On 02/27/2013 10:14 PM, Henson Sturgill wrote:
Is anyone else getting GPG signature errors when updating from
ftp.us.debian.org http://ftp.us.debian.org
tonight?*http://lists.debian.org/debian-testing-security-announce/*
Yes! http://ftp.us.debian.org address not found
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013
I'm not sure if my problem is related to my system's configuration (emulated
PPC) or PowerPC in general.
When I try to install a package, I get a message that the file couldn't be
found and the URL that was attempted. I can copy the URL and pass it to wget
and the file is retrieved -- no
Dear Steven,
Steven Grunza wrote:
Err http://ftp.lug.udel.edu/pub/debian/ squeeze/main libpoppler5 powerpc
0.12.4-1.2+squeeze1
404 Not found
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with
--fix-missing?
^^
On 27 February 2013 17:49, Claudius Hubig debian_1...@chubig.net wrote:
Steven Grunza wrote:
Err http://ftp.lug.udel.edu/pub/debian/ squeeze/main libpoppler5 powerpc
0.12.4-1.2+squeeze1
404 Not found
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with
--fix-missing?
-Original Message-
From: Harvey Kelly [mailto:harvey1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:17 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problems with apt-get
On 27 February 2013 17:49, Claudius Hubig debian_1...@chubig.net
wrote:
Steven Grunza wrote:
Err
On Wed 27 Feb 2013 at 13:36:10 -0500, Steven Grunza wrote:
Running apt-get update now. It's a little bit slower since I'm one
state away from udel.edu but there's an ocean between me and the UK.
Looks like slow and correct beats fast and broken.
sudo apt-get install thunar evince is
* On 2013 27 Feb 12:37 -0600, Steven Grunza wrote:
Also, after running 'apt-get update' try another mirror. Change:
deb http://ftp.lug.udel.edu/pub/debian/
To:
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/
Run 'apt-get update' and see what's what.
Running apt-get update now.
Is anyone else getting GPG signature errors when updating from
ftp.us.debian.org tonight?*
http://lists.debian.org/debian-testing-security-announce/*
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Nate Bargmann n...@n0nb.us wrote:
* On 2013 27 Feb 12:37 -0600, Steven Grunza wrote:
Also, after running
Hola!
I am given the command
sudo apt-get -t sid install ^r-cran
but gets
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:50:15 -0600, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote:
Hola!
I am given the command
sudo apt-get -t sid install ^r-cran
but gets
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian
lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this
machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version
2.22. If I do an apt-get install evolution, apt wants to delete a huge
number of packages
On Monday 11 August 2008 23:42, Mark Phillips wrote:
I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian
lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this
machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version
2.22. If I do an apt-get install
Mark Phillips wrote:
I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian
lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this
machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version
2.22. If I do an apt-get install evolution, apt wants to delete a
On Mon,11.Aug.08, 16:42:39, Mark Phillips wrote:
I just completed an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade on my Debian
lenny machine. I noticed that evolution, which is installed on this
machine, is still at version 2.10 and the latest in testing is version
2.22. If I do an apt-get install
Hola David,
Am 2007-03-08 10:44:53, schrieb David Primero Segundo:
linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update
Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB]
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Release
Obj
hi, my problem is the next:
when i run apt-get update, debian says me:
linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update
Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB]
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Release
Obj
Hellol David.
David Primero Segundo, 08.03.2007 11:44:
hi, my problem is the next:
when i run apt-get update, debian says me:
linex-inWpyZ:/var/lib/dpkg# apt-get update
Des:1 http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages [491kB]
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main Packages
Obj
Hi,
hi, my problem is the next:
when i run apt-get update, debian says me:
...
E: Error de lectura - read (5 Error de entrada/salida)
E: No se pudieron analizar o abrir las listas de paquetes o el
archivo de estado.
my sourcelist is this:
deb http://apt.linex.org/linex2006 sarge
update, but i don't get luck.
From: Cédric Lucantis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problems with apt-get update
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:14:32 +0100
Hi,
hi, my problem is the next:
when i run apt-get update, debian says me:
...
E: Error de lectura - read (5
no friend, the error continues, i try this:
linex-inWpyZ:/etc/apt# cat apt.conf
APT
{
APT::Cache-Limit 1;
CDROM
{
NoMount True;
};
};
hmm, not sure about it, but maybe APT::Cache-Limit inside APT{} is redundant
and not understood
hello friends, can you help me please?, can i get the output from debian in
english for you? this is my problem is:
linex-inWpyZ:/home/david# apt-get update
Obj http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Packages
Obj http://apt.linex.org sarge/linex2006 Release
Obj http://ftp.de.debian.org sarge/main
hi
you should try cleaning your apt cache using apt-get clean and then
reissuing
apt-get update apt-get -y upgrade
I had the same problem, but with a local repository for apt. It was an
corrupted packages error... but still do not know what precisley happened,
simply downloaded again and
thanks friend, i too got a problem seemed and it was ok when i did the
commands that you have said to me but now these commands don't fix it. What
can i do?
From: Raffaele Morelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problems with apt-get
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14
2007/3/8, David Primero Segundo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
thanks friend, i too got a problem seemed and it was ok when i did the
commands that you have said to me but now these commands don't fix it.
What
can i do?
Try to remove these packages and do a fresh install.
raffaele
Hey, thanks a bunch, Dwayne.
equivs was exactly the sort of solution I hoped
existed. I knew Debian had a rational fix
for this but had never used equivs before.
First I had to uninstall lgtoclnt so that apt-get
would let me do things.
Then I installed equivs: apt-get install equivs
Then I
The --patch option for alien might also help you build a lgtoclnt package
that doesn't include the X clients.
Alternatively, the 'equivs' package might help. It will let you build and
install a fake package that Provides: xlibs. However, keep in mind that if
you *do* decide to install X
Howdy,
I have a package I've installed by alien for
legato networker backup client. It comes
with X versions of the client, which I
don't need. Therefore I want the install to
ignore the xlibs and other dependancies.
# dpkg --force-depends -i lgtoclnt_6.1-2_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 12716
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
In order to install the kmobiletools package, which is not present
in the stable repository, I added to my sources.list the following
lines:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable
Hi all.
In order to install the kmobiletools package, which is not present
in the stable repository, I added to my sources.list the following lines:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
,
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:44:54 +0200
Rodolfo Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
In order to install the kmobiletools package, which is not present
in the stable repository, I added to my sources.list the following
lines:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 16:38:53 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:44:54 +0200
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Hi all.
In order to install the kmobiletools package, which is not present
in the stable repository, I added to my sources.list the following
lines:
deb
Can you help me to fix this? I really want to reinstall the system, I
don´t know how I can repair it, wasted some hours with trying.
mond:~# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you help me to fix this? I really want to reinstall the system, I
don´t know how I can repair it, wasted some hours with trying.
mond:~# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following
On 22 Nov 2005 10:31:48 -0800, ponga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wish I had some idea for you... how long did you let the process run,just to see if it would finish?
For 5 minutes or so. Anyway, we figured it out, we narrowed it down to one single package.
Then we removed some (stale) files in
Am 2005-11-22 12:04:45, schrieb Niklas Palmqvist:
Hi there.
Having a problem with a package installation, and I would appreciate some
pointers.
Running Sarge on a HP pc, P4, 256 Mb ram, ide disc etc.
Ihave a sytem AMD Sempron 2400 with 256 MB of memory and if I install
something, it eats
Hi there.
Having a problem with a package installation, and I would appreciate some pointers.
Running Sarge on a HP pc, P4, 256 Mb ram, ide disc etc.
So, in this case, want to install freeswan:
quote
The following NEW packages will be installed:
freeswan
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to
Wish I had some idea for you... how long did you let the process run,
just to see if it would finish?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi..
i'm having some problems doing an apt-get install libgtk2.0-bin.
The following error occur.
Setting up libgtk2.0-bin (2.6.4-3) ...
Updating the IM modules list for
GTK+-2.4.0.../usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0: error while loading
shared libraries: libexpat.so.1: cannot open shared object
I am having problems doing an apt-get upgrade with the following
packages:
libnspr4 libnss3 mozilla-browser mozilla-psm
each time i try. the following error occurs.
Err http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main mozilla-psm
2:1.7.8-1sarge2
404 Not Found [IP: 82.94.249.158 80]
Err http
Did you do an apt-get update first?
-Original Message-
From: Richard Swen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 6:03 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: problems with apt-get upgrade
I am having problems doing an apt-get upgrade
--- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:21:08PM -0700, Eric
Dickner wrote:
... I got all the
packages...the problem is they sit in the
/var/cache/apt/archives directory uninstalled,
except
for a few crucial ones that hurt more than they
helped, like
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:35:19PM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote:
Some of the dependency conflicts make no sense. One
that I remember clearly was libstdc++5 needed gcc-3.3
to be configured. The *very next package* was gcc-3.3
that said it needed libstdc++5 to be configured
(WTH?!).
I'm an
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:35:19PM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote:
That was a very powerful command that I will remember
for later use...after I reinstall Woody and start
over. Tons of things were installed that apt-get
dist-upgrade missed but they ended up hosing the
system. I had to boot off
--- Tim Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works fine when you go from one (former) stable
release to another,
though you would probably have to enter it several
times.
Tim,
I am going from stable to testing so that may be the
problem. My instinct was that iterating through those
--- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm an idiot, and I gave you bad advice.
dpkg -r /var/cache/apt/archives would work and would
resolve the
dependencies (and would take a long time).
Carl,
It went through everything, and I'm not sure that the
above would do anything differently.
I downloaded hundreds of packages through an online
apt-get dist-upgrade from a fast mirror and then
from the central download site; I assumed that they
were being installed by apt as it went along (it tok a
day and a half by modem) but it seems only bits and
pieces were installed.
The bits and
--- Eric Dickner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
choice I will go back to dpkg -i and laboriously cut
and paste all the warnings and do it by hand.
The following command will reinstall all packages on your system:
COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l | awk '/^ii/ {print $2}' | xargs apt-get --reinstall
install
--
--- Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following command will reinstall all packages on
your system:
COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l | awk '/^ii/ {print $2}' | xargs
apt-get --reinstall
install
-- Thomas Adam
So I should just give up on using apt-get
dist-upgrade and try to go back?
ejd
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:43:40AM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote:
I tried to use dselect but was unable to make it
work. That was likely my fault as I found the the
interface very confusing. If dselect is my only
choice I will go back to dpkg -i and laboriously cut
and paste all the warnings
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:43:40AM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote:
... the whole system out of whack. For example, I now have a new
kernel (2.4.27-x) and the new lib6c library (2.3.x) going but very
little else is up to date. The compiler is 2.95 which puts it out
of whack with both the old
On Monday 11 October 2004 10:25 am, Thomas Adam wrote:
COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l | awk '/^ii/ {print $2}' | xargs apt-get --reinstall
install
I took the liberty of making a script from this excellent tip:
Begin Script
#!/bin/bash
# This script *MUST* be ran either
# as root or under sudo.
# The
--- Bill Marcum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried aptitude?
I bet it is in that mass of .debs that are downloaded
but not installed I am sure it is a much needed
improvement to dselect
ejd
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself -
--- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What distribution did you START with?
Woody, 2.2.20-idepci, from CD's I purchased.
What distro is your sources.list pointing to?
testing from the main station. I ran apt-get
dist-upgrade pointing to a mirror at MIT but it was
missing some packages
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:21:08PM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote:
... I got all the
packages...the problem is they sit in the
/var/cache/apt/archives directory uninstalled, except
for a few crucial ones that hurt more than they
helped, like libc6 2.3.x.
How about 'find /var/cache/apt/archives
So I do:
[rabbit]root%apt-get install kde
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
kde is already the newest version.
You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
kdeaddons: Depends: kontact-plugins (=
Sockmonkey wrote:
So I do:
[rabbit]root%apt-get install kde
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
kde is already the newest version.
You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
kdeaddons: Depends:
From the cron daemon email I get wrt to apt-get (which I run from root's
crontab):
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/bin/apt-get upgrade -y
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following packages have been kept back
gaim libggz1 libgnomeprint2.2-0 libgnomeprint2.2-data
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
snip
What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without
commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this problem.
apt-get install debian-keys -t experimental
Can you give me your sources for this
On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm
Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
snip
What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without
commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this
problem.
Johann Koenig wrote:
On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm
Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
snip
What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without
commenting out those sources) with apt-get because of this
problem.
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 16:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
Johann Koenig wrote:
On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm
Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
snip
What's going on here? I can't do anything (at least not without
On Friday January 2 at 09:09am
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johann Koenig wrote:
On Friday January 2 at 03:26pm
Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 00:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
snip
What's going on here? I can't do anything
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A
W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. said
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A
W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A
W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US
Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY B629A24C38C6029A
W: GPG error: http://non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release: The
following signatures couldn't be
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:09:27PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
Yes, I am using packages from experimental (not many, but a few) because
testing and stable are too far behind (sorry, GAIM .58 and .64 are
really old news) for me (I use Yahoo, MSN, ICQ and AIM, as well as
really old
Antony Gelberg wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 05:09:27PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
Yes, I am using packages from experimental (not many, but a few) because
testing and stable are too far behind (sorry, GAIM .58 and .64 are
really old news) for me (I use Yahoo, MSN, ICQ and AIM, as well
Good morning,
In trying to get my Armada 4130T laptop's soundcard working I've
obtained kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 and installed it. I also modified
the lilo.conf file and it appears to be loading initrd on rebooting
the computer. However, as soon as the BIOS loaded successfully
message pops up
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:39:25AM -0600, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Colin Ellis wrote:
Either your internet connection is flakey, or the mirror was down.
IF it's down, this is two days in a row that it's been down.
Can someone else verify the status of this particular mirror?
I heard, from
I'm having problems with updating the package list from
mirrors.kernel.org (apt-get says connection times out). Is this a known
problem or am I just one of the (un)lucky few who this happens to?
Here's a partial output from apt-get (the other sites I was able to
update the lists just fine)
March 2003 15:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problems with Apt-Get
I'm having problems with updating the package list from
mirrors.kernel.org (apt-get says connection times out). Is this a known
problem or am I just one of the (un)lucky few who this happens to?
Here's a partial output from apt-get
man ping
man traceroute
Sometimes, a server just happens to be down.
--
Nicolas Kratz | GPG-key: 1D6D075A
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Never touch a running sysop,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | or your wife is a big hippo.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Colin Ellis wrote:
Either your internet connection is flakey, or the mirror was down.
IF it's down, this is two days in a row that it's been down.
Can someone else verify the status of this particular mirror?
Try again at a different time and get onto your isp if this continues.
This was the
Nicolas Kratz wrote:
man ping
man traceroute
Sometimes, a server just happens to be down.
www.trace-route.org
Called my ISP, they can't ping or traceroute the site either. Did a
whois now am going to contact them.
I know sometimes a server just happens to be down, but 2 days in a row
is a bit
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:56:50AM -0600, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Nicolas Kratz wrote:
man ping
man traceroute
Sometimes, a server just happens to be down.
www.trace-route.org
Called my ISP, they can't ping or traceroute the site either. Did a
whois now am going to contact them.
I know
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 09:40:10AM -0600, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
I'm having problems with updating the package list from
mirrors.kernel.org (apt-get says connection times out). Is this a known
problem or am I just one of the (un)lucky few who this happens to?
Here's a partial output from
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:39:51PM -0600, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Nathan E Norman wrote:
Why are you using the ftp method? The http method is more efficient
since it uses HTTP 1.1 pipelining.
*shrugs* Because I am. Maybe I'll switch to HTTP after today, but for
now I'm happy with ftp.
Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:39:51PM -0600, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
snip
Perhaps one day they'll improve upon FTP.
HTTP improved upon FTP long ago. The fact that the name hasn't been
changed doesn't affect this.
(I do this for a living.)
Cheers,
Then what purpose does the
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 06:01:13PM -0600, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:39:51PM -0600, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
snip
Perhaps one day they'll improve upon FTP.
HTTP improved upon FTP long ago. The fact that the name hasn't been
changed doesn't affect
Hi,
Here is what I get when using apt-get source :
ebiz:/etc/apt# man apt-get
Reformatting apt-get(8), please wait...
ebiz:/etc/apt# apt-get source krb5-telnetd --download-only
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Could not open file
This one time, at band camp, Kenneth Stephen said:
Hi,
Here is what I get when using apt-get source :
ebiz:/etc/apt# man apt-get
Reformatting apt-get(8), please wait...
ebiz:/etc/apt# apt-get source krb5-telnetd --download-only
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency
i had debsig-verify installed.
d'oh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:02:32PM +, iain d broadfoot wrote:
Authenticating /var/cache/apt/archives/libsocks4_4.3.beta2-13_i386.deb ...
debsig: Origin Signature check failed. This deb might not be signed.
Signed .debs have not yet been deployed. Either put 'no-debsig' in
/etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg
I have problems with apt-get, namely he blocks the dist-upgrade since
some packets show independencies. The independencies occurs around
evolution, namely unmet dependencies with libgal 18. From some reason he
alway wants to install libgal 18, with message trying to overwrite
`/usr/share/gal
On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 14:10, johan boeckx wrote:
I have problems with apt-get, namely he blocks the dist-upgrade since
some packets show independencies. The independencies occurs around
evolution, namely unmet dependencies with libgal 18. From some reason he
alway wants to install libgal
I have problems with apt-get, namely he blocks the dist-upgrade since
some packets show independencies. The independencies occurs around
evolution, namely unmet dependencies with libgal 18. From some reason he
alway wants to install libgal 18, with message trying to overwrite
`/usr/share/gal
On 19 Jan 2002 21:51:45 +0100, johan boeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have problems with apt-get, namely he blocks the dist-upgrade since
some packets show independencies. The independencies occurs around
evolution, namely unmet dependencies with libgal 18. From some reason he
alway wants
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 02:52:42PM -0500, Scott Henson wrote:
On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 14:10, johan boeckx wrote:
I have problems with apt-get, namely he blocks the dist-upgrade since
some packets show independencies. The independencies occurs around
evolution, namely unmet dependencies
I know this is a topic that has been up several times, but I haven't
found an answer for my question.
I have followed the offline document that comes with apt-get, but I
still get into problems.
I do a on the computer connected to the net:
export APT_CONFIG=/opt/disc/apt.conf
apt-get update
I installed Debian from cd-rom.
I am networked.
I want to now manage packages by downloading from http sites.
I've copied /etc/apt/apt.conf and /etc/apt/sources.list from another
working Linux box. When I run the same command in the other Linux box,
apt-get install ssh works fine.
However, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 3. April 2001 11:50 schrieb Debian User:
However, I get an error when I run on my current box.
I get the following error:
W: Couldn't stat source package list 'http://non-us.debian.org ...
Is there something else that I should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
apt-get update
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Debian User wrote:
I installed Debian from cd-rom.
I am networked.
I want to now manage packages by downloading from http sites.
I've copied /etc/apt/apt.conf and /etc/apt/sources.list from another
working
Frank Preut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) i use pon/poff for my dialup connection.. the problem with this is
that poff somehow doesn't seem to completely close the connection or
something because when i try to re-connect with pon nothing happens..
that's also the reason why dial on demand
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 06:01:49AM +0100, Frank Preut wrote:
hello everyone,
i have two problems with my potato system which _really_ get on
my nerves..
1) i use pon/poff for my dialup connection.. the problem with this is
that poff somehow doesn't seem to completely close the
hello everyone,
i have two problems with my potato system which _really_ get on
my nerves..
1) i use pon/poff for my dialup connection.. the problem with this is
that poff somehow doesn't seem to completely close the connection or
something because when i try to re-connect with pon
Howdy Folks,
I tried to do a dist-upgrade about 3 or 4 days ago, and I got the following
messages, which are still happening today.
The following NEW packages will be installed:
alsa-base libasound1
The following packages have been kept back
kdeadmin kdebase kdegames kdegraphics kdenetwork
-- works fine...
apt-get dist-upgrade -- problems...
but, (see below) it looks like I get only a few fiels, adn many many errors
which seem server related.
Suggestions?
Gregory Guthrie
--
Script started on Thu Apr 13 20:13:21 2000
csgrg.root(501
I tried to do a slink-potato
upgrade,
I put the potato debian site in /etc/apt/sources.list, and let go with
atp-get update -- works
fine...
apt-get dist-upgrade -- problems...
Each time I would only get a few files, but after 15-20 tries, I seem to
have almost everything;
almost
atp-get update-- works fine...
apt-get dist-upgrade -- problems...
Each time I would only get a few files, but after 15-20 tries, I seem to
have almost everything;
almost..
Run update again if that fails find out if you are behind one of those
defective HTTP proxies :|
Jason
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
