Sjoerd Hardeman([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Commend in /etc/X11/xorg.conf the following line out:
Load dri
As the output shows an error concerning dri.
If it still doesn't work, look at the lines with (EE) in front, look if
you can find something matching in
Hi Pete,
recently i got the same error. you have to remove the /usr/X11R6/lib
line from your /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig afterwards. i think the
library directory X11R6 is no longer used in recent debian systems and
there are residing old librarys which don't contain that symbol.
hope it
I have just tried an
apt-get update; apt-get upgrade, and I am getting the following error.
.
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 29451 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace xfree86-common
, Sid or
Experimental. Is it an official Debian package? If not, get rid of it
and see if that fixes the upgrade problem.
--
Regards,
Florian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 11:19, Florian Kulzer wrote:
I cannot find package lgtoclnt anywhere in Sarge, Etch, Sid or
Experimental. Is it an official Debian package? If not, get rid of it
and see if that fixes the upgrade problem.
--
Regards,
Florian
Ah --- a silly
I recently encountered a problem with apt-get upgrade. My config fails
when trying to update the font cache. I have fontconfig 2.4.1-2 installed
from 'testing'.
Searching the web has offered no solution.
Here is a portion of the output from the apt-get upgrade:
Setting up ttf-opensymbol
OK, thank to Alexander Sack I see the problem. First I was a bad used of
the file /etc/apt/preferences, I used the Pin: release instead the
Pin: origin. Therefore I fix the /etc/apt/preferences file and write
it using Pin: origin and then gave to the official source Priority
equal to 990 P =
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 09:54:33PM +0300, gustavo halperin wrote:
Today I made 'apt-get update' and 'apt-get dist-upgrade' after well.
The system ask for upgrade the next packages:
libnspr4 libnss3 mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-calendar
mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm thunderbird
I
OK, thank you, that is the problem..
First I down the version of the thunderbird to 1.5.0.4-2bpo1 and
everythink back to work.
Second, I have some sources in my /etc/apt/sources.list not official,
but I also have a file /etc/apt/preferences. So maybe I'm using bad the
Pin: release option
Today I made 'apt-get update' and 'apt-get dist-upgrade' after well.
The system ask for upgrade the next packages:
libnspr4 libnss3 mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-calendar
mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm thunderbird
I obviously accept and the I receive the next errors:
Updating mozilla
Hey,
That did it... thanks for the help! :-)
goofy
Hi anonymous user 'goofy',
a common approach is to have a utility cd aka live cd like knoppix.
Which this in a cd drive, you would boot to run level 2 or the gui if
you like. From there you would use 'chroot' to access the root partition
of
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 20:40:01 +0100
goofy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
During the boot process the BIOS begins by scanning the available
disks/drives, etc. Since the machine is setup to boot from a floppy first
and then a drive, I receive the following (there's no boot floppy in the
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 08:40:01PM +0100, goofy wrote:
Hello,
During the boot process the BIOS begins by scanning the available
disks/drives, etc. Since the machine is setup to boot from a floppy first
and then a drive, I receive the following (there's no boot floppy in the
drive):
Hello,
Maybe someone can point me in the right direction... :-)
I performed a dist-upgrade from woody to sarge. Everything seemed to be
fine. After the upgrade the machine was up and running. I decided to
reboot the machine and now it doesn't come up. When the boot process is
trying
goofy wrote:
I performed a dist-upgrade from woody to sarge. Everything seemed to
be fine. After the upgrade the machine was up and running. I
decided to reboot the machine and now it doesn't come up. When the
boot process is trying to load linux it hangs. Possibly the MBR has
been
Hello,
During the boot process the BIOS begins by scanning the available
disks/drives, etc. Since the machine is setup to boot from a floppy first
and then a drive, I receive the following (there's no boot floppy in the
drive):
Searching for Boot Record from Floppy...Not Found
Searching
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:26:44PM -0500, Mario Frechette wrote:
I have benn trying without succes to upgrade my system ( i am using
Debian sarge testing distro)
and i always get this error
I have benn trying without succes to upgrade my system ( i am using
Debian sarge testing distro)
and i always get this error
debian:/usr/local/Program/OpenOffice/OOA680_m1_native_packed-1_fr.8990/RPMS/desktop-integration#
wajig upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency
On 02.03.06 19:20:55, Martin Reising wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:03:35PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Achja partimage ist auch das einzige Paket das derartige
Auffaelligkeiten zeigt und ein purge+install hat nix gebracht.
Vor dem install das Paket in /var/cache/apt/archive gelöscht?
Hi,
hab hier ein etwas dubioses Upgrade-Problem mit partimage. apt-cache
policy partimage sagt:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~apt-cache policy partimage
partimage:
Installiert:0.6.4-14
Mögliche Pakete:0.6.4-14
Versions-Tabelle:
0.6.4-14 0
450 http://www.teco.edu unstable/main Packages
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:03:35PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Achja partimage ist auch das einzige Paket das derartige
Auffaelligkeiten zeigt und ein purge+install hat nix gebracht.
Vor dem install das Paket in /var/cache/apt/archive gelöscht?
--
Nicht Absicht unterstellen, wenn auch
Ok so I had issues
with my Debian system and got myself into a bind. Reloaded from woody CD's
and ended up with mouse issues I could not fix. Threw in the towel and
reloaded once again. Mouse works fine but now I have a problem in
APT. When attempting to upgrade to the latest versions of
Don wrote:
snip
dpkg: `update-rc.d' not found on PATH.
snip
when I do as root:
which update-rc.d
I get:
/usr/sbin/update-rc.d
What do you get?
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 16 January 2006 10:18 am, Don wrote:
Ok so I had issues with my Debian system and got myself into a bind.
Reloaded from woody CD's and ended up with mouse issues I could not fix.
Threw in the towel and reloaded once again. Mouse works fine but now I
have a problem in APT. When
On 2005-09-28T13:40-0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote:
To reply to the list, check for example the *Reply to:*
debian-user@lists.debian.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@iki.fi%3ESubject=Re:%20upgrade%20problem
on http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/09/msg02773.html
That works with Mozilla
Hi Kai,
more useful or compact than apt-cache show would be $ apt-cache policy perl
However you apt-cache show seems to indicate you have a sarge/sid mix.
Since apt-get install perl indicates your perl is up-to-date for your
default release, I don't see why apt-get upgrade would be upgrading it
I am trying to upgrade my system, but apt-get won't let me. Am I missing
something? The problem seems to be with Perl.
bible$ apt-cache show perl
Package: perl
Priority: standard
Section: perl
Installed-Size: 11488
Maintainer: Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Version: 5.8.7-5
When i use apt-get to upgrade my debian ,some softwares' configuration can't
be completed.It outputs as follows.
ldconfig: /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2.desktop is not an ELF file - it
has the wrong magic bytes at the start.
What's the problem?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Using fresh install of Debian 3.1, followed by apt-get install
webmin, I get Webmin version 1.180
However, when I use its Upgrade Webmin function I get:
module proc does not exist
Any ideas ?
Maurice
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Maurice O'Regan wrote:
Using fresh install of Debian 3.1, followed by apt-get install
webmin, I get Webmin version 1.180
However, when I use its Upgrade Webmin function I get:
module proc does not exist
Do you have webmin-core installed as well?
Anyway you
Hi
I upgraded our server to sarge. I was running
* Postfix, Squirrelmail ( qpopper)
The upgrade went almost perfect. Only a few small glitches (e.g. the removed
php-gd2 package) could be fixed very quickly. Our website is running a lot
faster than before (thanks to mysql v4, i believe). I
Am 14.06.2005 um 09:06 schrieb VFJ - Damiaan Peeters:
When i try to log in i get the error message:
ERROR:
Bad request: The IMAP server is reporting that plain text logins
are disabled. Using CRAM-MD5 or DIGEST-MD5 authentication instead
may work. Also, the use of TLS may allow SquirrelMail
Hi
I upgraded our server to sarge. I was running
* Postfix, Squirrelmail ( qpopper)
The upgrade went almost perfect. Only a few small glitches (e.g. the removed
php-gd2 package) could be fixed very quickly. Our website is running a lot
faster than before (thanks to mysql v4, i believe). I also
: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: Sarge Upgrade Problem Webmail (Imap)
The error message tells you that your imap server does not allow a
plain text login. This is usually good practice, since passwords
are transmitted over the wire in clear text with this authentication
method.
However, your
Mam następujący problem po wydaniu polecenia apt-get upgrade wywala się
konfigurowanie cyrus-common
i za nic w świecie nie mogę ani nic zaintsalować ani nic z tym korzystnego
zrobić.
po wydaniu tegoż polecenia apt-get upgrade wywala mi następujący błąd:
[ciach]
yahnet:/etc# apt-get upgrade
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 07:47:28 +0100 (CET),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Starting Cyrus PAM pwcheck daemon: dpkg: błąd przetwarzania cyrus-common
[...]
Nie znam sie na cyrus'ie ale moze sprobuj z konsoli odpalic tego
daemon'a który wywala sie przy
post-installation z debugiem.
--- ocl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried aptitude install for a few of them, especially capplets, eog,
totem, and
libgnome2-0,
but aptitude tells me that 200+ pakages (mainly gnome-related, but not
exclusively as
pkg-config
is among them!) are no longer used and will be removed.
Ibrahim Mubarak wrote on 2004-11-29 14:03:
By the way, what does obsolete packages mean in synoptic (could not find
anything about it in the help)? Is it like with aptitude? I preferred aptitude
over apt-get because it would remove useless packages whenever the dependencies
of main packages
Hi,
I am using Debian SID/unstable with both KDE and GNOME installed. Custom Kernel
2.6.9! For about a
week now I have been trying to update the packages I got on my system. But each
time I do it
(about daily) it does update some of the packages just fine but can't seem to
be able to do
Thomas, thanks for the fix. It seemed to work. I need to improve my BTS
skills as I looked but did not find the solution to the problem.
Bruce
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 5:37 pm, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 11:31:41PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 09:33:02AM -0500, Bruce DeGrasse wrote:
Thomas, thanks for the fix. It seemed to work. I need to improve my BTS
skills as I looked but did not find the solution to the problem.
No worries. I was slightly guilty of it to, since I checked the BTS after
sending my
I have been unable to upgrade the last week. kdepim will not install due
korganizer not being upgrade from 4:3.2.2-2 to 4:3.2.3-1. How do I get
around this problem. See results of apt-get upgrade and apt-get install
korganizer. I am running Unstable by the way.
I think this problem has
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:59:07PM -0500, Bruce DeGrasse wrote:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/korganizer_4%3a3.2.3-1_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/etc/kde3/khotnewstuffrc', which is also in package
kdelibs-bin
dpkg -i --force-overwrite \
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 11:31:41PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:59:07PM -0500, Bruce DeGrasse wrote:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/korganizer_4%3a3.2.3-1_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/etc/kde3/khotnewstuffrc', which is also in package
Hello Stephen!
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:00:42AM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
All this over a bunch of icons?!? Yeesh. From what I see, I can't
imagine anyone taking offense.
And you tell him he's got file overlap, something's broken, and
perhaps he shouldn't be running experimental. So
Hello Chris!
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 05:18:02PM -0400, Chris Metzler wrote:
As near as I can tell you did fine. When I saw the original post, my
immediate reaction was he doesn't think to check (or doesn't know
about) the BTS, but wants to install packages out of experimental?
Not just
Incoming from Florian Ernst:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:00:42AM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
And you tell him he's got file overlap, something's broken, and
perhaps he shouldn't be running experimental. So what's the problem?
There's no warranty on sid. He gets to keep both pieces.
to proceed installing this package.
My off-list mails follow:
- Begin of mails -
Subject: Re: gnome hicolor-icon-theme_0.5-1_all.deb upgrade problem
To: Philip Pinkerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 21:42:39 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 02:48:53PM
Incoming from Florian Ernst:
escalating back to the list. Please tell me whether my behavior is
aggravating the situation and whether I'm screwing around with his
head. So far I considered myself not to be overly friendly but still
polite, and I thought my suggestions would have helped this
FYI It is fixed.
No thanks to Flo. No offense taken. Just wanted a real non-BS solution.
Philip
On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 14:00, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Florian Ernst:
escalating back to the list. Please tell me whether my behavior is
aggravating the situation and whether I'm
Incoming from Philip Pinkerton:
On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 14:00, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Florian Ernst:
escalating back to the list. Please tell me whether my behavior is
aggravating the situation and whether I'm screwing around with his
head. So far I considered myself not
Hello list!
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 12:07:33PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Philip Pinkerton:
FYI It is fixed.
Good for you. [...]
And if it should be good for anyone who might ever browse the list
searching for the solution to this problem, one should rather post how
exactly
I am afraid I cannot articulate as well as I would like.
I'll leave the advice to the experts.
My comments are honest my opinions are my own.
One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions
You can quote me on that one. It is too short to censor.
Philip
On Sat, 2004-04-17 at
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 18:31:20 +0200
Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snip ]
I'm seriously interested in getting to know whether I need to readjust
my code of conduct.
As near as I can tell you did fine. When I saw the original post, my
immediate reaction was he
Problems with latest upgrade: apt-get install -t expermential gnome
(Reading database ... 181234 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking hicolor-icon-theme (from .../hicolor-icon-theme_0.5-1_all.deb)
...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/hicolor-icon-theme_0.5-1_all.deb
Hello Philip!
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 01:24:14PM -0300, Philip Pinkerton wrote:
Problems with latest upgrade: apt-get install -t expermential gnome
[...]
dpkg: error processing
Thanks, Paddy, that did it for me, too. Out of curiosity (as a Debian
newbie) what had gone wrong with the package upgrade?
Ollie
Glad to help.
I still class myself as a newbie to. It would appear to be a simple bug
with the way the libxft-dev was built.
If you noticed the line in the error
That got me back in business.
Thanks!!
On Friday 02 April 2004 10:47, Patrick Beard wrote:
dpkg-divert: rename involves overwriting
`/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h'
with
different file `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h', not allowed
I had the exact problem with this upgrade
I had the exact problem with this upgrade upgrade.
What I did was to move Xft.h out of the way.
Try this;
cd /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/
mv Xft.h Xft.hbak
Then do;
apt-get -f install
dpkg --configure -a
That solved it for me.
--
Paddy
Thanks, Paddy, that did it
dpkg-divert: rename involves overwriting
`/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h'
with
different file `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h', not allowed
I had the exact problem with this upgrade upgrade.
What I did was to move Xft.h out of the way.
Try this;
cd /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/
mv
ich fahre woody kde 3.2. Beim upgrade von backports.org bekomme ich
folgende Meldung:
Preparing to replace kdeartwork-theme-desktop 4:3.1.4-0woody1 (using .../
kdeartwork-theme-desktop_4%3a3.2.0-0woody1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement kdeartwork-theme-desktop ...
dpkg: error processing
can anyone help me with this?
I did an apt-get update, apt-get upgrade a few days ago on my testing system
and ran into the following problem with libxft-dev. I tried removing the kde
and qt -dev stuff since I don't need it anymore, but apt-get won't allow it.
Help! I can't install anything
I just solved mine a while ago. What i did is purge libxft-dev from
dselect including those that depend on it, taking note of them. Then,
apt-get install libxft-dev (getting the newer version). And, apt-get
install xxx, where xxx are those that got purged together with
libxft-dev. This is
Hallo,
ich fahre woody kde 3.2. Beim upgrade von backports.org bekomme ich folgende
Meldung:
Preparing to replace kdeartwork-theme-desktop 4:3.1.4-0woody1 (using .../
kdeartwork-theme-desktop_4%3a3.2.0-0woody1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement kdeartwork-theme-desktop ...
dpkg: error
On 31.Mar 2004 - 21:50:00, Klaus Becker wrote:
Hallo,
ich fahre woody kde 3.2. Beim upgrade von backports.org bekomme ich folgende
Meldung:
Preparing to replace kdeartwork-theme-desktop 4:3.1.4-0woody1 (using .../
kdeartwork-theme-desktop_4%3a3.2.0-0woody1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking
* Klaus Becker wrote:
ich fahre woody kde 3.2. Beim upgrade von backports.org bekomme ich folgende
Meldung:
Preparing to replace kdeartwork-theme-desktop 4:3.1.4-0woody1 (using .../
kdeartwork-theme-desktop_4%3a3.2.0-0woody1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement kdeartwork-theme-desktop ...
Hier hat wer das gleiche Problem:
http://www.linuxtag.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=oberflaeche;action=display;num=1080393195;start=0
Beste Grüße,
Daniel
Klaus Becker schrieb:
Hallo,
ich fahre woody kde 3.2. Beim upgrade von backports.org bekomme ich folgende
Meldung:
Preparing to
Hi,
since i upgraded from 2.x Samba to 3.x i get errors (sent by
logcheck). It's when i connect from an XP machine.
I can copy or read files from my shares on the linux machine and
i can log in without any problems (Server is configured as PDC).
So everything works but i don't understand why i
Bonjour,
J'ai quelques soucis avec un package kdm depuis plusieurs jours. (mon dernier
upgrade)
A chaque fois que j'installe un nouveau pkg l'erreur kdm me reviens en pleine
figure. J'aimerais bien comprendre le problème, mais je ne sais pas par quel
bout commencer. Je lis bien que le
Jean-Marc Matline wrote:
Bonjour,
J'ai quelques soucis avec un package kdm depuis plusieurs jours. (mon dernier
upgrade)
A chaque fois que j'installe un nouveau pkg l'erreur kdm me reviens en pleine
figure. J'aimerais bien comprendre le problème, mais je ne sais pas par quel
bout commencer.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 05:34:23PM +0100, daniel huhardeaux wrote:
Jean-Marc Matline wrote:
Bonjour,
J'ai quelques soucis avec un package kdm depuis plusieurs jours. (mon
dernier upgrade)
A chaque fois que j'installe un nouveau pkg l'erreur kdm me reviens en
pleine figure. J'aimerais
Merci à Denis et Frédéric (BxLug)
le bug évoqué y est rapporté, avec un patch.
http://bugs.debian.org/kdm (cf les 6 bugs serious policy violation)
Il est dans le bug #224574.
Il faut l'appliquer au fichier /var/lib/dpkg/info/kdm.config. En
enregistrant le patch dans le-fichier, la commande
On Sunday 09 November 2003 13:20, Gerhard Gaussling wrote:
Am Sonntag, 9. November 2003 10:47 schrieb Gerhard Gaussling:
Hallo Leute,
Ich möchte mein debian testing/unstable mix zumindest was kde
betrifft upgraden, da die Returntaste in einer kde anwendung betätigt
zufällige Anwendungen
Hallo Leute,
Ich möchte mein debian testing/unstable mix zumindest was kde betrifft
upgraden, da die Returntaste in einer kde anwendung betätigt zufällige
Anwendungen startet. Wenn ich also in konsole oder kmail die
Returntaste drücke, so wird mal mozilla, mal konqueror oder irgendeine
andere
Am Sonntag, 9. November 2003 10:47 schrieb Gerhard Gaussling:
Hallo Leute,
Ich möchte mein debian testing/unstable mix zumindest was kde
betrifft upgraden, da die Returntaste in einer kde anwendung betätigt
zufällige Anwendungen startet. Wenn ich also in konsole oder kmail
die Returntaste
Hi
Can anyone give me a clue about sorting this one out ?
Decided to download Debian the latest version to my experimental
machine. The one that gets all the rough treatment.
The version that was installed was the stable version of 3.0 r0.
Changed the apt-get sources lists line to...
deb
Richard wrote:
Unpacking replacement Joe...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/joe.potrm: line 3: /usr/bin/update-menus:
Permission denied
Can you manually run /usr/bin/update-menus?
Look at line 3 of /var/lib/dpkg/info/jog.potrm and see if there's
anything odd-looking there or in the immediate vicinity.
--
Kent
Richard wrote:
Unpacking replacement Joe...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/joe.potrm: line 3: /usr/bin/update-menus:
Permission denied
Can you manually run /usr/bin/update-menus?
Yes, that's fine.
Look at line 3 of /var/lib/dpkg/info/jog.potrm and see if there's
anything odd-looking
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 15:16:20 + (GMT), Richard wrote:
Unpacking replacement Joe...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/joe.potrm: line 3: /usr/bin/update-menus:
Permission denied
snip
After this 'apt-get upgrade' dies altogether thus causing the whole
upgrade to die. Can't install Joe or remove it.
Hi
Had a problem with Postfix. I was altering some of the default values
to the ones that I prefer myself. For some reason when I re-started it
an error message came up on the screen which didn't make a lot of sense.
To cut a long story short I thought it might be better to re-install
Witam
Uzywam Sarge'a. Wszystko szlo dobrze az do ostatniego upgradu.
Po restarcie w momencie, gdy inicjalizowane sa konsole zaczely pojawiac
sie bledy:
RSetting up general console font.../etc/init.d/rcS: line 189: 142
Segmentation fault ${SETFONT} ${SETFONT_OPT} ${SCREEN_FONT}
Dnia Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:33:22AM +0200, Mateusz Pohl napisał(a):
Cześć,
Czy ktos jeszcze sie z tym spotkal?
U mnie pod testing jest tak samo. W X'ach mam poustawiane czcionki, więc
np. X-terminal-emulator wyświetla ogonki prawidłowo, a pod konsolą nie.
Wnioskuję, że podobnie jak pod X'ami
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:33:22AM +0200, Mateusz Pohl wrote:
Uzywam Sarge'a. Wszystko szlo dobrze az do ostatniego upgradu.
Po restarcie w momencie, gdy inicjalizowane sa konsole zaczely pojawiac
sie bledy:
RSetting up general console font.../etc/init.d/rcS: line 189: 142
Segmentation
Witam
Juz sobie poradzilem:
# cd /usr/share/consolefonts/
# gunzip iso2-16.psf.gz
i dziala jak powinno :)
Pozdrawiam
Mateusz Pohl (aka PoLu)
--
Registered Linux User: #284408 -|- Debian GNU/Linux
Mateusz Pohl (aka PoLu) - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GG: 1985937
Kiedy na nasze pytanie odpowiada
I ran an update and started and refused a dist-upgrade this morning. I
refused the dist-upgrade because it wanted to remove half my system.
Below is output from apt-get update and the first part of the output from
apt-get -s dist-upgrade.
Anyone know if this is a problem with the distribution? Or
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sarge(testing) dist-upgrade problem?
I ran an update and started and refused a dist-upgrade this morning. I
refused the dist-upgrade because it wanted to remove half my system.
Below is output from apt-get update and the first part of the output from
apt-get -s dist
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 08:21:29 -0400 (GMT)
Paul Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixed it. Ran an upgrade via aptitude which installed a few packages
but removed none. Now apt-get dist-upgrade thinks everything's up to
date. Must have been some dependency glitch.
[snip]
1 packages upgraded,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 11:00:39PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
Hi
- Original Message -
From: Mario Duve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Liste Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: Update Upgrade Problem?
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hallo, was bedeutet
Körde just dist-upgrade på min sid-burk och fick beroende problem som
jag inte vet hur jag ska få orning på.
#apt-get -f install ger mig följande:
# apt-get -f install
Läser paketlistor... Färdig
Bygger beroendeträd... Färdig
Rättar beroenden Färdig
Följande ytterligare paket kommer att
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 12:32, ZekeVarg wrote:
Körde just dist-upgrade på min sid-burk och fick beroende problem som
jag inte vet hur jag ska få orning på.
#apt-get -f install ger mig följande:
# apt-get -f install
Läser paketlistor... Färdig
Bygger beroendeträd... Färdig
Rättar
On Saturday 16 August 2003 12:32, ZekeVarg wrote:
Körde just dist-upgrade på min sid-burk och fick beroende problem som
jag inte vet hur jag ska få orning på.
apt-get --purge remove python2.2-gnome2 python2.2-glade2 apt-get -f install
Konstigt att de inte konflikterar.
*/ Christoffer Sawicki
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 14:16, Torbjörn Svensson wrote:
Hej!
Testa att tabort dessa packeten först, för du behöver väl inte både 2.2
och 2.3 versionerna?
apt-get remove python2.2-gtk2 python2.2-gnome2 \
python2.2-pyorbit python2.2-glade2
//Tobbe
Försökte med det och även med
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 15:02, Torbjörn Svensson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 14:50, ZekeVarg wrote:
Försökte med det och även med Christoffer Sawicki's
apt-get --purge remove python2.2-gnome2 python2.2-glade2 apt-get -f
install
Men inget verkar fungera.
Vad jag än gör med apt-get,
On Saturday 16 August 2003 14:50, ZekeVarg wrote:
Försökte med det och även med Christoffer Sawicki's
apt-get --purge remove python2.2-gnome2 python2.2-glade2 apt-get -f
install
Men inget verkar fungera.
Vad jag än gör med apt-get, install remove så listar den upp detta
beroende problem.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=205176 BTW
*/ Christoffer Sawicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just ran dist-upgrade on my sid-box and I got problems with:
python2.3-glade2, python2.3-gnome2, python2.3-gtk2 python2.3-pyorbit
and got a suggestion to run #apt-get -f install to fix it.
This is the output of #apt-get -f install after I accept the install of the above
packages.
(Reading
Since they're not crucial packages (by crucial, I mean things like bash,
and init), I would suggest forcing the removal of all of them, and then
apt-get the new ones.
Edward
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 23:21, ZekeVarg wrote:
I just ran dist-upgrade on my sid-box and I got problems with:
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hallo, was bedeutet denn folgende Meldung?
snip
The following packages have been kept back
libssl-dev openssl postfix postfix-pcre python-newt whiptail
Das diese pakete auf Hold gesetzt sind. Also dies werden nicht
bei einem upgrade bercksichtigt.
0 packages upgraded, 0
- Original Message -
From: Mario Duve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Liste Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: Update Upgrade Problem?
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hallo, was bedeutet denn folgende Meldung?
snip
The following packages have been kept
On Wednesday 13 August 2003 22:30, Jim Knuth wrote:
Hallo, was bedeutet denn folgende Meldung?
snip
The following packages have been kept back
libssl-dev openssl postfix postfix-pcre python-newt whiptail
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
/snip
cu
401 - 500 of 632 matches
Mail list logo
