On 2010-12-13 02:55 +0100, Frank Church wrote:
I was paring down my installation and the command for gcc-4.2-base more or
less threatened to wipe out everything on the server.
apt-get purge gcc-4.2-base
Is that the norm, or is it due to a corrupted package database?
My hunch is that the
On 13 December 2010 08:58, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2010-12-13 02:55 +0100, Frank Church wrote:
I was paring down my installation and the command for gcc-4.2-base more
or
less threatened to wipe out everything on the server.
apt-get purge gcc-4.2-base
Is that the
On 2010-12-13 10:47 +0100, Frank Church wrote:
==
r...@heron01:/usr/src# apt-cache policy libgcc1
libgcc1:
Installed: 1:4.2.4-1ubuntu4
Candidate: 1:4.2.4-1ubuntu4
Version table:
*** 1:4.2.4-1ubuntu4 0
500
On 13 December 2010 09:54, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2010-12-13 10:47 +0100, Frank Church wrote:
==
r...@heron01:/usr/src# apt-cache policy libgcc1
libgcc1:
Installed: 1:4.2.4-1ubuntu4
Candidate: 1:4.2.4-1ubuntu4
Version
On 2010-12-13 11:50 +0100, Frank Church wrote:
Aren't ubuntu questions welcome here?
Depends on the type of question. In any case, please mention that you
are using Ubuntu, and which distribution.
I thought that at this kind of low level Ubuntu and Debian are the same.
Except that you would
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:50:16AM +, Frank Church wrote:
Aren't ubuntu questions welcome here?
What is wrong with the ubuntu-user support mailing lists?
--
Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.
-- Napoleon Bonaparte
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 10:50:16, Frank Church wrote:
Please ask on Ubuntu lists for help next time.
Aren't ubuntu questions welcome here?
Please don't take it the wrong way, it's not that we don't want to help
Ubuntu users[1][2], it's just that some of our advices will not work, be
completely
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:55:37 +, Frank Church wrote:
I was paring down my installation and the command for gcc-4.2-base more
or less threatened to wipe out everything on the server.
apt-get purge gcc-4.2-base
Wow, gcc is an important package on every linux system:
s...@stt008:~$
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 14:33:39, Camaleón wrote:
Is the norm for base packages, like this. At least the package manager is
smart enough to warn you against the operation :-)
AFAIK this is warning is only done for packages with Essential: yes.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:55:19 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 14:33:39, Camaleón wrote:
Is the norm for base packages, like this. At least the package manager
is smart enough to warn you against the operation :-)
AFAIK this is warning is only done for packages with
On Lu, 13 dec 10, 16:49:33, Camaleón wrote:
But curious is that some of those packages are not essential but are
selected to be unistalled as they were... from OP's log, apt and das,
for instance :-?
Don't forget OP is running Ubuntu ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among
I was paring down my installation and the command for gcc-4.2-base more or
less threatened to wipe out everything on the server.
apt-get purge gcc-4.2-base
Is that the norm, or is it due to a corrupted package database?
r...@sys-1275:~# apt-get purge gcc-4.2-base
Reading package lists... Done
- Original message -
I was paring down my installation and the command for gcc-4.2-base more
or less threatened to wipe out everything on the server.
apt-get purge gcc-4.2-base
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/gcc-4.2-base
Is that the norm, or is it due to a corrupted package
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Simon Hollenbach
ionpowe...@googlemail.com wrote:
- Original message -
I was paring down my installation and the command for gcc-4.2-base more
or less threatened to wipe out everything on the server.
apt-get purge gcc-4.2-base
14 matches
Mail list logo
