On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 17:01 -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have two machines with debian installed. One has sarge and the other
> has a fresh install of etch. I use gnome evolution in both machines for
> emailing. I would like to copy all the emails from the machi
Hello!
I have two machines with debian installed. One has sarge and the other
has a fresh install of etch. I use gnome evolution in both machines for
emailing. I would like to copy all the emails from the machine with
sarge to the machine with etch. How can do that? can I use rsync over
the
my
> > > network card no longer works (it's a Xircom PCMCIA card (cardbus)).
> > > I've searched the message boards for solutions, but can't find anything
> > > that solves my problem. Unfortunately, I don't have time to figure out
> > > what
PCMCIA card (cardbus)). I've searched
> > the message boards for solutions, but can't find anything that solves my
> > problem. Unfortunately, I don't have time to figure out what's wrong, I
> > just need my machine to work. Downgrading back to Sarge seems like t
Hi!
Back at work I just upgraded my sarge installation to etch. I changed the
sources for apt, did apt-get update, apt-get install aptitude and aptitude -f
--with-recommends dist-upgrade.
All has gone fine, but when I start to work, I discover a problem with my main
tool: kdvi. It can't se
bigoperm wrote:
>
> Kevin,
> Thanks for the advice - this is what I was thinking, actually. I have full
> backups of /etc, /var, and /home. Is it enough to re-install Sarge
> (formatting all of the disks), and copying my backups back over? Should
> that just work? Thanks
>
ing that solves my
> problem. Unfortunately, I don't have time to figure out what's wrong, I
> just need my machine to work. Downgrading back to Sarge seems like the best
> option.
I ran into a similar problem when I upgraded my 486 from Sarge to Etch
and the upgrade hosed l
#x27;t find anything that solves my
> problem. Unfortunately, I don't have time to figure out what's wrong, I
> just need my machine to work. Downgrading back to Sarge seems like the best
> option.
It is certainly an approach that befits a boorish debianhelp.org user
who does no
Kevin,
Thanks for the advice - this is what I was thinking, actually. I have full
backups of /etc, /var, and /home. Is it enough to re-install Sarge (formatting
all of the disks), and copying my backups back over? Should that just work?
Thanks
jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
time to figure out what's wrong, I just need my
machine to work. Downgrading back to Sarge seems like the best option.
jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bigoperm wrote:
>
> I need to downgrade from Etch back to Sarge. The only resource I have is
> the original Sarge install CD. How can I use this CD to reinstall Sarge
> (over Etch) without using any data?
>
> My intuition tells me all I need to do is skip the partition phas
2007/5/1, bigoperm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I need to downgrade from Etch back to Sarge. The only resource I have is
the original Sarge install CD. How can I use this CD to reinstall Sarge
(over Etch) without using any data?
I did something very close to this using a local repository f
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:41:48AM +0200, bigoperm wrote:
>
> I need to downgrade from Etch back to Sarge. The only resource I have is
> the original Sarge install CD. How can I use this CD to reinstall Sarge
> (over Etch) without using any data?
>
> My intuition tells me a
On Monday 30 April 2007 16:41, bigoperm wrote:
> I need to downgrade from Etch back to Sarge. The only resource I have is
> the original Sarge install CD. How can I use this CD to reinstall Sarge
> (over Etch) without using any data?
There is no (official) downgrade path, only upgra
I need to downgrade from Etch back to Sarge. The only resource I have is the
original Sarge install CD. How can I use this CD to reinstall Sarge (over Etch)
without using any data?
My intuition tells me all I need to do is skip the partition phase of the
install, and things should be okay
Hello,
Hopefully someone can help here...
I'm on an R50e Thinkpad with Sarge installed.
I ran an upgrade (note: upgrade not dist-upgrade). Something strange
happened.
The file /etc/debian-release states 4.0 now.
In my /etc/apt/apt.conf I had the following entry:
APT::Default-Release &
Hello
Brandon B (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Hopefully someone can help here...
>
> I'm on an R50e Thinkpad with Sarge installed.
>
> I ran an upgrade (note: upgrade not dist-upgrade). Something strange
> happened.
> The file /etc/debian-release states 4.0 now
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 09:03:37PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> That libc6 requires recent 2.6.* kernels.
Fully up-to-date sarge 2.6 kernel.
>
> Even if your running kernel were such a kernel, there are other factors. I
> doubt whether you had anything like this, but read my p
That libc6 requires recent 2.6.* kernels.
Even if your running kernel were such a kernel, there are other factors. I
doubt whether you had anything like this, but read my posting about
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=#.#.# in the environment. If for whatever reason, i.e.
certain software running on a 32meg me
Hi all,
The subject says it all.
I've submitted an upgrade report with all the requisite attachements but
wanted to summarize here.
System: IBM PS/ValuePoint 6492X5C 486DX4-100, 32 MB ram, 1200 MB and 840
MB drives.
Was running up-to-date Sarge but used Woody's xserver-s3 driver.
> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 02:50:34 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: Re: Problems with sarge to etch
> upgrade> > > > hi patrick,> > you have a problem with the sgi xfs filesystem.
> i got currently the> info
Ralph Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As noted, I made similar mistakes. Please file a bug report to Package:
> release-notes and/or Package: upgrade-reports as you feel appropriate.
> Others can be forewarned of the traps with more readable upgrade
> instructions, as I've suggested in
>> The good news is, you stopped and asked! I didn't, and had more
>> trouble. (As reported to the list on 12 April, Subject: Sarge ->
>> Etch: A Painful Upgrade)
>>
>> Good luck, I think you caught it in time!
>>
>> Ralph
>
> Ralph,
&g
If you do have a full desktop system installed, run:
>
> # aptitude install libfam0 xlibmesa-glu
>
>See http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/releasenotes .
>
>The good news is, you stopped and asked! I didn't, and had more
>trouble. (As reported to the list on 1
On 04/22/2007 01:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I decided to abort a dist-upgrade from Sarge to Etch when some strange stuff
> started to happen durning the run up. I followed the upgrade steps in the
> release notes. Here's a synopsis:
> 1. updated sarge packages.
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:24:18PM -0400, Patrick Cummings wrote:
> > So I finally had some time and tested the memory with memtest. I got 5
> > passes without errors, so I guess it was not that. It's also ECC memory.
On 20.04.07 20:59, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> memtest won't catch a lot of
I decided to abort a dist-upgrade from Sarge to Etch when some strange stuff
started to happen durning the run up. I followed the upgrade steps in the
release notes. Here's a synopsis:
1. updated sarge packages.
2. upgraded, nothing upgraded.
3. did an audit, nothing broken
4. ch
hi patrick,
you have a problem with the sgi xfs filesystem. i got currently the
information there is a bug in linux--2.6
i am searching for it here:
bugs.debian.org/linux-2.6 for xfs
i had the same error on two completly differently machine's (hardware was
different). both had debian
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:25:53PM -0500, Sam Leon wrote:
>
> Another trouble shooting method would be to run a live cd of some kind
> on the box for a few hours or days and see if the problem still exists.
indeed, but better put this on the list.
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
the
temps? do you have a stuck fan?
> Is there any way to get out of this without a clean install? I think that's
> what I will do. That will be very complex since there is so much on this
> computer. I guess I should have continued with sarge.
>
yes: find out what your
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>CC:
>debian-user@lists.debian.org>Subject: RE: Problems with sarge to etch
>upgrade>Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:37:37 -0400>
>> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:28:32 -0400>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> CC:
>
Michelle Konzack wrote the following on 18.04.2007 19:46:
> Am 2007-04-09 23:35:38, schrieb Thilo Six:
>> afaik
>>> Deb ftp://ftp.usdebian.org/debian/ oldstable main contrib. non-free
> ^
> This SLASH should not be there.
>
>> ^^^
Am 2007-04-09 23:35:38, schrieb Thilo Six:
> afaik
> > Deb ftp://ftp.usdebian.org/debian/ oldstable main contrib. non-free
^
This SLASH should not be there.
> ^^^ ^^
> | | |
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 09:07 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> Nigel Henry escribió:
> > On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:53, you wrote:
> >> nigel henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> What's happened to the repo for Sarge Christian. Folks are get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Nigel Henry escribió:
> On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:53, you wrote:
>> nigel henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> What's happened to the repo for Sarge Christian. Folks are getting 404's
>>> when trying to
> Nigel Henry wrote:
> > I appreciate that Christian. Stable is now asigned to Etch. But do we
> > have access to the Sarge repo, before Etch became stable? I think this
> > equates as old-stable now. it would be a shame to think that all these
> > packages for Sarge we
;>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>>>>> What I don't quite understand is that Christian didn't give us any
>>>>> warning that the Sarge packages from his repo were about to be
>>>>> trashed when Etch went stable.
>>
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 23:41:34 +0200, steef wrote:
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 23:13 +0200, Nigel Henry wrote:
[...]
What I don't quite understand is that Christian didn't give us any
warning that the Sarge packages from his
Christian didn't give us any
> >>> warning that the Sarge packages from his repo were about to be trashed
> >>> when Etch went stable.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well, you know the how the French are... sometimes full of _ _ _ _ and
> >&g
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 23:41:34 +0200, steef wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 23:13 +0200, Nigel Henry wrote:
[...]
>>> What I don't quite understand is that Christian didn't give us any
>>> warning that the Sarge packages from his re
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:57:11 +
"enediel gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just installed etch, and tried to install ntop from the source
> code, but I receive the following error
>
> checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
> configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 23:13:44 +0200, Nigel Henry wrote:
[...]
> What I don't quite understand is that Christian didn't give us any warning
> that the Sarge packages from his repo were about to be trashed when Etch went
> stable.
Maybe he simply did not anticipate that
09:48 +0800, Yuwen Dai wrote:
Dear all,
It seems debian-multimedia for sarge has been removed after Etch was
officially released. Where can I find the old sarge repository?
What I don't quite understand is that Christian didn't give us any warning
that
Liam O'Toole wrote:
> Beware of upgrades, though. When lenny goes through a major transition
> (as it surely will), those packages are likely to break when used in
> etch.
IIUC from
Index of /debian/debian-multimedia/pool/main/a/acroread
Icon Name
Last modified Size [DIR]
e, 2007-04-17 at 09:48 +0800, Yuwen Dai wrote:
> > >>>> Dear all,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> It seems debian-multimedia for sarge has been removed after Etch was
> > >>>> officially released. Where can I find the old sarge repository?
>
ups to reload the conf.
> >
> > in a few minutes the other machine will notice the proper url fo the
> > printer and it will be able to work.
> >
> > Notice, something changed between Sarge and Etch as far as URLs for the
> > printers. The Auto config stuff works be
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 22:33, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 15:39 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> >> Greg Folkert wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 09:48 +0800, Yuwen Dai wrote:
> >>>> Dear all,
>
nter and it will be able to work.
>
> Notice, something changed between Sarge and Etch as far as URLs for the
> printers. The Auto config stuff works better than forcing it.
>
> The only thing is you need to have your machine that has the real
> printer... make sure you define eve
Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 15:39 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> Greg Folkert wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 09:48 +0800, Yuwen Dai wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> It seems debian-multimedia for sarge has been removed
ote administration
Allow users to cancel any job (not just their own)
Then wait for cups to reload the conf.
in a few minutes the other machine will notice the proper url fo the
printer and it will be able to work.
Notice, something changed between Sarge and Etch as far as URLs for the
printers.
lame attempt to help below...
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 12:45:13PM -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
> No replies? Clear as mud? Let me rephrase my question! :)
>
> My 2 computer network running sarge on both boxes printed fine until I
> upgraded one box to etch. Now only local printing wor
Hello
I just installed etch, and tried to install ntop from the source code, but I
receive the following error
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
checking into the debian's site, I noticed that this file existe
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:39:56 +0200
Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 09:48 +0800, Yuwen Dai wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> It seems debian-multimedia for sarge has been removed after Etch
>
No replies? Clear as mud? Let me rephrase my question! :)
My 2 computer network running sarge on both boxes printed fine until I
upgraded one box to etch. Now only local printing works.
Box A runs sarge. Box B with an HP5L printer runs etch.
Box A config files are unchanged. Box B has new
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 15:39 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 09:48 +0800, Yuwen Dai wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> It seems debian-multimedia for sarge has been removed after Etch was
> >> officia
Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 09:48 +0800, Yuwen Dai wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> It seems debian-multimedia for sarge has been removed after Etch was
>> officially released. Where can I find the old sarge repository?
>
> Good luck, Christian (the s
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 09:48 +0800, Yuwen Dai wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It seems debian-multimedia for sarge has been removed after Etch was
> officially released. Where can I find the old sarge repository?
Good luck, Christian (the site owner) already removed it. No backups.
--
Dear all,
It seems debian-multimedia for sarge has been removed after Etch was
officially released. Where can I find the old sarge repository?
Best regards,
Dai Yuwen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 05:37:37PM -0400, Patrick Cummings wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:28:32 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: Re: Problems with sarge
> > to et
--- Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:21:12 +0200
> Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is a bit sad. Christian has trashed all the
> available
> > multimedia packages for Sarge since Etch has gone
> stable.
Christ
> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:28:32 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC:
> debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: Re: Problems with sarge to etch
> upgrade> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
> MESSAGE-> Hash: SHA1> > Patrick
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:21:12 +0200
Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a bit sad. Christian has trashed all the available
> multimedia packages for Sarge since Etch has gone stable. In
> effect. if we want multimedia packages we are being forced to
> upgrade to
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 15:53 -0400, Matthew K Poer wrote:
> If sarge is now old-stable (and I think it is), how would we access
> Woody packages?
Here,
http://archive.debian.org/
--
Cheers,
Sven Arvidsson
http://www.whiz.se
PGP Key ID 760BDD22
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Sarge packages have disappeared
Date: Sunday 15 April 2007 21:50
From: Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:53
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nigel Henry wrote:
> On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:53, you wrote:
>> nigel henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> What's happened to the repo for Sarge Christian. Folks are getting 404's
>>> when trying to acc
With sarge on two computers, this worked smoothly to print from either box:
Sarge box -> Sarge box with printer
Now: Sarge box -> Etch box with printer
With Etch now running on the box with the HP5L printer, only local jobs
print. Print jobs from the sarge box are not ac
On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:53, you wrote:
> nigel henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What's happened to the repo for Sarge Christian. Folks are getting 404's
> > when trying to access it?
>
> Sarge the stable distribution is now called etch.
>
> Christ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Cummings escribió:
> The computer was working perfectly since almost 1 year before the
> upgrade and as far as I know there is no hardware problem with it.
> Thanks for your time
Well, there's a problem with your RAM memory, try with another m
Patrick Cummings wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:37:55 -0400> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:
>> Problems with sarge to etch upgrade> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Apr
>> 10, 2007 at 02:00:09AM -0400, Patrick Cummings wrote:> > Hello list,
On 04/13/2007 03:00 PM, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> On 04/13/2007 10:50 AM, Ralph Katz wrote:
>> See the bug (latest messages),
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418911 turns
>> out I missed one key step that has trapped others, too.
>
> Has it been considered that we could automate t
On 04/13/2007 10:50 AM, Ralph Katz wrote:
> See the bug (latest messages),
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418911 turns
> out I missed one key step that has trapped others, too.
Has it been considered that we could automate the recommended
steps to upgrade? That would certainly
On 04/13/2007, Dave Ewart wrote:
> What I was getting at, really, was that something hugely fundamental
> must have caused your error at that first stage. There's not enough
See the bug (latest messages),
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418911 turns out I
missed one key step th
upgrade at that point, it would probably have
> > been better if you'd stopped there - and reported the
> > errors/warnings you saw.
>
> In retrospect, absolutely!
>
> > Given that you had trouble after what is a very simple operation,
> > something fundamental
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:37:55 -0400> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re:
> Problems with sarge to etch upgrade> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Apr
> 10, 2007 at 02:00:09AM -0400, Patrick Cummings wrote:> > Hello list, I just
> upgraded from sarge to etch
at is a very simple operation,
> something fundamental must be wrong. Perhaps your previous downgrade
> from Sid to Sarge wasn't quite right, even though your system appeared
> to be operating fine.
Not a chance. This machine had a fresh install of sarge last May (long
after
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:58:56 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Problems with sarge to etch
> upgrade> > Patrick Cummings wrote:> > I made a complete capture of the
> console output,> > I
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 13:02 -0500, Robert J Rae wrote:
> when I try to to install sarge as I have done many times via http, I now
> get warnings about kernel image removal and packages that have failed to
> install, web and mail packages that have worked fine in the past, so a
> l
n upgrade at that point, it would probably have been
better if you'd stopped there - and reported the errors/warnings you
saw.
Given that you had trouble after what is a very simple operation,
something fundamental must be wrong. Perhaps your previous downgrade
from Sid to Sarge wasn&#x
On Thursday, 12.04.2007 at 21:31 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Thursday, 12.04.2007 at 13:02 -0500, Robert J Rae wrote:
>
> > when I try to to install sarge as I have done many times via http, I
> > now get warnings about kernel image removal and packages that have
> > fa
On Thursday, 12.04.2007 at 13:02 -0500, Robert J Rae wrote:
> when I try to to install sarge as I have done many times via http, I
> now get warnings about kernel image removal and packages that have
> failed to install, web and mail packages that have worked fine in the
> past, so
when I try to to install sarge as I have done many times via http, I now
get warnings about kernel image removal and packages that have failed to
install, web and mail packages that have worked fine in the past, so a
little bit of reading points to etch upgrades having similar
problems
t from the bug report:
Background:
I'm a simple desktop user. Installed debian in late 2003 from Woody CD
image, then upgraded immediately to sid. (I had help with this
introduction to Linux.)
As sarge was being finalized, I downgraded from sid to testing
(painlessly!) and stayed with sarg
Read
http://www.de.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-minimal_upgrade
and use 4.5.4.1 or 4.5.4.2, whichever applies to your situation.
Does this work ok?
Doh!
I read those notes too - that's how I managed to upgrade 6 o so boxes
without a problem...just skipp
Pete Clarke wrote:
>
> cholet:~# aptitude dist-upgrade
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree
> Reading extended state information
> Initializing package states... Done
> Some packages had unmet dependencies. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or i
Michael S. Peek([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Patrick Cummings wrote:
> >I made a complete capture of the console output,
>
> I would love to know how you did that! Maybe I'm just a Debian n00b...
/usr/bin/script which is in the bdsutils package.
WT
--
Man is the best compute
Hi there,
I am running a bunch of Sarge servers and slowly upgrading them to etch.
Most have been fine, but I am having a few problems with the mailserver. It
is running :
courier-authdaemon
courier-base
courier-doc
courier-imap
courier-imap-ssl
courier-ldap
courier-pop
courier-pop-ssl
Patrick Cummings wrote:
I made a complete capture of the console output,
I would love to know how you did that! Maybe I'm just a Debian n00b...
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 03:15 +0200, Andreas Goesele wrote:
> I have a zaurus which under sarge I could connect to using usbnet and
> hotplug.
This isn't something I have any experience with, but I did find some
instructions for Etch[0], if you want to double check your
configuration,
Hi!
Here another problem I had (still have :-() moving to etch.
I have a zaurus which under sarge I could connect to using usbnet and
hotplug.
But now this doesn't work anymore.
In /etc/network/interfaces I have:
allow-hotplug usb0
mapping hotplug
script grep
map usb0
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:01:53AM +0200, Andreas Goesele wrote:
> Hi,
>
> doing an upgrade I encountered among others the following problem: I
> so far used apt-get, but following the release notes I switched to
> aptitude. But as a result much to much packages were installed:
> So my question:
Hi,
doing an upgrade I encountered among others the following problem: I
so far used apt-get, but following the release notes I switched to
aptitude. But as a result much to much packages were installed:
Before the upgrade I did still with sarge sources an "aptitude
dist-upgrade"
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:13:10AM -0500, Michael Kerwin wrote:
> I got the sources right for apt thanks to an earlier post and now am trying
> to get the kernel upgrade according to the release notes for going from
> sarge to etch.
>
> I have a desktop system and I am trying to
I got the sources right for apt thanks to an earlier post and now am trying
to get the kernel upgrade according to the release notes for going from
sarge to etch.
I have a desktop system and I am trying to do the command aptitude install
linuux-image-2.6-flavor. Now I read some where that etch
I get the same problem, font 'fxed' missing for both vncserver and vnc4server.
Worked perfectly with Sarge. Have tried to fiddle with the font paths in
/etc/vnc.conf but to no avail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On 4/10/07, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I tried to uprade a dev server to etch today. The upgrade erred out on mysql
upgrades. I'm told I might want to run 'apt-get -f install'. I've played with
the force option before with bad results. Why are the libs that mysql depends
on not upg
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 02:00:09AM -0400, Patrick Cummings wrote:
> Hello list, I just upgraded from sarge to etch using apt-get
> dist-upgrade. I have a few problems. The OS won't completely start. I
> made a complete capture of the console output, if anybody is kind
> enough to
> Hello list,
> I just upgraded from sarge to etch using apt-get dist-upgrade. I have
> a few problems. The OS won't completely start.
Well, just a couple of guesses below:
I had problems getting x to run after upgrading. Issues with the
xfree86 to xorg transition.
Try dpkg-recon
try running apt-get -f install for it to suggest a solution. Sometimes it
is smarter than you are (and sometimes not) The force option simply allows
apt-get to function if your package cache is broken. At least try it before
reinstalling etch clean (although that might be fun)
On 4/9/07, Tom B
Hello cousin this is jandre,how are you are you coming this summer.
--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/696 - Release Date: 21.2.2007
15:19
Patrick Cummings wrote:
> Hello list, I just upgraded from sarge to etch using apt-get dist-upgrade. I
> have a few problems. The OS won't completely start.
What is incomplete about the start? Can you login? Can you run applications?
>
> [...]
>
> I can get the compute
401 - 500 of 6016 matches
Mail list logo
