Seb writes:
> I just discovered to my horror /tmp is handled by a tmpfs system that
> allocates by default a percentage of RAM that happens to be too small
> for my use of /tmp. What is the Debianish way to avoid using this
> system for /tmp so that it uses whatever is available on /?
Set TEMPDIR
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:17:15 -0700,
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Seb wrote:
>> I just discovered to my horror /tmp is handled by a tmpfs system that
>> allocates by default a percentage of RAM that happens to be too small
>> for my use of /tmp. What is the Debianish way to avoid using this
>> system for
Seb wrote:
> I just discovered to my horror /tmp is handled by a tmpfs system that
> allocates by default a percentage of RAM that happens to be too small
> for my use of /tmp. What is the Debianish way to avoid using this
> system for /tmp so that it uses whatever is available on /?
Set RAMTMP=n
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:44:46 +,
Dom wrote:
> On 28/11/11 18:07, Camaleón wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'm running an updated wheezy and today faced with this little
>> problematic.
>> While running Midnight Commander to open (on-the-fly decompression
>> for browsing the archive) the kernel source pa
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:07:43 +, Camaleón wrote:
> I'm running an updated wheezy and today faced with this little
> problematic.
(...)
> Okay, so /tmp is full. Fine. I know how to solve it but I can foresee
> more situations like this in the future so some questions arise. As the
> current tm
On 28/11/11 18:07, Camaleón wrote:
Hello,
I'm running an updated wheezy and today faced with this little
problematic.
While running Midnight Commander to open (on-the-fly decompression for
browsing the archive) the kernel source package (a ~75 MiB .tar.bz2 file)
I got this error:
http://picpas
Camaleón wrote:
> /dev/sda2247G 7,7G 239G 4% /
> tmpfs423M 423M 0 100% /tmp <--- here!
>
> Okay, so /tmp is full. Fine. ...
Especially when you have 250G of space it seems egregious to clamp it
down to only 423M.
> 1/ How many room should be set for a "/tmp"
On 28/11/11 19:07, Camaleón wrote:
Hello,
I'm running an updated wheezy and today faced with this little
problematic.
While running Midnight Commander to open (on-the-fly decompression for
browsing the archive) the kernel source package (a ~75 MiB .tar.bz2 file)
I got this error:
http://picp
Hello,
I'm running an updated wheezy and today faced with this little
problematic.
While running Midnight Commander to open (on-the-fly decompression for
browsing the archive) the kernel source package (a ~75 MiB .tar.bz2 file)
I got this error:
http://picpaste.com/mc-error-YXdyRawO.gif
My A
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:23:23 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:07:33 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
(...)
>> BTW, there appears to be a significant problem with your wifi channel
>> selection. That is,
>>
>> 1. There are actually 3 useable channels in the wifi spectrum: 1, 6,
>> 11.
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:07:33 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:53:03 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
(...)
>> Okay, let's make a brute-force test. I've removed the power cord of the
>> netbook and walked next to the AP, et voilà, now it associates fine...
>> go figure :-o
>
> I
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:53:03 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
> Tried with both ("-D nl80211" and reduced conf file) but I get the same ;-
> (
>
> ***
> Trying to associate with 00:26:44:df:60:91 (SSID='WLAN_6D' freq=2452 MHz)
> Authentication with 00:26:44:df:60:91 timed out.
> ***
>
> It cannot even
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:07:28 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 31 Jul 2011 at 13:22:45 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:24:11 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
>>
>> > Oh, and I forgot to say in the previous mail: Turn everything
>> > fiddling with the wifi interfaces off, that is, nm, ho
On Sun 31 Jul 2011 at 13:22:45 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:24:11 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
>
> > Oh, and I forgot to say in the previous mail: Turn everything fiddling
> > with the wifi interfaces off, that is, nm, hostapd, etc., before trying
> > any manual method.
>
> Hey
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 15:24:11 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 12:02:02 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
(...)
>> But when I try to connect, both of my wifi cards fail:
>>
>> wlan0 → broadcom 4313+brcmsmac
(...)
>> Authentication with 00:26:44:df:60:91 timed out.
>> wlan2 → ral
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 12:02:02 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
> In testing I have "2.6.39-2686-pae"
> [...]
>
> Good idea. Done...
>
> /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf
>
> # WPA-PSK/TKIP
>
> ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant
>
> network={
> ssid="WLAN_6D"
> key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
> p
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:52:49 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:46:56 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
(...)
>> I wonder if someone is currently using this driver and what are his/her
>> experiences.
>
> I'm using brcmsmac since 1 year without a problem.
(...)
Thanks for repliy
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:46:56 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
> Our cell phone provider has given us a netbook that embeds a broadcom
> 4313 wifi chipset¹.
>
> This card seems to be supported by the new -and open source- brcmsmac
> driver² (still in a staging development) but I am having problems to
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:46:56 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
> I wonder if someone is currently using this driver and what are his/her
> experiences.
>
> ¹http://wiki.debian.org/brcm80211
Ping...
No one is using a broadcom 4313 wifi chipset with the new "brcmsmac"
driver? :-?
Greetings,
--
C
Hello,
Our cell phone provider has given us a netbook that embeds a broadcom
4313 wifi chipset¹.
This card seems to be supported by the new -and open source- brcmsmac
driver² (still in a staging development) but I am having problems to
associate it with my AP.
All seems going fine (wlan0 inte
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:46:13PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > > I was questioned about some config files which I know I did not modify.
> > > In that case, I accepted the new one blindly.
> >
> > This one is more weird as the config file
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:46:13PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > I was questioned about some config files which I know I did not modify.
> > In that case, I accepted the new one blindly.
>
> This one is more weird as the config file was modified by something, most
> often a post-install scri
a
without requiring user interaction.
I hoped to have more feedback in order to better target the packages that
needed to be improved. Given the lack of response, I guess that I will target
package that bother me most often during upgrades (like cups)...
> I was questioned about some conf
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:54:46AM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm working on a project that aim to ease configuration upgrades during
> package upgrade. [1]
>
> Since a lot of people will upgrade them system from Lenny to Squeeze, I'd be
> intere
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Did the upgrade process stopped to ask you question about merging
> configuration files ? If yes, for which files (and packages)
No! Just the old messages about replacing your configs with the new
maintainer's version. There definitely has to be some streamlining her
Hello
I'm working on a project that aim to ease configuration upgrades during
package upgrade. [1]
Since a lot of people will upgrade them system from Lenny to Squeeze, I'd be
interested in feedback on the upgrade of configuration files.
Did the upgrade process stopped to ask yo
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-12-09 18:55 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> I basically see two issues here:
>>
>> 1/ We lack? for a "recommended way/Debian way" for disabling scripts
>> (this thread is plenty of alternatives and tips for doing it but
>> documentation is
On 2010-12-09 18:55 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
> I basically see two issues here:
>
> 1/ We lack? for a "recommended way/Debian way" for disabling scripts
> (this thread is plenty of alternatives and tips for doing it but
> documentation is not very clear on the matter). I think it is important
> f
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 04:50:52AM -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Joel Roth wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:24:51PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> On 2010-12-07 17:21 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
>
>
> >> > A month ago, I disabled Network Manager service in my Squeeze sys
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:33:20 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:15:08AM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:37:19 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> > On 2010-12-08 23:41 +0100, Javier Barroso wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:15:08AM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:37:19 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > On 2010-12-08 23:41 +0100, Javier Barroso wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >>>
> >>> You should use "update-rc.d network-manager disa
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-12-09 09:15 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:37:19 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-12-08 23:41 +0100, Javier Barroso wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
You should use "update-rc.d network-manager disable" instead. See
upd
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:07:11 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> The warning can be ignored but the service levels are not touched and
>> it does not work as expected (meaning, the service is not disabled at
>> all).
>
> It was silly of me to say that
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 03:54:11 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> Whenever I use update-rc.d on a sid box to stop/remove/disable, I get a
>> "using concurrency based boot sequencing" message with a warning a
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 03:54:11 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Mmm... man page says by using "defaults" the service should be put in
>> sequence number 20 (unless there are any conflicts):
>>
>> t...@debian:~$ ls -l /etc/rc* | grep network-manager
>
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Joel Roth wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:24:51PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2010-12-07 17:21 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
>> > A month ago, I disabled Network Manager service in my Squeeze system so
>> > it doesn't run on start up. I wanted to keep NM install
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Javier Barroso wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2010-12-07 17:21 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>
>>> A month ago, I disabled Network Manager service in my Squeeze system so
>>> it doesn't run on start up. I wanted to keep NM installed
On 2010-12-09 09:15 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:37:19 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2010-12-08 23:41 +0100, Javier Barroso wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
You should use "update-rc.d network-manager disable" instead. See
u
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:37:52 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:46:53 +0100, Jochem Kossen wrote:
>
You didn't disable network-manager. You removed the startup scripts
which
On 2010-12-08 01:21 +0100, Arthur Machlas wrote:
> Problem is, or at least, what I think the problem with that is, is
> that insserv is installed by default, and concurrent is now the
> default as well. So whenever a system service is added removed,
> changed or when insserv is called by some othe
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:37:19 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-12-08 23:41 +0100, Javier Barroso wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>>
>>> You should use "update-rc.d network-manager disable" instead. See
>>> update-rc.d(8).
>> I think update-rc.d manpage should
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:24:51PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-12-07 17:21 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
>
>
> > A month ago, I disabled Network Manager service in my Squeeze system so
> > it doesn't run on start up. I wanted to keep NM installed (just in case)
> > but preferred to use the ol
On 2010-12-08 23:41 +0100, Javier Barroso wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> You should use "update-rc.d network-manager disable" instead. See
>> update-rc.d(8).
> I think update-rc.d manpage should then change example which Camaleon
> referenced in her solved pos
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-12-07 17:21 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
>
>
>> A month ago, I disabled Network Manager service in my Squeeze system so
>> it doesn't run on start up. I wanted to keep NM installed (just in case)
>> but preferred to use the old "ifup" network
On 2010-12-07 17:21 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
> A month ago, I disabled Network Manager service in my Squeeze system so
> it doesn't run on start up. I wanted to keep NM installed (just in case)
> but preferred to use the old "ifup" network setup method.
>
> So I issued "update-rc.d network-manage
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:05:20 -0700, green wrote:
> Camaleón wrote at 2010-12-07 09:21 -0700:
>> So I issued "update-rc.d network-manager remove" and also disabled
>> gnome NM applet from being started. So far so good, no more NM running
>> at booting.
>
> You probably want to use "disable" instea
No one else has mentioned it:
chmod a-x /etc/init.d/script-name
Works for me :-)
Cheers
--
Joel Roth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010120816115
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:46:50 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Arthur Machlas wrote:
>> Camaleón wrote:
>> > Are you suggesting to manually edit the "/etc/init.d/network-manager"
>> > script header to fit my needs? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I expect
>> > this file (as any file located here) can be upd
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:37:52 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:46:53 +0100, Jochem Kossen wrote:
(...)
>>> You didn't disable network-manager. You removed the startup scripts
>>> which were correctly put back by the update.
>>>
>>> O
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:46:53 +0100, Jochem Kossen wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:46:53 +0100, Jochem Kossen wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:21:38PM +, Camale?n wrote:
>>>
>>> A month ago, I disabled Network Manager service in my Squeeze s
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:46:53 +0100, Jochem Kossen wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:46:53 +0100, Jochem Kossen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:21:38PM +, Camale?n wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A month ago, I disabled Network Manager service in my Squeeze system so
>> it doesn't run on start up. I w
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:51:11 -0600, Arthur Machlas wrote:
>>
>> I'd definitely hold off on the bug report. I think you should look at
>> the lsb headers of the network-manager script in /etc/init.d and change
>> them to stop on all levels, start on
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Paul Lane wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A month ago, I disabled Network Manager service in my Squeeze system so
>> it doesn't run on start up. I wanted to keep NM installed (just in case)
>> but preferred to use the old "
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A month ago, I disabled Network Manager service in my Squeeze system so
> it doesn't run on start up. I wanted to keep NM installed (just in case)
> but preferred to use the old "ifup" network setup method.
>
> So I issued "update-rc.d
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 04:21:38PM +, Camale?n wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A month ago, I disabled Network Manager service in my Squeeze system so
> it doesn't run on start up. I wanted to keep NM installed (just in case)
> but preferred to use the old "ifup" network setup method.
>
> So I issued
Arthur Machlas wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > Are you suggesting to manually edit the "/etc/init.d/network-manager"
> > script header to fit my needs? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I expect this
> > file (as any file located here) can be updated at any time and so
> > replacing any of the customized v
Camaleón wrote at 2010-12-07 09:21 -0700:
> So I issued "update-rc.d network-manager remove" and also disabled gnome
> NM applet from being started. So far so good, no more NM running at
> booting.
You probably want to use "disable" instead of "remove". See update-rc.d(8).
signature.asc
Descr
ed should keep its state regardless any further update it can be
>>> applied afterwards), I would like to get some feedback... what do you
>>> think on this matter? I missed something -there is a better way to
>>> handle this or should I write a report?
>>
>> I&
afterwards), I would like to get some feedback... what do you
>> think on this matter? I missed something -there is a better way to
>> handle this or should I write a report?
>
> I'd definitely hold off on the bug report. I think you should look at
> the lsb headers of the n
don't read spanish, but my french is ok, and tha'ts what I would've
guessed had happened
> Before I fill a bug report (I think a service that has been manually
> disabled should keep its state regardless any further update it can be
> applied afterwards), I would like to get
-enabled it again.
Before I fill a bug report (I think a service that has been manually
disabled should keep its state regardless any further update it can be
applied afterwards), I would like to get some feedback... what do you
think on this matter? I missed something -there is a
Hello,
if you don't follow Planet Debian, you're probably not aware
that Roland Mas and myself are planning to translate our French Debian
book into English. If we manage to get the work funded, we'll publish
the translation under a DFSG-compliant license. That said we need your
f
Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> Mostly to experiment,
I set up hardware RAID striping today using one 300 GB SATA II NCQ drive, one
SATA II NCQ 320 GB drive, Windows XP SP3 (32-bit), and the Asus driver
raid-MakeDisk_XP-8.24.zip. Sandra 1599 benchmarked read access at 117 MB/s;
write access was simi
2009/11/24 David Christensen :
> What are you trying to accomplish? Server? Workstation? What software?
> What users? Why RAID?
Desktop pc + homeserver, although i'm reading up on virtualization
before i go into the homeserver part. Why RAID... why not...? Mostly
to experiment, if/when i f
Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> I'm considering upgrading my box in an either-or scenario.
> *) either i buy an AMD Phenom X4 (9650, no TLB issue; socket AM2+ is
> compatible with AM2) to replace my Athlon64; or
> *) i buy one 500+ GB SATA-2 drive; or two with RAID. I'm considering
> Western Digital, two o
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:08:13 +
Nuno Magalhães dijo:
> *) either i buy an AMD Phenom X4 (9650, no TLB issue; socket AM2+ is
> compatible with AM2) to replace my Athlon64; or
> *) i buy one 500+ GB SATA-2 drive; or two with RAID. I'm considering
> Western Digital, two of them with 32Mb cache ar
Hi,
I'm considering upgrading my box in an either-or scenario.
*) either i buy an AMD Phenom X4 (9650, no TLB issue; socket AM2+ is
compatible with AM2) to replace my Athlon64; or
*) i buy one 500+ GB SATA-2 drive; or two with RAID. I'm considering
Western Digital, two of them with 32Mb cache are
is printable.
.
This is done by use of magicfilter's own magic database (a la file(1))
to decide how to print out a given print job.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have adopted this package in the last few weeks and I would really
appreciate som
that there's
nothing that would prevent them from working in a testing/squeeze
environment, which means that you can grab the packages from your
preferred mirror and install them (along with their dependencies, of
course).
So, I would like to kindly request some feedback on rtorrent/
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:23:15 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Do you have tried to rename temporary the "iceweasel" directory and
> started it again?
Yes, I have, and it didn't work. It was still broken.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Am 2007-03-27 16:06:47, schrieb Ed G:
> Actually, yes, it is different. When running the version from
> mozilla.org, Firefox works just fine. No broken session management. Even
> building it from source provided at mozilla.org as an unofficial build
> with the unofficial, non-trademark encumb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/29/07 15:47, Ed G wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:31:20 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> OK. Are "you all" using some sort of session-saver plugin?
>
> No. I am not using any sort of session-saving plugin on my set up.
Hmmm. Any other plugins?
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:31:20 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> OK. Are "you all" using some sort of session-saver plugin?
No. I am not using any sort of session-saving plugin on my set up.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/07 15:13, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 14:19 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 03/27/07 12:13, Ed G wrote:
>>> Bug 401255[1] has all of the details. To answer your question, I am
>>> running sid. It's not saving the homepage,
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 14:19 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/27/07 12:13, Ed G wrote:
> > Bug 401255[1] has all of the details. To answer your question, I am
> > running sid. It's not saving the homepage, history, or bookmarks on exit.
> >
> > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/07 12:13, Ed G wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:01:56 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> Were you running Sid or Etch? What kind of session management issues?
>>
>> Lots and lots of us are using IW with no problems.
>
> Bug 401255[1] has all of
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:01:56 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Were you running Sid or Etch? What kind of session management issues?
>
> Lots and lots of us are using IW with no problems.
Bug 401255[1] has all of the details. To answer your question, I am
running sid. It's not saving the homepage,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/07 11:06, Ed G wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:50:09 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> I don't think that would be very different with firefox ;)
>
> Actually, yes, it is different. When running the version from
> mozilla.org, Firefox
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:50:09 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I don't think that would be very different with firefox ;)
Actually, yes, it is different. When running the version from
mozilla.org, Firefox works just fine. No broken session management. Even
building it from source provide
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:36:11 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > but for usability it's irelevant...
On 26.03.07 22:29, Ed G wrote:
> Unlike for iceweasel, which was completely useless to me (with broken
> session management) for many weeks.
I don't think that would be very different with
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:36:11 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> but for usability it's irelevant...
Unlike for iceweasel, which was completely useless to me (with broken
session management) for many weeks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Dear d-u:
On Saturday 24 March 2007 23:35, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
> Only to be mathematically rigorous: not only the name, but some of the
> artwork, is different.
I just upgraded to version 1.5.0.10 (20070307), and the new artwork
is great!
--
Best wishes,
> >icedove is debianised version of Mozilla Thunderbird (the same software,
> >but
> >different name due to licensing issues). so I'd say MANY people use it.
On 24.03.07 19:35, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
> Only to be mathematically rigorous: not only the name, but some of the
> artwork, i
On 3/25/07, Michael Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just learned of Icedove today.
> Is anybody here using it?
> What do you think of it?
Personally, I just use seamonkey??.tar.gz from mozilla.org, as seamonkey's
extension function
On 3/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just learned of Icedove today.
Is anybody here using it?
What do you think of it?
A couple of years ago I had to give up on nmh as my mail system,
because it didn't work with imap, and I was sick of constantly having
to fetch mail off t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings;
I just learned of Icedove today.
Is anybody here using it?
What do you think of it?
Where caqn I find some more info on it?
Thanks for any info!
Dennis
I am using it on my Debian Testing machine. I just love it. After adding
the Lightning extension,
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 03:06:38PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> I just learned of Icedove today.
>
> Is anybody here using it?
>
> What do you think of it?
>
I don't use Icedove personally, but I can say from experience that I
don't personally like Icedove. I'm not sure on
On Saturday 24 March 2007 23:35, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
> > icedove is debianised version of Mozilla Thunderbird (the same software,
> > but
> > different name due to licensing issues). so I'd say MANY people use it.
>
> Only to be mathematically rigorous: not only the name, but some o
On 3/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings;
I just learned of Icedove today.
Is anybody here using it?
What do you think of it?
Where caqn I find some more info on it?
Thanks for any info!
Dennis
Slightly off topic, but I use and like Sylpheed. Sylpheed is a very
icedove is debianised version of Mozilla Thunderbird (the same software,
but
different name due to licensing issues). so I'd say MANY people use it.
Only to be mathematically rigorous: not only the name, but some of the
artwork, is different.
The actual *code*, however, is essentially the same.
On 24.03.07 15:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just learned of Icedove today.
>
> Is anybody here using it?
>
> What do you think of it?
>
> Where caqn I find some more info on it?
icedove is debianised version of Mozilla Thunderbird (the same software, but
different name due to licensing issu
Greetings;
I just learned of Icedove today.
Is anybody here using it?
What do you think of it?
Where caqn I find some more info on it?
Thanks for any info!
Dennis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello,
with debian (i tried the latest net-install) - but also with a lot of
other distros - i have a special problem: i can't get a dhcp-connection.
only with zenwalk there is (latest version 4) not the slightest problem.
i asked - very generally - them, what the differences could be that mad
you still can send us
your ideas, comments and bug reports related to our products! Please use
our web pages:
http://www.suse.de/feedback
If you need support please contact our installation support
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, if you have a valid registration code or consult our
sup
Caro dooyooer
innanzitutto grazie per averci contattato, abbiamo ricevuto il tuo messaggio e
cercheremo di risponderti al più presto.
Il numero d messaggio che riceviamo è cosi grande che siamo costretti a gestire i
tempi di risposta a seconda dell'urgenza delle vostre richieste.
Nel frattempo,
Major snip
> You can get micro-itx systems for <$200 from idot.com, complete.
> I don't know how they related to PVR applications.
All that is needed to have a PVR is a TV tuner card that is supported
by Linux, which you then can save your shows to a hard drive. Most
graphics cards nowadays ha
> Dear: Fellow Debian users;
> I was thinking about using a micro-atx case and board probably using
> an AMD chip, then getting the supported hardware for the pvr. I was
> thinking about going the VIA mini-itx way but the cases are almost as
> expensive as the motherboard chip combo. I also woul
Dear: Fellow Debian users;
I would like to get some feedback from those of you who have setup a
Linux pvr, or used linux in their home threatre system. I have been
thinking about building a dedicated pvr box for this purpose.
I have visted different sites, such as Mythtv.org and also been to
Thank you for providing your feedback regarding the beta firmware/software.
Your feedback will be reviewed by the Netgear engineering team for possible
inclusion into current and future releases. Please be advised that you will
not be receiving further responses from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mai
Thank you for providing your feedback regarding the beta firmware/software.
Your feedback will be reviewed by the Netgear engineering team for possible
inclusion into current and future releases. Please be advised that you will
not be receiving further responses from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mai
101 - 200 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
