Hallo Christian,
CK Nullmodemkabel auf ttyS0 und pppd.
hab ich auch schon dran gedacht, habe aber leider kein solches Kabel
:-/
gibt es nicht sowas wie fortgesetzte .zip archive auch unter linux?
--
greetz,
Carsten
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 05:00:11PM +0100, Carsten Wenske wrote:
Nein ich habe kein CD-Rom in dem Teil und auch keine Netzwerkkarte,
das macht die Sache natürlich nicht gerade einfacher ;) Denn ich kann
das Paket xbase (2MB) nich so ohne weiteres in die Kiste reinbekommen
:-/
Bin für
Hallo Christian,
CK Nullmodemkabel auf ttyS0 und pppd.
hab ich auch schon dran gedacht, habe aber leider kein solches Kabel
:-/
gibt es nicht sowas wie fortgesetzte .zip archive auch unter linux?
--
greetz,
Carsten
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo frank,
fp mit 'split' kannst du urspruenglichen dateien auseinandernehmen, und
fp mit 'cat' wieder zusammenfuegen.
genau sowas hab ich gesucht, Danke!!
--
greetz,
Carsten
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hallo Hans,
Am Thursday, February 26, 2004, 7:06:03 PM, schriebst Du:
HGK Es fehlt dir die Linux XFree86 HOWTO
HGK zu beziehen bei http://www.debian.org
nicht nur Die hat gefehlt sondern Hauptsächlich das Paket x-base. Das
habe ich jetzt aber dank split/cat installieren können. Das XFree86
ja hallo erstmal,...
Am Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2004 17:51 schrieb Carsten Wenske:
Hallo Christian,
CK Nullmodemkabel auf ttyS0 und pppd.
hab ich auch schon dran gedacht, habe aber leider kein solches Kabel
:-/
gibt es nicht sowas wie fortgesetzte .zip archive auch unter linux?
tar
Hallo Carsten,
CK Nullmodemkabel auf ttyS0 und pppd.
hab ich auch schon dran gedacht, habe aber leider kein solches Kabel
:-/
Das ist aber nicht wirklich schwierig herzustellen. Du kaufst Dir einfach
ein relativ dickes Kabel (die sind meist voll belegt), kneifst an einem
Ende den
Am Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2004 17:00 schrieb Carsten Wenske:
Hallo liebe Leute,
Ich versuche seit gestern ein lauffähiges Debian 1.3 + X auf einem
Compaq Contura 430cx (486/100 8MB) zu installieren. Allerdings bekomme
ich keinen Windowmanager zum laufen. xserver läuft schon und fvwm2
Carsten Wenske [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gibt es nicht sowas wie fortgesetzte .zip archive auch unter linux?
mit 'split' kannst du urspruenglichen dateien auseinandernehmen, und
mit 'cat' wieder zusammenfuegen.
--
frobnicate foo
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
to install pppoe on a debian 1.3 ?
You would have to back port the ppp changes in the kernel and the pppd package.
Does not look like an easy task unless you know the kernel pretty well.
May be time for a new router )-:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
I have a local network at home and an ADSL connexion. I would like to install
my linux box as a firewall for my network.
Unfortunately I can't upgrade my debian version (1.3) because of compatibility
reasons with my hardware and my bios.
Is there a way to install pppoe on a debian 1.3 ?
Romuald
Hello,
I have been reading much information about the Thinkpad 560 and
linux, but have not come across anything that relates to MY problem.
This is my first attempt to install linux ever. I only have a 1.3
debian distribution on CD, from Boot magazine, from 1996. It may
be that this version
This is my first attempt to install linux ever. I only have a 1.3
debian distribution on CD, from Boot magazine, from 1996. It may
be that this version will never run on my system, or perhaps someone
out there can help me. The kernel is 2.0.29_2.0.29-7
You may want to make a set of floppy
of the standard install disks (I'm not
sure if this was true for Debian 1.3, but it is true for 2.0 and beyond
for certain.)
Any and all help is greatly appreciated, I really want to run linux!
I have a 2.1G drive, that I partitioned with DOS fdisk, to have
1G, 900M, and 112M. I hope to leave
for Debian 1.3, but it is true for 2.0 and beyond
for certain.)
That is what I use on my 560, the Tecra rescue disk. With the regular
rescue disk, the machine just goes into an endless loop of reboots.
Also, don't use bzImage, just zImage will work.
--
Andrew
if vanilla Debian 1.3 is year 2000 compliant. If not, which version
should we upgrade to?
Any advice will be much appreciated.
Many thanks in advance
Richard
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 13:28:47 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My company has just discovered that one of our branches is running Debian
version 1.3. The company is quite happy for them to do so, but needs to
know if vanilla Debian 1.3 is year 2000 compliant.
For general information
Alguien me explicaría las principales diferencias entre las dos versiones?
Tengo instalada la 1.3, y estoy evaluando la posibilidad de cambiar a 2.x.
Lo que no sé es si hay algún cambio significativo que justifique la
actualización.
Ya sé confirmo la aparición de la versión 2.1 en Linux Actual?
Ummm... para ver las principales diferencias te recomiendo
http://www.openresources.com/es/magazine/debian-21/index.html
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 09:56:07AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alguien me explicaría las principales diferencias entre las dos versiones?
Tengo instalada la
On mar, abr 20, 1999 at 09:56:07 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alguien me explicaría las principales diferencias entre las dos versiones?
Tengo instalada la 1.3, y estoy evaluando la posibilidad de cambiar a 2.x.
Lo que no sé es si hay algún cambio significativo que justifique la
On mar, abr 20, 1999 at 03:34:55 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
libc5 a libc6 (o glibc)... más que de sobra para justificar el cambio :-DD
Luego, mogollón más de paquetes, mejoras en la instalación... pero lo
importante es lo que te he dicho antes.
Pero esa librería no se puede actualizar
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
libc5 a libc6 (o glibc)... m=E1s que de sobra para justificar el cam=
bio
:-DD
Luego, mogoll=F3n m=E1s de paquetes, mejoras en la instalaci=F3n...=
pero lo
importante es lo que te he dicho antes.
Hi,
where can I find the SVGA server for Debian 1.3? I have only
found libc6 based binaries.
Would be very happy if I could get hold of the old binaries.
/mill
--
#
# S-mail: Olof Oberg # [EMAIL PROTECTED
install. So I am trying new things. I am
using Debian 1.3.
X won't work. I try to use the Config program, but when it says it is
switching to Graphics mode, it exists with can't connect to server
errors.
PPP won't work. I am using the same PPP scripts that worked with
both Re dHat
is scratched and won't install. So I am trying new things. I am
using Debian 1.3.
X won't work. I try to use the Config program, but when it says it is
switching to Graphics mode, it exists with can't connect to server
errors.
PPP won't work. I am using the same PPP scripts that worked with
both
or Elm. I think that some of my system is missing and was wondering if
there is an easy way to reinstall all the base system files without screwing
up my system. I am running Debian 1.3 and would like to some day run 2.0,
but I don't want to do anything serious like that until I get my system in
order
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Shaleh wrote:
We have done all the work needed to support libc6 for you. Please do
not make yourself go through more hassle than needed. apt has a upgrade
feature which will update your system. We also have an autoup.sh
script on the ftp site which will update for
Apt is in slink, we can not put it in stable. Autoup.sh apparently
still has a flake now and then. There is a howto in the hamm directory
(I believe) which tells you step by step how and what to update by
hand. This is how I and many others do it. Once you update the 5 or so
needed packages,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Shaleh wrote:
We have done all the work needed to support libc6 for you. Please do
This stuff always seems odd to me. Has autoup stopped killing
people's systems?
Yup, I've upgraded lots of systems
I have now Debian 1.3 and I want to install a libc6 manualy. Can anybody
describe me how to do it?
I try to install glibc-2.0.6, and don't receive any error message while
compiling and installing, but no one programes can found libc.so.6 and
other.
Need I to delete bad library first
now Debian 1.3 and I want to install a libc6 manualy. Can anybody
describe me how to do it?
I try to install glibc-2.0.6, and don't receive any error message while
compiling and installing, but no one programes can found libc.so.6 and
other.
Need I to delete bad library first
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I have a problem, installing debian 1.3 with AHA2842B VLB controller.
:
: When I'm booting the root.bin, I see this on the screen:
: In swapper task - not syncing.
You need a different rescue disk kernel. Compile
the rest of the 2.0 installation
set and install hamm.
Mike
On Tue, Jul 14, 1998 at 08:37:15PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
I have a problem, installing debian 1.3 with AHA2842B VLB controller.
Hardware:
VLB motherboard with AWARD 4.50G bios
AHA2842B controller with bios
Hello all!
I have a problem, installing debian 1.3 with AHA2842B VLB controller.
Hardware:
VLB motherboard with AWARD 4.50G bios
AHA2842B controller with bios enabled
Quantum ProDrive LPS 270 MB
Sony CDU 76S
When I'm booting the root.bin, I see this on the screen:
scsi0: AHA284x/ ... 4.0/3.2
On Tue, 14 Jul 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Hello all!
:
: I have a problem, installing debian 1.3 with AHA2842B VLB controller.
:
: Hardware:
: VLB motherboard with AWARD 4.50G bios
: AHA2842B controller with bios enabled
: Quantum ProDrive LPS 270 MB
: Sony CDU 76S
:
: When I'm booting
drives recognised and reformatted OK
had been converted to FAT when I was getting enough DOS
access to the CDROM to start the install off.
2) That Debian 1.3 default SCSI drivers don't work correctly
(perhaps I have to tell them something as a command line
parameter?) with the 3940/3940W second
software doesn't like
: partition information left by NT and those drives were still NTFS
: formatted whereas the two drives recognised and reformatted OK
: had been converted to FAT when I was getting enough DOS
: access to the CDROM to start the install off.
Nope, see above :)
: 2) That Debian
I am a very novice Linux/Debian user and am trying to setup minicom. I am
curious about how to get minicom to recognize my modem. I read in the man
page that most linux systems have the serial port as /dev/modem or
/dev/cua#. How can I get Linux to install my modem as a dev. Currently,
pppd
On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, scott hussey wrote:
I am a very novice Linux/Debian user and am trying to setup minicom. I am
curious about how to get minicom to recognize my modem. I read in the man
page that most linux systems have the serial port as /dev/modem or
/dev/cua#. How can I get Linux to
On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, scott hussey wrote:
I am a very novice Linux/Debian user and am trying to setup minicom. I am
curious about how to get minicom to recognize my modem. I read in the man
page that most linux systems have the serial port as /dev/modem or
/dev/cua#. How can I get Linux to
John Kloss writes:
I have been told that /dev/cua# is deprecated and that docs using
/dev/cua# are out of date...
Yes. They will disappear soon.
I'm pretty sure that /dev/modem is just a symbolic link..
Yes. It's always a symbolic link.
so to make /dev/modem type ln -s /dev/ttyS2
scott hussey wrote:
I am a very novice Linux/Debian user and am trying to setup minicom. I am
curious about how to get minicom to recognize my modem. I read in the man
page that most linux systems have the serial port as /dev/modem or
/dev/cua#. How can I get Linux to install my modem as a
Hi All!
I've checked ImageMagick 3.9.1 in RedHat 5.1, and it works OK.
Probably the reason of my problem is a bug in ImageMagick = 3.8.2
The another problem is however, that I can't find any newer version
which compiles in bo. The 4.0.4 version, which I've found in hamm
distribution uses
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Wojciech Marek Zabolotny wrote:
I've checked ImageMagick 3.9.1 in RedHat 5.1, and it works OK.
Probably the reason of my problem is a bug in ImageMagick = 3.8.2
The another problem is however, that I can't find any newer version
which compiles in bo. The 4.0.4 version,
in bo (Debian 1.3.r6)
Resent-Date: 17 Jun 1998 08:01:33 -
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Hi All!
I've checked ImageMagick 3.9.1 in RedHat 5.1, and it works OK.
Probably the reason of my problem is a bug in ImageMagick = 3.8.2
Hi All!
Does anybody used successfully the -draw command with the convert
program available in ImageMagick in bo distribution?
The only graphic primitive it accepts is circle. When I type:
convert -pen red -draw circle 5,5 10,10 image.gif im2.gif
everything works fine, but when I
I am wondering, is the default kernel from 386-binary(bo) compiled with
Masquerading?
I do not know if that is my problem, but whenever I try to use the
ipfwadm command (with [hopefully] valid switches) I always get a
message ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Protocol not available
Thanks, Milan
--
Is there any package sendmail8.8.8 for debian 1.3 ???
--
Nicolas Weinachter -- EXTERN
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried it in two different ways, and I didn't manage to do it.
The first: Booting from cdrom or rescue floppy. It died during the
scsi initialization, right after the md driver.
The second : I borrowed a zImage, made by Slackware, specifically for
AHA 2940, and I started with loadlin--
Hi,
I've just installed a debian 1.3, and booting with boot disk eth0 3c905 is not
recognized.
So installed with dselect 2.0.30 kernel image and i copie it onto the boot
floppy.
Nothing changed.
The strange thing, is that i've already installe debian 1.3 on e pc with 3c905.
this is the dmesg
On Mon, 2 Feb 1998, Maurizio Marini wrote:
Hi,
I've just installed a debian 1.3, and booting with boot disk eth0 3c905 is
not recognized.
So installed with dselect 2.0.30 kernel image and i copie it onto the boot
floppy.
Nothing changed.
The strange thing, is that i've already installe
Adam Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to run Linux on my computer at work, what we are running
normally is Windows 95 OSR on a Ethernet Star configured LAN. The NIC is
3com Etherlink XL 100baseTX (running as 10BaseT). We normally attach to a
Windows NT 4.0 server. I
[ please hit the enter key every 75 char's or so. You're email program
doesn't seem to do this for you. ]
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Adam Greene wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to run Linux on my computer at work, what we are running
normally is Windows 95 OSR on a Ethernet Star configured LAN.
Hello,
I am trying to run Linux on
my computer at work, what we are running normally is Windows 95 OSR on a
Ethernet Star configured LAN. The NIC is 3com Etherlink XL 100baseTX
(running as 10BaseT). We normally attach to a Windows NT 4.0 server.
I installed Linux, took the information
Dear Fellow Debian Users:
(let me know if I've posted this to the wrong place; I don't think
it's a Debian bug per-se, but a local installation problem I can't
solve).
I'm running Debian-1.3 on two machines, my home computer and my
work computer. My home computer runs man just fine, but on my
Dear Fellow Debian Users:
(let me know if I've posted this to the wrong place; I don't think
it's a Debian bug per-se, but a local installation problem I can't
solve).
I'm running Debian-1.3 on two machines, my home computer and my
work computer. My home computer runs man just fine
Are you using bash as your shell and have 'set -a' in /etc/profile or in any
of your bash startup files? If so, try removing 'set -a' or running man under
some other shell.
Bash hanging with man when 'set -a' was in use was reported as bug #8390
during last summer.
// Heikki
--
Heikki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 2 Jan 1998, Steve Hsieh wrote:
John,
On the IBM thinkpad 760, you must use the tecra boot disk in the
special directory, and not the standard bootdisk. If you build your
own kernel, you must build it with 'make zimage' and not 'make
bzimage'.
If the thinkpad problem persist, try the tecra bootdisk (in the special
directory I think).
Brandon
-
Brandon Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] We all know linux is great... it
PGP: finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED] does infinite loops in 5 seconds
Phone: (757) 221-4847
discovered, is to use loadlin to
boot from DOS.
Steve
On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, LKloss wrote:
attempts to install debian 1.3 and always the same problem. On reboot the
system hangs at
LILO loading linux
So the two main things here
1) I cannot install linux without first booting a DOS
hello,
has anyone had any success installing debian 1.3 on a dec ultra hinote
2 latop? trying to install w/ the vanilla installation disks left me
without pcmcia access (and hence no ethernet support in my case). could
it be that the tecra disks should be used for the hinote as well
Have you tried useing the tecra boot disks ... you might try these boot
disk ... try installing from there as it will add that kernel to the hard
drive ... I think that the tecra boot disks are made for the Laptops that
can't handle BzImages I think they can be found in the /disks
directory
I recently bought the debian 1.3 cd's and an IBM thinkpad 760xl. The IBM came
with windows NT preinstalled. I have a 2.1Gig HD which I repartitioned into
two gig partitions using fips.exe. That worked fine.
My NT partition was booting fine (first partition) until I tried to install
linux. I made
On Thu, 01 Jan 1998 04:35:24 EST, LKloss wrote:
I recently bought the debian 1.3 cd's and an IBM thinkpad 760xl. The IBM came
with windows NT preinstalled. I have a 2.1Gig HD which I repartitioned into
two gig partitions using fips.exe. That worked fine.
My NT partition was booting fine
---BeginMessage---
---BeginMessage---
Let me be a bit more specific ...
I no longer have NT on the machine. I formatted the whole disk in disgust. So
lets just assume that currently I have nothing on the machine.
I made the debian 1.3 floppies on a machine with a CD-Rom drive and DOS
command
On Thu, 01 Jan 1998 14:14:13 EST, LKloss wrote:
[..proper pre-install procedure snipped..]
Now, first problem. I take the boot-rescue disk, put it in the disk drive,
reboot the system, get a message from debian giving me various help screens,
and then the boot: prompt. So I press return and
Pedro Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, when user-name logs in and types groups he gets,
$ groups
user-name dialout
Where is dip? In fact, I tested by adding user-name to more groups but to
my surprise groups always returns the same two groups!
My first guess would be that
Pedro Sanchez wrote:
After this, /etc/group is ok, with user-name added where appropriate.
However, when user-name logs in and types groups he gets,
$ groups
user-name dialout
Where is dip? In fact, I tested by adding user-name to more groups but to
my surprise groups always returns the
On Thu, Dec 11, 1997 at 07:18:16PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Where is dip? In fact, I tested by adding user-name to more groups but to
my surprise groups always returns the same two groups!
Odd:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/groups
joey dialout cdrom floppy tape dos users pub network
Were you
That's it. I have to logout and login again for the new groups to take effect.
I wasn't using X, just the console.
Thank you for your answers.
P. Sanchez
--
In message Debian 1.3 ignores more than 2 groups., [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 11, 1997 at 07:18:16PM -0500, Joey Hess
Hello,
I have a fresh Debian 1.3 minimal installation, just the base packages and
two or three more. As root I do
# addgroup user-name dialout
-- user user-name added to group dialout
# addgroup user-name dip
-- user user-name added to group dip
After this, /etc/group is ok, with user-name
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, the thought here is that if a partition is a primary Linux
partition rather than a Linux partition sitting in a DOS extended
partition, perhaps a virus looking for DOS partitions will leave the LINUX
partitions alone. Whereas, viruses would recognise the
the extended partition as a DOS partition and
reek havoc on the DOS, thus trashing any Linux partition residing within.
Thus a rescue floppy might allow you to at least recover Linux.
Any thoughts on this?
--
-= Sent by Debian 1.3 Linux =-
Thomas Kocourek KD4CIK - member of ARRL
@[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 10 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, the thought here is that if a partition is a primary Linux partition
rather than a Linux partition sitting in a DOS extended partition, perhaps a
virus looking for DOS partitions will leave the LINUX partitions alone.
Whereas, viruses would
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Logical partitions created with DOS
fdisk are completely unusable by Linux, and often will result in cfdisk
reporting a broke partition table.
In general, it is wise to assume human error or misunderstanding when
problems with partition tables
in a
extended partition if the extended partition gets accidently _trashed_?
(like from a virus)
--
-= Sent by Debian 1.3 Linux =-
Thomas Kocourek KD4CIK - member of ARRL
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@westgac3.dragon.com Remove @_@ for correct Email address
On Tue, 9 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question for you... What happens to the Linux partitions sitting in a
extended partition if the extended partition gets accidently _trashed_?
(like from a virus)
I assume it does the same thing as trashing a primary partition ... FUBAR
Hi,
System: Debian 1.3/kernel 2.0.30/pcmcia 3com 562D/563G card
My goal is to recompile the kernel2.0.30 in order to solve some bug
with pcmcia.(see below for the error message at boot time)
I have installed pcmcia-source_2.9.6-3, same for pcmcia-cs and
pcmcia-modules. Also kernel
/hda1. Then create new 'primary' partitions
which will become the swap and root partitions. Use the 'type' command to
switch the new swap partition from ext2 to swap. And then write it out when
you are satisfied with the division of your drive.
Hope this helps you
--
-= Sent by Debian 1.3 Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gianluca Ryo Trimarchi writes:
Few days ago I've installed my new hd (conner 1080mb) in my computer.=
It's
splitted in three partions: 1 primary (dos fat 16) e 2 logical for linux =
That's the problem-^
When
On 8 Dec 1997, Sten Anderson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gianluca Ryo Trimarchi writes:
Few days ago I've installed my new hd (conner 1080mb) in my computer.=
It's
splitted in three partions: 1 primary (dos fat 16) e 2 logical for linux =
That's the
On 8 Dec 1997, Sten Anderson wrote:
That's the problem-^
When You install debian (or most other distributions), you must remove
these
pseudo-partitions as only DOS understands them.
Are you saying that linux can't handle logical
Hi,
I tried to install Debian 1.3 on my laptop : EUROCOM 6200. I already
installed Debian on my previous laptop with no problems. I read the
installation guide and several Linux HOWTO (Hardware Compatibility,
Laptop, PCI ...) and I couldn't find any clue.
First the technical specifications of my
(the
old one is a Ibm 1700mb as master, three partitions fat 16), while the cd
(Creative infra1800) is on the secondary channel as master. During the first
step of the installation with Debian 1.3 distribution I haven't problems...all
the hardware was founded (except the Mistyque and the 3dfx
Charles Read wrote:
The bottom of my mouse says the mouse
is an IntelliMouse 1.1A and PS/2 compatible.
The port the mouse plugs into is a PS/2 port
(ie, round). So within /etc/X11/XF86Config,
I changed (under the Pointer section) the
Protocol to be PS/2, and then changed
the Device to be
Charles Read [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe both PS/2 and /dev/mouse
are correct.
What else could be messing up the mouse/cursor?
There are certain ambiguities in the way that you specified how you
connected your mouse to the computer. Here are the correct
possibilities, to the best of
I tried installing /dev/psaux with 'modconf'.
I get this result:
Installation failed
/lib/modules/2.0.29/misc/psaux.o:
unresolved symbol kill_fasync_R689dfeeb
How can I fix this?
Thanks,
-c
There are two steps to fixing this.
1) As root, run 'modconf',
On Wed, 5 Nov 1997, Charles Read wrote:
I tried installing /dev/psaux with 'modconf'.
I get this result:
Installation failed
/lib/modules/2.0.29/misc/psaux.o:
unresolved symbol kill_fasync_R689dfeeb
Try (as root)
insmod psaux
and see if it happens.
Ben Pfaff wrote:
There are certain ambiguities in the way that you specified how you
connected your mouse to the computer. Here are the correct
possibilities, to the best of my knowledge:
1. Mouse is connected to a PS/2 (aka mini-DIN 6, which is circular) port.
The port is
On Nov 05, Stephen Ryan wrote
Charles Read wrote:
I'v installed Debian 1.3 on an AMD-K6 platform.
My Xserver, XF86_S3V, starts out fine and autodetects
the chipset used for my Nitro 3D (S3 ViRGE/GX).
In the /etc/X11/XF86Setup, I specify in the Pointer
section a protocol
Adrian Bridgett wrote:
I have a 2.1a mouse and it works fine on /dev/ttyS0. It isn't an
intellimouse. Here are the two bits of /etc/gpm.conf and /etc/X11/XF86Config
that might help. Let me know if there is any thing you would like me to try
to see what the problem is. I'm running (pretty much)
I'v installed Debian 1.3 on an AMD-K6 platform.
My Xserver, XF86_S3V, starts out fine and autodetects
the chipset used for my Nitro 3D (S3 ViRGE/GX).
In the /etc/X11/XF86Setup, I specify in the Pointer
section a protocol of IntelliMouse and a device
of /dev/ttyS0. However, the mouse cursor does
Charles Read wrote:
I'v installed Debian 1.3 on an AMD-K6 platform.
My Xserver, XF86_S3V, starts out fine and autodetects
the chipset used for my Nitro 3D (S3 ViRGE/GX).
In the /etc/X11/XF86Setup, I specify in the Pointer
section a protocol of IntelliMouse and a device
of /dev/ttyS0
Debian 1.3 on an AMD-K6 platform.
My Xserver, XF86_S3V, starts out fine and autodetects
the chipset used for my Nitro 3D (S3 ViRGE/GX).
In the /etc/X11/XF86Setup, I specify in the Pointer
section a protocol of IntelliMouse and a device
of /dev/ttyS0. However, the mouse cursor does
not respond
On Wed, 5 Nov 1997, Charles Read wrote:
I changed (under the Pointer section) the
Protocol to be PS/2, and then changed
the Device to be /dev/mouse [On my box,
/dev/mouse is a link to /dev/ttyS0.].
I'm pretty sure you need /dev/psaux.
Why don't you
a) try deleteing /dev/psaux and running
I installed Debian 1.3. Now, I am having problems logging in as a normal user.
When logging in root, I got a message about delay bypassed, root allowed to log
in. Also, when I shutdown, I got a prompt about logging in for maintenance
mode, or control-d to shutdown. Pressing control-d does
Hi Benjamin de Coninck Owe; unless Mutt is confused,on Aug 28, you wrote :
I am trying to install debian 1.3 om my pc:
ALI motherboard
Phoenix BIOS 4.03
I486 DX4 - 100MhZ
Adaptec 2840A / 42A
I am having trouble. Booting the rescuedisk at boot prompt I write:
boot: linux aic7xxx
I am trying to install debian 1.3 om my pc:
ALI motherboard
Phoenix BIOS 4.03
I486 DX4 - 100MhZ
Adaptec 2840A / 42A
I am having trouble. Booting the rescuedisk at boot prompt I write:
boot: linux aic7xxx=no_reset
loading the kernel the computer writes:
...
(aic7xxx): Encoutered
On Wed, 20 Aug 1997, Dan Dooher wrote:
I'm trying to enable IP aliasing, but when a execute:
/sbin/insmod /lib/modules/`uname -r`/ipv4/ip_alias.o
It returns: ip_alias.o: No such file or directory.
It sounds like you need to build yourself a custom kernel. Get the
'kernel-package'
Gang,
I'm trying to enable IP aliasing, but when a execute:
/sbin/insmod /lib/modules/`uname -r`/ipv4/ip_alias.o
It returns: ip_alias.o: No such file or directory.
Can anyone tell me where I can get this and if there
are any special instructions I should no about?
Regards,
Dan
--
TO
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
