On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 11:57:58 -0600
William Torrez Corea wrote:
> > Hit:8 https://repo.steampowered.com/steam stable InRelease
> >
> > Hit:9 https://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/pgadmin/pgadmin4/apt/bullseye
> > pgadmin4 InRelease
> > Hit:10 tor+http://deb.ooni.org unstable InRelease
> > Err:4
Hi William,
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 11:57:58AM -0600, William Torrez Corea wrote:
> > W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is
> > not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error:
> > http://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian bullseye InRelease: The
is to look like, so
I suggest you get writing, rather than leaving it up to someone else
to second-guess what it is you want.
> this will act as a readme for all
> debian based distros to use apt as their only package manager.
> then distros can just say read "man apt" upon inst
hi
please add the most necessary and common examples of package management
with apt to the synopsis of "man apt". this will act as a readme for all
debian based distros to use apt as their only package manager. cli package
management is way better than ubuntu's software package manager f
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Ravi Roy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [!!] Configure the package manager
>
>Cannot access repository
> The repository on xx.xx.xx.xx could not be accessed, so its updates will
> not be made available to you at this time. You should investigate
apt-setup/contrib boolean true
It works as expected but i getting below mentioned annoying dialog which
i'm not sure how to ignore/skip/disable using pressed and should be able to
install non-free and contrib tools from local repo:
[!!] Configure the package manager
Cannot access
Hi all:
I appreciate everyone’s answer, now I’m clear that “aptitude” is still one of
the main tool for package managing.
I installed from a CD Rom created by jigdo and I verified myself the iso image
with md5sum and sha1sums.
The only different thing I did from previous installations is that
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 at 16:38:24 (+), Curt wrote:
> On 2018-01-24, wrote:
> >
> >> > [1] https://packages.debian.org/
> >> > [2]
> >> > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=aptitude=names=all=all
> >>
> >> Hm. I had occasion to go to ¹ yesterday.
On 1/24/18, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:05:08AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
>> So forget using this page for anything really vague like kernel-image,
>> even if you set suite, section and then architecture; it can't even
>> show you the most basic
uxteam.de wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:21:45AM +0100, Floris wrote:
>> > Op Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:44:19 +0100 schreef OECT T
>> > <oect_1...@hotmail.com>:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > >I searched into Synaptics package manager and noticed
On 2018-01-24, wrote:
>
>> > [1] https://packages.debian.org/
>> > [2]
>> > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=aptitude=names=all=all
>>
>> Hm. I had occasion to go to ¹ yesterday. (In passing, if I remove the
>> word "index", I end up at a
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, OECT T wrote:
Hi all:
I just installed Debian Stretch 9.3.0 and noticed that the Aptitude
package was not installed by default.
I searched into Synaptics package manager and noticed that the
package is not marked with the Debian icon indicating that the
package
eef OECT T <oect_1...@hotmail.com>:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > >I searched into Synaptics package manager and noticed that the
> > > >package is not marked with the Debian icon >indicating that the
> > > >package is not supported.
On Wed 24 Jan 2018 at 10:53:17 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:21:45AM +0100, Floris wrote:
> > Op Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:44:19 +0100 schreef OECT T <oect_1...@hotmail.com>:
>
> [...]
>
> > >I searched into Synaptics package manager
searched into Synaptics package manager and noticed that the package
> is not marked with the Debian icon indicating that the package is not
> supported.
This conclusion has been comprehensively dealt with by Tomas.
> I would appreciate any comments about it.
>
> What oth
specifically request that it be.
>I searched into Synaptics package manager and noticed that the package
>is not marked with the Debian icon indicating that the package is not
>supported.
That's not necessarily what the (lack of) icon means at all. It can
simply be that the relevant pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:08:52AM +0100, Floris wrote:
> Op Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:53:17 +0100 schreef :
> >Folks, learn to use the web site [...]
> Thanks for explaining how to use the internet /s
Always glad to help.
> >For
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 07:44:19PM +, OECT T wrote:
I just installed Debian Stretch 9.3.0 and noticed that the Aptitude
package was not installed by default.
I searched into Synaptics package manager and noticed that the package
is not marked with the Debian icon indicating that the package
Op Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:53:17 +0100 schreef <to...@tuxteam.de>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:21:45AM +0100, Floris wrote:
Op Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:44:19 +0100 schreef OECT T
<oect_1...@hotmail.com>:
[...]
>I searched into Synaptics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:21:45AM +0100, Floris wrote:
> Op Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:44:19 +0100 schreef OECT T <oect_1...@hotmail.com>:
[...]
> >I searched into Synaptics package manager and noticed that the
> >package is not m
Op Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:44:19 +0100 schreef OECT T <oect_1...@hotmail.com>:
Hi all:
I just installed Debian Stretch 9.3.0 and noticed that the Aptitude
package was not installed by default.
I searched into Synaptics package manager and noticed that the package
is not
On 1/23/2018 8:44 PM, OECT T wrote:
What other command line packages are recommended instead of Aptitude?
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ch-pkgtools.en.html
--
John Doe
Hi all:
I just installed Debian Stretch 9.3.0 and noticed that the Aptitude package was
not installed by default.
I searched into Synaptics package manager and noticed that the package is not
marked with the Debian icon indicating that the package is not supported.
I would appreciate any
songbird:
> Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
>>
>> One more O.T. observation: Debian let me do a truly dumb thing, but I
>> wouldn't have it any other way.
>
> who here hasn't done an erroneous rm or some
> other fumble fingered thing?
>
> a few weeks ago i was working on tagging some
> pictures and
Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
>Jochen Spieker wrote:
>> Chuck Hallenbeck:
>> >
>> > # apt-get remove upgrade-system apt
>>
>> Nice one! This brightens my day a little as it reminds me how I found
>> out the relationship betweent the commands available on MSDOS 5.0 and
>> the contents of the C:\DOS
On Friday 24 March 2017 19:57:56 Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> One more O.T. observation: Debian let me do a truly dumb thing, but I
> wouldn't have it any other way.
:-))) +1
Lisi
Chuck Hallenbeck:
>
> One more O.T. observation: Debian let me do a truly dumb thing, but I
> wouldn't have it any other way.
That's the spirit!
J.
--
If I am asked 'How are you' more than a million times in my life I
promise to explode.
[Agree] [Disagree]
Hi J.,
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 08:47:18PM +0100, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Chuck Hallenbeck:
> >
> > # apt-get remove upgrade-system apt
>
> Nice one! This brightens my day a little as it reminds me how I found
> out the relationship betweent the commands available on MSDOS 5.0 and
> the contents
Chuck Hallenbeck:
>
> # apt-get remove upgrade-system apt
Nice one! This brightens my day a little as it reminds me how I found
out the relationship betweent the commands available on MSDOS 5.0 and
the contents of the C:\DOS directory. :) I don't know how many times I
had deleted stuff from
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:22:06PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> ...
> > I presume you are suggesting using wget to retrieve the missing
> > packages after identifying their URL's?
>
> if you haven't cleared /var/cache/apt/archives you
> can check what is in there
Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
...
> I presume you are suggesting using wget to retrieve the missing
> packages after identifying their URL's?
if you haven't cleared /var/cache/apt/archives you
can check what is in there by:
$ ls /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb | grep apt and
see what versions are
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:53:59AM -0400, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
>
> I presume you are suggesting using wget to retrieve the missing
> packages after identifying their URL's?
>
Yeah, or just download the package from packages.debian.org with a web
browser, and then use dpkg -i on it.
Check
Hi Jonathan,
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:40:52PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:30:31AM -0400, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> > dpkg-reconfigure doesn't help, nor dpkg -i apt-get.
>
> "apt-get" exists in the "apt" package, but "dpkg -i" takes an argument to
> a local .deb
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:30:31AM -0400, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> dpkg-reconfigure doesn't help, nor dpkg -i apt-get.
"apt-get" exists in the "apt" package, but "dpkg -i" takes an argument to
a local .deb archive, not a package name. Try downloading a .deb of apt
for your version of debian and
Correction below:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:30:31AM -0400, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been using Debian Stretch for a couple of months, and following
> this list for a month or two. I'm afraid I did something stupid anyway,
> and find myself with a damaged apt-get and can't
Hi folks,
I've been using Debian Stretch for a couple of months, and following
this list for a month or two. I'm afraid I did something stupid anyway,
and find myself with a damaged apt-get and can't figure out how to fix
it short of reinstalling.
Here is what I did to damage it:
The discussion
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le quintidi 25 brumaire, an CCXXV, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> > This sounds like you're looking for debtags, which gives you the ability
> > to subset packages by different tags. (For example, if you wanted all of
> > the package management tools:
> >
>
Le duodi 22 brumaire, an CCXXV, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI a écrit :
> Also, if I
> wanted to run another program from stable, I could build another docker
> image for that, but due to the clever way docker works, there'd be only
> one copy of
Le quintidi 25 brumaire, an CCXXV, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> This sounds like you're looking for debtags, which gives you the ability
> to subset packages by different tags. (For example, if you wanted all of
> the package management tools:
>
> debtags search admin::package-management;
>
> gives
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, Nicolas George wrote:
> There is a feature in Debian that I find missing in Debian, I wonder if
> other people would agree with me.
>
> I call that feature "layered package manager".
This sounds like you're looking for debtags, which gives you the abil
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 09:18:26PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> If I understand correctly how Docker works, its images are big blobs
> that contain the program they are meant to distribute plus all its
> dependencies. Am I mistaken?
That's broadly true, at least, they are presented to the user
On 12-11-2016 18:18, Nicolas George wrote:
> If I understand correctly how Docker works, its images are big blobs
> that contain the program they are meant to distribute plus all its
> dependencies. Am I mistaken?
>
> If it works like that, that means when the next OpenSSL security issue
> is
Le primidi 21 brumaire, an CCXXV, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI a écrit :
> docker does not work as you describe (and I know of nothing that does
> anything close to your idea), but it does suit some of the uses you
> mentioned (the ones quoted).
If I understand correctly how Docker works, its images are
On 11-11-2016 17:34, Nicolas George wrote:
> Being able to install incompatible packages at the same time.
>
> Isolate servers. Run servers in a layer where the compilers and other
> development tools are not visible. It does not actually add any security but
> it may help mitigate or slow down an
There is a feature in Debian that I find missing in Debian, I wonder if
other people would agree with me.
I call that feature "layered package manager".
Here is what it means. The system has "layers" defined, organized as a
directed acyclic graph, and packages are
Hi,
Le 19-07-2016, à 22:49:48 -0400, Jesse Stephen a écrit :
I am using GNOME. I have a problem with no sound on you tube I cant run
updates And I can not download the Google talk plug-in because it says the
package updater is open
You need to kill the "package updater" first.
One
On Wednesday 20 July 2016 04:27:00 Gene Heskett wrote:
> The proper command is:
>
> sudo dpkg --configure -a
OR
# dpkg --configure -a
or Brian's
dpkg --configure -a
but become root first.
We simply don't know enough. But I would assume the existence of root in
Debian if there is no
On Tuesday 19 July 2016 17:35:51 Jesse Stephen wrote:
> I'm getting an error message when I run ther synaptic package manager
> that I have to manually run the dpkg-- configure to correct the
> problem. This is not something I no how to do, I am very green at
> this.
The proper comma
e Stephen wrote:
>
> > I'm getting an error message when I run ther synaptic package manager
> that
> > I have to manually run the dpkg-- configure to correct the problem. This
> is
> > not something I no how to do, I am very green at this.
>
> It is almost impossible
On Tue 19 Jul 2016 at 17:35:51 -0400, Jesse Stephen wrote:
> I'm getting an error message when I run ther synaptic package manager that
> I have to manually run the dpkg-- configure to correct the problem. This is
> not something I no how to do, I am very green at this.
It is almost i
I'm getting an error message when I run ther synaptic package manager that
I have to manually run the dpkg-- configure to correct the problem. This is
not something I no how to do, I am very green at this.
Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net writes:
On 11/09/2011 03:33 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 03 nov 11, 10:59:43, Ken Heard wrote:
Sian Mountbatten wrote, in part:
Is there a KDE package manager available?
For the various things that get installed for Gnome, KDE
Dan B. d...@kempt.net wrote:
For the various things that get installed for Gnome, KDE, etc.,
which are specific to the chosen desktop environment, and which
work with any desktop environment (or perhaps any sufficiently
capable DE (e.g., FreeDesktop-compliant))?
When a DE includes a (default)
Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net writes:
On 11/09/2011 03:33 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 03 nov 11, 10:59:43, Ken Heard wrote:
Sian Mountbatten wrote, in part:
Is there a KDE package manager available?
What happened to KDE's Kpackage? It is in Lenny, but I do not see it in
the Debian
Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net writes:
On 11/09/2011 03:33 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 03 nov 11, 10:59:43, Ken Heard wrote:
Sian Mountbatten wrote, in part:
Is there a KDE package manager available?
What happened to KDE's Kpackage? It is in Lenny, but I do not see it in
the Debian
On Jo, 03 nov 11, 10:59:43, Ken Heard wrote:
Sian Mountbatten wrote, in part:
Is there a KDE package manager available?
What happened to KDE's Kpackage? It is in Lenny, but I do not see it in
the Debian repositories for Squeeze and Wheezy.
As far as I recall kpackage did not support APT
On 11/09/2011 03:33 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 03 nov 11, 10:59:43, Ken Heard wrote:
Sian Mountbatten wrote, in part:
Is there a KDE package manager available?
What happened to KDE's Kpackage? It is in Lenny, but I do not see it in
the Debian repositories for Squeeze and Wheezy
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 03:07:16PM -0400, Doug wrote:
Of course Synaptic requires root permission. If you're not root,
you should not be allowed to install packages! Aren't you the owner
of the
Debian installation? If so, you surely have a root password.
Personally, I like aptitude's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sian Mountbatten wrote, in part:
Is there a KDE package manager available?
What happened to KDE's Kpackage? It is in Lenny, but I do not see it in
the Debian repositories for Squeeze and Wheezy.
Ken Heard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
and
probably remove (but I have not tried that yet) packages. The search
facility is excellent.
packagesearch is great for searches.
Yes, but that's not a package manager. You can only query for
applications like apt-cache search or the online package search
interface.
synaptic now asks
Am Mittwoch, 2. November 2011 schrieb Doug:
On 11/02/2011 01:56 PM, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:22:14 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
[...]
world's easiest program to use.
Is there a KDE package manager available?
What happened with our beloved
Having installed Debian/GNU wheezy onto my desktop, I am now looking
for some KDE applications.
The only package manager provided on wheezy is aptitude which is not the
world's easiest program to use.
Is there a KDE package manager available?
--
Sian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:22:14 +
Sian Mountbatten poenik...@operamail.com wrote:
Having installed Debian/GNU wheezy onto my desktop, I am now looking
for some KDE applications.
The only package manager provided on wheezy is aptitude which is not the
world's easiest program to use
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:22:14 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Having installed Debian/GNU wheezy onto my desktop, I am now looking for
some KDE applications.
The only package manager provided on wheezy is aptitude which is not the
world's easiest program to use.
Is there a KDE package
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:22:14 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Having installed Debian/GNU wheezy onto my desktop, I am now looking
for
some KDE applications.
The only package manager provided on wheezy is aptitude which is not
the
world's easiest program to use
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:56:06 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:22:14 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Having installed Debian/GNU wheezy onto my desktop, I am now looking
for
some KDE applications.
The only package manager provided on wheezy
On 11/02/2011 12:22 PM, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Having installed Debian/GNU wheezy onto my desktop, I am now looking
for some KDE applications.
The only package manager provided on wheezy is aptitude which is not the
world's easiest program to use.
Is there a KDE package manager available
On 11/02/2011 01:56 PM, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:22:14 +, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
Having installed Debian/GNU wheezy onto my desktop, I am now looking
for
some KDE applications.
The only package manager provided on wheezy is aptitude which
of course.
The only package manager provided on wheezy is aptitude which is not the
world's easiest program to use.
People who use aptitude will tell you it's better.
Is there a KDE package manager available?
Synaptic - simple, and, simple.
PackageSearch - beautiful for searching
Camaleón wrote:
What happened with our beloved Synaptic? :-)
It works, but it is in /usr/sbin so it needs root permissions.
But of course, as it should be.
I've found a KDE package called packagesearch which will install and
probably remove (but I have not tried that yet) packages. The
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:02:11PM BST, Harry Putnam wrote:
I went ahead and compiled it myself and installed in /usr/local
Is there anyway to do that and still allow pkgmanager to keep track of
the install?
Apart from rebuilding the package from source packages,
would 'checkinstall' fulfil
Raf Czlonka r...@linuxstuff.pl writes:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:02:11PM BST, Harry Putnam wrote:
I went ahead and compiled it myself and installed in /usr/local
Is there anyway to do that and still allow pkgmanager to keep track of
the install?
Apart from rebuilding the package from
If I wanted a special compile time flag set at compile time, for a
package, is the only way to just compile it myself, or is there some
procedure where the package manager is involved and thereby is able to
keep stats on the installed pkg?
For example: I keep a fair number of system files, like
On 10/06/2011 06:02 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
If I wanted a special compile time flag set at compile time, for a
package, is the only way to just compile it myself, or is there some
procedure where the package manager is involved and thereby is able to
keep stats on the installed pkg?
For example
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:30:38 +0800, Saibal K Saha wrote:
Have spent the last several days trying to get a usable BitTorrent
download of Debian 6.0.0. Since yesterday, the automated setup has been
unable to complete setup of the package manager, from various ftp/
mirror sites. Have tried
On 02/17/2011 11:30 PM, Saibal K Saha wrote:
Have spent the last several days trying to get a usable BitTorrent
download of Debian 6.0.0. Since yesterday, the automated setup has been
unable to complete setup of the package manager, from various ftp/
mirror sites. Have tried multiple sites
Have spent the last several days trying to get a usable BitTorrent
download of Debian 6.0.0. Since yesterday, the automated setup has been
unable to complete setup of the package manager, from various ftp/
mirror sites. Have tried multiple sites in multiple locations including
Singapore, Australia
In i5c1r6$ob...@speranza.aioe.org, s. keeling wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net:
Is there a description or screenshot of it somewhere? Can I easily
engage it from the command-line? I'd like to play with it and see
if it is as useful as the aptitude one.
See the -s
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 04:46:03 +, T o n g wrote:
[...]
$ apt-get install swatch
[...]
The following extra packages will be installed:
libbit-vector-perl libcarp-clan-perl libdate-calc-perl libdate-manip-perl
libfile-tail-perl libperl5.10 libyaml-syck-perl perl perl-base
On Vi, 27 aug 10, 07:23:20, Tom Browder wrote:
I have to say I'm getting confused. I'm in the middle of setting up
my first Debian server (which used to be Ubuntu).
I will be administering it remotely and would like to use the best
tool for the job.
For a stable server it probably doesn't
In 4c786423.7080...@cox.net, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 08/27/2010 02:24 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In1282920166.29761.13.ca...@huevos, Chance Platt wrote:
I say pick one and stick to it. Apt and aptitude are close to parity
feature-wise anymore (I'm sure others will disagree and it depends
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. b...@iguanasuicide.net:
Is there a description or screenshot of it somewhere? Can I easily
engage it from the command-line? I'd like to play with it and see
if it is as useful as the aptitude one.
See the -s switch, just like aptitude.
--
Any technology
I have to say I'm getting confused. I'm in the middle of setting up
my first Debian server (which used to be Ubuntu).
I will be administering it remotely and would like to use the best
tool for the job.
Now I read conflicting opinions from experienced people about apt-*,
aptitude, and wajit.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to say I'm getting confused. I'm in the middle of setting up
my first Debian server (which used to be Ubuntu).
I will be administering it remotely and would like to use the best
tool for the job.
Now I read
Le 27/08/2010 à 14:23, Tom Browder a écrit :
I have to say I'm getting confused. I'm in the middle of setting up
my first Debian server (which used to be Ubuntu).
I will be administering it remotely and would like to use the best
tool for the job.
Now I read conflicting opinions from
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:33:19 +0400, Roman Khomasuridze wrote:
I will be administering it remotely and would like to use the best tool
for the job.
Now I read conflicting opinions from experienced people about apt-*,
aptitude, and wajit.
Is there a consensus?
consensus? I wish.
well,
On 27 Aug 2010, Tom Browder wrote:
I have to say I'm getting confused. I'm in the middle of setting up
my first Debian server (which used to be Ubuntu).
I will be administering it remotely and would like to use the best
tool for the job.
Now I read conflicting opinions from experienced
political, in that many people who have a lot of experience with Debian
have no real idea of the hit rate of each package manager for their
respective features. To me, that's OK, because that means they're both
probably excellent.
Over the years, I started with the apt tools, then I moved
In 1282920166.29761.13.ca...@huevos, Chance Platt wrote:
I say pick one and stick to it. Apt and aptitude are close to parity
feature-wise anymore (I'm sure others will disagree and it depends on
how you define features) and there's some disagreement if aptitude
really is the better choice even
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:23:20 -0500 Tom Browder tom.brow...@gmail.com
shared this with us all:
Is there a consensus?
Certainly.
In Debian the consensus is always what you think sounds best to you,
tried and tested by yourself, and then use because it's best for you.
When people ask a similar
On 08/27/2010 02:24 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In1282920166.29761.13.ca...@huevos, Chance Platt wrote:
I say pick one and stick to it. Apt and aptitude are close to parity
feature-wise anymore (I'm sure others will disagree and it depends on
how you define features) and there's some
Opa pessoal da lista,
Toda vez aparece uma placa amarela com uma exclamacao dentro, no canto
direito superior da tela.
Ao clicar o package manager informa o seguinte erro:
W: GPG error: http://dl.google.com stable Release: The following signatures
couldn't be verified because the public key
.
Ao clicar o package manager informa o seguinte erro:
W: GPG error: http://dl.google.com stable Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY A040830F7FAC5991
W: GPG error: http://www.backports.org lenny-backports Release: The
following
pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key CHAVEDOERRO
gpg -a --export CHAVEDOERRO | apt-key add -
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:31, EURO euri...@gmail.com wrote:
Opa pessoal da lista,
Toda vez aparece uma placa amarela com uma exclamacao dentro, no canto
direito superior da tela.
Ao clicar o package manager
euri...@gmail.com wrote:
Opa pessoal da lista,
Toda vez aparece uma placa amarela com uma exclamacao dentro, no canto
direito superior da tela.
Ao clicar o package manager informa o seguinte erro:
W: GPG error: http://dl.google.com stable Release: The following
signatures couldn't
...@gmail.com wrote:
Opa pessoal da lista,
Toda vez aparece uma placa amarela com uma exclamacao dentro, no canto
direito superior da tela.
Ao clicar o package manager informa o seguinte erro:
W: GPG error: http://dl.google.com stable Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified
--keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key CHAVEDOERRO
gpg -a --export CHAVEDOERRO | apt-key add -
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:31, EURO euri...@gmail.com wrote:
Opa pessoal da lista,
Toda vez aparece uma placa amarela com uma exclamacao dentro, no canto
direito superior da tela.
Ao clicar o package
Olá,
2010/3/3 EURO euri...@gmail.com:
Opa Bruno. Agradeco sua atencao...
Nao deu certo. Retornou:
euro:~# gpg --keyserver pgpjeys.mit.edu --recv-key A040830F7FAC5991
gpg: requesting key 7FAC5991 from hkp server pgpjeys.mit.edu
?: pgpjeys.mit.edu: Host not found
o servidor é pgpkeys e não
Oi,
2010/3/3 EURO euri...@gmail.com:
Opa !!!,
Agora o update manager insiste em nao completar a lista de downloads.
Segue anexo as imagens dis erros. Parece que o problema e com o google.
Não recebi os anexos.
Aqueles comandos para achar as chaves:
gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu
http://www.backports.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=instructions
If you want apt to verify the downloaded backports you can import
backports.org archive’s key into apt:
apt-get install debian-backports-keyring
or
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 16BA136C
gpg --export 16BA136C |
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo