Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

On Wed 07 Jul 2021 at 23:43:57 (-0400), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > On 2021-07-07 11:34 p.m., David Wright wrote: > > If you want to be able to set and change the default entry to boot, > > that's straightforward to do with GRUB_DEFAULT and GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT > > in /etc/default/grub, as

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

On Mi, 07 iul 21, 20:11:20, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > On 2021-07-07 5:55 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > The default in the grub menu is typically the newest kernel installed, > > regardless of when it was (re)installed. > If this is true then all this talk is useless because h

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:43:57PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: [...] > Wasn't it more simple when using Lilo or Syslinux (Keep It Simple for > Stupid) ? > > Yes I know, grub have so much more but sometime you don't need that much > and this just make it more complicated. While

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

Hi, On 2021-07-07 11:34 p.m., David Wright wrote: > On Wed 07 Jul 2021 at 20:11:20 (-0400), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: >> On 2021-07-07 5:55 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote: >>> On Mi, 07 iul 21, 16:05:13, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU w

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

On Wed 07 Jul 2021 at 20:11:20 (-0400), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > On 2021-07-07 5:55 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Mi, 07 iul 21, 16:05:13, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > >> On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote: > >>> On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude R

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

Hi, On 2021-07-07 5:55 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 07 iul 21, 16:05:13, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: >> Hi ! >> >> On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote: >>> On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: Yes you can downgrand apt-get d

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

On Wed 07 Jul 2021 at 16:05:13 (-0400), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > >> > >> Yes you can downgrand > >> apt-get downlaod linux-image-4.19.0-16-amd64 > >> dpkg -i linux

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

On Mi, 07 iul 21, 16:05:13, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Hi ! > > On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > >> > >> Yes you can downgrand > >> apt-get downlaod linux-image-4.19.0-16-amd64 > >> dpkg -i linux-i

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

Hi ! On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: >> >> Yes you can downgrand >> apt-get downlaod linux-image-4.19.0-16-amd64 >> dpkg -i linux-image-4.19.0.16-amd64.deb > > Why so complicated? > > If APT can download the pack

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > > Yes you can downgrand > apt-get downlaod linux-image-4.19.0-16-amd64 > dpkg -i linux-image-4.19.0.16-amd64.deb Why so complicated? If APT can download the package it can also install it (by calling dpkg itself, of course).

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

On Wed 07 Jul 2021 at 09:35:17 (-0400), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > On 2021-07-07 7:59 a.m., Dan Ritter wrote: > > w f wrote: > >> I locally host and maintain some Minecraft (Java) servers for my kids and > >> their friends. This morning, I kicked everyone off the servers while I did

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

Hi, On 2021-07-07 7:59 a.m., Dan Ritter wrote: > w f wrote: >> I locally host and maintain some Minecraft (Java) servers for my kids and >> their friends. This morning, I kicked everyone off the servers while I did >> some routine maintenance. I finished with a standard sudo apt update && sudo

Re: Oracle Java 16.0.1 CPU usage 100% after kernel update to 4.19.0-17-amd64

w f wrote: > I locally host and maintain some Minecraft (Java) servers for my kids and > their friends. This morning, I kicked everyone off the servers while I did > some routine maintenance. I finished with a standard sudo apt update && sudo > apt full-upgrade > A few things were updated - PHP

RE: Oracle VM VirtualBox on MS Windows 10

-Original Message- From: Alexandre GRIVEAUX Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 10:29 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Oracle VM VirtualBox on MS Windows 10 Le 2018-11-05 13:12, s.mol...@sbcglobal.net a écrit : > I have encountered an unusual (at least for me) prob

Re: Oracle VM VirtualBox on MS Windows 10

Le 2018-11-05 13:12, s.mol...@sbcglobal.net a écrit : I have encountered an unusual (at least for me) problem. The only platform that I own that does not run Debian, is my new 64-bit HP laptop. I had VirtualBox installed on my old 64-bit laptop. I just downloaded VirtualBox-5.2.20-125813-Win.e

Re: Oracle 9i R2 installation on Debian 64 (Installer hang at 17% work done)

In <4d37044e.7060...@googlemail.com>, Arturo Gutierrez wrote: >java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: >/oracle/tmp/OraInstall2011-01-19_12-47-24PM/libactionUnix22.so: >/oracle/tmp/OraInstall2011-01-19_12-47-24PM/libactionUnix22.so: symbol >errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link t

Re: Oracle SQLPLUS

MASOKIS: > > oh.. it was a missing part. now i already try it. the path now echo as > inside the file. > > maso...@oshirixnet:~$ . /etc/profile > maso...@oshirixnet:~$ echo $PATH > /home/masokis/.dist/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/games:/usr/l

Re: Oracle SQLPLUS

oh.. it was a missing part. now i already try it. the path now echo as inside the file. maso...@oshirixnet:~$ . /etc/profile maso...@oshirixnet:~$ echo $PATH /home/masokis/.dist/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/games:/usr/lib/oracle/xe/app/oracle

Re: Oracle SQLPLUS

MASOKIS: > > hi.. i'm happing a difficult. i learn oracle .. as usual. i use oracle in > windows platform.. but i my love is on linux.. :) > then i setup the path..using this command; > maso...@oshirixnet:~$ nano /etc/profile > > to > PATH="/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local

Re: Oracle on (current) Debian Sid

I did write up[1] what I did to install 10g on Lenny a couple of months ago. Everything had to be done by hand, but it was simple enough. There's a togaware page linked from the wiki page which was invaluable for external setup (kernel params, etc). Footnotes: [1] http://trac.klp.org.in/wiki/Ora

Re: oracle non-free

Hi, Thank you for replay/s, it seems the only good solution is to move oracle to open source, and until that simply skip this if not realy needed. I hope, one day, we will see that dba in main. regards, Eugen Paiuc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Re: oracle non-free

Eugen Paiuc: > > I'm useing debian from last 5 years , and I like to know if installing > new non-free oracle.deb is a security risk for my systems. As fas as I can tell (only from following the usual IT news sites), Oracle doesn't exactly belong to the overly security conscious corporations. The

Re: oracle non-free

Eugen Paiuc wrote: > Hi, > > I'm useing debian from last 5 years , and I like to know if installing > new non-free oracle.deb is a security risk for my systems. > > Thanks, > > Eugen Paiuc > > Ask Oracle to let you have the source code. Then you can perform a proper security audit and report

Re: oracle non-free

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 14:32 +0200, Eugen Paiuc wrote: > Hi, > > I'm useing debian from last 5 years , and I like to know if installing > new non-free oracle.deb is a security risk for my systems. How exposed is your system to the outside world? -- ---

Re: Re: Oracle 10g in debian/amd64

I have had quite some problems in installing Oracle 10gR2 on Debian Sarge but have overcome most of the problems using the information provided by you and documentation available at http://www.togaware.com/linux/survivor/Oracle_10g.shtml. Unfortunately, after having successfully installed Oracle (

Re: Oracle 10g in debian/amd64

Hi, Михаил Иванов wrote: > Hallo! Did anybody have a successful experience installing oracle > under debian on amd64? I have a problem with missing X locale when > running oracle installer. But all locales are there, both native > and in 32 bit emulation directory (oracle installer is 32 bit app >

Re: Oracle 9i on Sarge

Cool! That got me moving again and I learned a new Debian survival skill. thanks Roberto. /JVL Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 03:01:32PM -0400, J. Van Lierde wrote: Hi, I'm trying to get Oracle 9i going on my new sarge system. The installer fails with the following er

Re: Oracle 9i on Sarge

On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 03:01:32PM -0400, J. Van Lierde wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get Oracle 9i going on my new sarge system. The installer > fails with the following error: > > error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot open > shared object file: No such file o

Re: Oracle 8.1.7 on Debian Sarge?

Paradise wrote: sorry, sarge is glibc 2.3.2 On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:14:19 +0800, Paradise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all Can someone tell me can I install Oracle8i on Debian Sarge? Since Oracle8i needs glibc 2.1.3and Sarge is glibc2.4 -- Regards, Paradise I don't know about 8.1.7 since

Re: Oracle 8.1.7 on Debian Sarge?

Paradise wrote: sorry, sarge is glibc 2.3.2 On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:14:19 +0800, Paradise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all Can someone tell me can I install Oracle8i on Debian Sarge? Since Oracle8i needs glibc 2.1.3and Sarge is glibc2.4 -- Regards, Paradise why not installing or

Re: Oracle 8.1.7 on Debian Sarge?

sorry, sarge is glibc 2.3.2 On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:14:19 +0800, Paradise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > Can someone tell me can I install Oracle8i on Debian Sarge? > Since Oracle8i needs glibc 2.1.3and Sarge is glibc2.4 > > -- > Regards, > Paradise > -- Regards, Paradise --

Re: Oracle install

On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 16:32, Alex Malinovich wrote: > On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 20:57, Cage wrote: > > I got my hands on a copy of Oracle 8i. I'm mostly trying it out for fun. > > But from what I've read it's a bear to install. I'm up to the > > challenge. Been getting bored lately with no new proj

Re: Oracle install

On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 20:57, Cage wrote: > I got my hands on a copy of Oracle 8i. I'm mostly trying it out for fun. > But from what I've read it's a bear to install. I'm up to the > challenge. Been getting bored lately with no new projects. Anyone > install this bugger in Debian Woody and what

Re: Oracle 9i and Debian

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:49:21PM +0330, Arash Bijanzadeh spake thus: > Does anybody have experience with installing Oracle9i on Debian? On April 5 this year, there was a detailed post about installing 9i on Woody. Sam - -- Sam Varghese http://www

Re: Oracle 8i on woody problem

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:38:24PM -0700, Evgeny Stukalov wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get Oracle 8.1.7 to work on woody. It seems to install fine but I keep > getting "ORA-03114: not connected to ORACLE" errors while creating the starter >database. > This problem has been reported on a few o

Re: Oracle 8i on woody problem

try potato instead. Oracle uses glibc 2.1 and links static binary in install process. After installing Oracle, you can safely upgrade to woody or sid. - Original Message - ?? ??: "Evgeny Stukalov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?? ??: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?? ??: 2002? 9? 11? ??? ?? 3:38 ??: Oracle 8i

RE: Oracle 9i on Debian

ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/supplementary/commercial/Oracle/orarun9i.rp m -Original Message- From: Romuald DELAVERGNE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 5:10 AM To: Anant Kabra Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Oracle 9i on Debian On 2001.11.01

Re: Oracle 9i on Debian

On 2001.11.01 17:14 Anant Kabra wrote: > Hi, > > After struggeling for quite a while trying to get Oracle 9i running on > Debian properly, I copped out and went the easy route. Since I wasen't > ready to move from Debian to Suse just for a test/play oracle > installation, I took the middle road. I

Re: Oracle 9i on Debian

On Thursday 01 November 2001 06:14 pm, Anant Kabra wrote: > Hi, > > After struggeling for quite a while trying to get Oracle 9i running on > Debian properly, I copped out and went the easy route. Since I wasen't > ready to move from Debian to Suse just for a test/play oracle > installation, I took

Re: Oracle on Debain 2.2.19

Quoting "Hight, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > My 3 questions are: > > Anyone have a known good entry from /etc/apt/sources.list? > What is the package required for installing Oracle (i.e. apt-get > java-linux, or apt-get java-sdk or what?) > Are there any other issues I will likely run into tryi

Re: Oracle on Debain 2.2.19

Quoting "Hight, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Anyone have a known good entry from /etc/apt/sources.list? > What is the package required for installing Oracle (i.e. apt-get > java-linux, or apt-get java-sdk or what?) > Are there any other issues I will likely run into trying to get Oracle > to run

Re: Oracle on Debain 2.2.19

Hight, Steve([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > I am trying to test Oracle 8i on Debian 2.2.19 (currently running Oracle on > Solaris/SPARC). I am pretty impressed with Debian, but I am having a problem > figuring out package management. > > I need to install the java-linux package

Re: Oracle on Debain 2.2.19

On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 10:25:51AM -0700 or thereabouts, Hight, Steve wrote: > > Anyone have a known good entry from /etc/apt/sources.list? Don't know about the oracle specific stuff, but here is what you need for blackdown java. for stable: deb ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/

Re: Oracle on Debian?

On 23 Jul 2001, Guy Geens wrote: > Did you read the Oracle8-HOWTO? It gives a few hints. > > IIRC, most common problems seem to be an incorrect libc version, or > the wrong JDK (HOWTO mentions the version Oracle wants). > > I tried installing Oracle 8 on my home machine once. After selecting the >

Re: Oracle on Debian?

> "J" == J F Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: J> Stan, Awhile back (last november) I tried to install Oracle 8.1.6.2 J> on Debian 'potato' and it's true, it just won't work. Worst of it, J> you won't get any error messages. Oracle will link its binaries J> without a hitch, but whenever you'

Re: Oracle on Debian?

Stan, Awhile back (last november) I tried to install Oracle 8.1.6.2 on Debian 'potato' and it's true, it just won't work. Worst of it, you won't get any error messages. Oracle will link its binaries without a hitch, but whenever you'll try "startup nomount" it will just hang there. I don't know ab

Re: Oracle, perl & DBI under debian

will trillich wrote: On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 05:01:25PM +, Victor wrote: To use perl and DBI:oracle do I need to install perl and the DBI stuff for oracle from the DBI site only OR perl, the DBI stuff for oracle and A SERVER (PROPRIETARY) CLIENT FOR ORACLE?

Re: Oracle, perl & DBI under debian

On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 05:01:25PM +, Victor wrote: > To use perl and DBI:oracle do I need to install > > perl and the DBI stuff for oracle from the DBI site only > > OR > > perl, the DBI stuff for oracle and A SERVER (PROPRIETARY) CLIENT FOR > ORACLE? I see that ther

Re: Oracle 8i ProC and Debian Potato

Original Message - > >From: "Stan Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: ""J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Cc: "Debian User List" > >Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 12:20 PM > >Subject: Re: Oracle 8i P

Re: Oracle 8i ProC and Debian Potato

-- Original Message - >From: "Stan Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: ""J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: "Debian User List" >Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 12:20 PM >Subject: Re: Oracle 8i ProC and Debian Potato

Re: Oracle 8i ProC and Debian Potato

On Wed Feb 7 17:03:53 2001 "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" wrote... > >> >> What am I doing wrong here? > >You've probably forgotten to install libc6-dev which contains these headers. >If not, you'll have to provide more details (e.g. a script(1) transcript of >a compilation attempt). > Interestin

Re: Oracle 8i ProC and Debian Potato

On Wed Feb 7 17:03:53 2001 "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" wrote... > >On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 14:16:36 -0500, Stan Brown wrote: >> bad news, _Lot's_ of erors. The firs one is failing to find stddef.h, tehn >> stdarg.h ... and so on. >> >> What am I doing wrong here? > >You've probably forgotten to install

Re: Oracle 8i ProC and Debian Potato

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 14:16:36 -0500, Stan Brown wrote: > bad news, _Lot's_ of erors. The firs one is failing to find stddef.h, tehn > stdarg.h ... and so on. > > What am I doing wrong here? You've probably forgotten to install libc6-dev which contains these headers. If not, you'll have to prov

Re: Oracle

> Eric Langager wrote: > > Greetings, > > We are currently in the process of setting up the curriculum for > teaching the Oracle database system here at the University of > Advancing Computer Technology. I feel that it would be a good idea to > teach Oracle administration on some sort of UNIX pl

RE: Oracle

I know this is sacrilege, but I found it fairly easy to install oracle on an intel box running solaris. you can get the cd-rom set for solaris 8 from sun for $80 and install it in as many places as you want. You'll have to check to ensure that your hardware is supported before trying to install so

RE: Oracle

> Greetings, > > We are currently in the process of setting up the curriculum for teaching > the Oracle database system here at the University of Advancing Computer > Technology. I feel that it would be a good idea to teach Oracle > administration on some sort of UNIX platform, and I am very in

Re: Oracle

> Eric Langager wrote: > > Greetings, > > We are currently in the process of setting up the curriculum for > teaching the Oracle database system here at the University of > Advancing Computer Technology. I feel that it would be a good idea to > teach Oracle administration on some sort of UNIX pl

Re: oracle on debian

On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 10:50:09AM +0100, Knud Sørensen wrote: > Hi > > I have tried to install oracle on debian. > > The database is running but when I try to connect it > gives the error > ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel > > Does anybody know what is wrong ! > > Knud ORA-31

Re: Oracle 8I on debian?

You can find some info on installing it on redhat at: http://jordan.fortwayne.com/oracle/index.html This should be enough to get you on the road. Oracle has included a jdk to avoid problems, IIRC. Have fun ;) On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 16:47, Stan Brown wrote: > I am fixing to try to install

Re: Oracle bI 2nd request

On Tue Nov 21 04:08:13 2000 Jaume Teixi wrote... > >Stan, > >Oracle works ok on Debian potato. >Be sure to not to use libc6 greater than 2.1.3 because Oracle as from 8.1.6 >doens't >works with glibc2.2 (only 2.1) >If you wait me for 2 days I will post install instructions for Debian on a >site...

Re: Oracle bI 2nd request

Stan, Oracle works ok on Debian potato. Be sure to not to use libc6 greater than 2.1.3 because Oracle as from 8.1.6 doens't works with glibc2.2 (only 2.1) If you wait me for 2 days I will post install instructions for Debian on a site... .and for 128 Mb no problems at all!.and yes it comes w

RE: Oracle bI 2nd request

> > Cool. thnaks. > > I would have sworn somewhere that I had seen that the > Oracle installer required > a particular JRE, Blcakdown I think. I think previous versions required this. Earlier than 8.1.6. But Oracle was nice enough, and smart enough, to include this in 8i for us

Re: Oracle bI 2nd request

On Mon Nov 20 12:47:33 2000 Stan Kaufman wrote... > >Stan Brown wrote: >> >> I posted yesterday, and unfortunately, have recieved no replies. >> >> I have a fresh potato install, and wish to install Oracle 8I on it. >> Most of the information I have is for RedGAt. >> >>

Re: Oracle bI 2nd request

On Mon Nov 20 13:49:52 2000 Jason Holland wrote... > >Hi Stan, > you don't need anything extra to install Oracle 8i in Debian. java comes >with oracle, you need no extra java packages. If your not building a >production machine, 64MB would probably work, but I would not run X at the >same time,

Re: Oracle bI 2nd request

Stan Brown wrote: > > I posted yesterday, and unfortunately, have recieved no replies. > > I have a fresh potato install, and wish to install Oracle 8I on it. > Most of the information I have is for RedGAt. > > has anyone made this work on Debian? If so, whatr do

RE: Oracle bI 2nd request

Hi Stan, you don't need anything extra to install Oracle 8i in Debian. java comes with oracle, you need no extra java packages. If your not building a production machine, 64MB would probably work, but I would not run X at the same time, otherwise, go with 128MB. Hope this helps Jason >

Re: Oracle 8i R2 on a mixed potato-woody box WILL WORK!

Damian Gerow wrote: > I'm having some problems creating databases with Oracle 8i (8.1.6) on a > freshly-installed woody box. Oracle works fine on Potato!!! but you can turn it running on Woody by 2 ways: A. (tested) On a mixed potato-woody box, it will work! you should install following package

RE: Oracle 8i R2 on a woody box

> > I can get it to install fine, and the listener will run properly, but on > > creation of a database, dbassist stops at 2% and sits there (the second > > stage, "Creating Database Files"). I noticed that Oracle pretty much > > requires the original-awk installed, with a link to /bin/awk fro

RE: Oracle 8i R2 on a woody box

> > I can get it to install fine, and the listener will run properly, but on > creation of a database, dbassist stops at 2% and sits there (the second > stage, "Creating Database Files"). I noticed that Oracle pretty much > requires the original-awk installed, with a link to /bin/awk from > /usr/

Re: Oracle 8i problems.

What is the exact version of Oracle you are trying to install... I spent several days trying to get Oracle 8 version 8.1.5 to work with not success on my Debian box. Finally was able to download 8.1.6 and it installed painlessly. Ken At 10:23 AM 9/11/2000, James Grant wrote: Hi, I am trying

Re: Oracle 8.1.6 on Linux RH

Tyler, please reply /below/ what you're replying to. On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 05:48:16 -0700, Tyler Sperry wrote: >> I'll simply add, having watched several people bloody themselves horribly >> trying to get O8i on an RH 6.1 system, that the installation is broken >> for RH itself. There is appare

Re: Oracle 8i and Debian?

Mike, I've used both the 8.1.5 and 8.1.6.1 versions. Definitely stick with the latter. The installation was pretty much a breeze. The only snafu that I've run up against is lack of sufficient swap space. Make sure that you have at least 325MB of swap out there and available. (This might be

Re: Oracle 8i and Debian?

I'm running Oracle 8 w/ Potato on a production server. It was a PITA to get running but it runs very well. You'll find the discussion forums at Oracle.com an invaluable resource. Regards Jeff

Re: oracle and debian

Trimming CCs I was running this in my old company, and it's still up and going. Debian Slink, with some potato stuff, but not libc. 256MB RAM (please do not skimp). Oracle 8.0.5 mostly, although installing OAS 4.0 forced many upgrades, so I think we may be closer to 8.1.5, actually. Need to ch

Re: oracle and debian

Scavenging the mail folder uncovered BAKHSHESH Kazem (SoftCompagny)'s letter: > Is some one know the possibility to install Oracle(8.1.5, or 8i) en a > debian box(slink or potato) ? yes. we use it on a potato box as devel machine. the production stuff goes an a sun 450, *grin*. ciao, federico --

Re: oracle and debian

On Tue, 16 May 2000 BAKHSHESH Kazem (SoftCompagny) wrote: > Hi; > > Sorry for my english > > Is some one know the possibility to install Oracle(8.1.5, or 8i) en a > debian box(slink or potato) ? I would strongly recommend using 8.1.6 (= 8iR2). This release installs without serious problems, and

RE: oracle 8i

At 09:35 AM 2/10/00 -0800, debian wrote: >I have oracle 8i running under potato 2.2.14. > >The installer required JRE which I had to get from elsewhere(not dselect). >Additiontally the installer required you to install under X (visually java). > >But It runs great! What JRE did you use? (and ofcou

RE: oracle 8i

I have oracle 8i running under potato 2.2.14. The installer required JRE which I had to get from elsewhere(not dselect). Additiontally the installer required you to install under X (visually java). But It runs great! +=> -Original Message- +=> From: Tiago Antao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: oracle 8i

Tiago, I had a problem where I was getting errors about missing files and unreferenced symbols after a number of installs. Someone pointed out that they had made an extra 250MB swapfile before installing. The machine had 256M of physical ram as well as a 128 meg swap partition, but I figured

Re: oracle 8i

The big hemorroidali with installation 'cos of \r\n instead of simple \n in all the Oracle distribution's text files. Debian does nothing if such the file is a script. But when this problem had been resolved all were ok.

Re: oracle 8i

Hi, It works great. There was nothing Red Hat specific as far as I could tell. There are a few tiny problems like the awk problem you discovered (just link /bin/awk to /usr/bin/awk) and their script oraenv didn't work until I'll fixed it. Also they install a few scripts in /usr/bin (oraenv, corae

Re: Oracle on Debian potato

On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, A. M. Varon wrote: > Hi, > > Anybody has experiences running Oracle on a potato system? > > regards, I am running 8.0.5 without problems now. However the install was something to mention. In the following I assume you have installed oracle on another linux. If you haven'

Re: oracle 8.0.5 and glibc2.1 segfaults

On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Remco van 't Veer wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 19:47, Robert Varga wrote: > > > Due to the problem b: it did not build anything, but make my binaries > > vanish (got renamed). After I set these to point to /usr/bin/gcc272 and > > /usr/bin/ld I got only messages for erro

Re: oracle 8.0.5 and glibc2.1 segfaults

Remco van 't Veer wrote: > I sure hope 8i runs on potato. Can anybody confirm this? > > Regards, > Remco > Hi, It seems to work fine. Although I only installed it and haven't used it much at all yet. I did do some imports which went normally though. $ sqlplus SQL*Plus: Release 8.1.5.

Re: oracle 8.0.5 and glibc2.1 segfaults

On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 19:47, Robert Varga wrote: > Due to the problem b: it did not build anything, but make my binaries > vanish (got renamed). After I set these to point to /usr/bin/gcc272 and > /usr/bin/ld I got only messages for error a:, however the binaries built > segfaulted again. Did no

Re: oracle 8.0.5 and glibc2.1 segfaults

On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Remco van 't Veer wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 17:38, Robert Varga wrote: > >1) Change to the directory where you downloaded your patch. > * cd ~/orapatch > >2) Extract the patch. > * tar -xvzf glibcpatch.tgz > >3) Run the script. > * sh gli

Re: oracle 8.0.5 and glibc2.1 segfaults

On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 17:38, Robert Varga wrote: > > You need to patch the Oracle binaries to get 8.0.5 running on > > glibc-2.1 based systems. Please follow > > for details. > > It is not clear which packages should I install in debian since it i

Re: oracle 8.0.5 and glibc2.1 segfaults

On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Remco van 't Veer wrote: > You need to patch the Oracle binaries to get 8.0.5 running on > glibc-2.1 based systems. Please follow > for details. > > HTH, > Remco It is not clear which packages should I install in debian since

Re: oracle 8.0.5 and glibc2.1 segfaults

You need to patch the Oracle binaries to get 8.0.5 running on glibc-2.1 based systems. Please follow for details. HTH, Remco On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 00:54, Robert Varga wrote: > I have tried to install oracle 8.0.5 on a slink machine upgraded to >

Re: oracle 8.0.5 and glibc2.1 segfaults

I've seen i think an edition of caldera that comes with oracle..seen it in a few stores so far..if you want run run a oracle server it may be best to start with that..im sure other places have it..it was kinda pricey though ..around $90 i think .. nate On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Robert Varga wrote: ro

Re: Oracle

On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Daniel Yang wrote: > I am not sure what exactly you are looking for. Oracle doesn't provide free > Oracle DB and its tools for Linux and any other OS. However, you can get 30 > days trial CD for $4.95 each on some Oracle products across different > platforms, including Oracl

Re: Oracle

I am not sure what exactly you are looking for. Oracle doesn't provide free Oracle DB and its tools for Linux and any other OS. However, you can get 30 days trial CD for $4.95 each on some Oracle products across different platforms, including Oracle8 for Linux. Check Oracle website for details. Dan

Re: Oracle

On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, ICON ICON wrote: > Does anyone know of any free software for oracle development?? > > Icon You could be more specific.. Would you like to develop in pl/sql or just plain sql for oracle? Robert Varga

Re: oracle 8.0.5 with glibc2.1

Hi, I am running Oracle 8.0.5.0 on a slink (glib2.0) machine and it works very well. BTW, version 8.0.5.1 (enterprise edition) has been released some months ago and is downloadable from the web. You can find it at: . It will probably not fix your problem

Re: Oracle in dba group

On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Eric Wayte wrote: > I was scanning the archives at www.debian.org and may have a solution > for you! When installing Oracle on Solaris/SPARC, you have to edit > /etc/group by hand and make sure that the oracle account is listed in > the dba group: > > dba::101:oracle Yes, t

Re: Oracle 8i has problems [solved]

Success! The Oracle 8i together with Oracle Webserver is running. We installed redhat and the same error occurred, so we (gladly) switched back, so it's no debian specific problem. The problem seems to be not a configuration error but a bug in oracle; a queue somewhere (we don't know) keeps one

Re: Oracle

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 10/09/98 at 04:36 PM, Martin Oldfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> "Alex" == Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Alex> Debian is not a company to "sign up with". You can use >Alex> Oracle on Debian with no problems whatsoever. It is even >Ale

Re: Oracle

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 10/09/98 at 11:27 AM, Jeff Noxon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [...] >I wish decisions were made on technical merit alone, but this is the real >world. For that reason, it would be nice if Debian had a marketing >interface to corporations like Sybase, Oracle, etc. And

Re: Oracle

On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 10:12:33PM -0400, Bedrock LAN Administrator wrote: > alien -i oracle.rpm > (or whatever the filename turns out to be) Oracle is a ~145mb .tar.gz file. It has its own installer. Regards, Jeff -- It's time to close windows and open source. Linux is a trademark of Linus To

Re: Oracle

Martin: alien -i oracle.rpm (or whatever the filename turns out to be) that sounds like the best ~/.plan to me. - DeJay. _ / Bedrock \__ | http://bedrock.dyn.ml.org/dejay | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| |_| On Fri, 9

  1   2   >