On Fri 07 Jun 2024 at 22:34:58 (+0300), Jan Krapivin wrote:
> пт, 7 июн. 2024 г. в 22:04, David Wright :
> > On Fri 07 Jun 2024 at 20:06:27 (+0300), Jan Krapivin wrote:
> > > Yes, you are right, maybe. Though Debian is probably a rare (if not the
> > > only) distro that still uses Gnome 43.9,
On 06/06/2024 17:41, Jan Krapivin wrote:
Recently i have found out
that i am unable to install new extensions with browser plugin "GNOME Shell
integration". I have tried different browsers: Firefox stable
If snap or flatpak sanboxing is involved then the following may be releva
On gnome you can just run
$ *gnome-shell --version*
пт, 7 июн. 2024 г. в 22:04, David Wright :
> On Fri 07 Jun 2024 at 20:06:27 (+0300), Jan Krapivin wrote:
> > Yes, you are right, maybe. Though Debian is probably a rare (if not the
> > only) distro that still uses Gnome 43.9, which is, as i
On Fri 07 Jun 2024 at 20:06:27 (+0300), Jan Krapivin wrote:
> Yes, you are right, maybe. Though Debian is probably a rare (if not the
> only) distro that still uses Gnome 43.9, which is, as i use Debian, my
> case. And (maybe) a problem?
I searched for gnome in https://packages.debian.org/index
install Gnome extensions with it. They are also not
> > Debian packages.
> >
> > https://extensions.gnome.org/about/
>
> So maybe a Gnome forum or list or one about the specific plugin or even
> one about the browser is a better place to look for help than a debian
> mailing list?
>
>
rationForChrome
>
> I am trying to install Gnome extensions with it. They are also not
> Debian packages.
>
> https://extensions.gnome.org/about/
So maybe a Gnome forum or list or one about the specific plugin or even
one about the browser is a better place to look for help than a debian
mailing list?
extensions with it. They are also not Debian
packages.
https://extensions.gnome.org/about/
The problem can be reproduced only if you use Gnome.
For this you must install a special Gnome *BROWSER* plugin and try to
install any Gnome extension.
It is not a big deal, as I am still able to install
a "GNOME Shell integration" package ?
You said, "i am unable to install new extensions with browser plugin
"GNOME Shell integration"".
Could you please explain the steps to reproduce your problem,
including installation of the browser plugin package, how in the web
Guys, can you please spend 30 seconds and check if it is a universal
problem..?
чт, 6 июн. 2024 г. в 13:41, Jan Krapivin :
> I have a problem with a Gnome browser plugin. I have even created an issue
> report (see below).
>
> Unfortunately I don't know if I am the only one with
I have a problem with a Gnome browser plugin. I have even created an issue
report (see below).
Unfortunately I don't know if I am the only one with this problem.
If you use Debian 12 stable with Gnome, please let me know about your
experience.
"Hello! I use Debian 12 stable with Gnome
; > Richmond writes:
> >
> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to
> a
> >> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems;
> stuttering,
> >> sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lowe
Lee writes:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 3:30 PM Richmond wrote:
>>
>> Richmond writes:
>>
>> > Richmond writes:
>> >
>> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
>> >> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get pla
On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 3:30 PM Richmond wrote:
>
> Richmond writes:
>
> > Richmond writes:
> >
> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
> >> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
> >> so
Have you tried a LIVE-version of another Linux distribution? It will be
interesting to compare.
вс, 7 апр. 2024 г. в 22:30, Richmond :
> Richmond writes:
>
> > Richmond writes:
> >
> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
> >> b
Richmond writes:
> Richmond writes:
>
>> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
>> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
>> sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lower). These things can
>>
Richmond writes:
> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
> sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lower). These things can
> clear up after a minute or two, or be reduced.
>
When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lower). These things can
clear up after a minute or two, or be reduced.
When playing from nvlc however I get
On 8/4/23 19:26, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 03 Aug 2023 at 15:56:07 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
On 8/2/23 19:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
entry?
On Thu 03 Aug 2023 at 15:56:07 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
> On 8/2/23 19:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> > > Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
> > > entry?
> >
> >
On 8/2/23 19:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
entry?
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.en.html#_the_hostname_resolution
I'm sure there
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:48:30 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/2/23 13:21, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:07:13PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > > > > *
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:05:11PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
[...]
> show mea link to the doc that explains that please
> Cheers, Gene Heskett.
There's not "the doc", but many of them. For starters, rfc5735 [1]
tells us that the whole subnet 127.0.0.0/8 is available for
loopback purposes (I've
On Thu 03 Aug 2023 at 07:48:54 (+0800), jeremy ardley wrote:
> On 3/8/23 07:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > > On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
> > > > > Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
> > > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
> entry?
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.en.html#_the_hostname_resolution
I'm sure there are others, but this was the first one
On 8/2/23 16:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
True, but I've never seen a description of what that does or what its
for.
On 8/2/23 16:26, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
On 8/2/23 17:02, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
version
On 8/2/23 17:02, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
version
On 3/8/23 07:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
True, but I've never seen a description of what that does or what its
for.
> On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
> > > Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
> > >
> > True, but I've never seen a description of what that does or what its
> > for.
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
> > > > No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
> > > > version that suits
On 8/2/23 15:17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:14:41PM +0100, Brian wrote:
Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
Either deleted, or not provided by Armbian in the first place. In any
case, it's not immediately relevant to this thread's issue, so
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
version that suits you.
ok, same cat in full:
gene@bpi52:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
On 8/2/23, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
>
>> On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
>> > No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a
>> > censored
>> > version that suits you.
>> >
>> ok, same cat in full:
>> gene@bpi52:~$ cat /etc/hosts
>>
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:14:41PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
Either deleted, or not provided by Armbian in the first place. In any
case, it's not immediately relevant to this thread's issue, so long as
the web service doesn't redirect to
Gene,
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 02:05:48PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> this is a blatent attack by chrome
You've absolutely no evidence to suggest that, and other people
have already pointed out they are unable to replicate your issues.
Like almost every thread you start or derail here this is
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 13:07:13 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
* "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
[...]
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to
On 8/2/23 13:21, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:07:13PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
* "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
[...]
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for
On 8/2/23 09:42, Stefan Monnier wrote:
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce the
problem. Failing that, it'll be up to Gene to debug the situation on
his end. I'm still leaning toward an edited /etc/hosts file.
My guess is that his Chrome runs in a kind of container
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:07:13PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > > * "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
> > >
> [...]
> >
> > It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce
On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
* "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
[...]
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce the
problem. Failing that, it'll be up to Gene to debug the situation on
his end.
> It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce the
> problem. Failing that, it'll be up to Gene to debug the situation on
> his end. I'm still leaning toward an edited /etc/hosts file.
My guess is that his Chrome runs in a kind of container that doesn't
have access to the
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> * "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
>
> In the case of the latter, are you wanting to use the localhost scheme to
> access the resource called 80 (now, you're going to say "There is no
> protocol called localhost" and I think that
On 01/08/2023 10:33, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
klipper..
I think this comes down
On Tuesday 01 August 2023 05:33:55 am gene heskett wrote:
> Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
> to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
> cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
> klipp
On 1/8/23 20:54, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/1/23 06:26, Bret Busby wrote:
On 1/8/23 17:33, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a
browser to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so
localhost:80 cannot be used for troubleshooting
On 8/1/23 06:26, Bret Busby wrote:
On 1/8/23 17:33, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
klipper
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 08:13:50AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/1/23 06:16, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 05:33 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Maybe direct this to the appropriate arena. Debians default browser is
> > Fire
On 8/1/23 06:16, Phil Wyett wrote:
On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 05:33 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a
browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:33:55AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser to
> run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80 cannot be
> used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with klipper..
&g
On 1/8/23 17:33, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
klipper..
FF has no such problems.
Cheers
On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 05:33 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a
> browser
> to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
> cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
> klippe
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
klipper..
FF has no such problems.
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four
30 mars 2023, 23:56 de debianl...@potentially-spam.de-bruyn.de:
I was successful at downloading the video with:
yt-dlp --verbose -k --ignore-config -c
Am 31.03.2023 um 00:28 schrieb l0f...@tuta.io:
> How do you get that URL? Via your browser resource/code inspector?
Hi, i had been asking not having to answer that question, because i
myself do not really understand, how it works.
I stumbled across an explanation while skimming through o
option/switch.
How do you get that URL? Via your browser resource/code inspector?
l0f4r0
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 23:28:23 +0200 (CEST)
l0f...@tuta.io wrote:
Hello l0f...@tuta.io,
>Interesting theory but I can play that specific video in my browser
>without being logged in ;)
Weird; I had to log in first. No idea why your experience differs.
Still, as this doesn't forward th
Am 30.03.2023 um 20:20 schrieb Bret Busby:
> On 31/3/23 02:08, David Wright wrote:
>> On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
>>> On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> I had previously been able to use
pect, it's because to access video on that FamilySearch
> page, one is required to be logged in. IDK whether yt-dlp can handle
> that.
>
Interesting theory but I can play that specific video in my browser without
being logged in ;)
l0f4r0
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:55:05 +0200 (CEST)
l0f...@tuta.io wrote:
Hello l0f...@tuta.io,
>In your case, yt-dlp falls back on its generic extractor (documentation
>says "Generic downloader that works on some sites") but it doesn't work
>for familysearch.org visibly...
Largely, I suspect, it's
Hello,
30 mars 2023, 20:46 de b...@busby.net:
> Fri Mar 31 02:18:31 bret@bret-Precision-Tower-5810:~$yt-dlp
> https://www.familysearch.org/rootstech/session/expanding-your-family-tree-with-sideview-and-more-innovations-from-ancestrydna?lang=eng
> [generic]
>
On 31/3/23 02:08, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
youtube, but, it no longer
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:08:19PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
[...]
> Writing "did not work" just doesn't cut it on this list:
> we need some specifics. Here's an example I ran this
> morning on a reference given by David Christensen:
On Fri 31 Mar 2023 at 01:41:04 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> >
> > > I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
> > > youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
> >
On 31/3/23 00:40, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
AIUI youtube-dl is now obsolete, and its new spelling is yt-dlp.
You can
On Thu 30 Mar 2023 at 19:31:21 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote:
> I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
> youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
AIUI youtube-dl is now obsolete, and its new spelling is yt-dlp.
You can download it from bullseye-backports. If
On 2023-03-30, Bret Busby wrote:
>
> I had previously been able to use youtube-dl, to download videos from
> youtube, but, it no longer works with youtube.
>
If you're not using the latest version, this is it:
https://youtube-dl.org/downloads/latest/youtube-dl-2021.12.17.tar.gz
I used this
On 30/3/23 19:11, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, March 26, 2023 04:21:00 PM Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
One last thought is I read somewhere that ISPs, especially smaller
ones, have been caught throttling users based on type of usage even
though the same ISPs label their services as
On Sunday, March 26, 2023 04:21:00 PM Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> One last thought is I read somewhere that ISPs, especially smaller
> ones, have been caught throttling users based on type of usage even
> though the same ISPs label their services as unlimited. Conspiracy
> theories tossed aside,
On 3/26/23, Juan R.D. Silva wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Debian Bullseye here up to date. Browsers installed: Firefox, Opera,
> Vivaldi, and Google Chrome.
>
> I'm having a weird problem streaming movies from archive.org. The movies
> are lagging & keep buffering in all browsers but Google Chrome.
Hi folks,
Debian Bullseye here up to date. Browsers installed: Firefox, Opera,
Vivaldi, and Google Chrome.
I'm having a weird problem streaming movies from archive.org. The movies
are lagging & keep buffering in all browsers but Google Chrome. Google
Chrome streams same movies at the same
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 11:09:39PM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> I am trying to install the "brave browser" based on their own instructions:
>
> https://brave.com/linux/
> ~
> sudo apt install curl
> sudo curl -fsSLo /usr/share/keyrings/brave-browser-archive
I am trying to install the "brave browser" based on their own instructions:
https://brave.com/linux/
~
sudo apt install curl
sudo curl -fsSLo /usr/share/keyrings/brave-browser-archive-keyring.gpg
https://brave-browser-apt-release.s3.brave.com/brave-browser-archive-keyring.gpg
echo &q
在 2022年10月4日星期二 UTC+8 13:00:06，MaxNikulin写道：
x-scheme-handler/http=google-chrome.desktop;
x-scheme-handler/https=google-chrome.desktop;
Do not forget to run update-desktop-database with a proper directory as
its argument.
Thanks! Changing the x-scheme-handler to google-chrome.desktop works for
Tianyu Chen writes:
>
> I'm using Google Chrome (/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome) as my default
> browser, which is set by `update-alternatives` command. However my
> firefox-esr is always launching when links are opened in Telegram and
> Mozilla Thunderbird.
>
> I'd lik
On 04/10/2022 11:07, Tianyu Chen wrote:
I'm using Google Chrome (/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome) as my default
browser, which is set by `update-alternatives` command. However my
firefox-esr is always launching when links are opened in Telegram and
Mozilla Thunderbird.
Almost certainly
Hi all,
I'm using Google Chrome (/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome) as my default
browser, which is set by `update-alternatives` command. However my
firefox-esr is always launching when links are opened in Telegram and
Mozilla Thunderbird.
I'd like to know why firefox-esr is launching
> Hardly an issue. Just do:
> $ apt -s install dbus-x11
> NOTE: This is only a simulation!
> apt needs root privileges for real execution.
> Keep also in mind that locking is deactivated,
> so don't depend on the relevance to the real current situation!
> Reading package
On Thu 29 Sep 2022 at 12:42:30 (+), jindam, vani wrote:
> > unicorn:~$ apt install sl
> > E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend - open (13:
> > Permission denied)
> > E: Unable to acquire the dpkg frontend lock (/var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend),
> > are you root?
> so, debian
seek help from a dedicated WPCleaner support community. People who
> > actually know and use the application might be able to answer questions
> > about it, like "how do you configure which web browser it launches
> > when you press the XYZ button on the ABC page".
>
> unicorn:~$ apt install sl
> E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend - open (13:
> Permission denied)
> E: Unable to acquire the dpkg frontend lock (/var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend),
> are you root?
so, debian on device **warns** & **refuses**
to download package.
without thinking
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 08:02:54AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2022-09-29 at 07:49, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> > There are hints in this thtread as to where to configure your
> > default browser. Update-alternatives is probably your friend here. If
> > al
On 2022-09-29 at 07:49, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> There are hints in this thtread as to where to configure your
> default browser. Update-alternatives is probably your friend here. If
> all of this is just to run the Wikipedia cleaner application, then
> you may well want a GUI br
l continue to guess wildly.
Reference to palemoon suggests to me this isn't stock Debian since stock
Debian would include Firefox as default browser.
There are hints in this thtread as to where to configure your default
browser. Update-alternatives is probably your friend here. If all of this
is
> > That puts quite a new complexion on the thread here called
> > "how disable apt downloads w/o sudo".
> > It might be worth being a bit more revealing about the
> > system that you're running so that you don't waste other
> > people's time, and your own, with red herrings.
>
> as normal user
On 2022-09-29 at 07:22, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 04:47:37AM +, jindam, vani wrote:
>
>> as normal user i expected apt to show **some kind** of warning
>> without providing root password installation of package will fail.
>
> unicorn:~$ apt install sl
> E: Could not
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 04:47:37AM +, jindam, vani wrote:
> as normal user i expected apt to show **some
> kind** of warning without providing
> root password installation of package
> will fail.
unicorn:~$ apt install sl
E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock-frontend - open (13:
> That puts quite a new complexion on the thread here called
> "how disable apt downloads w/o sudo".
> It might be worth being a bit more revealing about the
> system that you're running so that you don't waste other
> people's time, and your own, with red herrings.
as normal user i expected apt
know and use the application might be able to answer questions
> about it, like "how do you configure which web browser it launches
> when you press the XYZ button on the ABC page".
i did ask dev & it was fixed for palemoon.
if XYZ button contains url, so instead of
choosing
On 2022-09-28, David Wright wrote:
>
> So I think you mentioned userland.app or something.
> Does that mean you're running all this on a mobile phone?
> Its wikipedia says "UserLAnd does not require a root account."
> That puts quite a new complexion on the thread here called
> "how disable apt
On Wed 28 Sep 2022 at 05:06:33 (+), jindam, vani wrote:
> > A line like:
> > export BROWSER=lynx
> > in /etc/profile may help.
>
> i have updated ~/.profile, but it is not working
>
> > You don't indicate your desktop, which may be significant.
>
On 9/28/22 06:01, jindam, vani wrote:
So you use openbox... and what, startx? Or some Display Manager (DM)?
i have installed debian on userland app.
trying to use or familiarise with linux.
i think i am not using any DM.
Also, how are you launching your "default browser"? Please
munity. People who
actually know and use the application might be able to answer questions
about it, like "how do you configure which web browser it launches
when you press the XYZ button on the ABC page".
thing else?
>>
>> i am trying to launch browser button on wikipedia wpcleaner. it was
>> working for palemoon.
>
> I have no idea what "wikipedia wpcleaner" is either. Is it an
> application that you installed? Does it have its own configuration
> menu/fi
be helpful.
> > Also, how are you launching your "default browser"? Please be precise
> > and specific.
> right clicking provides box with terminal
> emulator, web browser, debian, etc..
> of openbox menu. clicking browser fails
> with message "fai
> So you use openbox... and what, startx? Or some Display Manager (DM)?
i have installed debian on userland app.
trying to use or familiarise with linux.
i think i am not using any DM.
> Also, how are you launching your "default browser"? Please be precise
> and speci
play Manager (DM)?
This matters, because the ~/.profile file will not be read if you login
with a DM.
Also, how are you launching your "default browser"? Please be precise
and specific. Does openbox have some sort of "browser button" that
launches a mystery browser?
> Try "_" (underscore) instead. That way the string "SENSIBLE_BROWSER" is
> interpreted by the shell as one whole variable name.
$ echo $SENSIBLE_BROWSER
its blank
> It ist also good to copy the command and the output completey into mails
> so everybody can exactly see what happened.
pearl
> Interesting, what does echo $"-browser" return? What does echo
> "$-BROWSER" return?
jindam@localhost:~$ -BROWSER
-bash: -BROWSER: command not found
regards,
jindam, vani
toots: @jindam_v...@c.im
others: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jindam_vani
> I'm on a
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2022 schrieb jindam, vani:
> > It may be necessary to disable SENSIBLE-BROWSER. echo
> > $SENSIBLE-BROWSER to see if it's loaded.
>
> $ echo $SENSIBLE-BROWSER
> it shows "-BROWSER"
Shell variables can't contain "-", so this is
1 - 100 of 3046 matches
Mail list logo
