vad i hela världen är hamm för debian utgåva
menar hittade majordomos om deb där
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, mattias wrote:
vad i hela världen är hamm för debian utgåva
menar hittade majordomos om deb där
hamm == Debian 2.0, släpptes 24/7 1998.
jag skulle inte rekomendera varse sig att du installerar en deb från den
eller ens att du installerar majordomo överhuvudtaget. Det är
ofan är dom så buggiga?
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Martin Bagge / brother [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 5 augusti 2008 18:30
Till: debian-user-swedish@lists.debian.org
Ämne: Re: disten hamm
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, mattias wrote:
vad i hela världen är hamm för debian utgåva
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, mattias wrote:
ofan är dom så buggiga?
Njae. men knappast kompatibla med ditt system om du inte har ett riktigt
gammalt system.
minimalist kanske kan va av intresse för ditt listmojängande. har hört att
den ska va rätt snäll. inga features eller så, bara lista.
--
: disten hamm
Hej!
Mattias, detta är tredje gången du frågar om majordomo.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user.swedish/8881/focus=8881
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user.swedish/9498/focus=9498
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user.swedish/9870/focus=9870
Suite à ce fil, j'ai mis en ligne sur
http://franboisson.free.fr/CD/
des images ISO de la Bo, de la Ham Binaries (fichier découpé en 12
parties).
Je mettrais la Ham-contrib et la Ham-sources dans les prochains jours.
François Boisson
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
Am Samstag, 24. März 2007 10:08 schrieb François Boisson:
Suite à ce fil, j'ai mis en ligne sur
http://franboisson.free.fr/CD/
des images ISO de la Bo, de la Ham Binaries (fichier découpé en 12
parties).
Je mettrais la Ham-contrib et la Ham-sources dans les prochains jours.
François
serais curieux de savoir ce que c'est
D'anciennes versions de Debian. La Hamm, c'est la 2.0.
--
THIS IS NOT A CLUE...OR IS IT?
THIS IS NOT A CLUE...OR IS IT?
THIS IS NOT A CLUE...OR IS IT?
-+- Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 2F16
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question
dans les prochains jours.
François Boisson
Salut,
je serais curieux de savoir ce que c'est
D'anciennes versions de Debian. La Hamm, c'est la 2.0.
et ça sert à quoi aujord'hui?
Klaus
et ça sert à quoi aujord'hui?
La Bo et la Hamm s'installe sans problème sur des machines avec 16M de
RAM, elles ont un système qui tourne avec un noyau 2.0 faisant de
l'ordre de 400K: Exemple sur un serveur d'impression 486SX25 (25MHz
sans coprocesseur flottant donc) toujours increvable chez
C'est une démonstration pas l'exemple... ce n'est donc pas significatif
__ exprimé de la sorte __
J'ai plutôt la perception d'un système stable par morceaux,
autre formulation système stable si on n'utilise pas ce qui n'est pas
stable...
(pour savoir ce que j'appelle non-stable, il suffit
Quoting Erwan David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
A condition d'avoir une liaison rapide... En RTC il est impensbale de
maintenir par le réseau...
Sur stable, si, à mon avis. C'est d'ailleurs tellement mon avis que c'est ce
que je fais chez moi..:)
--
Le Tue, 16 Oct 2001 18:05:19 -0400 (EDT)
Eric LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] a dit:
Salut!
Je recherche un ISO de debian, version hamm et anterieures. Un parmi
vous
l'aurait?
Cela m'aiderait beaucoup :)
J'ai les CD de la 2.0 hamm et un CD (= distrib complète je crois) de la
(1.3 = bo
Le Wed 17/10/2001, François Boisson disait
(Samba, noyau 2.2, Apache, etc). A aucun moment, je n'ai eu besoin de
réinstaller ou de faire un dist-upgrade violent. C'est à mon avis
significatif sur la stabilité du système Debian et minore à mon avis
considérablement la lenteur de sortie des
Salut!
Je recherche un ISO de debian, version hamm et anterieures. Un parmi vous
l'aurait?
Cela m'aiderait beaucoup :)
Merci!
Guenas
El Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:11:35AM -0200, Christoph Simon disidio iscribir:
Yo en Hamm con una línea ADSL no conseguí hacer funcionar el dhcp de
ninguna de las maneras.
[...]
No lo he probado, pero sé que el pump funcionó a la primera en potato,
woody e sid.
Gracias a ambos
Yo en Hamm con una línea ADSL no conseguí hacer funcionar el dhcp de
ninguna de las maneras. Al final lo solucioné porque la me dí cuenta que la
dirección ip que asignaba a un PC Windows era siempre la misma y se la puse
fija. Pero con ONO no sé si esto valdrá. Aunque muchos asignadores de
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:29:29 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yo en Hamm con una línea ADSL no conseguí hacer funcionar el dhcp de
ninguna de las maneras. Al final lo solucioné porque la me dí cuenta que la
dirección ip que asignaba a un PC Windows era siempre la misma y se la puse
fija. Pero
Guenas
Tengo un problema que me tiene mosca.
Escenario: Debian Hamm, tarjeta de red 8029 del montón, módem cable de ONO,
cliente DHCP (dhcpcd versión vete a saber, la de Hamm y la de Slink he
probado; era el paquetito que traía sólo el cliente).
La instalación, como siempre fácil. La
I want to upgrade my system from Hamm (2.0) to Potato (2.2), using CDROMs. I
tried to first install apt, but, not surprisingly, I got all kinds of
dependency errors.
So I thought I would do it the old fashioned way one more time: using dselect
and do each of the binary CDs separately (Update
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to upgrade my system from Hamm (2.0) to Potato (2.2), using CDROMs. I
tried to first install apt, but, not surprisingly, I got all kinds of
dependency errors.
http://panic.et.tudelft.nl/~costar/potato/upgrade-i386/
cu
--
hafi
Here is my problem: My end goal is to
install StarOffice 51. I loaded hamm from my cd, upgraded to slink using
apt-get from ftp.debian.org, then pulled down XFree86 3.3.5 (current) for
glibc. When I run startx I get this:
/usr/X11R6/bin/X: error in loading shared
libraries
: undefined
Hi
I want to update my server running with hamm to slink ...
What's the safest way to do this ?
I'd prefer not to use dselect, just update necessary
libraries and installed software.
Wacek
// Wacek Gocki
// e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
// http://www.lhotse.com.pl
On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 08:31:25AM +0100, Wacek Gocki wrote:
Hi
I want to update my server running with hamm to slink ...
What's the safest way to do this ?
I'd prefer not to use dselect, just update necessary
libraries and installed software.
download and install apt, read the docs
, Wacek Gocki wrote:
Hi
I want to update my server running with hamm to slink ...
What's the safest way to do this ?
I'd prefer not to use dselect, just update necessary
libraries and installed software.
Wacek
// Wacek Gocki
// e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
// http
Take a look at:
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/Release-Notes
No more questions, that's all what I wanted to know
Thanks for all answers ...
Merry Christmas and Happy Y2K :-)
Wacek
// Wacek Gocki
// e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
// http://www.lhotse.com.pl
On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 08:31, Wacek Gocki wrote:
I want to update my server running with hamm to slink ...
What's the safest way to do this ?
I'd prefer not to use dselect, just update necessary
libraries and installed software.
I've got a fairly sketchy but also fairly complete
Faltaría más que incluso siendo gratis y hecha por gente sin ningún
ánimo
de lucro encima se les pudiera exigir
responsabilidades, ¿no? :)
Pero... Debian o alguna otra organización podría comenzar(aunque ya es
un poco tarde) a probar y certificar los programas más usados. No se,
una especie de
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, jcarlos wrote:
Faltaría más que incluso siendo gratis y hecha por gente sin ningún
ánimo
de lucro encima se les pudiera exigir
responsabilidades, ¿no? :)
Pero... Debian o alguna otra organización podría comenzar(aunque ya es
un poco tarde) a probar y certificar los
I've installed Hamm from a cd. I need to
upgrade X to 3.3.5 so it will support my i740 video card. It would be nice
to install StarOffice51, but that won't happen cause it needs glibc. How
can I get to where I need to be?
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Ximo Nadal wrote:
Igual mi pregunta es una burrada pero ¿alguien ha leido en algún
sitio, o sabe si Hamm es Y2K?.
Yo creo que si debe serlo, pero para pasar la auditoria del año 2000
en mi empresa se necesita algo mas que mi creencia y las cuatro
pruebas que yo
De todas formas, si vas a trabajar con software libre, no vayas por ahí
pidiendo certificados de compatibilidad con el año 2000. Lee por ejemplo
el párrafo de la GPL que habla acerca de la ausencia total de garantía y
verás a lo que me refiero. Naturalmente, no por no garantizarte algo va a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Faltaría más que incluso siendo gratis y hecha por gente sin ningún ánimo
de lucro encima se les pudiera exigir
responsabilidades, ¿no? :)
Totalmente de acuerdo contigo. Ya es mucha la generosidad
que muestran los desarroladores de linux como para que
encima vengamos
El jue, 16 de dic de 1999, a las 04:02:39 +0100, Jose Luis Trivino va y
dice:
funciona en el 2000 (independientemente de la minuciosidad
con la que lo compruebe). Sería algo así como incluir una
nota en el 'lastchanges' del paquete que diga 'Y2K tested'.
Se puede consultar si el paquete se
El Wed, Dec 01, 1999,
Javier Viñuales Gutiérrez...
Ayer hine una actualización (ya era horita) de Hamm a
Slink...
El único problema lo tengo con sendmail que al
pasar de la versión de Hamm a Slink parece que varía
el tema de la base que utiliza y
Hoy he actualizado en el trabajo la nueva version del samba. Anteriormente
tenia funcionando otra version (tambien de la hamm) que no me habia dado ningun
problema. En el servidor sale un mensaje del tipo: smbd no puede cambiar el
gid cuando se da un password correcto en los windoze pero
On mié, dic 01, 1999 at 11:02:58 +0100, Cosme Perea Cuevas wrote:
No comprendo totalmente el funcionamiento de sendmail, pero
ahí va un `sendmail.mc' que funciona en Slink, ;-)
[...]
VERSIONID(`@(#)sendmail.mc8.7 (Linux) 3/5/96')
¿Este no es el sendmail de Hamm?, mi versión es:
[EMAIL
Buenas a todos y todas.
Ayer hine una actualización (ya era horita) de Hamm a Slink y como era de
esperar no tuve problemas con casi nada...Debian es así :-)
El único problema lo tengo con sendmail que al pasar de la versión de
Hamm a
Slink parece que
Hola:
Igual mi pregunta es una burrada pero ¿alguien ha leido en algún
sitio, o sabe si Hamm es Y2K?.
Yo creo que si debe serlo, pero para pasar la auditoria del año 2000
en mi empresa se necesita algo mas que mi creencia y las cuatro
pruebas que yo pueda hacer.
Saludos.
--
Mecanizados, s
vistazo http://www.debian.org
Un saludo
Daniel
debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org con fecha 30/11/99 09:36:29
Por favor, responda a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destinatarios: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
CC: (cci: Daniel Ferradal Marquez/INFO/URQUIJO)
Asunto: Es Debian Hamm Y2K
Ximo Nadal wrote:
Hola:
Igual mi pregunta es una burrada pero ¿alguien ha leido en algún
sitio, o sabe si Hamm es Y2K?.
Yo creo que si debe serlo, pero para pasar la auditoria del año 2000
en mi empresa se necesita algo mas que mi creencia y las cuatro
pruebas que yo pueda hacer.
En
Hello!
After finally upgrading to hamm-potato, one small problem remains unsolved
(the rest I managed to kill :).
While printing works fine when I do 'cat file /dev/printer', lpd seems
to think the printer is offline (lpc claims the daemon is waiting for
the printer).
What could be the cause
this so I don't know if any new problems have cropped up, but that
is how I installed Debian on this machine, as I had the Debian 2.0 CD
and wanted to be running potato.
Sean
Peter Schuller wrote:
Hello!
Theoretically, if I installed apt on a hamm (2.0) system, and attempted to
have
I am using a weird hamm dist with a self compiled kernel (2.0.10), and
some other software which wasn't available as packages with the features I
needed (postfix, ssh2, perl, apache-ssl ...).
How could I upgrade to potato without running in conflicts with
dependencies? E. g
dependiendo de qué cambio
de version se trate.
Gracias a todos y disculpad mi anterior mensaje.
El 30 Jul 1999 a las 04:54PM +0200, Andres Seco Hernandez escribio:
En la linea de mi anterior mensaje,
Cuando usé apt-get para actulizar hamm a slink, el kernel no se actualizó.
Lo que tambien he visto
En la linea de mi anterior mensaje,
Cuando usé apt-get para actulizar hamm a slink, el kernel no se actualizó.
Lo que tambien he visto es que tampoco se ha actualizado mutt. Lo he actualizado
a mano con dpkg -i. Tenia la version 0.93 de hamm y he montado la 0.95 de
slink
¿Tambien son paquetes
urgente: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Microsoft Certified Product Specialist MCP ID 445900
Debian GNU Linux 2.0 (hamm) - Linux Registered User no. 113867
--
pgpW4oYIBQkbF.pgp
Description
-i386/
deb cdrom:slink (2.1) binary-i386 (1 de 2)/
debian/dists/frozen/non-free/binary-i386/
deb cdrom:slink (2.1) binary-i386 (1 de 2)/
debian/dists/local/local/binary-i386/
... pero en una actualización de hamm sí tuve que indicarselo a mano:
deb file:/cdrom/debian stable main contrib non-free
On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 10:33:41PM +0200, Ignacio J. Alonso wrote:
Hola
Ayer en un 'ratito' decidi actualizarme a Slink usando la Citius de LA y la
verdad
que el método de actualización apt-get es una pasada :-) (ya lo use para
pasar de Bo a Hamm). Todo me funciona (incluso las X) más o
Hola
Ayer en un 'ratito' decidi actualizarme a Slink usando la Citius de LA y la
verdad
que el método de actualización apt-get es una pasada :-) (ya lo use para
pasar de Bo a Hamm). Todo me funciona (incluso las X) más o menos aunque hay
cosas que no me acaban de convencer (p.e. xdm) y otras
Robert Rati wrote:
Are there any ftp sites with the hamm dist still on them? All ther ones
I've found only have slink and potato. Thanks.
Rob
===
[EMAIL
Are there any ftp sites with the hamm dist still on them? All ther ones
I've found only have slink and potato. Thanks.
Rob
===
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Role-Player
Robert Rati wrote:
Are there any ftp sites with the hamm dist still on them? All ther ones
I've found only have slink and potato. Thanks.
Rob
http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/dists/
ftp://debian.midco.net/debian
*- On 22 Jun, Robert Rati wrote about hamm dist sites
Are there any ftp sites with the hamm dist still on them? All ther ones
I've found only have slink and potato. Thanks.
Scroll down to the bottom of http://www.debian.org and you will find:
Old versions of Debian
Debian 1.3 (codenamed
Hello,
I am currently considering upgrading my hamm system to kernel 2.2.x and glibc
2.1 (because of IBM's JVM port :).
My questions is, has anyone tried this? Which packages can I expect to have
to upgrade? What might brake? The kernel is no biggie, I know (since I can
just boot the old one
On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 09:58:34PM +0200, manu wrote:
Did i make a mistake ?
APT simply don't do anything useful.
I wanted it to upgrade my entire system, but only 3 pakages were
updated.
yes, i ve read the release-info.
Can anyone tell me the secret ?
Cause i really don't want to
, France.
If you are upgrading a hybrid system (i.e. bo/hamm) you will need to
edit the file /etc/apt/sources.list to the locations that you want. I
will attach a copy of mine to assist you. I assume that you are wanting
to stay with a stable slink version
Hallo,
Last night I upgraded my mixed hamm/slink/potato system to a
slink-based system.
Everything is working satisfactorily now except for the two problems
mentioned in the subject line.
1. I cannot get the compose key working again in console mode. When this
happened in my previous upgrade
Did i make a mistake ?
APT simply don't do anything useful.
I wanted it to upgrade my entire system, but only 3 pakages were
updated.
yes, i ve read the release-info.
Can anyone tell me the secret ?
Cause i really don't want to upgrade by hand...
Thanks.
Emmanuel, France.
Did i make a mistake ?
APT simply don't do anything useful.
I wanted it to upgrade my entire system, but only 3 pakages were
updated.
yes, i ve read the release-info.
Can anyone tell me the secret ?
Cause i really don't want to upgrade by hand...
Thanks.
Emmanuel, France.
I applied the diff done by Magallo at
http://master.debian.org/~mmagallo/packages/wmaker/ and that fixed the
locale problems, thanks!
Now all I have to do is figure out why netscape dies with a bus error... :(
--
Chris Frost | http://www.frostnet.advicom.net/chris/
I'd like to run a 2.2.x kernel on my hamm system.
Does anyone know what problems will occur when doing this?
Thanks, Stephan
Hachinger.
I just upgraded an i386 box from hamm slink (a very rocky upgrade on this
box), and when starting Window Maker 0.60 which I compiled under hamm I
get an error message with an undefined reference to `_Xsetlocale'. Trying
to compile WM 0.60 does the same, giving the following output:
Making all
Subject: some losses after hamm-slink
Date: Sun, May 30, 1999 at 02:26:51PM +0400
In reply to:Eugene Sevinian
Quoting Eugene Sevinian([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
after upgrading to slink am unable to work with floppy:
Operation not supported by device or something like
Hi,
after upgrading to slink am unable to work with floppy:
Operation not supported by device or something like that.
Another problem is that it seems that old way of
copying kernel (2.2.5) to another harddisk of floppy by doing
dd with previosly set root device by rdev also does not work.
I have HAMM installed. I have the slink distro files. what's the best
way to upgrade (apt?) and how?
Matthew McFarlane
-
yOn Sat, 29 May 1999, Matthew McFarlane wrote:
I have HAMM installed. I have the slink distro files. what's the best
way to upgrade (apt?) and how?
The instructions are in the file main/Release-Notes.
I think I added apt as a method in dselect, and then let dselect to its
thing.
...RickM...
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 04:44:37PM -0400, Matthew McFarlane wrote:
I have HAMM installed. I have the slink distro files. what's the best
way to upgrade (apt?) and how?
apt-get dist-upgrade
There is an upgrade guide somewhere in the top level directory
structure.
Bob
--
Bob Nielsen
Where are the hamm .deb's kept nowadays? All I can find are slink and
potato and the 'old' bo
ones.
Is there a way to determine a sources dependancies before trying to
compile it up? Specifically
I'm referring to mysql and netpbm-nonfree but I'd like a way of finding
this out for an general
case
I have a mixed system with a hamm base and slink and potato packages. I
want to try out a cd writer (HP 7200i) and to do that want to install a
new version of cdrecord as hamm's version does not support the drive.
cdrecord depends on libc6 2.1.
When I try to install libc6 the following happens
I'm trying to upgrade a debian 2.0 (hamm) system to 2.1 (slink). I've got 2.1
on a mounted CD-ROM and apt installed correctly on the system. The problem I
am having is getting apt-get dist-upgrade to work. When I run the command
(as root) I get the following error message:
Updating package
I'm trying to upgrade a debian 2.0 (hamm) system to 2.1 (slink). I've got 2.1
on a mounted CD-ROM and apt installed correctly on the system. The problem I
am having is getting apt-get dist-upgrade to work. When I run the command
(as root) I get the following error message:
Updating package
Mark Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MT I'm trying to upgrade a debian 2.0 (hamm) system to 2.1 (slink).
MT I've got 2.1 on a mounted CD-ROM and apt installed correctly on
MT the system. The problem I am having is getting apt-get
MT dist-upgrade to work. When I run the command (as root) I get
Jean-Yves BARBIER wrote:
Todd 'Snoopy' Harper wrote:
G'Day,
I'm currently still running hamm, and I've installed Netscape 4.51
using the installer package (4.0-12). When I try to compose a new
message in Messenger, I get a subprocess diagnostic dialog box
Hi,
I think it could
G'Day,
I'm currently still running hamm, and I've installed Netscape 4.51
using the installer package (4.0-12). When I try to compose a new
message in Messenger, I get a subprocess diagnostic dialog box
pop up that says Warning: Type conversion failed and repeats it
twice.
Also, I can't use
Todd 'Snoopy' Harper wrote:
G'Day,
I'm currently still running hamm, and I've installed Netscape 4.51
using the installer package (4.0-12). When I try to compose a new
message in Messenger, I get a subprocess diagnostic dialog box
Hi,
I think it could come from 2 sources:
1- You told
I am running hamm but I don't have the cd; I do have the slink cds.
Where can I download hamm's apt-get so I can upgrade to slink?
Thanks
--Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*- On 8 May, Jeremy C.Reed wrote about where can I get hamm packages?
I am running hamm but I don't have the cd; I do have the slink cds.
Where can I download hamm's apt-get so I can upgrade to slink?
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/slink/main/upgrade-2.0-i386/
--
Brian
On Sat, May 08, 1999 at 12:37:06PM -0800, Jeremy C.Reed wrote:
I am running hamm but I don't have the cd; I do have the slink cds.
Where can I download hamm's apt-get so I can upgrade to slink?
AFAIK it should be on the CD-ROM. In the ftp archive it is in
/dists/stable/main/upgrade-2.0-i386
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeremy C.Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running hamm but I don't have the cd; I do have the slink cds.
Where can I download hamm's apt-get so I can upgrade to slink?
The 2 things that the apt from slink depends on that are not in
hamm are libc6 (= 2.0.7u
Having a problem with root mounted NFS file systems on my PC's acting as X
terminals. Everything has been working fine with hamm, but as soon as I
upgrade to the nfs-server (and net-base) in slink (either by a full install
of slink, or just upgrading the nfs-server), I'm getting all sorts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After much trouble trying to compile a 2.0.35 kernel on a hamm 2.0.34 machine,
I've decided to upgrade some stuff. Will this be enough, or would I need
anything else? Will it cause any trouble in hamm? (touching libc6 scares the
hell out of me!)
I've downloaded
~ glibc-doc_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb
~ libc6_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb
~ make_3.77-4.deb
~ make-doc_3.77-4.deb
~
~ upghrading from hamm to slink is a snap:
~
~ 1.as root open an internet connection
~
~ 2.open dselect, from the first menu choose apt and choose the stable
~ version (probably already
After much trouble trying to compile a 2.0.35 kernel on a hamm 2.0.34 machine,
I've decided to upgrade some stuff. Will this be enough, or would I need
anything else? Will it cause any trouble in hamm? (touching libc6 scares the
hell out of me!)
I've downloaded (from Slink):
bin86_0.14.3-1.deb
the contrib CD and the binary CD to one of my hard drives and
ran the install from the hard drive. This seems like a terrible solution,
since not everyone is going to have enough free space to be able to do
this.
I think multi-CD selection has arrived, but not in hamm, or even slink
as released. I
I got my cheapbytes debian 2.1 4 cd set and tried to upgrade. I
downloaded the latest apt package (0.3.1) from ftp.debian.org and
installed it. I ran the apt-cdrom program to set up the
/etc/apt/sources.list file. Then I ran apt-get update. (I which I
remembered to run the loging script
Hello... thought it might be instructive to pass along the things that
happened to me when trying to install Linux on my Pentium-133.
Some background: I have never installed any brand of Linux before, but
I've dabbled in Unix and am somewhat familiar with Linux (some friends have
it installed --
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 12:23:56 GMT, you wrote:
I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows
this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails.
/etc/apt/apt.conf:
Acquire::cdrom::Mount /mnt/cdrom;
fixes this.
Greetings
Marc
--
--
There have been several posts on debian-user asking how to use apt-get
to upgrade from hamm to slink, now that the binaries no longer fit on
a single CD.
I've seen two answers so far on the list---both of them containing
very helpful suggestions, but very different from one another, and
both
On Sun, 28 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have been several posts on debian-user asking how to use apt-get
to upgrade from hamm to slink, now that the binaries no longer fit on
a single CD.
I've seen two answers so far on the list---both of them containing
very helpful suggestions
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:48:33 -0700 (MST), you wrote:
The final solution is to install APT 0.3 from potato and use it's built in
CD handling through apt-cdrom.
Good work. I like it.
I have made a special source specifically
for this,
deb http://www.debian.org/~jgg apt/
Which will contain the
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:48:33 -0700 (MST), you wrote:
then run 'apt-get dist-upgrade -u' twice (or is it 3 times?)
I had to run apt-get dis-upgrade -u numerous times (at least twenty
times) with varying cd changes to upgrade my hamm test system to
slink. Occasionally, even --fix-missing (?, don't
Marc Haber wrote:
I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows
this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails.
Edit your /etc/fstab file so /dev/hdc (or whatever device your cdrom is) is
mounted
on /cdrom -- change the /mnt/cdrom to /cdrom, then type:
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 11:12:06 -0500, you wrote:
Marc Haber wrote:
I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows
this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails.
Edit your /etc/fstab file so /dev/hdc (or whatever device your cdrom is) is
mounted
on /cdrom -- change
On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 11:12:06AM -0500, Sean wrote:
Marc Haber wrote:
I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows
this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails.
Edit your /etc/fstab file so /dev/hdc (or whatever device your cdrom is) is
mounted
on
Hello,
I'm upgrading from Hamm to Slink, I didn' reboot yet but everything
seems OK
except for a few minor (?) problems:
- I started upgrading with dselect/ftp then I downloaded apt and am
actually using it. the problem is that I have a few packages left in
/var/cache/apt/archives, though
I just tried to edit a 25Mb text file in Emacs20 on a hamm system
with 128Mb of RAM. I discovered that the end of the file is shown
on the screen (no X, raw ssh/telnet screen) as a structured lot of
question marks
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, buns wrote:
This is a bit off-topic.
Raymond A. Ingles wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Don Erickson wrote:
Somebody (through jhb60.jaring.my) wandered into my system, set up a user
account for themselves and set up a couple of programs, eggdrop and smurf.
The
Raymond A. Ingles wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, buns wrote:
This is a bit off-topic.
Raymond A. Ingles wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Don Erickson wrote:
Somebody (through jhb60.jaring.my) wandered into my system, set up a
user
account for themselves and set up a couple
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, buns wrote:
Raymond A. Ingles wrote:
The address seem to indicate that the intruder originates from Malaysia.
As does yours.
Rest assured that mine does.
BTW, I meant to put a smiley after that As does yours part, sorry.
I sincerely think that the intruder
1 - 100 of 1690 matches
Mail list logo
