On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:48:09 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
Hello Gary,
>Yes but: both gdb and nfs-client installed fine. Moreover, the
>nfs-client doesn't appear to be a dependency of any of the massive load
>of files updated lately. The gdb package however is but for some
This t
moved from testing and, as things stand, it looks like it
might be permanent - I fully understand why, but I shall mourn its
passing, as I find it to be quite handy for weeding out cruft.
Yes but: both gdb and nfs-client installed fine. Moreover, the
nfs-client doesn't appear to be a depende
wn
> to a lack of nfs software on my workstation. Reinstalling nfs-client
> fixed this.
>
> I guess I need to pay closer attention to what autoremove tells me it's
> going to remove, but I'm confused as to why it would remove nfs-client &
> related packages.
>
> This
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:51:01 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
Hello Gary,
>Not looking for a solution. Just reporting a spate of oddities I've
>encountered lately.
As Erwan says, this is 'normal'. Especially ATM due to the t64
transition.
As you've found out, paying attention to removals is a Good
erver shares. I eventually traced this down to
> a lack of nfs software on my workstation. Reinstalling nfs-client fixed
> this.
>
> I guess I need to pay closer attention to what autoremove tells me it's
> going to remove, but I'm confused as to why it would remove n
workstation. Reinstalling nfs-client
fixed this.
I guess I need to pay closer attention to what autoremove tells me it's
going to remove, but I'm confused as to why it would remove nfs-client &
related packages.
This follows a couple of previous full-upgrades that were having
problems. The f
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:27:41AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, February 22, 2020 09:42:32 AM Mark Raynsford wrote:
> > It's a new VM, but this actually _was_ the problem, amusingly. I had
> > the following in the bhyve device.map:
>
> I sometimes get too curious, but is bhyve
On 2020-02-22T10:27:41 -0500
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, February 22, 2020 09:42:32 AM Mark Raynsford wrote:
> > It's a new VM, but this actually _was_ the problem, amusingly. I had
> > the following in the bhyve device.map:
>
> I sometimes get too curious, but is bhyve a typo, or
On Saturday, February 22, 2020 09:42:32 AM Mark Raynsford wrote:
> It's a new VM, but this actually _was_ the problem, amusingly. I had
> the following in the bhyve device.map:
I sometimes get too curious, but is bhyve a typo, or something real? (I tried
locate on my system, didn't find
I've discovered what the problem was...
On 2020-02-22T17:39:05 +0300
Reco wrote:
>
> A leftover from an old installation maybe?
It's a new VM, but this actually _was_ the problem, amusingly. I had
the following in the bhyve device.map:
(hd0) /dev/zvol/storage/vm/peppermint/disk1
(cd0)
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 02:03:55PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> On 2020-02-22T16:44:18 +0300
> Reco wrote:
> >
> > And yet it is a case of running a wrong kernel.
> > You see, buster's kernel currently has version 4.19.0-8, but yours
> > (4.9.0-9) looks like an outdated stretch one.
> > And you
On 2020-02-22T16:44:18 +0300
Reco wrote:
>
> And yet it is a case of running a wrong kernel.
> You see, buster's kernel currently has version 4.19.0-8, but yours
> (4.9.0-9) looks like an outdated stretch one.
> And you do have a kernel 4.9, but you don't have the modules for it.
> You do have a
Hi.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 12:53:38PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> I've rebooted the VM several times, so it's definitely not a case of
> running the wrong kernel.
>
> # uname -a
> Linux bloodorange.int.arc7.info 4.9.0-9-amd64
And yet it is a case of running a wrong kernel.
You see,
Hello!
I have a fresh install of Buster installed in a VM. I have
the following in /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ buster main
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main
deb-src
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 21:44:56 -0500
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> NFS is a very old protocol that very likely has as yet undiscovered
> vulnerabilities. I would expect that the likelihood of there being
> even a theoretical vulnerability that would allow a malicous user on
> the server to gain
> an attacker gain access to the internal server this way?
>
> Does anyone use such a setup?
>
> internal Server ---> DMZ
> (NFS-Client) (NFS-Server)
>
NFS is a very old protocol that very likely has as yet undiscovered
vulnerabilities. I would
?
internal Server ---> DMZ
(NFS-Client)(NFS-Server)
- Chris
Ron Leach wrote:
# mount 192.168.0.200:/srv /mnt/nfs/srv
mount.nfs no such device
I think the device refered to here is the network device.
Does the error message mean that there is no nfs client available in the
rescue shell?
Which root are you using for your rescue? Is it the root
in the rescue shell filesystem, and can be 'cd''d to.
Does the error message mean that there is no nfs client available in
the rescue shell?
Is there any way round this? There is an nfs client, somewhere in
the filesystem that the rescue shell can see, for example, if there
was a method
to.
Does the error message mean that there is no nfs client available in
the rescue shell?
Is there any way round this? There is an nfs client, somewhere in the
filesystem that the rescue shell can see, for example, if there was a
method to invoke it.
regards, Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
exists in the rescue shell filesystem, and can be 'cd''d
to.
Does the error message mean that there is no nfs client available in the
rescue shell?
Is there any way round this? There is an nfs client, somewhere in the
filesystem that the rescue shell can see, for example
I am running Debain Kernel Version 3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 and system is expecting
very large number of NFS Mount point.
Here is my question...
How I can find minor and major number for FileSystem Type NFS.
I dont see nfs under /dev.
Is there any program that I can run which will show me
I think that nfs ins't a block or character divece, but a network filesystem
2014-07-25 18:19 GMT+02:00 Minesh Parmar parmarmin...@ymail.com:
I am running Debain Kernel Version 3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 and system is
expecting very large number of NFS Mount point.
Here is my question...
How I
So in that case is there any limit on number of mount NFS mount point we can
have on any given system running debain.
On Friday, July 25, 2014 1:00 PM, emmanuel segura emi2f...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that nfs ins't a block or character divece, but a network filesystem
2014-07-25 18:19
o...@illinois.edu wrote:
I've come across a problem with either Debian or recent Linux
kernels with NFS that I am really confused by. I have an NFS server
(Debian Squeeze) exporting to a large number of users. While setting
up a new computer (Squeeze) as an NFS client, I noticed
kernels with NFS that I am really confused by. I have an NFS server
(Debian Squeeze) exporting to a large number of users. While setting
up a new computer (Squeeze) as an NFS client, I noticed that it was
taking ~10 seconds to run 'ls -l' on a directory with ~900 entries.
This seemed a bit
Hi all,
I've come across a problem with either Debian or recent Linux
kernels with NFS that I am really confused by. I have an NFS server
(Debian Squeeze) exporting to a large number of users. While setting
up a new computer (Squeeze) as an NFS client, I noticed that it was
taking ~10 seconds
After upgrading to squeeze on a Toshiba Satellite laptop, and
upgrading kernel to 2.6.32, I am unable to mount remote nfs
partitions. When I try, it just sits, and after several minutes says
something like mount.nfs system call failed. Nothing else of
relevance appears in any log files that I
David Zelinsky dzp...@dedekind.net writes:
After upgrading to squeeze on a Toshiba Satellite laptop, and
upgrading kernel to 2.6.32, I am unable to mount remote nfs
partitions. When I try, it just sits, and after several minutes says
something like mount.nfs system call failed. Nothing else
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:32 PM, David Zelinsky dzp...@dedekind.net wrote:
After upgrading to squeeze on a Toshiba Satellite laptop, and
upgrading kernel to 2.6.32, I am unable to mount remote nfs
partitions. When I try, it just sits, and after several minutes says
something like mount.nfs
Hi,
I am new to Debian; using etch.
I have installed nfs on server and clients. It is functional manually but
does not mount the shares automatically from /etc/fstab.
I have modified /etc/init.d/mountall.sh to mount nfs by changing the 'nonfs'
to 'nfs' in the lines shown below
On Tue July 17 2007 08:38, randhir phagura wrote:
Hi,
I am new to Debian; using etch.
I have installed nfs on server and clients. It is functional manually but
does not mount the shares automatically from /etc/fstab.
I have modified /etc/init.d/mountall.sh to mount nfs by changing the
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 03:38:56PM +, randhir phagura wrote:
Hi,
I am new to Debian; using etch.
I have installed nfs on server and clients. It is functional manually but
does not mount the shares automatically from /etc/fstab.
I have modified /etc/init.d/mountall.sh to mount nfs by
I am using a P3 desktop as the NFS server, which is labeled BDS, and a
P2 laptop as the NFS client, which is labeled LAP. Both computers have
Etch installed with the latest upgrades.
On the server (BDS), the command exportfs -v returns the following:
/home/ken
LAP(rw,async,wdelay
Sorry for my late reply. I have been busy with other things so
continued my diskless install a couple of weeks after your answer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think what you want to do now is something like this:
mount -t proc none /tftpboot/client-dir
chroot
I want to install Debian testing on a diskless machine (i.e. no
floppy, no CDROM, no hard disk) using DHCP/TFTP and NFS. Besides
being diskless, the machine is a standard Pentium PC with a NIC which
has an etherboot EPROM to boot via DHCP/TFTP.
As described in the Debian Installation Guide,
that / is mounted using nfs), and perhaps
install other nfs-related packages for more options regarding nfs.
(apt-get install nfs-common portmap nfs-client)
You should make sure /etc/network/interfaces does *NOT* have an entry
for your interface - at least using the dhcp/pxe-boot process
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 05:01:16PM +0100, Urs Thuermann wrote:
I want to install Debian testing on a diskless machine (i.e. no
floppy, no CDROM, no hard disk) using DHCP/TFTP and NFS. Besides
being diskless, the machine is a standard Pentium PC with a NIC which
has an etherboot EPROM to boot
On 2006-08-21, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
I have a box that I want to run an NFS client on, but not the server. I
installed nfs-common, but attempts to mount result in the following:
mount: storage:/mnt/storage failed, reason given by server:
Permission denied
My /etc/exports
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:27:05PM +0200, Andreas Rippl wrote:
Also, are the various daemons (portmap, mountd etc) running properly?
Portmap is running, but mountd isn't part of nfs-common, it's part of
nfs-kernel-server. Since I only want to run the client, should I have to
run the server too?
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:19:23PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:27:05PM +0200, Andreas Rippl wrote:
Also, are the various daemons (portmap, mountd etc) running properly?
Portmap is running, but mountd isn't part of nfs-common, it's part of
nfs-kernel-server.
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
Portmap is running, but mountd isn't part of nfs-common, it's part of
nfs-kernel-server. Since I only want to run the client, should I have to
You don't need mountd on client computer. RTFM -- in this case NFS-HOWTO
(from doc-linux-nonfree-* package).
Matěj
--
GPG
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 12:01:01PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
I have a box that I want to run an NFS client on, but not the server. I
installed nfs-common, but attempts to mount result in the following:
mount: storage:/mnt/storage failed, reason given by server:
Permission denied
I have a box that I want to run an NFS client on, but not the server. I
installed nfs-common, but attempts to mount result in the following:
mount: storage:/mnt/storage failed, reason given by server:
Permission denied
My /etc/exports on the server seems to contain the right stuff
Zelos a écrit:
bonjour,
je possède un serveur nfs sur lequel le dossier /home/zelos/documents
est partagé pour un hôte dont l'ip figure dans /etc/exports. jusque là,
tout va bien.
sur mon client, lorsque je le monte avec:
mount -t nfs serveur:/home/zelos/documents /home/zelos/docs_sur_serveur
le
Troumad a écrit :
Raphaël 'SurcouF' Bordet a écrit :
Zelos a écrit :
bonjour,
je possède un serveur nfs sur lequel le dossier
/home/zelos/documents est partagé pour un hôte dont l'ip figure dans
/etc/exports. jusque là, tout va bien.
sur mon client, lorsque je le monte avec:
mount -t nfs
Zelos a écrit :
bonjour,
je possède un serveur nfs sur lequel le dossier /home/zelos/documents
est partagé pour un hôte dont l'ip figure dans /etc/exports. jusque là,
tout va bien.
sur mon client, lorsque je le monte avec:
mount -t nfs serveur:/home/zelos/documents /home/zelos/docs_sur_serveur
Hallo,
folgendes Problem:
Ich möchte eine Partition, die an einer Debain-Alpha-Maschine hängt, auf
einer IRIX 5.3 Installation per NFS mounten. Leider funktioniert das
nicht. Das Problem scheint auch bekannt zu sein und mit dem file
handling zusammen zu hängen. Inoffizielles workaround ist den
Hi,
auf dem NFS-Server (Kernel 2.4.x) sieht die /etc/exports in etwa so aus:
/ bse(ro,all_squash,sync)
/var bse(rw,no_root_squash,sync,nohide)
Das nohide soll bewirken, daß durch das schlichte mounten von / automatisch
auch /var des NFS-Servers sichtbar wird. Das funktioniert für
vielen Dank allerseits (besonders gerhard)!
dein letzter hinweis hat hingehauen. Die suse-firewall war schuld. Jetzt
läufts (ausser mit den lese/schreib-rechten, aber die krieg ich wohl selbst
hin).
Woher diese merkwürdige netz-konfiguration kommt hab ich übrigens keine
ahnung. auch der server
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:20:08 +0100, David Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hallo,
ich habe neu einen laptop mit debian.
darauf mchte ich das filesystem meiner anderen (suse) maschine lesen.
ich gehe nach http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/ vor.
leider kommt der client nicht zum laufen.
[snip]
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 20:38, Michael Schulz wrote:
wie sehen /etc/hosts.deny u. /etc/hosts.allow auf dem Server aus?
/etc/hosts.deny:
http-rman : ALL EXCEPT LOCAL
/etc/hosts.allow:
portmap: 192.168.1.4
/etc/exports:
/home/david 192.168.1.4(rw)
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und
danke für deine antwort!
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 02:18, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
Ist der Client überhaupt installiert?
apt-cache policy nfs-common
ja:
suriananda:/usr/local/mozilla# apt-cache policy nfs-common
nfs-common:
Installed: 1:1.0-2woody1
Candidate: 1:1.0-2woody1
der
Gruesse!
* David Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [12.11.03 09:55]:
danke für deine antwort!
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 02:18, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
Ist der Client überhaupt installiert?
apt-cache policy nfs-common
ja:
suriananda:/usr/local/mozilla# apt-cache policy nfs-common
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 12:30, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
a) dein Laptop (192.168.1.4)
produziert DUPs beim ping zum server.
Auch zum Router?
nein:
suriananda:/etc# ping 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=254 time=1.0 ms
sorry,
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 14:35, David Baer wrote:
ausserdem bin ich mir nicht sicher, ob ich auf debian seite irgendwelche
firewalls hab. auf suse seite hab ich die ports 111 und 2048 geöffnet.
ist natürlich 2049 (der nfs-port, so glaube ich)
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und
Am 2003-11-11 09:09:44, schrieb David Baer:
hallo,
Hallo,
suriananda:/home/david# more /proc/filesystems
nodev rootfs
nodev bdev
nodev proc
nodev sockfs
nodev tmpfs
nodev shm
nodev pipefs
cramfs
nodev ramfs
nodev devfs
nodev devpts
ext3
vfat
nodev
David Baer schrieb am 12.11.2003 um 09:54:25 +0100:
Hallo David,
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 20:38, Michael Schulz wrote:
wie sehen /etc/hosts.deny u. /etc/hosts.allow auf dem Server aus?
/etc/hosts.deny:
http-rman : ALL EXCEPT LOCAL
/etc/hosts.allow:
portmap: 192.168.1.4
trag da noch
Gruesse!
* David Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [12.11.03 14:35]:
Ich verkürze das Reply-Quoting jetzt mal, damits übersichtlicher wird.
Der einzige Problem-Ping ist also der vom Laptop zum Server.
d) funktionieren andere netz-Programme ohne Fehler bzw. nennenswerte
Verzögerungen?
hallo,
ich habe neu einen laptop mit debian.
darauf möchte ich das filesystem meiner anderen (suse) maschine lesen.
ich gehe nach http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/ vor.
leider kommt der client nicht zum laufen.
der server scheint zu laufen:
compuJAH:/home/david # rpcinfo -p
Program Vers
ueberhaupt geconft? Laesst er dich als NFS rein? Ist der
NFS-Client-Support im Kernel? Blockst du was mit einer Firewall ab? Hast du
mal mitgesnifft, was die Rechner ueberhaupt senden? Kannst du NFS-Dirs von
anderen Rechner mounten? Funktioniert eine Namensauflösung? Ist die NIC sonst
in Ordnung
David Baer schrieb am 11.11.2003 um 09:09:44 +0100:
Hallo David,
ich habe neu einen laptop mit debian.
darauf möchte ich das filesystem meiner anderen (suse) maschine lesen.
ich gehe nach http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/ vor.
leider kommt der client nicht zum laufen.
der server
Gruesse!
* David Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [11.11.03 09:09]:
hallo,
ich habe neu einen laptop mit debian.
darauf möchte ich das filesystem meiner anderen (suse) maschine lesen.
ich gehe nach http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/ vor.
leider kommt der client nicht zum laufen.
Ist
Mark C wrote:
It feels like a client issue, as RedHat on the client works great.
I just realized that Mark pointed out that you were running NFSpv2
instead of NFSpv3. That could make a big difference. Check your
kernel versions. Here is the decoder ring. I think. But the this
has been my
Bob Proulx said on Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:12:20AM -0600:
So you might try an upgrade to 2.4.20 in order to get the new code.
Thinking about this with the information so far and this is my best
guess.
Unfortunately, 2.4.20 is not available prebuilt for woody directly, it
is in sarge. So
On (05/06/03 11:12), Bob Proulx wrote:
Mark C wrote:
It feels like a client issue, as RedHat on the client works great.
I just realized that Mark pointed out that you were running NFSpv2
instead of NFSpv3. That could make a big difference. Check your
kernel versions. Here is the decoder
Mark said on Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:32:07AM +0100:
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 00:01, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Just a guess: I have 4 of these entries... and I'm pretty sure that you're
supposed to have more than one kernel NFS thread on the server. Are you using
the userspace NFS server?
Hi,
I'm posting this as a last resort, as I'm now at my wits end, after
several hrs googling and reading the man pages, I'm still no closer to
solving this mystery.
My NFS server is running stock woody (with all updates) and exporting
several shares, a few for public access and one for the /home
Mark C said on Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:40:13PM +0100:
I have woody running perfectly, yet it takes an age to read/write any
files from my nfs server, where as redhat is (for nfs clients anyway)
blistering fast, I have tried several wsize and rsize options, but its
still very slow, I'm
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:09, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Are you running portmap on the client and server?
Yes
Are you sure that portmap knows about the NFS progs (what does pmap_dump tell
you?)
It would seem so, as her is the output regarding on both the client and
server:
Client:
# pmap_dump
Support said on Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:40:02PM +0100:
Server:
#pmap_dump
102 tcp111 portmapper
102 udp111 portmapper
132 udp 2049 nfs
^ ^
Just a guess: I have 4 of these entries... and I'm pretty sure
doh!
sorry for the last post, I sent it from the wrong address, I was
checking the support email at the same time..
Anyway, I have done a bit more investigation, and it seems that I only
get the slowdown if I write TO the nfs server from the client,
As I copied some large binaries across to the
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 00:01, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Just a guess: I have 4 of these entries... and I'm pretty sure that you're
supposed to have more than one kernel NFS thread on the server. Are you using
the userspace NFS server?
How would I tell that? (sorry to sound silly)
I basically
Bob Proulx wrote:
What does your /etc/exports on your server say? Does it say 'sync' or
'async' for export options?
At the top of my head I cannor remeber, will check it out, but personally,
It feels like a client issue, as RedHat on the client works great.
Just as an aside you might check
Hi,
I have set up an nfs server and it can be mounted by most nfs clients,
but there is one doesn't work. I use rpcinfo -p ***.***.***.*** to
test that client, and it answers Can't contact portmapper: Remote
System Error - connection refused. When I use rpcinfo -p on that
client, which is also an
Am Montag, 27. Januar 2003 17:10 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hiho,
ich hab für nen SAP System hier aus Platzgründen für einen Export eine
Linuxkiste mit 2 120er IDE Platten (raid 1) hingestellt.
Ich würde gerne von Solaris aus das NFS auch mounten
Dazu ganz simpel:
# /etc/fstab
Title: NFS Mount (Debian: NFS host, Solaris: NFS client)
Hiho,
ich hab für nen SAP System hier aus Platzgründen für einen Export eine Linuxkiste mit 2 120er IDE Platten (raid 1) hingestellt.
Ich würde gerne von Solaris aus das NFS auch mounten
Dazu ganz simpel:
# /etc/fstab
/dev/hda1
I have two Debian Woody (kernel 2.4.19) systems NFS mounting (v3) off
the same NFS server. Suddenly, one of the systems is reporting the
below error. This happens quite offen and is usually, but not always
preceeded by a file save, from Open Office, over the NFS mount. The
other computer does
Douglas == Douglas Eck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Douglas I am running debian sid. I am on a network with my
Douglas homedirectory served via NFS by a Dell intel box (note,
Douglas not IRIX) running Redhat 7.1.
Douglas Under kernels 2.4.14 [patched with sourceforge NFS patch
I am running debian sid. I am on a network with my homedirectory
served via NFS by a Dell intel box (note, not IRIX) running Redhat 7.1.
Under kernels 2.4.14 [patched with sourceforge NFS patch
linux-2.4.14-seekdir.dif]
and also with unpatched 2.4.7 I have problems with screwed up file
reading
[nfsd nfs]
Client lsmod - woody
nfs 160536 1 (autoclean)
lockd 41720 1 (autoclean)[nfs]
sunrpc 41720 1 (autoclean)[nfs lockd]
Hi,
I get the following message and the machine crashes,
apparently when it tries to access our nfs server.
nfs: task 588 cant get a request slot
This is not the server problem (most probably) as the
files can be accessed at the same time from someother
client machine.
This error
Hi,
I get the following message and the machine crashes, apparently when it
tries to access our nfs server.
nfs: task 588 cant get a request slot
This is not the server problem (most probably) as the files can be
accessed at the same time from someother client machine.
This error
Hi,
I was upgrading my potato box and got this as the nfs-client was being set up.
I also get an error message about this when I am rebooting.
Here goes:
Setting up nfs-client (1.4.3-2) ...
Starting NFS client services: rpc.lockdlockdsvc: Function not implemented
rpc.statd.
Whar does
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 10:12:20AM -0500, Christian Dysthe wrote:
Hi,
I was upgrading my potato box and got this as the nfs-client was being set up.
I also get an error message about this when I am rebooting.
Here goes:
Setting up nfs-client (1.4.3-2) ...
Starting NFS client services
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 06:42:06PM +0200, Lex Chive wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 10:12:20AM -0500, Christian Dysthe wrote:
Hi,
I was upgrading my potato box and got this as the nfs-client was being set
up.
I also get an error message about this when I am rebooting.
Here goes
I have a debian box at work mounting a few (well, I guess a lot) of NFS
shares on various Solaris machines. It was working just fine until
yesterday (two months solid uptime) when all of a sudden, I started
getting many errors like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~/naetwt2]$ ls
ls: 800pts: Stale NFS file
does anybody know of a client for win95 that will allow me to map a linux
drive across the network? perferably something that is a free download.
thanks.
rg
attachment: winmail.dat
Rob Goodwin wrote:
does anybody know of a client for win95 that will allow me to map a linux
drive across the network? perferably something that is a free download.
Use the built-in windows networking (with tcp/ip) and install samba
on the linux box.
Tim
--
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Rob Goodwin wrote:
does anybody know of a client for win95 that will allow me to map a linux
drive across the network? perferably something that is a free download.
AFAIK there are only commercial implementations of nfs on windows. Of
course, Microsoft didn't invent (and
90 matches
Mail list logo
