On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:46:07 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
>
>
> This is a popular essay on the subject:
>
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
You may also want to look at RFC 1855 "Netiquette Guidelines". ESR
recommends it.
stions.html
[Back to the technical discussion.]
I appears that Debian single-user mode does not load the kernel modules
you need. I assume this is by design, so that you can boot the system
when you have a bad module.
Loading modules by hand in single user mode might work, but there is th
may be you need to import zpool before?
try zpool import
Best,
Alex
On 9/3/20 10:34 AM, James Allsopp wrote:
This is just debian grub recovery mode so on the same machine, so
hopefully zfsutil will be there. Looked at this;
zfs 4214784 9
zunicode 335872 1 zfs
This is just debian grub recovery mode so on the same machine, so hopefully
zfsutil will be there. Looked at this;
zfs 4214784 9
zunicode 335872 1 zfs
zlua 172032 1 zfs
zavl 16384 1 zfs
icp 331776 1 zfs
zcommon
James Allsopp wrote:
> Hi,
> Just trying to move var to a zfs partition. Rebooted into recovery mode,
> but could access the zfs pool. I tried to modprobe zfs, but still nothing.
> Is there something else I should be doing?
>
Does your recovery mode have the zfs kernel modules and zfsutil?
Hi,
Just trying to move var to a zfs partition. Rebooted into recovery mode,
but could access the zfs pool. I tried to modprobe zfs, but still nothing.
Is there something else I should be doing?
Thanks
James
> What about the really big iron ?
The heck with mainframes. Back in the 1990s I had PC-based Debian boxes
with users working on dumb terminals hooked up to the PC via serial cables.
That certainly seemed "multi-user" to us and it didn't require big iron.
--
"There’s class warfare, all
Richard Owlett wrote:
> Do you have any problem with my statement: Today Linux is being used
> by an individual who is the _only_ user of a standalone system
> (e.g. laptop).
The natural person hammering on the keyboard is not the only "user".
Daemons are users too, and permissions are the
On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 16:56 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Richard Owlett wrote:
> > Do you have any problem with my statement:
> > > Today Linux is being used by an individual who is the _only_
> > > user of a standalone system (e.g. laptop).
>
> What about the really big iron ?
>
Hi,
Richard Owlett wrote:
> Do you have any problem with my statement:
> > Today Linux is being used by an individual who is the _only_
> > user of a standalone system (e.g. laptop).
What about the really big iron ?
"Linux Runs on All of the Top 500 Supercomputers, Again!"
(June 2019)
Additionally, I can not (easily) unmount /var. rpm.statd is running and
has a cwd of /var/lib/nfs, preventing normal system recovery. This seems
very wrong.
On 10/09/2015 11:09 AM, Pete Greening wrote:
All,
I would like to report a bug, but I am not sure what package it
belongs to. Probably
All,
I would like to report a bug, but I am not sure what package it belongs
to. Probably systemd...
Here's what happens. I have a LVM LV formated ext4 for /var partition.
At boot, there was a minor error and fsck failed due to a hard
shutdown. I received the well known error "UNEXPECTED
jida...@jidanni.org (jida...@jidanni.org on 2011-05-11 21:58 +0800):
What does it mean here on sid, when plugging in memory cards works
fine in single user mode, with only
[..]
running, but then in multi user mode, with
[..]
running, plugging in many of the same memory cards results
What does it mean here on sid, when plugging in memory cards works fine
in single user mode, with only
# pstree
init-+-init---bash---emacs-+-aspell
| `-bash---pstree
`-udevd---2*[udevd]
running, but then in multi user mode, with
# pstree
init-+-acpi_fakekeyd
On 2009-08-19 23:44, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear Niu
With many thanks for your reply , I tried to force fsck after reboot as the
followings :
#cd /
#touch /forcefsck
#reboot
Can you please do me favor and let me know if this is the same as your
proposed procedure (since I am not familiar with your
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 07:35:46AM +0100, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I have an Linux server that gets problemy from sudden power cut . I need to
run fsck in single user mode so I issued #init 1 on the server . At the
server prompt , to serialize the fsck on the intended file system , I
+0100, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I have an Linux server that gets problemy from sudden power cut . I need
to
run fsck in single user mode so I issued #init 1 on the server . At the
server prompt , to serialize the fsck on the intended file system , I
first
tried to unmount
On 2009-08-17 01:35, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I have an Linux server that gets problemy from sudden power cut . I need to
run fsck in single user mode so I issued #init 1 on the server . At the
server prompt , to serialize the fsck on the intended file system , I first
tried to unmount
cut . I need
to
run fsck in single user mode so I issued #init 1 on the server . At the
server prompt , to serialize the fsck on the intended file system , I
first
tried to unmount the intended file system and then issue the fsck (as the
following) :
#umount /dev/hda2
#fsck -s -a /dev/hda2
All
I have an Linux server that gets problemy from sudden power
cut . I need to
run fsck in single user mode so I issued #init 1 on the
server . At the
server prompt , to serialize the fsck on the intended file
system , I first
tried to unmount
...@cox.net wrote:
On 2009-08-17 01:35, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I have an Linux server that gets problemy from sudden power
cut . I need to
run fsck in single user mode so I issued #init 1 on the
server . At the
server prompt , to serialize
Dear All
I have an Linux server that gets problemy from sudden power cut . I need to
run fsck in single user mode so I issued #init 1 on the server . At the
server prompt , to serialize the fsck on the intended file system , I first
tried to unmount the intended file system and then issue the fsck
Hallo Leute,
ich möchte ein Script schreiben, daß in den Single User Mode wechselt,
wartet bis der Sinlge User Mode auch wirklich erreicht ist, ein Backup
durchführt, und wieder in den normalen zustand zurückkehrt. Also
ungefähr so:
init 1
sleep 20
tar --exclude /dev --exclude /proc
Hi,
How can I get into the Debian Sarge Single user mode from grub?
without giving a password???
passing the single option doesn't seem to work :-(
Kind Regards
Siju
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 07:45:58PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
How can I get into the Debian Sarge Single user mode from grub?
without giving a password???
passing the single option doesn't seem to work :-(
set init=/bin/bash?
Kind Regards
Siju
--
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
如果敌人让你生
On 22:46 Wed 26 Oct , amalgam.swhe wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 07:45:58PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
How can I get into the Debian Sarge Single user mode from grub?
without giving a password???
passing the single option doesn't seem to work :-(
set init=/bin/bash?
Just
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:14:45PM +0800, rosetta wrote:
Yes..But I didn't install the sudo.
And I want to reset the root password without rescure CD or some
else. Because the debian reference say single user mode can reset the
password.
Hi Rosetta,
There is usually more than one way
hi
I am using the kernel-2.6.11-1-386 and grub.
In boot menu, I have choosed the recovery mode. But while the
system boot completely, it prompt Give root password for
mantenance(or Control-D to continue):.
If I press ctrl+d, then it will use normal runlevel.
How can I use 1 runlevel if I
system boot completely, it prompt Give root password for
mantenance(or Control-D to continue):.
If I press ctrl+d, then it will use normal runlevel.
How can I use 1 runlevel if I forget the root password in grub?
Hi.
I guess you'll have to use a rescue CD. A knoppix CD
will do. A
Nelson Castillo quoted someone who wrote:
system boot completely, it prompt Give root password for
mantenance(or Control-D to continue):.
If I press ctrl+d, then it will use normal runlevel.
How can I use 1 runlevel if I forget the root password in grub?
This doesn't sound like a grub
Yes..But I didn't install the sudo.
And I want to reset the root password without rescure CD or some
else. Because the debian reference say single user mode can reset the
password.
On 9/27/05, Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nelson Castillo quoted someone who wrote:
system boot completely
rosetta:
I am using the kernel-2.6.11-1-386 and grub.
In boot menu, I have choosed the recovery mode. But while the
system boot completely, it prompt Give root password for
mantenance(or Control-D to continue):.
If I press ctrl+d, then it will use normal runlevel.
It's a feature.
I finally solved the problem. My /etc/environment had a single line
LANG=nl_NL@euro
which (for unknown reasons) caused the problems. Removing this line did
the trick.
Now that I can login as root again, I still wonder why this is causing
trouble in the first place and also why it only prevents
I run debian woody on a number of machines, but on one of them I can't
login as root. Only if I reboot in single user mode, everything is fine.
Did this start after a crash? A similar thing happened to me a while back,
my machine crashed and then no user could login except root in single user
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:53:47 +0100
Xaveer Leijtens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run debian woody on a number of machines, but on one of them I can't
login as root. Only if I reboot in single user mode, everything is fine.
Did this start after a crash? A similar thing happened to me a while
This one time, at band camp, Xaveer Leijtens said:
I run debian woody on a number of machines, but on one of them I can't
login as root. Only if I reboot in single user mode, everything is fine.
Did this start after a crash? A similar thing happened to me a while back,
my machine crashed
Stephen == Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen Somewhere in /etc/pam.d (maybe security?) there is an
Stephen option to disable root console logins. You might check
Stephen to see if that's been enabled.
/etc/pam.d/login
# Disallows root logins except on tty's listed
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 22:20:33 +0100 Xaveer Leijtens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run debian woody on a number of machines, but on one of them I can't
login as root. Only if I reboot in single user mode, everything is fine.
Did this start after a crash? A similar thing happened to me a while back
I run debian woody on a number of machines, but on one of them I can't
login as root. Only if I reboot in single user mode, everything is fine.
I also tried to login via 'ssh root@localhost', and it does prompt for
(and accepts) the password, but stops after displaying /etc/motd. Same
happens
on Tue, Apr 09, 2002, Tom Cook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 0, Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
begin quoting what Karsten M. Self said on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:18:58AM
-0700:
Not recommended. If X quits abnormally, it will also restart. What you
want:
: Building a single user Internet terminal / Done!
on Mon, Apr 08, 2002, Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
begin quoting what Erik van der Meulen said on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at
10:32:35AM +0200:
- /usr/local/bin/startkiosk only does 'startx'
Now make that script do a shutdown -h now after
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:00:04PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
Have the whole system use ext3. Have no shutdown at all (just switch it
off like a stereo)
I'm going to say DON'T DO THIS as well.
This isn't what ext3fs is designed to prevent or protect against.
You can speed shutdown by
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:04:08PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
Also I have made this, only containing 'startx'.
Now if I reboot, I see no X, but a message repeating:
X: user not authorised to run the X server, aborting.
Change the first two lines of /etc/X11/Xserver to read:
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 13:35, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:04:08PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
Also I have made this, only containing 'startx'.
Now if I reboot, I see no X, but a message repeating:
X: user not authorised to run the X server, aborting.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:39:52PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
which contains a file 'SecurityPolicy'. That seems to be applicable,
only quite complex! Can I accomplish the required by making changes
here?
Do you have /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config?
Read my post somewhere else in this
begin quoting what Erik van der Meulen said on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:32:35AM
+0200:
- /usr/local/bin/startkiosk only does 'startx'
Now make that script do a shutdown -h now after startx exits, and all
you'll have to do to shut down is exit X. Maybe.
pgp2QJC55sVdU.pgp
Description: PGP
on Mon, Apr 08, 2002, Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
begin quoting what Erik van der Meulen said on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at
10:32:35AM +0200:
- /usr/local/bin/startkiosk only does 'startx'
Now make that script do a shutdown -h now after startx exits, and all
you'll have to do
begin quoting what Karsten M. Self said on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:18:58AM
-0700:
Not recommended. If X quits abnormally, it will also restart. What you
want:
startx_command shutdown -h now
...which should only restart the system if X is exited normally. If it
exits with a
On 0, Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
begin quoting what Karsten M. Self said on Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:18:58AM
-0700:
Not recommended. If X quits abnormally, it will also restart. What you
want:
startx_command shutdown -h now
...which should only restart the
stop lilo from
presenting a prompt. But then, if you deny console logins, and don't
allow single user mode, and, say, your network card gets borked, or
even if telnetd/sshd won't allow root logins, how are you going to
admin the machine? Have a boot disk which can boot *without* the hard
disk
Dear Group - I would like to build on old iron (P90/64Mb) a simple
Galeon only Internet terminal. I have prepared a Sid configuration
that contains the following:
- Internet access
- IceWM-experimental
- Galeon
Things seem to work well (b.t.w. any chance of adjusting the Gnome fonts
in menus
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 20:25, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
Dear Group - I would like to build on old iron (P90/64Mb) a simple
Galeon only Internet terminal. I have prepared a Sid configuration
that contains the following:
- Internet access
- IceWM-experimental
- Galeon
Things seem to work
also sprach Erik van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.04.07.1425 +0200]:
Dear Group - I would like to build on old iron (P90/64Mb) a simple
Galeon only Internet terminal. I have prepared a Sid configuration
that contains the following:
not quite your solution, but look at how jamie did it
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:44:06PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
Have a script that starts X for a certain user and begins galeon. Run
this as a respawn process under /etc/inittab. Make a certain runlevel be
kiosk mode (the default). Make other run levels the admin mode (normal
logins
begin quoting what Crispin Wellington said on Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:44:06PM
+0800:
Have the whole system use ext3. Have no shutdown at all (just switch it
off like a stereo)
Jeebus. Do you tell people with airbags to not bother using their
brakes, just go ahead and hit a tree to stop?
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 21:30, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:44:06PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
Have a script that starts X for a certain user and begins galeon. Run
this as a respawn process under /etc/inittab. Make a certain runlevel be
kiosk mode (the
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 21:33, Shawn McMahon wrote:
begin quoting what Crispin Wellington said on Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at
08:44:06PM +0800:
Have the whole system use ext3. Have no shutdown at all (just switch it
off like a stereo)
Jeebus. Do you tell people with airbags to not bother
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 08:47, Crispin Wellington wrote:
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 21:30, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:44:06PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
Have a script that starts X for a certain user and begins galeon. Run
this as a respawn process under
My suggestion would be to use straight sawfish for a window manager.
It's lightning fast when used alone. Also you could configure a
shortcut key such as ctrl-alt-esc to shutdown. If memory serves all
you have to do is replace the gnome-session in your .xsession with
sawfish
On Sun,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:47:38PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
Also I have made this, only containing 'startx'.
Now if I reboot, I see no X, but a message repeating:
X: user not authorised to run the X server, aborting.
The su -c command should change to a acceptable user.
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 18:52:40 +0200
Erik van der Meulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:47:38PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
Also I have made this, only containing 'startx'.
Now if I reboot, I see no X, but a message repeating:
X: user not authorised to run
on Sun, Apr 07, 2002, Crispin Wellington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Have the whole system use ext3. Have no shutdown at all (just switch it
off like a stereo)
I'm going to say DON'T DO THIS as well.
This isn't what ext3fs is designed to prevent or protect against.
You can speed shutdown by
on Sun, Apr 07, 2002, Erik van der Meulen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:44:06PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
Have a script that starts X for a certain user and begins galeon. Run
this as a respawn process under /etc/inittab. Make a certain runlevel be
kiosk
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 00:52, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:47:38PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
Also I have made this, only containing 'startx'.
Now if I reboot, I see no X, but a message repeating:
X: user not authorised to run the X server, aborting.
a way to unload all the modules before
booting or going into single user, from a rescue
cd-rom or boot disk.
Ian
You can try typing dmesg -n1 at a command prompt. If those are kernel
error messages, that should suspend their printing.
Cheers
Neilen
I booted from CDROM and dropped into a shell. After erasing
/lib/modules/`uname -r`/modules.dep
I was able to get past the complaints about net-filter-pf1. This
problem is solved.
Ian
--
FreeSoftware Developer
Registered GNU/Linux user 239985
and user of Debian GNU/Linux
not load all the
way. I need a way to unload all the modules before
booting or going into single user, from a rescue
cd-rom or boot disk.
Ian
Ian,
It sound like you either have a bad rescue disk or are using it
improperly and it is somehow trying to boot off your installed config
and the paths
The subject pretty much says it all. I needed to
install Windows98 to use a program called Xilinx.
After doing this I went and installed System Commander
so I could dual boot into GNU/Linux and Windows 98.
System Commander wasn't able to boot GNU/Linux. I
uninstalled it and tried to boot
Ian Thomas said:
Now the system won't get past these error
messages. It starts to boot, then these messages just
keep repeating over and over again. How can I boot up
with no modules loaded from a boot disk or the CD-ROM?
I figure if I can do this, I'll update LILO and be in
good
or going into single user, from a rescue
cd-rom or boot disk.
Ian
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
I recently ran dselect and did an upgrade with unstable which had the
result that I can't log in at all (typing 'root' at the login promt
returns Login Incorrect, I don't even get to try the password, similar
results with the kdm login screen).
My first thought was to boot into single user mode
The problem is caused by some problems in the libpam* packages.
To boot into single user mode, if you're using lilo, just append s to
the end of your image name when you boot, like:
LILO: linux s
It will then boot and ask you for root password, which will work. Then
download the libpam
Hi,
Maybe a stupid question, but how do I boot my debian-linux (slink)
in single-user-mode?
Thanks in advance,
Noella
Hi,
2 ways to do.
1. When booting, at LILO: enter linux single assuming that your
favourite kernel is labelled
linux, if not replace the correct kernel label.
2. at shell prompt type init 1 to go to single user mode.
-gnana
Maybe a stupid question, but how do I boot my debian-linux (slink
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Noella Pierlet wrote:
: Hi,
:
: Maybe a stupid question, but how do I boot my debian-linux (slink)
: in single-user-mode?
From the lilo prompt: `linux single'
From a root prompt in runlevels 2 through 5: 'shutdown now'
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips
On 17/11/99 Noella Pierlet wrote:
Maybe a stupid question, but how do I boot my debian-linux (slink)
in single-user-mode?
if its x86 and you use lilo just type linux single at the lilo prompt
(unless you call the default image something else)
Best Regards,
Ethan Benson
To obtain my PGP
Thanks to everyone who responded.
The single option works fine!
Noella
At the lilo prompt, type linux single
Bob
On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Noella Pierlet wrote:
Hi,
Maybe a stupid question, but how do I boot my debian-linux (slink)
in single-user-mode?
Thanks in advance,
Noella
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Noella Pierlet wrote:
Noella Hi,
Noella
Noella Maybe a stupid question, but how do I boot my debian-linux (slink)
Noella in single-user-mode?
I think you can type single and the LILOprompt and it will do it. i used
to use a boot disk, but have since remapped CTRL+ALT+DEL
When boot up, type linux single or linux emergency
Rob Lundahl wrote:
Help my x-windows went south and Debian cycles on
the xdm login.
To fix it I need to login. Can I stop it from going automatically
to X windows?
Rob
_
Do You
Help my x-windows went south and Debian cycles on
the xdm login.
To fix it I need to login. Can I stop it from going automatically
to X windows?
Rob
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
In a message dated 4/6/99 11:51:56 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To fix it I need to login. Can I stop it from going automatically
to X windows?
1) If you're using hamm - put no-xdm in your /etc/X11/options file to
prevent xdm from starting
On any system you should
to the
kernel image that you boot...So get the boot: prompt by hitting the shift
key at the LILO prompt. Then hit tab to see what kernel images you have
available. Type in the name of the kernel image, followed by a space,
followed by single and hit return. You'll boot to single user mode.
For example
- Received message begins Here -
Perhaps you used the wrong way to go to single user mode. The only
correct way to switch to single user from multi user is:
shutdown now
I used init s. I thought that was the same. Thanks for the tip, I'll try that.
Jim
using /usr, I guess. Anyway then I set out to try
to boot single user from loadlin.exe. I didn't know what to put. I
tried loadlin vmlinux root=/dev/hdb1 ro single, but that didn't seem to
work. Can someone enlighten me? I looked in the docs, but I guess I
didn't find the right one.
Thanks
well. It keeps /usr mounted because it doesn't
kill off the process using /usr, I guess.
Perhaps you used the wrong way to go to single user mode. The only
correct way to switch to single user from multi user is:
shutdown now
[Note the omission of the -r/-h option!].
Anyway then I set out
that booting single from a running
: system doesn't work very well. It keeps /usr mounted because it doesn't
: kill off the process using /usr, I guess.
:
: Perhaps you used the wrong way to go to single user mode. The only
: correct way to switch to single user from multi user
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Kent West wrote:
At 09:10 PM 10/6/1998 +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Raymond A. Ingles wrote:
[stereogram .sig]
Now that, folks, has class.. Cool Ray :)
I kept focusing on the row with Os in it and never could see anything.
Finally I gave up on
On Fri, 2 Oct 1998, Christopher D. Judd wrote:
Make sure the sixth field in your /etc/fstab is set to 0(zero) or
empty for removable media. From 'man 5 fstab'
[...]
Sure enough, that fixed it. Odd that this problem only showed up
when I upgraded to Hamm, though. Thanks for the tip.
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Raymond A. Ingles wrote:
Sincerely,
Ray Ingles (248)377-7735 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Stereogram!
Try to make the two Os in the next row look like three:
OO
n n n n n n n n n n
At 09:10 PM 10/6/1998 +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Raymond A. Ingles wrote:
Sincerely,
Ray Ingles (248)377-7735 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Stereogram!
Try to make the two Os in the next row look like three:
*- Christopher D. Judd wrote about Re: What causes single user boot?
|
|This happens on my system since upgrading to Hamm. The problem seems
| to be that fsck -A tries to check /fd0 (since I have entries for /fd0 in
| fsab) and fails since no disk is in the drive. If that is the case
According to Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2. A filesystem check failed because there were serious errors and
the system wants you to run fsck manually
It is not 1 and 3 so it must be 2. That sounds reasonable, because
the operator (who had no idea what he was doing) read
Hi!
I've got a webserver which is running constantly. A few days ago
we had to reboot it, because of a SCSI problem with the JAZ drive.
(side note: can you imagine the load went up to 115 still growing!?)
Well, after the reboot the system stopped at the prompt:
Press Ctrl-D or give root
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Spiegl) writes:
Hi!
I've got a webserver which is running constantly. A few days ago
we had to reboot it, because of a SCSI problem with the JAZ drive.
(side note: can you imagine the load went up to 115 still growing!?)
Well, after the reboot the system stopped
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andy Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I've got a webserver which is running constantly. A few days ago
we had to reboot it, because of a SCSI problem with the JAZ drive.
(side note: can you imagine the load went up to 115 still growing!?)
Well, after the reboot
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andy Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I've got a webserver which is running constantly. A few days ago
we had to reboot it, because of a SCSI problem with the JAZ drive.
(side note: can you imagine the load went up to 115 still growing!?)
Well, after
*- Christopher D. Judd wrote about Re: What causes single user boot?
|
|This happens on my system since upgrading to Hamm. The problem seems
| to be that fsck -A tries to check /fd0 (since I have entries for /fd0 in
| fsab) and fails since no disk is in the drive. If that is the case
Hi,
This is explained in the manpage for init(1).
Quoting man init:
---cut---
BOOTFLAGS
It is possible to pass a number of flags to init from the
boot monitor (eg. LILO). Init accepts the following flags:
S, single
Single user mode boot. In this mode /etc
ogins and i did not create any user accounts.
i figure the only way to fix this is to boot into single user
mode and remove the xdm entries, however i am not sure
how to do this in linux... needless to say i am feeling very
stupid right about now. any help would be appreciated.
//daryl
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
