Seeking someone who..? (

Sharing what I posted to alpine as well as here..My resource isdoing all they can, but I truly am not equips to help them..please someone who knows what they are doing first hand get in touch? Currently uses alpine to access their gmail account. A bit of context I experience sight loss

Re: Who pays Debian developement

used to pay a Developer for >>> its work in the project. > > That being said, there are certainly developers out there, who are > working on company time, to make contributions to Debian (and other) > open source software.  And folks at places that host the work - like > th

Re: Who pays Debian developement

Hi, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote on 31/01/2023 at 19:50:06+0100: > On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 05:34:49 AM Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: >> There are also individuals making such donations. >> >> That being said, these donations can't be used to pay a Developer for >> its work in the project. > >

Re: OT: Charities (a rant) (was: Re: Who pays Debian developement)

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:54 PM Dan Ritter wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:05:16PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > The reasons that there are quite a few charities that I do not > contribute to > > > has to do with two (related) things: >

Re: Who pays Debian developement

these donations can't be used to pay a Developer for > > > its work in the project. > > That being said, there are certainly developers out there, who are working > on company time, to make contributions to Debian (and other) open source > software.  And folks at places that host the w

Re: Who pays Debian developement

there, who are working on company time, to make contributions to Debian (and other) open source software.  And folks at places that host the work - like the OSU OSL - are certainly drawing salaries from their parent institutions.  I expect a lot of that work is grant funded. Miles Fidelman

Re: OT: Charities (a rant) (was: Re: Who pays Debian developement)

to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:05:16PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > [...] > > > The reasons that there are quite a few charities that I do not contribute > > to > > has to do with two (related) things: > > Quite the Scientific Method (TM). Making a few things up

Re: Who pays Debian developement

ns cdrskin and xorriso. They are not specific to Debian or to GNU/Linux. I support Debian especially by preparing the Debian packages of my upstream projects. Those get signed and uploaded by Dominique Dumont who holds a Debian rank, unlike me. See what Debian makes out of my upstream package libisoburn

Re: OT: Charities (a rant) (was: Re: Who pays Debian developement)

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:05:16PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: [...] > The reasons that there are quite a few charities that I do not contribute to > has to do with two (related) things: Quite the Scientific Method (TM). Making a few things up to make your point :-) Now: Pick one. Prove

OT: Charities (a rant) (was: Re: Who pays Debian developement)

te of video (or audio) or create a transcript and edit it to 10% of the original. A speaker who uses ahhs, ums, or such may have a real physical or mental disability, or may be showing disrespect for his listeners by not properly preparing in advance and thinking before speaking. (Remember Cicero who did

Re: Who pays Debian developement

... A picture is worth a thousand words. A video (or "audio"): not so much -- divide by 10 for each minute of video (or audio) or create a transcript and edit it to 10% of the original. A speaker who uses ahhs, ums, or such may have a real physical or mental disability, or may be s

Re: Who pays Debian developement

"Thomas Schmitt" wrote on 31/01/2023 at 15:01:15+0100: > I don't get paid for this. It's for fun, curiosity, and conscience. I'd add "and because I rely on it", from my point of view. All my systems run Debian, having a nice OS is the guarantee that my systems will keep working a way I like

Re: Who pays Debian developement

fic to Debian or to GNU/Linux. I support Debian especially by preparing the Debian packages of my upstream projects. Those get signed and uploaded by Dominique Dumont who holds a Debian rank, unlike me. See what Debian makes out of my upstream package libisoburn: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libiso

Re: Who pays Debian developement

gene heskett wrote: ... > So something like this needs to be said: > > Make it easier for John Q. Public's like me to contribute to those > support funds. I'm not Elon Musk, but I could manage a $50 bill from > time to time. Make it easier for the users who have benefited greatl

Re: Who pays Debian developement

gene heskett wrote on 31/01/2023 at 14:00:14+0100: > On 1/31/23 05:43, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: >> Hi, >> krys...@ibse.cz wrote on 31/01/2023 at 10:51:10+0100: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> I ran into argument with my father about who pays Debian >>

Re: Who pays Debian developement

On 1/31/23 05:43, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: Hi, krys...@ibse.cz wrote on 31/01/2023 at 10:51:10+0100: Hello everyone, I ran into argument with my father about who pays Debian developement. He says everyone want to eat something and since only donation won't cut it, corporations

Re: Who pays Debian developement

Hi, krys...@ibse.cz wrote on 31/01/2023 at 10:51:10+0100: > Hello everyone, > I ran into argument with my father about who pays Debian > developement. He says everyone want to eat something and since only > donation won't cut it, corporations and companies which use Debian &g

Who pays Debian developement

Hello everyone, I ran into argument with my father about who pays Debian developement. He says everyone want to eat something and since only donation won't cut it, corporations and companies which use Debian need to fund the developement. I understand that some task like kernel maintanace

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

de, rather than a fresh >> installation. >> >> My mistake may have prompted Andrei's suggestion which I then explained away >> partly in relation to having upgraded - sorry. > > I don't know anything about ZFS. That said, it's *conceivable* that > your / ownershi

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

Jan 25, 2022, 13:06 by donots...@fastmail.fm: > both return nothing, with or without sudo. > >>>> Can anyone replicate this or suggest what may have happened? I'm fairly >>>> sure I've used who since upgrading from Buster. >>>> Also upgraded from Buste

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

n which I then explained away > partly in relation to having upgraded - sorry. I don't know anything about ZFS. That said, it's *conceivable* that your / ownership has been broken this entire time, and you never noticed until now. Either because you never ran "who", or because syst

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

On Tue 25 Jan 2022, at 01:31, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Mon 24 Jan 2022, at 12:45, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:51:05AM +, Gareth Evans wrote: >>> I've just noticed that: >>> >>> $ who >>> >>> and >>>

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

t; >> where a user sees this error because / is owned by the user rather than root. >> >> Lo and behold >> >> $ stat / >> >> shows this is what has somehow happened. >> >> $ sudo chown root:root / >> >> solves the disappearing /var/run/u

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

han root. > > Lo and behold > > $ stat / > > shows this is what has somehow happened. > > $ sudo chown root:root / > > solves the disappearing /var/run/utmp problem (and fixes who/users) > > There is nothing in bash history to suggest I did this - can/should it hap

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

a user sees this error because / is owned by the user rather than >> >> root. >> >> >> >> Lo and behold >> >> >> >> $ stat / >> >> >> >> shows this is what has somehow happened. >> >> >> >> $ s

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

old > >> > >> $ stat / > >> > >> shows this is what has somehow happened. > >> > >> $ sudo chown root:root / > >> > >> solves the disappearing /var/run/utmp problem (and fixes who/users) > >> > >> There is not

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

stemd-tmpfiles[1340]: Detected unsafe path >> transition / → /var during canonicalization of >> /var/log/journal/7f684579096949909ba2bfac31e8423e/sy> >> Jan 25 01:46:52 qwerty systemd-tmpfiles[1340]: Detected unsafe path >> transition / → /var during canonicalization of &

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

31e8423e/sy> > Jan 25 01:46:52 qwerty systemd[1]: Finished Create Volatile Files and > Directories. > > Googling "Detected unsafe path transition during canonicalization" led me to > > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=260924 > > where a user sees t

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

rty systemd[1]: Finished Create Volatile Files and Directories. Googling "Detected unsafe path transition during canonicalization" led me to https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=260924 where a user sees this error because / is owned by the user rather than root. Lo and behold

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 03:06:00AM +, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Tue 25 Jan 2022, at 03:02, Gareth Evans wrote: > > On Tue 25 Jan 2022, at 02:54, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> A google search led me to > >> which says that the /run/utmp file is supposed to

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

od 664 utmp >>> /var/run$ ls -l utmp >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 root utmp 0 Jan 25 00:08 utmp >>> /var/run$ who >>> /var/run$ >>> [logout, login] >>> /var/run$ ls -l /var/run/utmp >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 root utmp 384 Jan 25 00:17 /var/run/utmp >&

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

p 0 Jan 25 00:08 utmp >> /var/run$ who >> /var/run$ >> [logout, login] >> /var/run$ ls -l /var/run/utmp >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 root utmp 384 Jan 25 00:17 /var/run/utmp >> $ who >> user tty7 2022-01-25 00:17 (:0) >> $ sudo reboot >> ... &

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 01:31:35AM +, Gareth Evans wrote: > /var/run$ sudo touch utmp > /var/run$ sudo chown root:utmp utmp > /var/run$ sudo chmod 664 utmp > /var/run$ ls -l utmp > -rw-rw-r-- 1 root utmp 0 Jan 25 00:08 utmp > /var/run$ who > /var/run$ > [logout, login

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

On Tue 25 Jan 2022, at 01:31, Gareth Evans wrote: > On Mon 24 Jan 2022, at 12:45, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:51:05AM +, Gareth Evans wrote: >>> I've just noticed that: >>> >>> $ who >>> >>> and >>>

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

On Mon 24 Jan 2022, at 12:45, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:51:05AM +, Gareth Evans wrote: >> I've just noticed that: >> >> $ who >> >> and >> >> $ users >> >> both return nothing, with or without sudo. > &g

Re: Bullseye - who and users return nothing

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:51:05AM +, Gareth Evans wrote: > I've just noticed that: > > $ who > > and > > $ users > > both return nothing, with or without sudo. > Can anyone replicate this or suggest what may have happened? I'm fairly sure > I've use

Bullseye - who and users return nothing

Hello, I've just noticed that: $ who and $ users both return nothing, with or without sudo. $ sudo strace who access("/var/run/utmpx", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) openat(AT_FDCWD, "/var/run/utmp", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = -1 ENOENT (No suc

Re: Manners [ was Re: 'Hoping people won't *who-ha* too much']

You will have to ask an expert like Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside. The diagnosis came as acomplete surprise to me. I am beginning to think it was part of the "putting the boot" technique applied to users who do not fall into line and agree with certain views. The prevalance of ad hominem in some posts is worrying. -- Brian.

Re: Manners [ was Re: 'Hoping people won't *who-ha* too much']

On 8/7/21 7:57 PM, Brian wrote: advising someone to read a book on anatomy seems to be your style  : *ach, so schwere ist das leben* * * ** * rgds* *.* **

Re: Manners [ was Re: 'Hoping people won't *who-ha* too much']

On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 12:30:45 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > > > On 2021-08-07 12:11 p.m., Brian wrote: > > On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 10:13:15 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 2021-08-07 10:05 a.m., Brian wrote: > >>> On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at

Re: Manners [ was Re: 'Hoping people won't *who-ha* too much']

On 2021-08-07 12:11 p.m., Brian wrote: > On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 10:13:15 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 2021-08-07 10:05 a.m., Brian wrote: >>> On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 16:36:19 +0300, ellanios82 wrote: >>> : https://www.merriam-webster.com/ >>> >>>

Re: Manners [ was Re: 'Hoping people won't *who-ha* too much']

On 8/7/21 7:11 PM, Brian wrote: Having diagnosed my condition  : regrettably, my archive seems in state of a toxic-waste-dump  :((( .  -- a synopsis of your condition??  rgds .

Re: Manners [ was Re: 'Hoping people won't *who-ha* too much']

On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 10:13:15 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Hi, > > On 2021-08-07 10:05 a.m., Brian wrote: > > On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 16:36:19 +0300, ellanios82 wrote: > > > >> > >> : https://www.merriam-webster.com/ > > > > [Snipped] > > > > The point of your posting

Manners [ was Re: 'Hoping people won't *who-ha* too much']

Hi, On 2021-08-07 10:05 a.m., Brian wrote: > On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 16:36:19 +0300, ellanios82 wrote: > >> >> : https://www.merriam-webster.com/ > > [Snipped] > > The point of your posting appears to be to point out a user's > spelling mistake. Maybe he is grateful for the uinsolicited >

Re: 'Hoping people won't *who-ha* too much'

On Sat 07 Aug 2021 at 16:36:19 +0300, ellanios82 wrote: > > : https://www.merriam-webster.com/ [Snipped] The point of your posting appears to be to point out a user's spelling mistake. Maybe he is grateful for the uinsolicited advice but it is regarded as bad manners on this list. Please

'Hoping people won't *who-ha* too much'

: https://www.merriam-webster.com/ "variants: or less commonly hoo-hah Definition of hoo-ha informal : a state or condition of excitement, agitation, or disturbance : COMMOTION, UPROAR … she wore the jacket again … —wore it unapologetically knowing all the hoo-ha it had caused … — Vanessa

Re: how to record sound to mp3 [wav, for those who can]

On Thu 25 Mar 2021 at 23:22:35 (+0100), Nicolas George wrote: > David Wright (12021-03-25): > > > > $ arecord -d 10 -f cd -v -v -v -D plughw:0,0 /tmp/audiofile.wav > > > This command does not record the sound being played. > > … on your machine. > > On no machine, unless specifically configured,

Re: how to record sound to mp3 [wav, for those who can]

On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:47:28 +0100 Michael Lange wrote: > Plus, I don't know how to switch the OSS capture > device programmatically (if this is important for the OP's purpose). uh, got it. $ aumix -v R sets "Vol" as capture device. Regards Michael .-.. .. ...- . .-.. --- -. --. .- -.

Re: how to record sound to mp3 [wav, for those who can]

Hi, On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:38:02 +0100 wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:22:35PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > > David Wright (12021-03-25): > > > > > $ arecord -d 10 -f cd -v -v -v -D plughw:0,0 /tmp/audiofile.wav > > > > This command does not record the sound being played. > > > … on your

Re: how to record sound to mp3 [wav, for those who can]

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:22:35PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > David Wright (12021-03-25): > > > > $ arecord -d 10 -f cd -v -v -v -D plughw:0,0 /tmp/audiofile.wav > > > This command does not record the sound being played. > > … on your machine. > > On no machine, unless specifically

Re: how to record sound to mp3 [wav, for those who can]

David Wright writes: On Thu 25 Mar 2021 at 17:40:51 (+0100), Nicolas George wrote: > David Wright (12021-03-25): [...] > > To record, you could type, for example, in another xterm: > > > > $ arecord -d 10 -f cd -v -v -v -D plughw:0,0 /tmp/audiofile.wav > > This command does not record the

Re: how to record sound to mp3 [wav, for those who can]

David Wright (12021-03-25): > > > $ arecord -d 10 -f cd -v -v -v -D plughw:0,0 /tmp/audiofile.wav > > This command does not record the sound being played. > … on your machine. On no machine, unless specifically configured, which is not trivial at all. It would be helpful if people around here

Re: how to record sound to mp3 [wav, for those who can]

On Thu 25 Mar 2021 at 17:40:51 (+0100), Nicolas George wrote: > David Wright (12021-03-25): > > > now i modify my requirement to how to use arecord to record sound being > > > played to wav file > > > To record, you could type, for example, in another xterm: > > > > $ arecord -d 10 -f cd -v -v

RE: Discover who your competitors are - Vision Expo East 2021

Hey there, Hope you received my below email. Shall I send you count and cost for the list. Best Regards, Nora Lawrence-Marketing Executive From: Nora Lawrence Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 12:15 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Discover who your competitors are - Vision Expo East

Discover who your competitors are - Vision Expo East 2021

Hello, I'm writing to check if you would be interested in obtaining Vision Expo East 2021. We do have the pre registered attendees database. Visitors profile:- Optometrist, Buyer, Optician, Office/Practice Management and many others. It helps you with multi-channel marketing. that includes :

Re: who is tracking me?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, January 1, 2021 8:58 AM, Mike McClain wrote: > My old PIII died and I replaced it with a Raspberry PI running > the Raspbian derivative of Debian. > It's clear just from the cookies that PaleMoon

Re: who is tracking me?

Mike McClain wrote: > My old PIII died and I replaced it with a Raspberry PI running > the Raspbian derivative of Debian. > It's clear just from the cookies that PaleMoon browser and > Chromium call home every time they are used. > The number of other apps that are keeping history of

Re: who is tracking me?

I use the kernel packet filtering rules to examine outgoing packets' destinations. You can do this in real-time and block or rewrite outgoing packets if you wish. On Fri, Jan 1, 2021, 10:21 AM Mike McClain wrote: > My old PIII died and I replaced it with a Raspberry PI running > the

Re: who is tracking me?

0/ Dropping by Adobe, and then checking out who they associate with is interesting. Using duckduckgo for searching, rather than Google helps a lot. And installing NoScript works. Cheers! Harry. -- `We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is fals

who is tracking me?

My old PIII died and I replaced it with a Raspberry PI running the Raspbian derivative of Debian. It's clear just from the cookies that PaleMoon browser and Chromium call home every time they are used. The number of other apps that are keeping history of my usage/transactions that I

Re: Who installed package "foo"?

Nito wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:51:29 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: > > > or apt-cache rdepends foo > > > > I got the impression that it shows all possible reverse dependencies, > > not just those installed locally. > > It lists plenty of stuff which "dpkg

Re: Who installed package "foo"?

On 02/11/2020 12:31, Victor Sudakov wrote: David Wright wrote: On Mon 02 Nov 2020 at 09:52:53 (+0700), Victor Sudakov wrote: Dan Ritter wrote: When I want to figure out what package has installed package "foo" as a dependency, is there a less barbaric method than apt-get -s remove foo In

Re: Who installed package "foo"?

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:51:29 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: > > or apt-cache rdepends foo > > I got the impression that it shows all possible reverse dependencies, > not just those installed locally. apt-cache rdepends --installed foo will limit this to locally

Re: Who installed package "foo"?

David Wright wrote: > On Mon 02 Nov 2020 at 09:52:53 (+0700), Victor Sudakov wrote: > > Dan Ritter wrote: > > > > > > > > When I want to figure out what package has installed package "foo" as a > > > > dependency, is there a less barbaric method than > > > > > > > > apt-get -s remove foo > > >

Re: Who installed package "foo"?

On Mon 02 Nov 2020 at 09:52:53 (+0700), Victor Sudakov wrote: > Dan Ritter wrote: > > > > > > When I want to figure out what package has installed package "foo" as a > > > dependency, is there a less barbaric method than > > > > > > apt-get -s remove foo > > > > In addition to the other

Re: Who installed package "foo"?

Dan Ritter wrote: > > > > When I want to figure out what package has installed package "foo" as a > > dependency, is there a less barbaric method than > > > > apt-get -s remove foo > > In addition to the other answers I see, you probably have a > record of when it happened in

Re: Who installed package "foo"?

Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: > > > > > > When I want to figure out what package has installed package "foo" as a > > > dependency, is there a less barbaric method than > > > > > > apt-get -s remove foo > > > > > > ? > > or apt-cache rdepends foo I got the impression that it shows all possible

Re: Who installed package "foo"?

Andreas Ronnquist wrote: > >Dear Colleagues, > > > >When I want to figure out what package has installed package "foo" as a > >dependency, is there a less barbaric method than > > > >apt-get -s remove foo > > > >? > > > > There's > > aptitude why [package] > > which should do what you ask.

Re: Who installed package "foo"?

Victor Sudakov wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > When I want to figure out what package has installed package "foo" as a > dependency, is there a less barbaric method than > > apt-get -s remove foo In addition to the other answers I see, you probably have a record of when it happened in

Re: Who installed package "foo"?

Le 01/11/2020 à 13:35, Andreas Ronnquist a écrit : On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:59:16 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: Dear Colleagues, When I want to figure out what package has installed package "foo" as a dependency, is there a less barbaric method than apt-get -s remove foo ? There's aptitude

Re: Who installed package "foo"?

On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:59:16 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: >Dear Colleagues, > >When I want to figure out what package has installed package "foo" as a >dependency, is there a less barbaric method than > >apt-get -s remove foo > >? > There's aptitude why [package] which should do what you

Who installed package "foo"?

Dear Colleagues, When I want to figure out what package has installed package "foo" as a dependency, is there a less barbaric method than apt-get -s remove foo ? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: how to determine who is responsible for a file

Hi. On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 02:31:25PM +0100, gru...@mailfence.com wrote: > how can i find what package is responsible for installing a file. for example > /etc/ssh/sshd_config. apt-file returns nothng and dpkg -S returns > dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /etc/ssh/sshd_config.

how to determine who is responsible for a file

how can i find what package is responsible for installing a file. for example /etc/ssh/sshd_config. apt-file returns nothng and dpkg -S returns dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /etc/ssh/sshd_config. on another note, is there a mailing list just for the package manager?

Re: is there who's who for this list?

On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 11:18:56PM +, Long Wind wrote: > some celebrities: deloptes, Reco, Ben ... No, I don't think there's a "who's who" (and honestly, I like it that way -- remember that old saying "on the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog" [1]?) Cheers [1] h

Re: who is verifying proposed-updates ?

PS: Sorry for sending this thrice. I did not receive a copy due to some misconfiguration. Harri

who is verifying proposed-updates ?

Hi folks, how good is test coverage of proposed-updates? This repository is pretty much unknown (IMHO), so I wonder if there are numbers from the popularity contest? Regards Harri

who is verifying proposed-updates ?

Hi folks, how good is test coverage of proposed-updates? This repository is pretty much unknown (IMHO), so I wonder if there are numbers from the popularity contest? Regards Harri

who is verifying proposed-updates ?

Hi folks, how good is test coverage of proposed-updates? Its pretty unknown (IMHO), so I wonder if there are numbers from the popularity contest? Regards Harri

Re: Monitor process who is eat my entropy

Hello, Il 11/01/19 20:28, basti ha scritto: I have try lsof /dev/urandom without luck. I'm afraid /dev/urandom is not the only way to get random bytes from the kernel. Maybe the `top` command can help, it does not filter specifically by entropy usage, but processes that use a lot of

Re: Monitor process who is eat my entropy

Hello, On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:33:39PM +0300, Reco wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 08:28:18PM +0100, basti wrote: > > is there a way to monitor processes that access /dev/urandom > > auditctl -w /dev/urandom -r > > remove it with > > auditctl -D Note also that one should not really be

Re: Monitor process who is eat my entropy

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 08:28:18PM +0100, basti wrote: > Hello, > > is there a way to monitor processes that access /dev/urandom auditctl -w /dev/urandom -r remove it with auditctl -D > and show how may entropy the get? You'll probably need some advanced kernel-level tracing facility (such

Monitor process who is eat my entropy

Hello, is there a way to monitor processes that access /dev/urandom and show how may entropy the get? I have try lsof /dev/urandom without luck. Best regards,

141A318A:SSL routines:tls_process_ske_dhe:dh key too small - who is to blame?

it working. The one thing, I did not understand: If this error appears, who is to blame? Is this a problem by the server or is this caused by the provider, who still uses too small keys? Is there a way to avoid this problem, without editing the confoiguration? I am thinking of users, who

Re: thank you everyone who posts here :)

I find their Archives very helpful, especially with the Search option. Also, people here are friendly and helpful. Good luck! Kenneth Parker On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 6:47 AM songbird wrote: > it's a debian/linux play day for me and perhaps > i can figure out how to fix

thank you everyone who posts here :)

it's a debian/linux play day for me and perhaps i can figure out how to fix my issues. songbird

Re: The white man - Who he is. A Discussion

t; do, but when we are cut from those roots we feel adrift in this world. Like > this world is not our own. In the past many of us have been forcefully cut > from those roots through no fault of our own nor of our ancestors. > > To know why things are, you must know Who the peo

The white man -- Who he is

Truth about the white man: http://youtu.be/Foi_LbdMjXU I think all my fellow FLOSS programmers should take a moment to join the discussion, to take a good look at just WHO the white man is and how his essence negatively or positively affects the people of the world, and if any accord can

Re: Who is Bringing up My Wireless if?

On Friday, August 25, 2017 at 4:30:06 PM UTC-5, Zoltán Herman wrote: Hi Zoltán, Thank you for responding. > Hi, > do you use ebtables?  I had set up ebtables. I don't remember where or how. I had set some rules to support bridging. Maybe this is the interference? Where are these rules set

Re: Who is Bringing up My Wireless if?

Hi, do you use ebtables? You stopped the network managers? Greetings 2017. aug. 25. 18:06 ezt írta ("ray" ): > I am trying to bring up a bridge in Debian 9. I have an Ethernet > interface working. When I attempt to bring up a bridge, it won't come up. > Syslog shows that a

Who is Bringing up My Wireless if?

I am trying to bring up a bridge in Debian 9. I have an Ethernet interface working. When I attempt to bring up a bridge, it won't come up. Syslog shows that a wireless interfaces was trying to come up and the bridge failed to come up due to conflicts. I am familiar with the conflict so I

Re: Who changed

Hi, Johan DS wrote: > NAME       LINE         TIME             IDLE          PID COMMENT  EXIT Looks like the effect of "who" options -a and -H. I installed the newest coreutils on my Sid VM. Output looks still like on Jessie: user pts/02016-12-29 12:24 (10.0.2.2

Re: Who changed

On 2017-01-03 at 12:38, Johan DS wrote: > Hi > I use the who command in my .zlogin for counting how many times I'm logged > in. > who | awk '$1 == "'$USER'"' | wc -l > > previously the output was something like > user tty1 > user pts/2 > so user was 2 times

Who changed

Hi I use the who command in my .zlogin for counting how many times I'm logged in. who | awk '$1 == "'$USER'"' | wc -l previously the output was something like user tty1 user pts/2 so user was 2 times logged in However the who output seems to be changed in: NAME LINE

Re: w, who, finger, last, and netstat and ipv6

Hi Michael, On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 12:08:34AM +0100, Michael Grant wrote: > > > % who > > > mgrant pts/12016-07-18 06:15 (2a00:S.1) > > > > I type "who" on Debian jessie and I do get the full IPv6 address: > > > > $ who > > an

Re: w, who, finger, last, and netstat and ipv6

I just figured out what is going on. The problem is gnu screen. It's screen that's truncating the address. When login and don't reattach to my screen, I get the full address and "PROCPS_FROMLEN=40 w" prints the expected full address.

Re: w, who, finger, last, and netstat and ipv6

> > > > > % who > > mgrant pts/12016-07-18 06:15 (2a00:S.1) > > I type "who" on Debian jessie and I do get the full IPv6 address: > > $ who > andy pts/6 2016-07-23 01:42 (2001:ba8:1f1:f019::2) > $ who --version > who (GN

Re: w, who, finger, last, and netstat and ipv6

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 01:53:07AM +, Andy Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:57:32PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote: > > netstat does a little better still but not much: > > > > tcp6 0 2640 2600:3c00:::9:22 2a00:23c4:6d10:4d:36663 > > ESTABLISHED 12345/sshd: mgrant > >

Re: w, who, finger, last, and netstat and ipv6

Hi Michael, On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:57:32PM +0100, Michael Grant wrote: > Why is it w, who, and finger truncate an ipv6 address just after the first > 4 characters of the address (the first :)? It isn't a great answer but I'm guessing the honest one is that it's because they come from

w, who, finger, last, and netstat and ipv6

Why is it w, who, and finger truncate an ipv6 address just after the first 4 characters of the address (the first :)? % who mgrant pts/12016-07-18 06:15 (2a00:S.1) % w 18:37:31 up 4 days, 12:26, 4 users, load average: 0.05, 0.07, 0.05 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >