On Lu, 20 mai 13, 23:06:29, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 23:19 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
You are of course aware of debian-user-german, or not?
I don't know the German mailing list. I know some good German forums,
but international lists and forums simply provide a huger
Am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013 schrieb Lisi Reisz:
On Sunday 19 May 2013 17:05:40 Lisi Reisz wrote:
Your backported packages, _and_ _only_ your backported
packages will be updated from wheezy-backports.
Sorry, upgraded.
Lisi
Hi Lisi,
no they did not. I thought, libreoffice would
On Lu, 20 mai 13, 09:21:59, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
no they did not. I thought, libreoffice would automaticallly update, as
wheezy-
backports was in my sources.list. But although the packagaes appeared in
aptitude, they won't update automatically. So I did it manually.
Dear Hans-J, could
On Monday 20 May 2013 08:21:59 Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013 schrieb Lisi Reisz:
On Sunday 19 May 2013 17:05:40 Lisi Reisz wrote:
Your backported packages, _and_ _only_ your backported
packages will be updated from wheezy-backports.
Sorry, upgraded.
Lisi
Hi
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 11:40 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
As per default configuration of backports (priority 100) 1 will *not*
happen unless you use '-t backports', but 2 will.
More information about priorities can be found at
http://wiki.debian.org/AptPreferences -
Dear Andrei
Dear Hans-J, could you please clarify your terminology? What do you mean
by 'automatically update' in above paragraph? Which one of the following
do you mean:
1. I have package version 1 and expected version 2~bpo from backports
to be installed
What I meant was I have package
On Monday 20 May 2013 11:05:53 Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Dear Andrei
Dear Hans-J, could you please clarify your terminology? What do you mean
by 'automatically update' in above paragraph? Which one of the following
do you mean:
1. I have package version 1 and expected version 2~bpo from
Hi Lisi!
It does. The lower pinning is to prevent backports from upgrading your
whole installation. If you install from Stable and do not change your
sources.list, upgrades will only be taken from Stable. To repeat what I
said earlier, packages from backports _and_ _only_ packages from
On Monday 20 May 2013 12:34:55 Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Andrei is one of the most knowledgeable and helpful of the people on this
list. He is also very experienced.
You appear to be relatively new to
Debian.
Ahem, no, I am not new to debian.
Sorry. :-( Mea culpa.
But I am no
On Lu, 20 mai 13, 12:49:21, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Oh, disagree with me all you like - but be cautious about disagreeing with
Andrei!
Please, you make it sound like I'm from the Romanian mafia or something
:p
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic
On Lu, 20 mai 13, 13:34:55, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Oh, I never doubted that you were imprecise. I was imprecise, maybe I cannotz
express myself in English as well as in my mother language German. I excuse
for that!
You are of course aware of debian-user-german, or not?
Kind regards,
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 23:19 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 20 mai 13, 13:34:55, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Oh, I never doubted that you were imprecise. I was imprecise, maybe I
cannotz
express myself in English as well as in my mother language German. I excuse
for that!
You are
Hello all,
I wanted to install LO4 in wheezy. I wondered, why it is in wheezy-backports
but not in testing. Maybe the packages in wheezy-backports are too young for
testing?
However, I managed it by using aptitude and made sure, all dependencies are
correct.
But I guess, there is an easier
Hi Hans,
If you want to see why a certain package version has not yet made it
from unstable into testing, you can go to:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/package
replacing package with the name of package in question.
Looking at the page for libreoffice[1], under testing migration you
can
On Du, 19 mai 13, 11:30:50, theart...@zoho.com wrote:
As a different question, could anyone please tell me why
wheezy-backports is not showing up on packages.debian.org?
No, but we can ask the people taking care of it ;)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
On Du, 19 mai 13, 11:39:30, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hello all,
I wanted to install LO4 in wheezy. I wondered, why it is in wheezy-backports
but not in testing. Maybe the packages in wheezy-backports are too young for
testing?
However, I managed it by using aptitude and made sure, all
Hi Andrei,
But I guess, there is an easier way, to update my ONLY my installed
packages out of wheezy. In the wiki I read, you can use apt-get -t
wheezy-backports install $package, which worked well.
Not sure what you mean here, could you please rephrase/elaborate?
No, not quite. I
On Sunday 19 May 2013 16:01:51 Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
But I guess, there is an easier way, to update my ONLY my installed
packages out of wheezy. In the wiki I read, you can use apt-get -t
wheezy-backports install $package, which worked well.
Not sure what you mean here, could you
On Sunday 19 May 2013 17:05:40 Lisi Reisz wrote:
Your backported packages, _and_ _only_ your backported
packages will be updated from wheezy-backports.
Sorry, upgraded.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Du, 19 mai 13, 17:01:51, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Normally a package has to be in testing first and only then backported
(to ensure some testing). The package in backports has a special version
so that apt/dpkg always consider the package in testing to be newer
(even if the software
On 20/05/13 03:01, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
and then apt-get upgrade libreoffice-* | grep installed or some similar
Note: Untested.
I think
# aptitude install '?name(libreoffice)?installed'
would do approximately that?
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
21 matches
Mail list logo
