On 14Oct16:1151-0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> It strikes me that there's actually very little that needs to be done. In
> the short term, the world, including Debian, will continue to support
> sysvinit scripts - if only because the BSDs aren't going anywhere, I expect
> autotools will continue t
Steve Litt wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:28:50 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
POINT OF CLARIFICATION:
Nothing written below is nosh specific. It could be used with nosh, or
upstart, or sysvinit, or any other PID1 that's *only* a PID1. So how
about it, who wants to join me in neutering systemd on Deb
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:28:50 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
POINT OF CLARIFICATION:
Nothing written below is nosh specific. It could be used with nosh, or
upstart, or sysvinit, or any other PID1 that's *only* a PID1. So how
about it, who wants to join me in neutering systemd on Debian and
probably eve
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:52:58 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * On 2014 15 Oct 19:39 -0500, Joel Rees wrote:
> >> systemd's problems would best be discussed at the systemd project.
> >> (Modulo the willingness of the devs over there to discuss th
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2014 16 Oct 07:54 -0500, Joel Rees wrote:
>> Would that be debian's sysv-init?
>
> That link is from the sysvinit-core package's description in Sid's
> Aptitude. Presumably it is the upstream project.
Thank you. I was under the impress
* On 2014 16 Oct 07:54 -0500, Joel Rees wrote:
> Would that be debian's sysv-init?
That link is from the sysvinit-core package's description in Sid's
Aptitude. Presumably it is the upstream project.
- Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessim
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2014 15 Oct 19:39 -0500, Joel Rees wrote:
>> systemd's problems would best be discussed at the systemd project. (Modulo
>> the willingness of the devs over there to discuss them.)
>>
>> What I'm thinking is to talk about specific feature
* On 2014 15 Oct 19:39 -0500, Joel Rees wrote:
> systemd's problems would best be discussed at the systemd project. (Modulo
> the willingness of the devs over there to discuss them.)
>
> What I'm thinking is to talk about specific features to enable the sort of
> "managing services" that systemd s
systemd's problems would best be discussed at the systemd project. (Modulo
the willingness of the devs over there to discuss them.)
What I'm thinking is to talk about specific features to enable the sort of
"managing services" that systemd seems to be aimed at, and how to implement
them, where exi
9 matches
Mail list logo
