On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 09:36:56PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 08:33:37PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > no place in the ntpsec docs, nor the chrony docs
> > does it show the ability to slam the current time into the SW clock on these
> > arm systems at bootup's first
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 08:06:15PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Look at the chronyd settime command and the chrony.conf makestep
> directive. These are intended for your situation.
This from man(8) ntpd:
-g, --panicgate
Allow the first adjustment to be Big. This option may appear an
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 08:33:37PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> no place in the ntpsec docs, nor the chrony docs
> does it show the ability to slam the current time into the SW clock on these
> arm systems at bootup's first access time.
Traditionally, this was done by the ntpdate command, which
Look at the chronyd settime command and the chrony.conf makestep
directive. These are intended for your situation.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 3/6/24 18:02, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 05:56:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
On 3/6/24 12:42, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 12:31:46PM -0500, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
sudo timedatectl set-ntp true
But *don't* do that if you're using some other
Le 06/03/2024 à 17:55, ajh-valmer a écrit :
On Wednesday 06 March 2024 12:50:06 Sébastien NOBILI wrote:
je constate que la version 115.8.0-esr Firefox,
marche mal, elle ne sait pas envoyer des formulaires,
ni faire apparaître des images, se bloque à un moment (ça mouline),
il faut le stopper
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 05:56:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 3/6/24 12:42, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 12:31:46PM -0500, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> > > sudo timedatectl set-ntp true
> >
> > But *don't* do that if you're using some other NTP program instead of
>
On 3/6/24 12:42, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 12:31:46PM -0500, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
Mine shows:
Local time: Wed 2024-03-06 12:09:44 EST
Universal time: Wed 2024-03-06 17:09:44 UTC
RTC time: Wed 2024-03-06 17:20:53
Time zone: America/New_York
On 3/6/24 13:37, Teemu Likonen wrote:
It seems that you have solved the problem but here is another hint.
"timedatectl" is a good high-level tool for querying and adjusting time
settings. Without command-line arguments it prints a lot of useful info:
$ timedatectl
Hola,
> 2024-03-04 08:20:28
> URL:http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/z/zlib/zlib1g_1.3.dfsg-3.1_amd64.deb
> [87580/87580] ->
> "/srv/chroot/sid//var/cache/apt/archives/partial/zlib1g_1%3a1.3.dfsg-3.1_amd64.deb"
> [1]
> tar: ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuuid.so.1.3.0: Cannot open: File
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to download some live DVD images using rTorrent,
$ apt show rtorrent
all works fine with Debian's images, I've successfully downloaded:
- debian-12.5.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
- debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-kde.iso
using their torrent files respectively. I've trouble with KDE
On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 18:39:17 +
ghe2001 wrote:
> Worst of all, I haven't been able to find out how to delete them :-)
To delete them, press and hold the message. A menu will pop up. Hit
More…. Hit the trash can in the lower left.
If you have a mac, you may be able to delete from it.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Vast apologies for mis-posting to the list. Please try to forget you ever saw
that :-)
--
Glenn English
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: ProtonMail
wsBzBAEBCAAnBYJl6MW4CZCf14YxgqyMMhYhBCyicw9CUnAlY0ANl5/XhjGC
On Wed 06 Mar 2024 at 07:07:36 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 07:37:09AM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> > It seems that you have solved the problem but here is another hint.
> > "timedatectl" is a good high-level tool for querying and adjusting time
> > settings. Without
On 06/03/2024 08:09, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
the repositories listed on https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive have
been signed using expired keys. Unfortunately this page doesn't deal
with this problem.
Do you think this could be improved?
No, I wouldn't have said so. The packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm getting a lot of txt lately on my iPhone. I suspect the spam from Niki
Haley will drop off now, but there's a lot of stuff that I think might be from
some of you guys. This morning there was talk from area code 713 talking about
something
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:08 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 07:37:09AM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> > It seems that you have solved the problem but here is another hint.
> > "timedatectl" is a good high-level tool for querying and adjusting time
> > settings. Without
Le 06/03/2024 à 18:19, ke6jti a écrit :
Hi,
I have a possible kernel regression for a usb-dvb tuner card. I know
the error in dmesg points to kernel : au0828 but I am not sure what
package this belongs to. I think it belongs to v4l(video for linux)
but I am still not sure what specific v4l
Hi,
I have a possible kernel regression for a usb-dvb tuner card. I know
the error in dmesg points to kernel : au0828 but I am not sure what
package this belongs to. I think it belongs to v4l(video for linux) but
I am still not sure what specific v4l package.
Thanks for you help.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:13 PM Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 06 March 2024 12:37:09 am Teemu Likonen wrote:
> > * 2024-03-06 02:47:06+0800, hlyg wrote:
> >
> > > my newly-installed deb11 for amd64 shows wrong time, it lags behind
> > > correct time by 8 hours though difference
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 12:31:46PM -0500, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> Mine shows:
>
> Local time: Wed 2024-03-06 12:09:44 EST
> Universal time: Wed 2024-03-06 17:09:44 UTC
> RTC time: Wed 2024-03-06 17:20:53
>Time zone: America/New_York (EST, -0500)
> Network time on:
* 2024-03-06 12:31:46-0500, Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> Local time: Wed 2024-03-06 12:09:44 EST
> Universal time: Wed 2024-03-06 17:09:44 UTC
> RTC time: Wed 2024-03-06 17:20:53
>Time zone: America/New_York (EST, -0500)
> Network time on: yes
> NTP synchronized: no
>
Hans wrote:
> HI Brad,
>
> I do not believe, it is a training problem. Why? Well, your formerly
> mail was marked as spam. So I marked it as ham. Now, your second mail
> again is marked as spam.
>
> We know, there is nothing unusual with your mail, but it is again
> marked as spam. Even, when
On Wednesday 06 March 2024 12:37:09 am Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * 2024-03-06 02:47:06+0800, hlyg wrote:
>
> > my newly-installed deb11 for amd64 shows wrong time, it lags behind
> > correct time by 8 hours though difference between universal and local
> > is ok.
>
> It seems that you have solved
On Wednesday 06 March 2024 12:50:06 Sébastien NOBILI wrote:
> > je constate que la version 115.8.0-esr Firefox,
> > marche mal, elle ne sait pas envoyer des formulaires,
> > ni faire apparaître des images, se bloque à un moment (ça mouline),
> > il faut le stopper et le ré-ouvrir...
> > Alors que
Shaheena Kazi wrote:
> Package: nslcd
>
> I have upgraded from Debian 11 to Debian 12.
>
> The problem is that I keep getting the below errors in the syslog...
> 893:2024-02-29T16:30:13.055665+00:00 hostname-shaheena nslcd[7712]:
> [d062c2] ldap_start_tls_s() failed (uri=ldap://
>
Package: nslcd
I have upgraded from Debian 11 to Debian 12.
The problem is that I keep getting the below errors in the syslog...
893:2024-02-29T16:30:13.055665+00:00 hostname-shaheena nslcd[7712]:
[d062c2] ldap_start_tls_s() failed (uri=ldap://
127.0.0.1:389/): Can't contact LDAP server:
On 03/06/2024 09:09 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 08:21:11AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
Not Found
The requested URL was not found on this server.
Apache/2.4.57 (Debian) Server at abnormal.att.net Port 80
I've installed WebMO a number of times and have not
On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 15:36:25 +0100
Hans wrote:
Hello Hans,
>I do not believe, it is a training problem. Why? Well, your formerly
>mail was marked as spam. So I marked it as ham. Now, your second mail
>again is marked as spam.
Spam/ham training is not, IME, a single shot affair. However, as
HI Brad,
I do not believe, it is a training problem. Why? Well, your formerly mail was
marked as spam. So I marked it as ham. Now, your second mail again is marked
as spam.
We know, there is nothing unusual with your mail, but it is again marked as
spam. Even, when I explicity marked your
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 08:21:11AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> Not Found
>
> The requested URL was not found on this server.
> Apache/2.4.57 (Debian) Server at abnormal.att.net Port 80
>
> I've installed WebMO a number of times and have not encountered this
> particular problem before.
On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 13:53:49 +0100
Hans wrote:
Hello Hans,
>It should be well trained
Spam training is an ongoing process
>But until then suddenly the false positives increased from one day to
>another, although I had changed nothing.
because the spam changes. What's coming now is
Merci à tous pour vos réponses.
Cela m'a amené à faire d'autres tests et le problème ne se produit que
sur un document particulier. Sans doute un pb de formatage de ce
document qui fait planter le plugin?
Désolé pour le bruit pour un pb somme toute mineur.
Le 06/03/2024 à 13:02, Bureau LxVx a
Hans (12024-03-06):
> I am using this spamfilter now for several years. It should be well trained
> and
> almost until about 4 months I never had any problems with it.
Hi.
It is probably not the reason for you problem now, but it is important
to note that in the “several years” since your spam
Am 06.03.2024 schrieb "Stephen P. Molnar" :
> The requested URL was not found on this server.
> Apache/2.4.57 (Debian) Server at abnormal.att.net Port 80
Check the apache config.
What is the Webroot?
Is the file you are looking for available in the webroot?
Hi,
Hans wrote:
> Re: *SPAM* Re: Spam from the list?
> In-Reply-To: <20240306112253.55e25...@earth.stargate.org.uk>
referring the mail
> > Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:22:53 +
> > From: Brad Rogers
> > Message-ID: <20240306112253.55e25...@earth.stargate.org.uk>
I assume that this mail
I am running a new installation of Bookworm and have encountered a 404
Not Found error problem with WebMO (https://www.webmo.net):
Not Found
The requested URL was not found on this server.
Apache/2.4.57 (Debian) Server at abnormal.att.net Port 80
I've installed WebMO a number of times and
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 01:53:49PM +0100, Hans wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> I am using this spamfilter now for several years. It should be well trained
> and
> almost until about 4 months I never had any problems with it.
>
> But until then suddenly the false positives increased from one day to
>
Hi Brad,
I am using this spamfilter now for several years. It should be well trained and
almost until about 4 months I never had any problems with it.
But until then suddenly the false positives increased from one day to another,
although I had changed nothing.
And weired: It happened only
Hans wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > you perhaps subscribed to one of the "Resent-*" lists ?
> >
> Not as far as I know.
>
> > > Subject: *SPAM* Bug#1065537: ITP: bleak-retry-connector --
> > > Connector for Bleak Clients that handles transient connection
> > > failures
> >
> > The mark
On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 11:19:27 +0100
Hans wrote:
Hello Hans,
>Does one see any reason, why this is considered as spam???
Further to what Thomas says; You haven't told your spam filtering that
it's ham. If you don't train your spam filters, it's never going to get
any better at detecting what
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 07:37:09AM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> It seems that you have solved the problem but here is another hint.
> "timedatectl" is a good high-level tool for querying and adjusting time
> settings. Without command-line arguments it prints a lot of useful info:
>
> $
No problème de mon côté non plus :-D
Le 06/03/2024 à 12:50, Sébastien NOBILI a écrit :
Bonjour,
Le 2024-03-06 12:38, ajh-valmer a écrit :
Désolé, je ne réponds pas au problème,
mais je constate que la version 115.8.0-esr Firefox,
marche mal, elle ne sait pas envoyer des formulaires,
ni faire
Hi,
Hans wrote:
> I changed nothing and suddenly many mails from debian-user
> (but not all, only some) are recognized as spam.
But the one you posted here did not come from debian-user.
So maybe what changed is an inadverted subscription to one of
debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Bonjour,
Le 2024-03-06 12:38, ajh-valmer a écrit :
Désolé, je ne réponds pas au problème,
mais je constate que la version 115.8.0-esr Firefox,
marche mal, elle ne sait pas envoyer des formulaires,
ni faire apparaître des images, se bloque à un moment (ça mouline),
il faut le stopper et le
Am Mittwoch, 6. März 2024, 12:10:57 CET schrieb Dan Ritter:
> >
> > X-Spam-Flag: YES
> >
> > X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
>
> What sets these two headers?
>
I do not know. So I asked on this list.
What I believe is, that the X-Spam-Flag: YES is set somehow on the way and as
spamassin is looking at
On Tuesday 05 March 2024 16:50:44 Thierry wrote:
> depuis la mise à jour dans la version 115.8.0esr (testing), je reçois le
> message suivant à l'ouverture d'un PDF:
> "Votre navigateur ne comprend pas de plugin de lecture de PDF"
> Quelqu'un a t'il rencontré ce problème? (pas très gênant par
Hi Thomas,
> you perhaps subscribed to one of the "Resent-*" lists ?
>
Not as far as I know.
> > Subject: *SPAM* Bug#1065537: ITP: bleak-retry-connector --
> > Connector for Bleak Clients that handles transient connection failures
>
> The mark "*SPAM*" does not appear in the
Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> during the last moonths I get more mails from the debian-user list marked as
> spam than before. Something must have changed.
>
> I examined the header of the mails, but did not see any unusual.
>
> Below I send the header of an example of such a mail, maybe you
Hi,
Hans wrote:
> during the last moonths I get more mails from the debian-user list marked as
> spam than before.
> [...]
> Below I send the header of an example of such a mail, maybe you can see the
> reason?
The message does not look like it came to you via debian-user:
> X-Original-To:
Bonjour
puisqu'il suffit de télécharger le PDF pour le lire
En effet en paramétrant Ffx pour l'ouverture des fichiers :
Rubrique "Général" >>> "Applications" (bas de page).
:-D
@pluX ;-)
Le 05/03/2024 à 16:50, Thierry a écrit :
Bonjour,
depuis la mise à jour dans la version 115.8.0esr
Hi folks,
during the last moonths I get more mails from the debian-user list marked as
spam than before. Something must have changed.
I examined the header of the mails, but did not see any unusual.
Below I send the header of an example of such a mail, maybe you can see the
reason?
On my
Shaheena Kazi wrote:
> Package: ntpsec
>
> Hello, we were using Bullseye and have upgraded to Bookworm.
> With Bookworm, we have ntpsec.
> The package is installed successfully and the service looks good.
> But the syslog is filled with below messages:
>
>
Package: ntpsec
Hello, we were using Bullseye and have upgraded to Bookworm.
With Bookworm, we have ntpsec.
The package is installed successfully and the service looks good.
But the syslog is filled with below messages:
2024-03-06T14:58:11.724851+05:30 hostname-shaheena
Le 05/03/2024 à 16:50, Thierry a écrit :
Bonjour,
depuis la mise à jour dans la version 115.8.0esr (testing), je reçois le
message suivant à l'ouverture d'un PDF:
"Votre navigateur ne comprend pas de plugin de lecture de PDF"
Bonjour,
Aucun problème de mon côté (même version)
--
François
Hi folks,
the repositories listed on https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive have
been signed using expired keys. Unfortunately this page doesn't deal
with this problem.
Do you think this could be improved?
Regards
Harri
56 matches
Mail list logo
