an old Mac is way more than enough; I'll burn
ISO Images; netinstalls.
I agree that it's better to learn fewer things thorough than many quite
shallow, good advice
Gunnar
.
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021, 18:18 Stefan Monnier, wrote:
> > Second, the price of spinning disks is
>
> inxi shows that only 3 GB are available as the TOTAL, although it finds
> the 4 GB to be physically installed:
> $ sudo inxi -m -x
> Memory:RAM: total: 2.88 GiB used: 2.11 GiB (73.2%)
> Array-1: capacity: 4 GiB slots: 2 EC: None max module size: 2 GiB note:
> est.
> Device-1: M1 size: 2
The Subject of my preceding message was a blunder.
System board and PCI sound hardware
From: pe...@easthope.ca
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:20:16 -0700
> Got sound from the Intel device on the system board. Oddly enough
> there was a plastic cover over the sockets on the chassis back.
On 03.08.21 00:42, IL Ka wrote:
i have 2 memory slots
memtest86+ shows each has 2G, but total is 3G
after booting linux, top shows total is 3G
why 1 G is missing? Thanks!
You probably have 32bit OS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_GB_barrier
On August 3, 2021 8:17:58 AM Stefan Monnier wrote:
Second, the price of spinning disks is such that it makes no
sense to buy anything smaller than 4TB, which will fit all this,
and 6-8 TB are often a reasonable idea even for single users.
You seem to assume a 3½" form factor which either
Hi,
On 2021-08-03 8:18 a.m., Gunnar Gervin wrote:
> Dan,
> 40-50% of my ssd, is that correct
> For i386 or amd64? If I take both
> I'll still have 149gb. Interesting. I can do it, because the original
> need of the ssd evaporated. Thus it's possible to try both into the old
> mac(hine). But in
Gunnar Gervin wrote:
> Dan,
> 40-50% of my ssd, is that correct
> For i386 or amd64? If I take both
> I'll still have 149gb. Interesting. I can do it, because the original need
> of the ssd evaporated. Thus it's possible to try both into the old
> mac(hine). But in that list you linked to, are a
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 07:14:32AM +0800, loushanguan2...@sina.com wrote:
> Linux debian 4.9.0-13-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.9.228-1 (2020-07-05) i686
> GNU/Linux
So you are running 32-bit kernel. Will the hardware do 64-bit? What
does
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
say?
You may be able to install
Guys and girls:
Thx a lot for crash course/s!
I have to let it go a bit; pretty extreme learning portions here.
My head gets all wired up. But I have to go this track; for me it's all in
the terminal; it's more accurate, always works,& faster.
And I remember it way better.
Geg
On Mon, 2 Aug
Nicolas.
Will it work if I su into Root ?
BR, geg.
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021, 22:52 Nicolas George, wrote:
> Greg Wooledge (12021-08-02):
> > No, that won't work.
> >
> > https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls#pf53
> >
> > If you want to use redirections with sudo, you either need to wrap
> > things
Dan,
40-50% of my ssd, is that correct
For i386 or amd64? If I take both
I'll still have 149gb. Interesting. I can do it, because the original need
of the ssd evaporated. Thus it's possible to try both into the old
mac(hine). But in that list you linked to, are a lot more than those two
ISO
Andy,
THX A LOT! To the point;
Booting in 32b, running 64.
Seen a lot i686, &/or 64b software in it that confused me.
Now I may have a solution.
If this old (definitely a Mac 2,1):
Ever revives from this malstrom.
It matters a bit, cos my macbook Pro won't come back in week/s.
I have a Debian
Aug 3, 2021, 10:56 by s...@svenhartge.de:
> So in the end, we have 2812MB + 4846MB = 7658MB (approx) usable for the
> system as a whole. The Kernel and it data structures also take some of
> this, so to have ~7400MB as usable memory is not unreasonable.
>
Thanks for the explanation.
local10 wrote:
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x-0x0009c7ff] usable
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0009f800-0x0009] reserved
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000f-0x000f] reserved
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0010-0xafde] usable
> BIOS-e820:
Aug 3, 2021, 10:05 by s...@svenhartge.de:
> The PCI memory area is probably to blame here. Also the kernel needs
> some memory for itself.
>
> Please reboot your system and then, as root do:
>
> dmesg | grep "e820"
>
> and post the output. That will tell us the memory map of your system and
>
local10 wrote:
> The "why 1G memory is missing?" thread got me thinking. My PC also
> seems to be missing hundreds MB of RAM and that's how it's been for
> years. I have 4*2GB RAM boards so, in theory, I should've had 8GB of
> RAM but top shows only 7472.2MiB. Even after the MiB to MB conversion
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 02:03, David wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 01:45, David Wright wrote:
> As the warning says, it and /usr/bin/cryptroot-unlock will go away
> if you uninstall 'cryptsetup-initramfs', which is pulled in by 'cryptsetup',
> which describes itself as a transitional dummy
Hi,
The "why 1G memory is missing?" thread got me thinking. My PC also seems to be
missing hundreds MB of RAM and that's how it's been for years. I have 4*2GB RAM
boards so, in theory, I should've had 8GB of RAM but top shows only 7472.2MiB.
Even after the MiB to MB conversion there's still
Hola Narcís,
On 3/8/21 10:44, Narcis Garcia wrote:
Bones, no sé si en aquest grup hi ha algú de Caliu.cat , doncs és per
avisar que el servidor on tenen allotjat el web no respon en aquest moment.
Salut.
Avui i demà el servidor estarà fora de servei per manteniment de les
estacions
Bones, no sé si en aquest grup hi ha algú de Caliu.cat , doncs és per
avisar que el servidor on tenen allotjat el web no respon en aquest moment.
Salut.
--
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this mail public archive. Public archive
Sorry, Stefan. This was supposed to go to the list.
On 8/2/21 11:02 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
On 8/1/21 9:33 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
So really think hard before splitting off a filesystem outside of
volume management. I believe it is more likely to cause problems
than it is to avoid
42 matches
Mail list logo