El día 14 de enero de 2012 12:06, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió:
El Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:05:13 -0800, carugnom escribió:
Quisiera consultar sobre como se deben hacer las actualizaciones en la
rama SID de Debian.
Por un tiempo he usado Sidux, y una de las pocas diferencias con SID es
El Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:05:13 -0800, carugnom escribió:
Quisiera consultar sobre como se deben hacer las actualizaciones en la
rama SID de Debian.
Por un tiempo he usado Sidux, y una de las pocas diferencias con SID es
que recomiendan ENFATICAMENTE utilizar solo 'apt-get' para actualizar el
Hola grupo !
Quisiera consultar sobre como se deben hacer las actualizaciones en la
rama SID de Debian.
Por un tiempo he usado Sidux, y una de las pocas diferencias con SID
es que recomiendan ENFATICAMENTE utilizar solo 'apt-get' para
actualizar el sistema, y hacerlo sin las X corriendo.
Sin
carugnom escribió:
Hola grupo !
Quisiera consultar sobre como se deben hacer las actualizaciones en la
rama SID de Debian.
Por un tiempo he usado Sidux, y una de las pocas diferencias con SID
es que recomiendan ENFATICAMENTE utilizar solo 'apt-get' para
actualizar el sistema, y hacerlo sin las
On 13 ene, 11:40, Sergio Bessopeanetto sergio.b...@ymail.com wrote:
carugnom escribió:
Hola grupo !
Quisiera consultar sobre como se deben hacer las actualizaciones en la
rama SID de Debian.
Por un tiempo he usado Sidux, y una de las pocas diferencias con SID
es que recomiendan
Sidux, y una de las pocas diferencias con SID
es que recomiendan ENFATICAMENTE utilizar solo 'apt-get' para
actualizar el sistema, y hacerlo sin las X corriendo.
Sin embargo, nunca escuche esto en ninguna lista de Debian con
respecto a SID.
El metodo Sidux de actualizacion es el que debe
actualizaciones en la
rama SID de Debian.
Por un tiempo he usado Sidux, y una de las pocas diferencias con SID
es que recomiendan ENFATICAMENTE utilizar solo 'apt-get' para
actualizar el sistema, y hacerlo sin las X corriendo.
Sin embargo, nunca escuche esto en ninguna lista de Debian con
El vie, 13-01-2012 a las 06:55 -0800, carugnom escribió:
On 13 ene, 11:40, Sergio Bessopeanetto sergio.b...@ymail.com wrote:
carugnom escribió:
Hola grupo !
Quisiera consultar sobre como se deben hacer las actualizaciones en la
rama SID de Debian.
Por un tiempo he usado Sidux, y
salut
essaie de desactiver pulseaudio
souvent les problèmes de son viennent de pulse.--
merci de la réponse, en fait je pense que ta piste est bonne mais je dois
dire que je suis un peu dérouté par la configuration KDE dans sidux...
en fait je ne trouve pas l'équivalent du control center
}
Et si pour mplayer tu n'as pas de son, tu édite et modifie /etc/
mplayer/mplayer.conf :
ao=pulse,
Voilà pour plus de réglages GUI tu peux install les paquets
recommandés par pulseaudio.
Sinon recherche sur les forums car sidux c'est une debian like.
En espérant t'avoir aidé.
Cordialement
Merci de votre aide ...
En fait j'ai fini par supprimer pulseaudio ,virer les confs, redémarrer et
hop magique j'ai du son (au moins sous Gnome)
encore merci
Jerome
PS:
j ai un souci avec un grub qui se charge et qu'est pas le bon mais je teste
supergrub disk avant de vous embeter
--
Jerome
Bonjour à tous,
sur mon dell studio 1557 (équipé d'un chipset intel 810 et carte graphique
ati radeon 3970 je crois)
j'ai un comportement bizarre sur une sidux toute fraiche (avec MAJ vers KDE
4.4.x;y)
lspci |grep audio - me sort bien ma carte
cat /proc/ j'ai bien 2 cartes son (chipset i810 et
Le 11/05/2010 11:31, en cette année 2010 *jerome moliere* a écrit fort
justement :
Bonjour à tous,
sur mon dell studio 1557 (équipé d'un chipset intel 810 et carte
graphique ati radeon 3970 je crois)
j'ai un comportement bizarre sur une sidux toute fraiche (avec MAJ vers
KDE 4.4.x;y)
lspci
I keep a fairly vanilla Lenny box to do most of my personal/work stuff
get frustrated when I want to play a newer game and/or upgrade some
software that is requiring a newer library. Usually backports aren't
available and/or too unwieldy.
My question is how usable is Sidux? I've read a few
Anyone had any experience using Sidux and how usable was it compared to
Squeeze?
I have both a Sidux and a Squeeze install at the moment. Usability
wise they're roughly the same, though Sidux is generally faster about
getting fixes in place. Neither Sidux nor Squeeze will be as stable
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 15:19, ZephyrQ zeph...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Anyone had any experience using Sidux and how usable was it compared to
Squeeze?
I don't really notice unstable to be unstable, except when it is :)
Granted if you upgrade often you're more likely to run into trouble.
For my
Nuno Magalhães:
I don't really notice unstable to be unstable, except when it is :)
Granted if you upgrade often you're more likely to run into trouble.
In my experience, upgrading daily (or even twice a day) is almost
totally painless. Sure, you may hit a few more bugs on the way, but the
installer gnome comme n'importe quel package présent
dans les dépôts debian. Une sidux est avant tout une debian avec un peu de
bling bling et quelques customizations. Un simple aptitude install gnome
fonctionne parfaitement sur une sidux. De même qu'utiliser aptitude ou
synaptic pour installer des paquets
Bonjour,
Je ne sais pas si pédagogiquement si une bonne idée sidux. En effet,
dire on prend une version en cours de développement les yeux fermés, ce
n'est pas trop la logique à transmettre il me semble.
Une version stable est stable, les yeux fermés, ok.
Une version en développement, le nom est
Bonjour,
Je m'incruste, ça m'intéresse aussi, j'étais justement là dessus hier soire.
Le 14/11/09, Le poulpe qui bloppe ! a écrit :
L'avantage de sidux comparé a une sid, c'est la possibilite d'avoir
une sid stable, sans reflechir lors de mises a jour.
Autrement dit, quasiment pas de risque
Je me réponds à moi-même pour un point.
Le 14/11/09, Cristian a écrit :
L'incoveniant: il est impossible d'installer gnome, c'est bloqué. Y'a
quelques autres trucs bloqués.
Comment ça bloqués ? Genre on ne peut pas avoir Gnome sur sa Sidux ?
Gnome n'est pas supporté par la Sidux. Ils disent
Le samedi 14 novembre 2009 à 08:30 +0100, Le poulpe qui bloppe ! a
écrit :
L'inconveniant: il est impossible d'installer gnome, c'est bloqué. Y'a
quelques autres trucs bloqués.
Dommage
Pour quelqu'un qui sais un minimum faire attention aux mises a jours,
y'a aucun interet a mes yeux, une
Pour l'instant mon OS est Debian Lenny.
Sans vouloir lancer de troll, bien que ce soir il y ait un super loto de
vendredi 13, une question me tourne dans la tête depuis quelques jours.
Quel intérêt trouvent des utilisateurs de la distribution Sidux à
utiliser celle ci plutôt que Sid ?
Si parmi
Bonjour,
J'utilise les 2. Sid sur mon pc et sidux sur le portable.
L'avantage de sidux comparé a une sid, c'est la possibilite d'avoir
une sid stable, sans reflechir lors de mises a jour.
L'incoveniant: il est impossible d'installer gnome, c'est bloqué. Y'a
quelques autres trucs bloqués.
C'est
Hello
Given the on-going problems described here before about my SATA CDROM
drive, I ran Sidux LiveCD and then installed it onto my HDD over the
weekend. My CDROM drive was picked up perfectly. Sidux was running the
2.6.30* kernel, so thinking that that kernel might have better support
HybridDrive with stand. Windows Vista Compatible, fwiw.
But see the end. fdisk sees nothing on this thing. Previously, all I
could find on this thing was a read-only ptn, ca. 3 Gb, and system saw
it as /dev/sr?.
HTF do I partition this thing?!? :-| No hurry; it's just annoying.
Surely Sidux
Incoming from Frank Lin PIAT:
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 20:32 +, s. keeling wrote:
s. keeling keel...@nucleus.com:
Daryl Styrk darylst...@gmail.com:
s. keeling wrote:
Hi. This is a nice box. I've installed Sidux' latest on it.
The fan runs constantly. Gkrellm reports
On 01/20/2009 09:57 PM, s. keeling wrote:
I was missing libsasl2-modules and sasl2-bin. This was helpful:
http://tribulaciones.org/docs/postfix-sasl-tls-howto/
Does this mean that there is a Suggests/Recommends/Depends bug in
Postfix?
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
I am not
Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net:
On 01/20/2009 09:57 PM, s. keeling wrote:
I was missing libsasl2-modules and sasl2-bin. This was helpful:
http://tribulaciones.org/docs/postfix-sasl-tls-howto/
Does this mean that there is a Suggests/Recommends/Depends bug in
Postfix?
*I*
Ron Johnson a écrit :
On 01/20/2009 09:57 PM, s. keeling wrote:
I was missing libsasl2-modules and sasl2-bin. This was helpful:
http://tribulaciones.org/docs/postfix-sasl-tls-howto/
do read the official docs however:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
On 01/21/2009 12:46 PM, mouss wrote:
Ron Johnson a écrit :
[snip]
Does this mean that there is a Suggests/Recommends/Depends bug in Postfix?
In postfix, no. most people don't need cyrus-sasl.
whether there is a packaging descrepancy in cyrus-sasl is a different
story. I am too lazy to
s. keeling a écrit :
s. keeling keel...@nucleus.com:
mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net:
smtp_generic_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/generic
== generic:
keel...@newmil.nucleus.com keel...@nucleus.com
More clues? Again, this is Sidux on AMD64, HP Pavilion dv4.
Jan 19 18:33:35 newmil postfix/qmgr
= hash:/etc/postfix/generic
== generic:
keel...@newmil.nucleus.com keel...@nucleus.com
More clues? Again, this is Sidux on AMD64, HP Pavilion dv4.
Jan 19 18:33:35 newmil postfix/qmgr[12263]: 4EDADBC06:
from=keel...@newmil.nucleus.com, size=671, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Jan 19
mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net:
s. keeling a écrit :
Hi. I'd rather it ran from inetd.
don't. if you don't have a lot of mail, reduce the number of processes
in postfix master.cf.
Okay.
Jan 16 18:23:21 newmil postfix/smtp[21710]: E2196BBF7:
to=keel...@nucleus.com,
s. keeling keel...@nucleus.com:
mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net:
smtp_generic_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/generic
== generic:
keel...@newmil.nucleus.com keel...@nucleus.com
More clues? Again, this is Sidux on AMD64, HP Pavilion dv4.
Jan 19 18:33:35 newmil postfix/qmgr[12263]: 4EDADBC06
s. keeling a écrit :
Hi. I'd rather it ran from inetd.
don't. if you don't have a lot of mail, reduce the number of processes
in postfix master.cf.
These are single user systems,
intended to be fed via pop3/fetchmail/procmail/mutt, flowing back via
my ISP's smarthost. I've fought with
Hi. I'd rather it ran from inetd. These are single user systems,
intended to be fed via pop3/fetchmail/procmail/mutt, flowing back via
my ISP's smarthost. I've fought with Sendmail successfully in the
past, limped along with exim* for years, and now Postfix. What're my
most obvious blunders?
La verdad nunca use gparted.
Porque no probas de hacer las particiones en una consola, con fdisk o
cfdisk y luego instalas sidux sin usar el particionador ?
2008/11/24 Mario Daniel Carugno [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
La verdad nunca use gparted.
Porque no probas de hacer las particiones en una consola, con fdisk o
cfdisk y luego instalas sidux sin usar el particionador ?
Me he bajado la version AMD 64 I686... y yo tengo un Notebook i386 y
que no es
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:31 AM, AlePando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/24 Mario Daniel Carugno [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
La verdad nunca use gparted.
Porque no probas de hacer las particiones en una consola, con fdisk o
cfdisk y luego instalas sidux sin usar el particionador ?
Me he
2008/11/24 AlePando [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/11/24 Mario Daniel Carugno [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
La verdad nunca use gparted.
Porque no probas de hacer las particiones en una consola, con fdisk o
cfdisk y luego instalas sidux sin usar el particionador ?
Me he bajado la version AMD 64
luego instalas sidux sin usar el particionador ?
Me he bajado la version AMD 64 I686... y yo tengo un Notebook i386 y
que no es AMD...
¡Plop!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EPIC FAIL XD
Son cosas que
particiones en una consola, con fdisk o
cfdisk y luego instalas sidux sin usar el particionador ?
Me he bajado la version AMD 64 I686... y yo tengo un Notebook i386 y
que no es AMD...
¡Plop!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
He hecho algunos intentos para montar en el disco duro el 'Sidux'
(debian livecd basado en debian sid) www.sidux.com
Con el gparted le cree una particion:
/dev/sda5
tamaño: 30 Gb
sistema de archivos ext3
y esto es lo que hice y el error que salio al final, por lo que
entiendo es cuando accede al
David Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:57 PM, s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lahf_lm?!?
Supports LAHF in 64 bit mode, which is the closest I could find on
Thanks for your help. I guess this is an AMD (early) Celeron. :-)
Still, anice machine if a little oddly laid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/08 19:07, s. keeling wrote:
David Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:57 PM, s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lahf_lm?!?
Supports LAHF in 64 bit mode, which is the closest I could find on
Thanks for your help. I guess
Hi. I'm somewhat confused and in uncharted territory. I just bought
this laptop second hand.
Which kernel is this CPU supposed to be using? I've been testing with
Sidux for the moment (2008-06 (?) 2.6.25-10). It refused to boot on
their AMD images (... detected i1586[sic] CPU.).
This thing
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 23:13:08 +0200, s. keeling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi. I'm somewhat confused and in uncharted territory. I just bought
this laptop second hand.
Which kernel is this CPU supposed to be using? I've been testing with
Sidux for the moment (2008-06 (?) 2.6.25-10
On 2008-07-06 23:13 +0200, s. keeling wrote:
Hi. I'm somewhat confused and in uncharted territory. I just bought
this laptop second hand.
Which kernel is this CPU supposed to be using? I've been testing with
Sidux for the moment (2008-06 (?) 2.6.25-10). It refused to boot on
their AMD
Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2008-07-06 23:13 +0200, s. keeling wrote:
Hi. I'm somewhat confused and in uncharted territory. I just bought
this laptop second hand.
Which kernel is this CPU supposed to be using? I've been testing with
Sidux for the moment (2008-06 (?) 2.6.25
Bob Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 23:13:08 +0200, s. keeling ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Hi. I'm somewhat confused and in uncharted territory. I just bought
this laptop second hand.
Which kernel is this CPU supposed to be using? I've been testing with
Sidux
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:57 PM, s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lahf_lm?!?
Supports LAHF in 64 bit mode, which is the closest I could find on
google. If you have that, I don't see why you wouldn't have lm as they
should go together, AFAIK.
With semprons you have to be careful if they'll
On 14 Apr 2008, Haines Brown wrote:
Michael,
I wanted to put Debian on a new Thinkpad X61s, and to achieve that with
minimal pain, I went with sidux. I created a USB-stick to install it,
and it went as smooth as can be. I'm using the machine with wifi.
All hitches were simply the result
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey Hess wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
In your opinion, am I right in my assessment that testing is more
likely to be in an unusable state for longer than sid? (at least at
the package, not system, level)?
No, I don't think so. If a
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:04:48 +0100
Michael C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many swear seem to swear by sidux, though its claim to turn unstable
into a stable and reliable operating system for every-day usage seems
at odds with common sense, especially given its own advice to avoid
dist-upgrades
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:25:20 +0200
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you make something a bit more stable!?
More testing?!! :oP
Just go with testing - it's perfect.
Agreed, I just like Ubuntu! :o)
M.
--
|Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
|Tiger Computing Ltd
|The Linux Specialists
|
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:04:48 +0100
Michael C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many swear seem to swear by sidux, though its claim to turn unstable
into a stable and reliable operating system for every-day usage seems
at odds with common sense, especially given its
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:04:38 +0100
Matthew Macdonald-Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:04:48 +0100
Michael C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many swear seem to swear by sidux, though its claim to turn
unstable into a stable and reliable operating system for every-day
.
The unstable isn't really unstable per say, but it just breaks from time
to time because so many changes are added daily. From time to time the
dependencies between packages doesn't fit and stuff breaks.
I don't really see or find any need for Ubuntu or Sidux. On the contrary
I find
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:47:08 +0200
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The unstable isn't really unstable per say, but it just breaks from time
to time because so many changes are added daily. From time to time the
dependencies between packages doesn't fit and stuff breaks.
As people
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:27:22 +0200
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:35:56 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 06:25:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The crucial bit that many miss is that new
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:46:26AM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Both of you, thanks!
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
In your opinion, am I right in my assessment that testing is more
likely to be in an unusable state for longer than sid? (at least at
the package,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:16:19AM +1000, Rich Healey wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
I personally wouldn't run a testing system for regular use. I would
run sid or stable (with backports as needed). Of course, YMMV.
...
Interesting, when you put it like that it does make
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 08:34:30PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 03:09:26PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
Contrast that with sid, bug fixes happen fast. It seems, in my limited
experience, that serious bugs that get caught in sid rapidly
disappear,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:03:52AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:47:08 +0200
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The unstable isn't really unstable per say, but it just breaks from time
to time because so many changes are added daily. From time to time the
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:03:52 -0400
Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:47:08 +0200
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The unstable isn't really unstable per say, but it just breaks from
time to time because so many changes are added daily. From time to
On 2008-04-15 18:35 +0200, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
excellent description. MY wife, whose box is running mostly-up-to-date
sid, is annoyed because every few months some program changes it's
icon or some bit of its interface layout... another aspect of
unstable.
True. Probably stable
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:02:13PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-04-15 18:35 +0200, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
excellent description. MY wife, whose box is running mostly-up-to-date
sid, is annoyed because every few months some program changes it's
icon or some bit of its interface
Many swear seem to swear by sidux, though its claim to turn unstable
into a stable and reliable operating system for every-day usage seems
at odds with common sense, especially given its own advice to avoid
dist-upgrades in the middle of serious work because any package in
sid can break at any
Michael,
I wanted to put Debian on a new Thinkpad X61s, and to achieve that with
minimal pain, I went with sidux. I created a USB-stick to install it,
and it went as smooth as can be. I'm using the machine with wifi.
All hitches were simply the result of my ignorance. The applications
I've
Haines Brown wrote:
Michael,
I wanted to put Debian on a new Thinkpad X61s, and to achieve that with
minimal pain, I went with sidux. I created a USB-stick to install it,
and it went as smooth as can be. I'm using the machine with wifi.
All hitches were simply the result of my ignorance
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:29:19PM +0100, Michael C wrote:
Haines Brown wrote:
Michael,
I wanted to put Debian on a new Thinkpad X61s, and to achieve that with
minimal pain, I went with sidux. I created a USB-stick to install it,
and it went as smooth as can be. I'm using the machine
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The crucial bit that many miss is that new packages don't move into
testing unless they've sat in unstable with no new bug reports for 10
days (I think).
Or 5 days (urgency=medium in changelog).
Or 2 days (urgency=high).
Or 1 day if it's a bad enough problem
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 06:25:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The crucial bit that many miss is that new packages don't move into
testing unless they've sat in unstable with no new bug reports for 10
days (I think).
Or 5 days (urgency=medium in changelog).
Or 2
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:29:19PM +0100, Michael C wrote:
Haines Brown wrote:
Michael,
I wanted to put Debian on a new Thinkpad X61s, and to achieve that with
minimal pain, I went with sidux. I created a USB-stick to install it,
and it went as smooth
Michael C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm obviously never going to get a considered, impartial appraisal from
their forum and IRC channel, so has anyone here tried sidux only to find
that Testing was better suited to their desktop needs?
I've never run Sid. I do support a user who wants to play
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 03:09:26PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
Contrast that with sid, bug fixes happen fast. It seems, in my limited
experience, that serious bugs that get caught in sid rapidly
disappear, sometimes within hours. Sure there's more churn and
potentially more
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 06:25:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The crucial bit that many miss is that new packages don't move into
testing unless they've sat in unstable with no new bug reports for 10
days (I think).
Or 5 days
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:35:56 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 06:25:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The crucial bit that many miss is that new packages don't move
into testing unless they've sat in unstable with no new
- Original Message
From: Roby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 8:37:14 PM
Subject: Re: Needs help with Sidux install
Hello,
I have a unique problem involving sidux. I already tried to get help from
sidux users from thier forum
Hello,
I have a unique problem involving sidux. I already tried to get help from sidux
users from thier forum but no one could help me. This is why I am trying my
chances here.
The problem: When I run the live cd it takes about 3 to 4 minutes to output a
long text on the screen and after
eklektik wrote:
Hello,
I have a unique problem involving sidux. I already tried to get help from
sidux users from thier forum but no one could help me. This is why I am
trying my chances here.
The problem: When I run the live cd it takes about 3 to 4 minutes to
output a long text
82 matches
Mail list logo
