Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth)

I wrote: > My scripts copy all new non-spam to a ham directory which is fed to > sa-learn every night and then the contents of both the ham and the > spam directories are deleted. cbannister writes: > IIRC, it seems pointless feeding your mail through a spam filter > if you're downloading it from

Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth)

On Wednesday 27 April 2016 04:31:17 cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:57:08PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > > > Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last > > > 10 years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question > > > might have

Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth)

On Wed 27 Apr 2016 at 11:14:15 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:53:31AM +0100, Brian wrote: > > On Wed 27 Apr 2016 at 20:31:17 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:57:08PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > > > > > Thanks for making me

Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth)

Hi list, I am running spamassassin in kmail. As I got several spam from my provider although there is a spamfilter active, I trained my own spamfilter very well. There are no false positives or negatives since many years. However, some spammails still appear (about 2-3 a week), but this is no

Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:53:31AM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Wed 27 Apr 2016 at 20:31:17 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:57:08PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > > > > Thanks for making me think of that and the

Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth)

On Wed 27 Apr 2016 at 20:31:17 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:57:08PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > > > Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last 10 > > > years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question might > > > have

Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth)

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:57:08PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > > Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last 10 > > years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question might > > have had the seeds of something to help. :) > > My scripts copy all new non-spam to

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

Gene writes: > But thats a good idea for genuine ham, but so much crap gets thru I'd > still have to go thru it and clean it up before sa-learn saw it. Its > a thankless task for sure. I have Mailagent delete all high-scoring spam so that I never see it all. Low-scoring spam is sorted to my

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Saturday 23 April 2016 13:57:08 John Hasler wrote: > > Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last > > 10 years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question > > might have had the seeds of something to help. :) > > My scripts copy all new non-spam to a ham

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Saturday 23 April 2016 13:01:33 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 23 April 2016 10:35:12 John Hasler wrote: > > Gene writes: > > > Spamassassin, after several years of being fed all of that stuff > > > via a daily sa-learn -spam command on that resting directory, > > > still only catches 10%

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

> Thanks for making me think of that and the fact that over the last 10 > years, the only ham its seen are its mistakes. So this question might > have had the seeds of something to help. :) My scripts copy all new non-spam to a ham directory which is fed to sa-learn every night and then the

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

Le quintidi 5 floréal, an CCXXIV, Gene Heskett a écrit : > I feed it ham by moving stuff it should catch to the ham directory so its > treated as ham on the next runs of sa-learn. I could add a weekly > sa-learn --ham session, nameing one or more of the cleaner folders from > the mailing lists

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Saturday 23 April 2016 10:35:12 John Hasler wrote: > Gene writes: > > Spamassassin, after several years of being fed all of that stuff via > > a daily sa-learn -spam command on that resting directory, still only > > catches 10% of it. > > Interesting. For me it catches 90%. Do you feed it

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

Gene writes: > Spamassassin, after several years of being fed all of that stuff via a > daily sa-learn -spam command on that resting directory, still only > catches 10% of it. Interesting. For me it catches 90%. Do you feed it both spam and ham? -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood,

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On 23/04/2016 10:33 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 23 April 2016 07:52:06 Curt wrote: >> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/10915 >> >> works fine here. Yes, other pages worked fine too. > I finally did get to the article, but had to clear it with privacy badger > and ghostery and

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Saturday 23 April 2016 08:44:56 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Saturday 23 April 2016 13:33:54 Gene Heskett wrote: > > The data these sites collect and sell, gets me 100 new spams every > > day. 20 or 30 of for erectile disfunction cures that don't work. > >  I'm 81, and been diabetic for 25 + years,

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Saturday 23 April 2016 13:33:54 Gene Heskett wrote: > The data these sites collect and sell, gets me 100 new spams every day. > 20 or 30 of for erectile disfunction cures that don't work.  I'm 81, and > been diabetic for 25 + years, I couldn't reset my since counter if it > was offered.  I

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Saturday 23 April 2016 07:52:06 Curt wrote: > On 2016-04-23, Gene Heskett wrote: > > I was blocked, 5 times so far, at the front page of the current > > issue. I could poke around in the 4 sale areas, but could not > > access any other content, such as that sublink

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On 4/23/2016 6:52 AM, Curt wrote: On 2016-04-23, Gene Heskett wrote: I was blocked, 5 times so far, at the front page of the current issue. I could poke around in the 4 sale areas, but could not access any other content, such as that sublink without signing up. I was

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On 2016-04-23, Gene Heskett wrote: > > I was blocked, 5 times so far, at the front page of the current issue. I > could poke around in the 4 sale areas, but could not access any other > content, such as that sublink without signing up. I was taken to the regular old

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Apr 23, 2016 06:27, "Reco" wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:23:57 +0100 > Joe wrote: > > > 'Proper' serial equipment > > typically does not go higher than 115kBd, and most wired serial > > applications need much less than that. > > But

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

Hi Peter, On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:27:38PM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > …TCP/IP inside PPP on a Bluetooth connection is hypthetically > possible. > > Has anyone tried it with a debian system on one end at least? Yes; around 4 years ago I used to occasionally pair my Nokia E90 and use it

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Saturday 23 April 2016 03:36:48 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Saturday 23 April 2016 06:04:24 Gene Heskett wrote: > > Unforch for many, its also a link you have to subscribe to > > No you don't. I've just tried. > > You can, if you wish, once there, become a subscriber to the digital > version of the

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:23:57 +0100 Joe wrote: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:53:08 +0300 > Reco wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:27:38 -0700 > > pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > > > > According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth ,

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:53:08 +0300 Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:27:38 -0700 > pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > > According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth , > > Bluetooth was "... originally conceived as a wireless alternative > > to RS-232

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

Hi. On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:27:38 -0700 pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth , > Bluetooth was "... originally conceived as a wireless alternative > to RS-232 data cables." Therefore TCP/IP inside PPP on a > Bluetooth connection is

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Saturday 23 April 2016 06:04:24 Gene Heskett wrote: > Unforch for many, its also a link you have to subscribe to No you don't. I've just tried. You can, if you wish, once there, become a subscriber to the digital version of the magazine. Lisi

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Saturday 23 April 2016 00:37:42 shawn wilson wrote: > On Apr 23, 2016 00:09, wrote: > > According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth , > > Bluetooth was "... originally conceived as a wireless alternative > > to RS-232 data cables." Therefore TCP/IP inside PPP on a

Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

On Apr 23, 2016 00:09, wrote: > > According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth , > Bluetooth was "... originally conceived as a wireless alternative > to RS-232 data cables." Therefore TCP/IP inside PPP on a > Bluetooth connection is hypthetically possible. > > Has

TCP/IP over Bluetooth

According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth , Bluetooth was "... originally conceived as a wireless alternative to RS-232 data cables." Therefore TCP/IP inside PPP on a Bluetooth connection is hypthetically possible. Has anyone tried it with a debian system on one end at least?