Re: Password managers

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 06:08:04AM +0100, Oliver Schode wrote: > On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:58:17 -0500 > wrote: > >As it happens, pass(1) appeared to be precisely what I was looking for. > >My original code stores all passwords in a single file, whereas pass > >stores each password in a separate

Re: Password managers

On 2023-11-16, Oliver Schode wrote: > (hence almost all in-repo managers) and bash/git magic all but out of > the question for anyone also using mobile. I use bash and git on android with termux. Working easily with apt :)

Re: Password managers

On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:58:17 -0500 wrote: >As it happens, pass(1) appeared to be precisely what I was looking for. >My original code stores all passwords in a single file, whereas pass >stores each password in a separate file. In addition, I don't need pass >in order to decode the password

Re: Password managers

On 15/11/2023 15:40, Michel Verdier wrote: On 2023-11-15, Max Nikulin wrote: For Chromium it is better to have a password manager (gnome-keyring/kwallet/keepassxc/etc.) with D-Bus interface. It needs a key to encrypt passwords saved in browser and likely cookie store. Encryption is not applied

Re: Password managers

On 2023-11-15, Max Nikulin wrote: >>> For Chromium it is better to have a password manager >>> (gnome-keyring/kwallet/keepassxc/etc.) with D-Bus interface. It needs >>> a key to encrypt passwords saved in browser and likely cookie store. >>> Encryption is not applied otherwise. >> What about

Re: Password managers

On 15/11/2023 03:05, Anssi Saari wrote: Max Nikulin writes: For Chromium it is better to have a password manager (gnome-keyring/kwallet/keepassxc/etc.) with D-Bus interface. It needs a key to encrypt passwords saved in browser and likely cookie store. Encryption is not applied otherwise.

Re: Password managers

On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 23:38:58 +0700 Max Nikulin wrote: > On 14/11/2023 09:58, paulf wrote: > > > > As it happens, pass(1) appeared to be precisely what I was looking > > for. > [...] > > Plus, it will insert any line in the password file > > into the clipboard. > > In general it is better to

Re: Password managers

Max Nikulin writes: > For Chromium it is better to have a password manager > (gnome-keyring/kwallet/keepassxc/etc.) with D-Bus interface. It needs > a key to encrypt passwords saved in browser and likely cookie store. > Encryption is not applied otherwise. What about Firefox then? Does it work

Re: Password managers

On 14/11/2023 09:58, paulf wrote: As it happens, pass(1) appeared to be precisely what I was looking for. [...] Plus, it will insert any line in the password file into the clipboard. In general it is better to avoid secrets copied to the clipboard. Even JavaScript from a web page might

Re: Password managers

pa...@quillandmouse.com writes: > On Thu, 09 Nov 2023 10:48:14 -0600 > John Hasler wrote: > > > Why does "accepted/popular" matter? > > Not a great choice of words, perhaps. I was thinking in terms of those > password managers which are written by others and included in the > Debian

Re: Password managers

On Thu, 09 Nov 2023 10:48:14 -0600 John Hasler wrote: > Why does "accepted/popular" matter? Not a great choice of words, perhaps. I was thinking in terms of those password managers which are written by others and included in the Debian repositories. As it happens, pass(1) appeared to be

Re: Password managers

Why does "accepted/popular" matter? -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: Password managers

On 13/11/2023 21:29, Erwan David wrote: That was a bad idea : lokking closer I see that kpcli does not support the latest keepass file format (v4) Trying "apt search" I have noticed some python tool "secrets" having python3-pykeepass in its dependency. Does anybody use it (or at least have

Re: Password managers

Le 13/11/2023 à 15:11, Klaus Singvogel a écrit : Erwan David wrote: Note that you may have less dependencies with kpcli (a cli client for keepass password files) I always was peering at kpcli. Do you have any experience switching between the CLI (kpcli) and the GUI (keepassxc) version

Re: Password managers

Erwan David wrote: > Note that you may have less dependencies with kpcli (a cli client for > keepass password files) I always was peering at kpcli. Do you have any experience switching between the CLI (kpcli) and the GUI (keepassxc) version frequently? Is this flawless possible to switch from

Re: Password managers

Am Sonntag, 12. November 2023, 18:23:20 CET schrieb Joe: What about kwallet? Should run on other window managers than plasma5 as well. Hans

Re: Password managers

On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 22:07:33 +0700 Max Nikulin wrote: > On 10/11/2023 01:48, Michael Kjörling wrote: > > KeepassXC if you want a primarily GUI solution which also happens to > > be open source. (There's also a command-line version keepassxc-cli > > which can either be driven from the command

Re: Password managers

Le 12/11/2023 à 16:53, Michael Kjörling a écrit : On 12 Nov 2023 22:07 +0700, from maniku...@gmail.com (Max Nikulin): Having system booted from Debian Live image (assume some disaster), how many packaged have to be installed to get access to passwords stored by KeePassXC? I don't know about

Re: Password managers

On 12 Nov 2023 22:07 +0700, from maniku...@gmail.com (Max Nikulin): > Having system booted from Debian Live image (assume some disaster), how many > packaged have to be installed to get access to passwords stored by > KeePassXC? I don't know about Debian Live images, but from an up-to-date

Re: Password managers

On 10/11/2023 01:48, Michael Kjörling wrote: KeepassXC if you want a primarily GUI solution which also happens to be open source. (There's also a command-line version keepassxc-cli which can either be driven from the command line or used interactively in a terminal session.) Having system

Re: Password managers

On 10/11/2023 10:32, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:25 AM Timothy M Butterworth > wrote: On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 3:11 AM John Conover mailto:cono...@panix.com>> wrote: John Darrah writes: > On Thu,

Re: Password managers

On Thursday, 9 Nov 2023 at 12:46, Todd Zullinger wrote: > You may like pass[1]. It's a bash script which uses gpg, so > it's somewhat familiar to what you've written in a sense. +1 *and* it has an Emacs interface which is very easy to use. -- Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 30.0.50 2023-06-19)

Re: Password managers

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:25 AM Timothy M Butterworth < timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 3:11 AM John Conover wrote: > >> John Darrah writes: >> > On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 16:03 -0800, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: >> > > Folks: >> > > >> > > Does anyone know

Re: Password managers

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 3:11 AM John Conover wrote: > John Darrah writes: > > On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 16:03 -0800, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > > > Folks: > > > > > > Does anyone know of a password manager which will store a variety of > > > user-defined information for each login, and not

Re: Password managers

I can also recomend a Keepass compatible password manager. I am personally using the offical Keepass2 app over Mono, but KeePassXC has also worked well. I have been using Syncthing to sync it between my devices, include my Android smartphone. For Android, I have found KeepassDX and

Re: Password managers

On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:39:08 -0500 wrote: > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 12:46:23 -0500 > Todd Zullinger wrote: > > > > > [1] https://www.passwordstore.org/ > > > > Excellent suggestion! > > I can't get it to work properly, because there must be something > fundamentally missing in my understanding

Re: Password managers

On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 12:46:23 -0500 Todd Zullinger wrote: > Hi, > > pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > > I have a bash/GPG based password manager I wrote years ago, but I'd > > like to use something more "accepted/popular". The problem I have > > with the other password managers I've looked at is

Re: Password managers

Am 09. Nov, 2023 schwätzte der.hans so: moin moin, below I said KeePassXC doesn't have a way of syncing passwords with another password database file. Tonight I was looking at KeePassXC SSH integration documentation and I see there is a sharing option, KeeShare. "KeeShare allows you to share a

Re: Password managers

John Darrah writes: > On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 16:03 -0800, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > > Folks: > > > > Does anyone know of a password manager which will store a variety of > > user-defined information for each login, and not store that > > information > > on the internet (and which is free as

Re: Password managers

On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 16:03 -0800, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > Folks: > > Does anyone know of a password manager which will store a variety of > user-defined information for each login, and not store that > information > on the internet (and which is free as in beer)? > Take a look at

Re: Password managers

Am 09. Nov, 2023 schwätzte pa...@quillandmouse.com so: moin moin Paul, Folks: I have a bash/GPG based password manager I wrote years ago, but I'd like to use something more "accepted/popular". The problem I have with the other password managers I've looked at is that you can store a very

Re: Password managers

On 9 Nov 2023 11:05 -0500, from pa...@quillandmouse.com: > Does anyone know of a password manager which will store a variety of > user-defined information for each login, and not store that information > on the internet (and which is free as in beer)? KeepassXC if you want a primarily GUI

Re: Password managers

Hi, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > I have a bash/GPG based password manager I wrote years ago, but I'd > like to use something more "accepted/popular". The problem I have with > the other password managers I've looked at is that you can store a very > limited amount of information for each

Re: Password managers

On 11/9/23 11:05, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: Folks: I have a bash/GPG based password manager I wrote years ago, but I'd like to use something more "accepted/popular". The problem I have with the other password managers I've looked at is that you can store a very limited amount of

Re: Password managers

On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:05:53AM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > Folks: > > I have a bash/GPG based password manager I wrote years ago, but I'd > like to use something more "accepted/popular". The problem I have with > the other password managers I've looked at is that you can store a

Re: Firefox Future and Config [WAS: Re: Password managers]

"Garreau, Alexandre" writes: > Wait, do you mean overriding password manager, and TreeStyleTabs will > certainly and definitely stop to work? TreeStyleTab is already ported to the new Web Extensions: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tree-style-tab/ It says "Compatible with Firefox

Re: Firefox Future and Config [WAS: Re: Password managers [WAS: Re: when do I get a browsere that will do internet purchases?]]

On 20/10/2017 at 18:22, The Wanderer wrote: > (Please learn to quote properly. Failure to quote at all is arguably > even worse than top-posting.) Sorry, when I’m answering to all or the main part of a message completely I find it clearer to try to begin answering with a sole mail, but thank for

Re: Firefox Future and Config [WAS: Re: Password managers [WAS: Re: when do I get a browsere that will do internet purchases?]]

(Please learn to quote properly. Failure to quote at all is arguably even worse than top-posting.) On 2017-10-20 at 18:07, Garreau, Alexandre wrote: > Wait, do you mean overriding password manager, and TreeStyleTabs > will certainly and definitely stop to work? I don't know about TreeStyleTabs.

Firefox Future and Config [WAS: Re: Password managers [WAS: Re: when do I get a browsere that will do internet purchases?]]

Wait, do you mean overriding password manager, and TreeStyleTabs will certainly and definitely stop to work? Would it be realistic to find some way to make Debian maintain patches/a fork (or package GNU IceCat and work with them? why isn’t any fork packaged into Debian? ’cause Firefox isn’t known

Re: Password managers [WAS: Re: when do I get a browsere that will do internet purchases?]

On 2017-10-20 at 15:46, Garreau, Alexandre wrote: > Maybe these extensions will be remade and repackaged with > web-extensions then (afaik it’s a good move, yet breaking all the old > apps forever is bad, they should re-integrate it after I while I’d > personally prefer). > > Waiting for this,

Re: Password managers [WAS: Re: when do I get a browsere that will do internet purchases?]

Maybe these extensions will be remade and repackaged with web-extensions then (afaik it’s a good move, yet breaking all the old apps forever is bad, they should re-integrate it after I while I’d personally prefer). Waiting for this, XUL extensions I install through Debian on stable are perfectly

Re: Password managers [WAS: Re: when do I get a browsere that will do internet purchases?]

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, at 02:27, Garreau, Alexandre wrote: > I’d especially like to notice that there are the packages > *xul-ext-gnome-keyring* and *xul-ext-kwallet5* which make both Firefox > and Thunderbird use respectively GNOME and KDE’s password > managers. That’s way more secure imho, and

Re: Password managers [WAS: Re: when do I get a browsere that will do internet purchases?]

On Thursday 19 October 2017 21:27:07 Garreau, Alexandre wrote: > On 19/10/2017 at 22:24, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: > > I had similar problems and switched to Chromium, however I would > > never trust *any* browser to store passwords > > I don’t especially like or trust fully Firefox, but I

Re: Password managers [WAS: Re: when do I get a browsere that will do internet purchases?]

On 20/10/17 14:04, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:24:55PM +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: I had similar problems and switched to Chromium, however I would never trust *any* browser to store passwords. Passwordsafe is my best friend, especially since it was upgraded to