* Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.med...@gmail.com> [2017-02-28 13:24 +]:
> Hi.
>
> I want to install alsa-base but get:
>
> No candidate version found for alsa-base
alsa-base has been removed from distribution [0]. It's only purpose was
to clean old conffiles.
[0] https:
Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.med...@gmail.com> writes:
> Shin Ice <shin@shinice.net> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 28.02.17 um 14:24 schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I want to install alsa-base but get:
>>>
>>&
Shin Ice <shin@shinice.net> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am 28.02.17 um 14:24 schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I want to install alsa-base but get:
>>
>> No candidate version found for alsa-base
>>
>
> interesting, alsa-base is av
Hi,
Am 28.02.17 um 14:24 schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
> Hi.
>
> I want to install alsa-base but get:
>
> No candidate version found for alsa-base
>
interesting, alsa-base is availlable on sid on version 1.0.27+1.
how are you trying to install it? did you made an update befo
Hi.
I want to install alsa-base but get:
No candidate version found for alsa-base
, although the pacakage seems to exist. My sources.list:
# stable
#deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ stable main
#deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ stable main
# unstable
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:20:35 +0200, lee wrote:
In the meantime, I have a working system without having to worry about
keeping track of self-installed software and dependency problems that
might arise from it. Just don't circumvent the package management ---
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:31:34AM +0200, lee wrote:
When they are only different in version, then what is bad about having
packages from Debian-multimedia, and why should I remove them?
Read this:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
Also, just found this:
On Mi, 05 sep 12, 00:04:24, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:31:34AM +0200, lee wrote:
And how about the ones that aren't available in Debian?
You can build them yourself using the build dependencies from Debian.
If you go that route then that is when you'll need the
Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz writes:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:31:34AM +0200, lee wrote:
When they are only different in version, then what is bad about having
packages from Debian-multimedia, and why should I remove them?
Read this:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:39:59PM +0200, lee wrote:
Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz writes:
Read this:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
Also, just found this:
http://blogs.dailynews.com/click/2012/06/debian-project-leader-stefano.html
That's interesting --- the
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:29:20PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 05 sep 12, 00:04:24, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:31:34AM +0200, lee wrote:
And how about the ones that aren't available in Debian?
You can build them yourself using the build dependencies
Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz writes:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:39:59PM +0200, lee wrote:
Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz writes:
Read this:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
Also, just found this:
On Mi, 05 sep 12, 01:49:05, lee wrote:
For example if you watch DVD's on your computer you will need
libdvdcss2 which isn't available in Debian.
Yeah what's the replacement for that?
There is none that I know of.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and
On Du, 02 sep 12, 16:42:30, lee wrote:
The Wanderer wande...@fastmail.fm writes:
No. sid is the permanent name of *un*stable. Current stable is named
squeeze.
Ah ok --- I'm bad with remembering names and stopped caring about how
the releases are called a long time ago. It would explain
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:06:30PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:50:02 +0200
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
I experienced no issues with the dist-upgrade.
In my troubles with that I'm sure they installed alsa-base with everything
muted.
I think I remember
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:31:02PM +0200, lee wrote:
packages from these when needed? And if I removed Debian multimedia, I
would miss a lot of packages.
You might be suprised. The Debian Multimedia team is constantly
improving Debian's multimedia support.
--
If you're not careful, the
for that while it
should have been a simple and trivial thing to do.
For now, I removed linux-sound-base which triggered the removal of
alsa-base, upgraded the packages that were pending and re-installed
alsa-base. Perhaps I still have sound after the next reboot ...
--
Debian testing amd64
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 19:31:02 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
Some packages currently installed may be from unstable or experimental
because I needed more recent versions of them --- IIRC, the mumble
ones are. I would want to keep those until testing catches up.
Then
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 15:11:55, lee wrote:
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
On Du, 02 sep 12, 16:42:30, lee wrote:
downgrade. I'm surprised that there are so many packages from unstable
installed, though. Yet that will fix itself over time when the packages
now in unstable
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 19:31:02 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
Some packages currently installed may be from unstable or experimental
because I needed more recent versions of them --- IIRC, the mumble
ones are. I would want to keep
Chris Bannister cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz writes:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:31:02PM +0200, lee wrote:
packages from these when needed? And if I removed Debian multimedia, I
would miss a lot of packages.
You might be suprised. The Debian Multimedia team is constantly
improving Debian's
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 15:11:55, lee wrote:
I wish there was a good way to keep track of all these changes ... The
admin would enter why some change was performed, and the package
This is your responsibility as the administrator of your system.
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 18:57:26, lee wrote:
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
This is your responsibility as the administrator of your system.
There are various methods to do it, it all depends on preferences.
Interesting, which methods are there?
Since you only install select
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:20:35 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
(...)
What's wrong with it? Aptitude installs packages from testing by
default and installs packages from unstable or experimental when I
tell it to, which is what I want.
Nothing wrong per se but when
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 17:45:11, Camaleón wrote:
I think you still don't understand what Debian releases are for: you
simply can't have the four branches (stable/testing/sid/experimental)
enabled by default and wait for the updater do its job automagically. I
have little experience with
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 16:22:25, lee wrote:
Ok, how do I find out which packages from Debian-MM are actually
installed and what their Debian-MM-team replacements are?
aptitude search ~S~i~OMultimedia
Will show you which packages you have from deb-multimedia.org. However,
the Debian
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 16:22:25, lee wrote:
Ok, how do I find out which packages from Debian-MM are actually
installed and what their Debian-MM-team replacements are?
aptitude search ~S~i~OMultimedia
Will show you which packages you have
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 18:57:26, lee wrote:
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
This is your responsibility as the administrator of your system.
There are various methods to do it, it all depends on preferences.
Interesting, which
On Du, 02 sep 12, 07:28:23, lee wrote:
,
| lee@yun:~$ aptitude show alsa-base
| Paket: alsa-base
| Zustand: Installiert
| Automatisch installiert: nein
| Version: 1.0.23+dfsg-4
At least the .at. mirror has 1.0.25+2+nmu2 for wheezy.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
On Du, 02 sep 12, 07:28:23, lee wrote:
,
| lee@yun:~$ aptitude show alsa-base
| Paket: alsa-base
| Zustand: Installiert
| Automatisch installiert: nein
| Version: 1.0.23+dfsg-4
At least the .at. mirror has 1.0.25+2+nmu2 for wheezy
Mark Allums m...@allums.com writes:
On 9/2/2012 12:44 AM, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
On Du, 02 sep 12, 07:44:07, lee wrote:
See below: that would remove linux-sound-base, upgrade 52 packages and
downgrade 148 packages.
I picked a few of the to-be-downgraded packages and all of them were
from sid. Do you want to run sid or wheezy? There is at least one
(vsftpd) which I don't
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
On Du, 02 sep 12, 07:44:07, lee wrote:
See below: that would remove linux-sound-base, upgrade 52 packages and
downgrade 148 packages.
I picked a few of the to-be-downgraded packages and all of them were
from sid. Do you want to run sid or
On 09/02/2012 06:24 AM, lee wrote:
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
On Du, 02 sep 12, 07:44:07, lee wrote:
See below: that would remove linux-sound-base, upgrade 52 packages and
downgrade 148 packages.
I picked a few of the to-be-downgraded packages and all of them were
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 12:24:42 +0200, lee wrote:
Sid is stable?
Dude... what a question for a user running testing :-)
Sid is the codename for unstable.
I want to run testing and not stable, and shouldn't the
packages in testing not be newer than the ones in Sid?
Sid has the most updated
, the newest packages are always in sid. (Or, in some cases, possibly in
experimental; I've never quite gotten the exact function of experimental
figured
out.)
Hm I thought they travel from experimental through unstable into
testing. All this doesn't seem to cause the dependency problem with
alsa
The Wanderer writes:
Thus, the newest packages are always in sid. (Or, in some cases,
possibly in experimental; I've never quite gotten the exact function
of experimental figured out.)
The function of Experimental is experimentation. Packages uploaded to
it stay there until removed or
On 9/2/2012 11:49 AM, John Hasler wrote:
The Wanderer writes:
Thus, the newest packages are always in sid. (Or, in some cases,
possibly in experimental; I've never quite gotten the exact function
of experimental figured out.)
The function of Experimental is experimentation. Packages uploaded
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
Some packages currently installed may be from unstable or experimental
because I needed more recent versions of them --- IIRC, the mumble ones
are. I would want to keep those until testing catches up.
Then this can be the culprit for all your mess unless
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:56:29 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:20:02 +0200
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
* Drop linux-sound
/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
* Drop linux-sound-base: OSS was removed from the kernel
pre-squeeze.
(closes: #662038). Remove all module list generation
machinery, it's now obsolete.
* Removing linux-sound-base also closes: #376241, #558408
:
(...)
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
* Drop linux-sound-base: OSS was removed from the kernel
pre-squeeze.
(closes: #662038). Remove all module list generation
machinery, it's now obsolete.
* Removing linux-sound-base also
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
(...)
According to aptitude, alsa-base depends on linux-sound-base and
conflicts with linux-sound-base. So you
wrote:
(...)
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
* Drop linux-sound-base: OSS was removed from the kernel
pre-squeeze.
(closes: #662038). Remove all module list generation
machinery, it's now obsolete.
* Removing linux
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 15:35:19 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Hello lee,
The problem came up maybe a week ago and I'm waiting since and still
have it. It probably won't be fixed ...
I recall reading about your problems. When I performed the upgrade on
my testing system, I was a little
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 04:19:15PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:50:02 +0200
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
A towel, it says, is about the most massively useful thing
Exactly Ralf..I'm always wearing a towel instead of my sarong that often goes
Camaleónnoela...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
* Drop linux-sound-base: OSS was removed from the kernel
pre-squeeze.
(closes: #662038). Remove all module list generation
machinery, it's
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
(...)
According to aptitude, alsa-base depends on linux-sound-base
On 9/2/2012 12:44 AM, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
(...)
According to aptitude, alsa-base
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:50:02 +0200
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
A towel, it says, is about the most massively useful thing
Exactly Ralf..I'm always wearing a towel instead of my sarong that often goes
missing. You see it's true, a man who knows where his towel is, is never
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:50:02 +0200
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
I experienced no issues with the dist-upgrade.
In my troubles with that I'm sure they installed alsa-base with everything
muted.
Sound for me only returned after messing about with the alsamixergui keyboard
controls of which
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:10:02 +0200
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, you can unmute any of the detected input/outputs by this command
that can be run on system boot:
amixer set PCM 100 unmute
Not sure if this will help in your case, though... maybe using alsactl
to store the
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 12:15 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:10:02 +0200
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, you can unmute any of the detected input/outputs by this command
that can be run on system boot:
amixer set PCM 100 unmute
Not sure if this will help
waiting to see how this evaluates,
but I wanted to advise that 1.0.25+2+nmu2 alsa-base seems to list
linux-sound-base as a dependency, yet it also breaks it.
Thoughts?
I experienced no issues with the dist-upgrade. The package linux-sound-
base was marked to be removed and so
that when removing the
linux-sound-base and replacing it with alsa-base something comes muted
in the alsamixer(gui) that seemed to only be resolved with 'keyboard'
comands mentioned in the gui help menu. That's all I can tell you.
Today the package has been also removed from my system (wheezy
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:10:03 +0200
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
If package linux-sound-base has been dropped and this generates an
error in your system, you better report it,
Thanks for this advice maybe I should report that when removing the
linux-sound-base and replacing it with alsa
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:56:29 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:20:02 +0200
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
* Drop linux-sound-base: OSS was removed from the kernel
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:20:01 +0200
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
Did you also upgrade from GNOME2 to GNOME3? Perhaps you didn't run
pulseaudio and now you do run pulseaudio?
I don't use Gnome or pulseaudio, removed pulseaudio last year.
It's a damn mystery.
--
CK
--
To
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:00:03 +0200
Joe j...@jretrading.com wrote:
Has a mixer volume level been reset, the wrong sound card selected,
No, the mixer hasn't been changed and I only have the one sound card
thanks for your suggestion.
--
CK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello Charles,
From: Charles Kroeger ckro...@frankensteinface.com
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:49:53 -0500
I don't use Gnome or pulseaudio, removed pulseaudio last year.
It's a damn mystery.
Appears this may also be related to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585149
which
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:10:01 +0200
Charles Kroeger ckro...@frankensteinface.com wrote:
Joe j...@jretrading.com wrote:
Has a mixer volume level been reset, the wrong sound card selected,
No, the mixer hasn't been changed and I only have the one sound card
Every good fidgeter deserves
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:24:46 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
linux-sound-base gets removed on the upgrade and replaced with alsa-base
What upgrade are you referring to? Sid?
but no sound.
If linux-sound-base is reinstalled then alsa-base is removed
but still no sound
Mmmm, it has
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:20:02 +0200
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:24:46 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
linux-sound-base gets removed on the upgrade and replaced with alsa-base
What upgrade are you referring to? Sid?
Yes, sid, AKA unstable: alsa-base 1.0.25+2+nmu1
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:24:46 -0500
Charles Kroeger ckro...@frankensteinface.com wrote:
linux-sound-base gets removed on the upgrade and replaced with
alsa-base
but no sound.
If linux-sound-base is reinstalled then alsa-base is removed
but still no sound
I don't have an answer
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 20:57 +0100, Joe wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:24:46 -0500
Charles Kroeger ckro...@frankensteinface.com wrote:
linux-sound-base gets removed on the upgrade and replaced with
alsa-base
but no sound.
If linux-sound-base is reinstalled then alsa-base is removed
linux-sound-base gets removed on the upgrade and replaced with alsa-base
but no sound.
If linux-sound-base is reinstalled then alsa-base is removed
but still no sound
--
CK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Addendum: The PCM volume setting in
gnome-volume-control was not retained after each clip
after removing alsa-base and alsa-utils. It was
necessary to reinstall those packages in order to get
alsactl, which saves the state of the sound card. :-(
But, a fresh install after purge got rid
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:15:15PM -0700, Dominique Brazziel wrote:
I'm trying to get rid of modprobe error messages
(FATAL: Error trying to install sound_slot_1) and
think it has to do with the file
/etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base. I configured
a custom-built 2.6.8 kernel to have modular alsa
I have alsa as module in the kernel and selected
Crystal Logic CS46XX as the driver in the .config. I
think it is OK, I purged
alsa-base and alsa-utils but was able to play
streaming audio.
I had read that Alsa was included in the 2.6.8 kernel
so
I think this is OK to do.
Thanks
I'm trying to get rid of modprobe error messages
(FATAL: Error trying to install sound_slot_1) and
think it has to do with the file
/etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base. I configured
a custom-built 2.6.8 kernel to have modular alsa
support
and have it working correctly with the one sound card
I have
Bonjour,
Mon noyau est un 2.6.8 est-ce que je peux enlever le paquet alsa-base
(qui est en conflit avec hotplug) ?
Merci
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench
Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et
Reply
Le Dimanche 9 Avril 2006 11:50, Laurent FRANCOIS a écrit :
Bonjour,
Bonsoir,
Mon noyau est un 2.6.8 est-ce que je peux enlever le paquet alsa-base
(qui est en conflit avec hotplug) ?
Je crois me souvenir qu'il y avait un problème entre noyau 2.6.8 udev hotplug
et que cela c'est résorbé avec
Salve galera!
O que acontece com o pacote alsa-base no sid ?
Ele nao anda instalavel , a ultima vez que eu consegui instalar tive de
correr atras de pacotes deb manualmente e instalar pelo dpkg , rodei o aptitude
e ele removeu o alsa-base e alsa-utils sem motivos e no aptitude quando dou um
Bonjour,
On jeu, 2004-07-29 at 23:45 +0200, Michel Luc wrote:
Pour revenir à l'ancienne version j'ai essayé:
apt-get install alsa-base=1.0.4-3 alsa-utils=1.0.4-1 alsa-oss=1.0.4-1
il me répond que ces versions n'ont pas été trouvées, ok je vais voir sur
debian packages et dans les rep ftp
Le vendredi 30 Juillet 2004 09:47, Bruno Muller a écrit :
Bonjour,
On jeu, 2004-07-29 at 23:45 +0200, Michel Luc wrote:
Pour revenir à l'ancienne version j'ai essayé:
apt-get install alsa-base=1.0.4-3 alsa-utils=1.0.4-1 alsa-oss=1.0.4-1
il me répond que ces versions n'ont pas été
Bonjour,
Après un dist-upgrade, la version alsa-base 1.0.4-3 est passée en
1.0.5a-1 et alsa-utils 1.0.4-1 en 1.0.5-1, et là les problèmes ont
commencés avec mes applications audio comme Ardour (clône de Protools). Je
suis sous Sarge noyau 2.4.25 patché lowlatency/preempt
Au démarrage
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:34:25PM -0800, Rodney D. Myers said
I'm using debian Sarge
I've been attempting to install the alsa sound system, but it keeps
failing.
When doing a listing the installed packages I see;
dpkg -l | grep alsa
iF alsa-base 1.0.1-1ALSA sound driver
I'm using debian Sarge
I've been attempting to install the alsa sound system, but it keeps
failing.
When doing a listing the installed packages I see;
dpkg -l | grep alsa
iF alsa-base 1.0.1-1ALSA sound driver common files
rc alsa-modules-2 0.9.6+1Advanced Linux Sound
Kevin C. Smith wrote:
I attempted an apt-get install alsa-base, however this failed.
Received the message stating that alsa-base_0.5.9c-8.deb is not available,
Maybe it's because you dont have woody in your /etc/apt/sources.list
I think woody provide alsa 0.5.9
Olivier.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:03:22PM -0500, Kevin C. Smith wrote:
I attempted an apt-get install alsa-base, however this failed.
Received the message stating that alsa-base_0.5.9c-8.deb is not available,
which is true. It should be getting alsa-base_0.5.9d-1.deb.
How to I fix this? Do I need
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 03:55:40PM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:03:22PM -0500, Kevin C. Smith wrote:
I attempted an apt-get install alsa-base, however this failed.
Received the message stating that alsa-base_0.5.9c-8.deb is not available,
which is true
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:48:28AM -0500, Kevin C. Smith wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 03:55:40PM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
...
I'm also using woody, and alsa-base_0.5.0d-1 came with the last apt-get
upgrade.
Perhaps, an apt-get update helps.
...
I am running Woody. Odd that
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:48:28AM -0500, Kevin C. Smith wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 03:55:40PM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:03:22PM -0500, Kevin C. Smith wrote:
I attempted an apt-get install alsa-base, however this failed.
Received the message stating
I attempted an apt-get install alsa-base, however this failed.
Received the message stating that alsa-base_0.5.9c-8.deb is not available,
which is true. It should be getting alsa-base_0.5.9d-1.deb.
How to I fix this? Do I need to report it to someone?
Thanks,
Kevin
just today while doing an installation, i noticed alsa-base stopping (in
pre-inst) and starting the sound driver again.
the thing i started to wonder about is, why is it so?
if there hasn't been any major changes in the latest releases, the script
starts the driver and restores mixer settings
85 matches
Mail list logo
