- Original Message -
From: bernhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: Update Upgrade Problem?
gemacht. wenn abhngigkeits- (versions-) probleme auftreten, wird dir das
dann angezeigt.
Kann es auch sein, dass ich schon neuere
Jim Knuth schrieb:
Hi Rdiger,
Simuliere fr jedes der 6 Pakete eine Installation mit:
apt-get -s install paket
Was passiert denn bei dieser Simulation?
nichts was schlimm ausgehen knnte, er prft eigentlich nur, was
passieren wrde und anhand der ausgabemeldung kannst Du
Jim Knuth wrote:
SO Das waren jetzt 3 verschiedene Aussagen. :-))
Was ist denn nun wahr?
Simuliere fr jedes der 6 Pakete eine Installation mit:
apt-get -s install paket
Auerdem ein:
apt-cache policy paket
Danach drfte es keine Fragen mehr geben. ;-)
Gru
Rdiger
--
--
Haeufig gestellte
gemacht. wenn abhngigkeits- (versions-) probleme auftreten, wird dir das
dann angezeigt.
Kann es auch sein, dass ich schon neuere Versionen hab?
Bei Postfix und mod_ssl ist das so bei mir.
DA weiss ichs genau.
anscheinend gibt es bereits eine neuere version als bei dir installiert ist.
Hi Rdiger,
Simuliere fr jedes der 6 Pakete eine Installation mit:
apt-get -s install paket
Was passiert denn bei dieser Simulation?
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13.Aug 2003 - 23:24:49, Jim Knuth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: bb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:19 PM
Subject: Re: Update Upgrade Problem?
gemacht. wenn abhängigkeits- (versions-) probleme auftreten, wird dir das
dann
Hallo, was bedeutet denn folgende Meldung?
snip
The following packages have been kept back
libssl-dev openssl postfix postfix-pcre python-newt whiptail
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
/snip
cu Jim
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
- Original Message -
From: bb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:19 PM
Subject: Re: Update Upgrade Problem?
gemacht. wenn abhngigkeits- (versions-) probleme auftreten, wird dir das
dann angezeigt.
Kann es auch sein, dass ich schon neuere
Hallo,
ich hab ein kleines Problem mit einem dist-upgrad von woody auf unstable:
wenn ich ein apt-get dist-upgrade ausführen will bekomme ich folgende
fehlermeldung:
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Calculating Upgrade... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
console-tools-libs kab
Moin,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:43:28PM +0200, Gerald Pirkl wrote:
[...]
E: Internal Error, Could not perform immediate configuration (2) on libpam0g
Was kann ich dagegen tun?
versuch erstmal apt-get -s ... um zu sehen, was sonst noch alles schief geht
und probiers dann mal zusammen mit
hi
i finally rebooted to add some memory and am now in the grips of the
x4.2 problems. (was able to restart X ok yesterday before reboot so i
thought it would restart ok after boot..)
the log file from /etc/X11 shows it trying to load sub-module fb.
that has always been the kiss of death
remember the old adage: if it breaks when you change something, it's
whatever you changed!!
i swapped the memory upgrade out and problem is gone. happily running
X4.2.1
when will he ever learn???
dave
--
Dave Mallery, K5EN (debian testing woody)
PO Box 520 .~._
I run testing, and have just upgraded X to 4.2.1-3, and I eventually got
it
working OK. However, although I'm using the same XF86Config file as
before, and have not made any screensaver or other changes, my monitor no
longer goes into power saving mode as it used to with the previous version
of
Richard Kimber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-06 15:56:49 +]:
I run testing, and have just upgraded X to 4.2.1-3, and I eventually got
it working OK. However, although I'm using the same XF86Config file as
before, and have not made any screensaver or other changes, my monitor no
longer goes
I searched but didn't find anything in google...
I upgraded a box to 3.0 and that part went fine. But then I
upgraded to the standard 2.4.18 kernel image deb (from a 2.2
kernel.
I installed the matching initrd package too. At first I tried
the k6 kernel, and I tried the 2.4bf kernel and got the
The release notes didn't say there were any problems going
from 2.2 to 2.4. What did I forget to do?
If you modified /etc/lilo.conf to add the new kernel, did you remember to
type lilo before rebooting? Not doing this will lock it up for sure.
The bootdisk-HOWTO tells you what various LILO
nate wrote:
D.U. said:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:26:09AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I comment out eepro from /etc/modules, my box boots up under the 2.4
kernels and I can log in. An odd thing I just noticed is there are no
modules loaded at all. However, I can insmod eepro if I
Due to some errors I couldn't install kernel 2.4.x directly, so I gotto
isntall 2.2.y firt then upgrade to 2.4 .
But there is some problems, I can actually install it, but while booting it
gives me a lot of warning about read only root and it cann't write the log
files and it couldn't find the
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:11:26 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's longer ago I wanted to install a package from source. I
don't remember what kind of source-tarball I installed by using
auto-apt, but it was a developer version, the newest available.
Ok, but learn how
Am Montag, 30. September 2002 23:08 schrieb Faheem Mitha:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:26:04 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debian:/usr/src# apt-get remove coreutils
[...]You are about to do something potentially harmful
To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'
Am Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2002 22:11 schrieb Gerhard Gaussling:
How can I directly see that I have to do with a _base_ -package,
like libc6 or coreutils?
.. that I have to deal with a a _base_ -package...
sorry about my broken english :-(
regards
gerhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Am Montag, 30. September 2002 05:35 schrieb Faheem Mitha:
though. What does apt-get -u upgrade
currently say?
Hello Faheem,
Thank you for your response. Unfortunately I'd already overwritten
the 'coreutils-packages' of sarge (shellutils and textutils) with
their newest versions. That means
Hello Faheem,
Am Montag, 30. September 2002 17:52 schrieb Gerhard Gaussling:
I don't knoww if it's possible
to remove it. If it's possible I think I have to reinstall
shellutils, textutils, and fileutils.
debian:/usr/src# apt-get remove coreutils
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:26:04 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debian:/usr/src# apt-get remove coreutils
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
coreutils
WARNING: The following essential packages will be
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:52:06 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Montag, 30. September 2002 05:35 schrieb Faheem Mitha:
though. What does apt-get -u upgrade
currently say?
Hello Faheem,
Thank you for your response. Unfortunately I'd already overwritten
the
Hi all,
I got a wired problem upgrading woody to sarge. I'm not able to
upgrade shellutils.
I had setup preferences and sources list for pinning with unstable.
This might be the reason of my problem.
Now I got only testing and stable/upgrade (security) in my sources
list and I moved
Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 21:23 schrieb Gerhard Gaussling:
What can I do now to progress with dist-upgrade.
I did
dpkg --force-overwrite -i shellutils_2.0.12-2_i386.deb
dpkg --force-overwrite -i textutils_2.1-1_i386.deb
Now the dist-upgrade is progressing.
coreutils are only available in
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:52:42 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 21:23 schrieb Gerhard Gaussling:
What can I do now to progress with dist-upgrade.
I did
dpkg --force-overwrite -i shellutils_2.0.12-2_i386.deb
dpkg --force-overwrite -i
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:52:42 +0200, Gerhard Gaussling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debian:/home/gerhard# apt-cache show coreutils | grep shellutils
Replaces: textutils, shellutils, fileutils, stat
Provides: textutils, shellutils, fileutils
I think it's impossible to remove coreutils now.
Is
Hat jemand eine Ahnung, was hier schief gegangen ist und wie ich es re-
parieren kann? Ich habe auch keine Idee, wie ich erfahren kann, welches
Programm den Fehler verursacht hat. Ich habe den Eindruck, daß überhaupt
keine neues Paket aus Woody installiert wurde.
Also, erst mal die gute
Eckhard Hoeffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hat jemand eine Ahnung, was hier schief gegangen ist und wie ich es re-
parieren kann? Ich habe auch keine Idee, wie ich erfahren kann, welches
Programm den Fehler verursacht hat. Ich habe den Eindruck, daß überhaupt
keine neues Paket aus Woody
* Ulrich Büchsel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-09-02 22:58]:
Hat jemand eine Ahnung, was hier schief gegangen ist und wie ich es re-
parieren kann? Ich habe auch keine Idee, wie ich erfahren kann, welches
Programm den Fehler verursacht hat. Ich habe den Eindruck, daß überhaupt
keine neues Paket aus
* Frank Küster geb. Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20 09 02 11:19]:
Eckhard Hoeffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Nachdem der OP das nicht klar geschrieben hat: Möglicherweise liegt es
einfach daran, dass er vergessen hat, zunächst apt-get, dpkg und ein
paar andere zu aktualisieren.
Danach habe ich
Eckhard Hoeffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
* Frank Küster geb. Fürst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20 09 02 11:19]:
Nachdem der OP das nicht klar geschrieben hat: Möglicherweise liegt es
einfach daran, dass er vergessen hat, zunächst apt-get, dpkg und ein
paar andere zu aktualisieren.
[...]
Hallo Liste!
Heute wollte ich endlich von Potato zu Woody upgraden. Hierbei sind
jedoch Probleme aufgetreten, die ich nicht lösen kann. Zur Grundinfor-
mation: Ich hatte bisher eine Linuxland-Debian-Distribution (Potato)
und habe mir jetzt die 7 offiziellen Debian-Woody-CDs von Lin24.de
Hi All,
Running Debian unstable, i'm trying to upgrade my iptables to 1.2.7a-2.
It's giving me this error message : empty control file at
/usr/sbin/install-docs line 629
Anyone having this problem to, or know how to solve it ?
Thanks
Dick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Running Debian unstable, i'm trying to upgrade my iptables to
1.2.7a-2. It's giving me this error message : empty control file at
/usr/sbin/install-docs line 629
Hi Dick, I had the same prob so I emailed the package maintainer to let
him know and he emailed me back with this link:
D.J. Bolderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Running Debian unstable, i'm trying to upgrade my iptables to 1.2.7a-2.
It's giving me this error message : empty control file at
/usr/sbin/install-docs line 629
Anyone having this problem to, or know how to solve it ?
While your question seems to
Hello,
I'm using debian 2.2r5 potato. I downloaded kernel-package and
kernel-source-2.4.18 (from unstable). After reading through the documentation
and installing the kernel as described, I got a number of errors when booting
up. The error was xyz-kernel-module: Cannot locate module, for all
On Tuesday 21 May 2002 12:51, the jackol wrote:
Hello,
I'm using debian 2.2r5 potato. I downloaded kernel-package and
kernel-source-2.4.18 (from unstable). After reading through the
documentation and installing the kernel as described, I got a number of
errors when booting up. The error was
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 01:41, Charles Baker wrote:
...
Well, I just did an ``apt-get install
postgresql-client'' and it caused many supporting
packages to be installed including postgresql. Is this
indicative of a dependancy problem for these packages?
Did it cause the removal of any packages?
--- Oliver Elphick olly@lfix.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 01:41, Charles Baker wrote:
...
Well, I just did an ``apt-get install
postgresql-client'' and it caused many supporting
packages to be installed including postgresql. Is
this
indicative of a dependancy problem for these
After postgresql was kept back on both an upgrade and
a dist-upgrade, I tried an install. This is the
result:
twin:/etc/apt# apt-get install postgresql
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean
that you have
requested an
--- Charles Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After postgresql was kept back on both an upgrade
and
a dist-upgrade, I tried an install. This is the
result:
twin:/etc/apt# apt-get install postgresql
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 04:49:11PM -0600, Charles Blair wrote:
I have version 2.2 of Debian, running on a laptop. I recenty
tried using dpkg to install the version of xlibs in testing
Don't do that without upgrading wholesale to woody. If you're trying to
install a package that depends on
I have version 2.2 of Debian, running on a laptop. I recenty
tried using dpkg to install the version of xlibs in testing and
got the messages:
dpkg: considering removing xlib6g in favour of xlibs ...
dpkg: no, cannot remove xlib6g (--auto-deconfigure will help):
aalib1 depends on xlib6g
Deva Seetharam posts :
.. TIME: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=0
and the machine hangs after this message. what is going on?
Is this not an RTC issue ? You need to insmod the rtc module if you are
using the stock kernel 2.4.17 image. Better still, do recompile your
kernel; after enabling the
actually, i did enable realtime clock support while configuring the kernel.
what is surprising is, the 2.2.19 kernel is running in SMP mode.
cheers
deva
Deva Seetharam posts :
.. TIME: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=0
and the machine hangs after this message. what is going on?
Is this not an RTC
hi all,
i have a dual pentium (coppermine) processor machine and i was running kernel
version 2.2.19. i am trying to upgrade to kernel 2.4.17.
when i installed the kernel-image 2.4.17 and rebooted the machine,
i got the message
Total of 2 Processors activated (3742.10 BogoMIPS).
Enabling
I just did an upgrade to 2.2r4 (from 2.2r3). It
seemed to go well, except for one problem. One of
the packages upgraded was groff (it's been on the
security list for a good while).
After the upgrade, I tried a groff job, with
the -l option, which is supposed to send the
output to the printer.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 01:26:50PM -0700, Mike Fontenot wrote:
I just did an upgrade to 2.2r4 (from 2.2r3). It
seemed to go well, except for one problem. One of
the packages upgraded was groff (it's been on the
security list for a good while).
I'm the groff maintainer.
I discovered that
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 01:26:50PM -0700, Mike Fontenot wrote:
After the upgrade, I tried a groff job, with
the -l option, which is supposed to send the
output to the printer. Instead, it sent the
output to stdout.
I'd appreciate it if you could try out
Many thanks to Colin Watson for his rapid response
on my problem. Very impressive!
Mike Fontenot
Yesterdays dist-upgrade of woody caused apache to fail to load with
the following error message.
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so into server:
libexpat.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
#ldd /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so shows why - libexpat.so.0
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 12:50:00PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
Yesterdays dist-upgrade of woody caused apache to fail to load with
the following error message.
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so into server:
libexpat.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
Colin Watson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 12:50:00PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
Yesterdays dist-upgrade of woody caused apache to fail to load with
the following error message.
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so into server:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 01:15:45PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
Colin Watson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
There's a libexpat1 update in woody now which works around this problem.
I had just complated a dist-upgrade when I wrote the report. Just
tried to install libexpat1 again
Colin Watson([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 12:50:00PM -0500, Wayne Topa wrote:
Yesterdays dist-upgrade of woody caused apache to fail to load with
the following error message.
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so into server:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001 13:15:45 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you could make a symlink to the real lib.
i've done this:
# cd /usr/local/lib
# ln -s /usr/lib/libexpat.so.1.0.0 libexpat.so.0
# cd /etc
# mcedit ld.so.conf
then you add a new line
'/usr/local/lib'
save the file and run
#
Hi,
Added woody to sources.list, apt-get update, apt-get -u dist-upgrade and
then waited a long time even on a DSL line to download and then the
following happened.
Get:489 http://http.us.debian.org woody/main xsitecopy 1:0.9.10-1
[151kB]
Fetched 229MB in 1h3m28s (60.1kB/s)
86% [Scanning
On Friday 02 November 2001 20:26, Eric Richardson wrote:
Hi,
Added woody to sources.list, apt-get update, apt-get -u dist-upgrade and
then waited a long time even on a DSL line to download and then the
following happened.
Get:489 http://http.us.debian.org woody/main xsitecopy 1:0.9.10-1
Eric Richardson wrote:
Get:489 http://http.us.debian.org woody/main xsitecopy 1:0.9.10-1
[151kB]
Fetched 229MB in 1h3m28s (60.1kB/s)
86% [Scanning packages]Template parse error near at
/usr/lib/perl5/Debian/DebConf/Template.pm line 102, TEMPLATES chunk 2.
E: Sub-process
Bob Underwood wrote:
On Friday 02 November 2001 20:26, Eric Richardson wrote:
Hi,
Added woody to sources.list, apt-get update, apt-get -u dist-upgrade and
then waited a long time even on a DSL line to download and then the
following happened.
Get:489 http://http.us.debian.org woody/main
I was trying to upgrade my system the other day and apt-get upgrade
first tells me that my modutils can't be configured since my kernel
sturcture has changed. I figured nothing of but now it's not just
modutils it's initrd-tools and modconf as well. I tried upgrading to a
new kernel
I was trying to upgrade my system the other day and apt-get upgrade
first tells me that my modutils can't be configured since my kernel
sturcture has changed. I figured nothing of but now it's not just
modutils it's initrd-tools and modconf as well. I tried upgrading to a
new kernel
I had Potato 2.2r.2 installed on my system and did a
upgrade to testing. I changed the sources to testing
and did apt-get update. Then did a apt-get
dist-upgrade. About 270 programs downloaded and then
started to install. During the installation I kept
seeing the message Unable to (and I forget
- Original Message -
From: D. Hoyem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:09 PM
Subject: Testing upgrade problem?
I had Potato 2.2r.2 installed on my system and did a
upgrade to testing. I changed the sources to testing
and did apt-get
Subject: Testing upgrade problem?
I had Potato 2.2r.2 installed on my system and did
a
upgrade to testing. I changed the sources to
testing
and did apt-get update. Then did a apt-get
dist-upgrade. About 270 programs downloaded and
then
started to install. During the installation
Hello Hall,
Saturday, August 18, 2001, 10:40:02 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
/var/lib/dpkg/info/fetchmail.prerm: /etc/init.d/fetchmail: No such file
[snip]
Any help ?? Thanks in advance.
# dpkg --purge fetchmail
# apt-get install fetchmail
This will (line 1) say dpkg that there was no such file.
When trying to upgrade fetchmail, it complains that
/etc/init.d/fetchmail 'does not exist'. Why should it ?? I don't want
fetchmail started at bootup...
Here's the main part of the error message:
Preparing to replace fetchmail 5.8.16-1 (using
.../fetchmail_5.8.17-1_i386.deb) ...
on Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 02:40:02PM -0500, Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
When trying to upgrade fetchmail, it complains that
/etc/init.d/fetchmail 'does not exist'. Why should it ?? I don't want
fetchmail started at bootup...
Here's the main part of the error message:
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 02:40:02PM -0500, Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
When trying to upgrade fetchmail, it complains that
/etc/init.d/fetchmail 'does not exist'. Why should it ?? I don't want
fetchmail started at bootup...
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 02:40:02PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
When trying to upgrade fetchmail, it complains that
/etc/init.d/fetchmail 'does not exist'. Why should it ?? I don't want
fetchmail started at bootup...
While this is indeed a packaging bug, if you don't want something
started at
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010818 16:54]:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 02:40:02PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
When trying to upgrade fetchmail, it complains that
/etc/init.d/fetchmail 'does not exist'. Why should it ?? I don't want
fetchmail started at bootup...
While this is indeed
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 06:10:46PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010818 16:54]:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 02:40:02PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
When trying to upgrade fetchmail, it complains that
/etc/init.d/fetchmail 'does not exist'. Why should it ?? I
Hello,
This morning I tried to do my routine apt-get upgrade apt-get
dist-upgrade. The dist-upgrade blew up on some kde packages.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # apt-get -f dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
Calculating Upgrade...
Anthony Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
This morning I tried to do my routine apt-get upgrade apt-get
dist-upgrade. The dist-upgrade blew up on some kde packages.
I found the solution on bugs.debian.org:
dpkg --purge kdelibs3-crypto then apt-get -f install.
-Anthony.
Am 03. Jul, 2001 schwäzte Rick Macdonald so:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Hank Marquardt wrote:
Maybe this is self evident to some, but I'm stuck ... I'm running
unstable, I hadn't upgraded in about a week -- then last night I did
and there were 128 packages to upgrade including most of KDE.
Maybe this is self evident to some, but I'm stuck ... I'm running unstable, I
hadn't upgraded in about a week -- then last night I did and there were 128
packages to upgrade including most of KDE. After it fetched the archives it
chugged about half way though and then puked --
It indicates it
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Hank Marquardt wrote:
Maybe this is self evident to some, but I'm stuck ... I'm running unstable, I
hadn't upgraded in about a week -- then last night I did and there were 128
packages to upgrade including most of KDE. After it fetched the archives it
chugged about
Rick Macdonald wrote:
I upgraded from potato to testing and then to sid a few days ago and had
the same problem but with a different filename. I just did this:
dpkg -i --force-overwrite
/var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3_4%3a2.2.0-0beta1-1_i386.deb
This sort of thing happens to me every so
Thanks Rick,
Worked like a charm.
Hank
I upgraded from potato to testing and then to sid a few days ago and had
the same problem but with a different filename. I just did this:
dpkg -i --force-overwrite
/var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3_4%3a2.2.0-0beta1-1_i386.deb
followed by this to
Well, it just works now. For some reason things installed fine today.
Thank you cron jobs?
-nicole
Configuring packages ...
(Reading database ... 93508 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace mysql-server 3.22.32-4 (using
.../mysql-server_3.22.32-6_i386.deb)
I just apt-get upgrade d after about a month of not doing so (network
outages). One of the packages to upgrade was MySQL -- from version
3.22.32-4 to 3.22.32-6.
Here are the errors I get:
Configuring packages ...
(Reading database ... 93508 files and directories currently installed.)
lsh001:/var/cache/apt/archives# apt-get upgrade
mysql-serverReading Package Lists... DoneBuilding Dependency Tree...
Done0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not
upgraded.1 packages not fully installed or removed.Need to get 0B of
archives. After unpacking 0B will be
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:06:23PM +0200, c.o.i.n. wrote:
lsh001:/var/cache/apt/archives# apt-get upgrade mysql-server
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 packages not fully installed or
a package maintainer directly for help.]
- Forwarded message from tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: XFree4.0.2 upgrade problem
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know that this merits a bug report per se.
But.
I upgraded from 'stable
Brian Stults wrote:
I actually have two questions here. First... What is the next logical
step?
Attaching strace to the process (strace -p pid) and getting a log.
--
see shy jo
I recently updated through dselect, and the process hangs when it tries
to upgrade libc6. I am using testing. Here is what I get:
Preparing to replace libc6 2.2.1-1 (using libc6_2.2.1-3_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 .
It will hang there for at least an hour (yes, I let it run for
I've just upgraded my unstable installation to use XFree 4.0.1
(previously XFree 3.3.6) on a neomagic-based laptop. I run Helix GNOME
and gdm with two displays active by default. Soon after installing I
was moving from one X display to the other (Ctl-Alt-F8) and suddenly
the mouse changed from the
Hi to all...
I wanted so install the mysql- server last night. My idea was, go to
tuxfinder.com and get the latest mysql. So, I got the mysql-common,
-client and server in version 3.23.2. . Wenn I install the mysql-client
with dpkg -i, it says, that the package depends on libmysql9, the server
Hello Guys,
I have a qestion on Xwindows. I had it working great with Slink, Then I
upgraded my box to Potato. Now when I try to start X I receive an error:
Fatal server error:
could not open font `fixed`
So what will I need to do to fix this so I can use X again?
Thanks
Jay
On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 09:17:18PM -0700, Jay Kelly wrote:
Hello Guys, I have a qestion on Xwindows. I had it working great with
Slink, Then I upgraded my box to Potato. Now when I try to start X I
receive an error:
Fatal server error: could not open font `fixed`
Common error...
So what
On 11/1/2000 Stewart Fallis wrote:
I recently performed an apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade to update my
potato packages. On doing this a package age (mtx) gave an error and apt
exits. I have tried purging mtx using dpkg and tried to remove it and put it
on hold using dselect to no avail!
I recently performed an apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade to update my
potato packages. On doing this a package age (mtx) gave an error and apt
exits. I have tried purging mtx using dpkg and tried to remove it and put it
on hold using dselect to no avail!
I seem to remember this problem before
HI!
does anybody have an idea how may I upgrade my pgaccess (and other
packages) when dpkg says:
Removing pgaccess ...
dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute pre-removal script: Exec format error
dpkg: error processing pgaccess (--remove):
subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status
Hi,
I got the following errors when I ran apt-get upgrade.
Configuring packages ...
libopenldap-runtime failed to configure, with exit code 30
(Reading database ... 47778 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace base-files 2.1.10 (using .../base-files_2.1.11_all.deb) ...
I've responded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s email about base-files, but postinstal
script for libopenldap looks broken. Can't help you with that.
On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 04:53:32PM +1100, Martin Bishop wrote:
Hi,
I got the following errors when I ran apt-get upgrade.
Configuring packages ...
When using:
apt-get upgrade
on the unstable distribution I get an error running the upgrade.
The error is this:
Syntax error at sometmpfile line 263:
E: sub-process dpkg-preconfig --apt returned an error code (2)
E: failure running script dpkg-preconfig --apt
I don't seem to be able to
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 06:29:07PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Micha Feigin wrote:
I just upgraded my computer from a 486 to a petiumIII450.
I moved the old disk to the new computer in order to move the linux
instelation. Linux came up mostly fine exept for two
501 - 600 of 632 matches
Mail list logo
