bad fstab entry prevents ssh from starting [where do i file a bugreport?]
Hi. https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting told me this is the best place to ask if i am not sure which package causes the problem. The problem: if one entry in fstab fails, ssh fails to start and the vps/bare metal needs rescue. What causes this ? I suspect it's some systemd dependency, that's why I am asking here. my specific case: one md array failed to mount. the mountpoint was not vital to ssh functionality. in fact, it had nothing to do with it at all. / mounts perfectly fine. details: debian 10, standard cli install, not sure what else is needed.
Re: Messed up Email
On 2021-06-22 05:47, mick crane wrote: On 2021-06-22 00:22, Gary L. Roach wrote: Hi all, Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 10 KDE Plasma Version: 5.14.5 Qt Version: 5.11.3 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.54.0 Kernel Version: 4.19.0-16-amd64 OS Type: 64-bit Processors: 4 × AMD FX(tm)-4350 Quad-Core Processor Memory: 15.6 GiB of RAM Thunderbird 78.10.0(64bit) For some years, I have been using Thunderbird on Debian with no problems. Over a year ago I switched to gmail.com (Imap server) for my mail server. Everything went fine until about 6 months ago . All of a sudden I had an All-Mail folder that wasn't there before. Since then all of my Emails are bypassing my InBox and my filters. I decided to sort out the All-Mail by creating a new set of filters and running them on the All-Mail box. I completely cleaned out all 4000 or so Emails. As soon as I restarted Thunderbird all of the old Emails were downloaded from the web and re-filled the All-Mail box. Nothing in the InBox. In addition, I now have multiple copies of the same messages in all of my local folders. In short I have a real mess on my hands. I have seen various solutions on the web but none seem to work. I also noted that pop servers, unlike imap servers, store all of the files on the local computer. Could switching to pop solve this problem? Are there any other solutions? Please help. Gary R. I collect from gmail with getmail simpleIMAP asking please don't keep. Mails are removed from gmail INBOX but are kept in ALL MAIL. I've given up trying to make sense of it and periodically go on the gmail web interface, delete spam, delete from ALL MAIL and then delete again from BIN. It's a free service and the payment is they get to trawl your messages so it's understandable. PS. I think the way Gmail works is gmail specific where messages are not moved to a directory but are files that are tagged in some way so they are never really moved anywhere. -- Key ID4BFEBB31
Re: Messed up Email
On 2021-06-22 00:22, Gary L. Roach wrote: Hi all, Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 10 KDE Plasma Version: 5.14.5 Qt Version: 5.11.3 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.54.0 Kernel Version: 4.19.0-16-amd64 OS Type: 64-bit Processors: 4 × AMD FX(tm)-4350 Quad-Core Processor Memory: 15.6 GiB of RAM Thunderbird 78.10.0(64bit) For some years, I have been using Thunderbird on Debian with no problems. Over a year ago I switched to gmail.com (Imap server) for my mail server. Everything went fine until about 6 months ago . All of a sudden I had an All-Mail folder that wasn't there before. Since then all of my Emails are bypassing my InBox and my filters. I decided to sort out the All-Mail by creating a new set of filters and running them on the All-Mail box. I completely cleaned out all 4000 or so Emails. As soon as I restarted Thunderbird all of the old Emails were downloaded from the web and re-filled the All-Mail box. Nothing in the InBox. In addition, I now have multiple copies of the same messages in all of my local folders. In short I have a real mess on my hands. I have seen various solutions on the web but none seem to work. I also noted that pop servers, unlike imap servers, store all of the files on the local computer. Could switching to pop solve this problem? Are there any other solutions? Please help. Gary R. I collect from gmail with getmail simpleIMAP asking please don't keep. Mails are removed from gmail INBOX but are kept in ALL MAIL. I've given up trying to make sense of it and periodically go on the gmail web interface, delete spam, delete from ALL MAIL and then delete again from BIN. It's a free service and the payment is they get to trawl your messages so it's understandable. mick -- Key ID4BFEBB31
Re: Messed up Email
On 6/21/2021 6:22 PM, Gary L. Roach wrote: Hi all, Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 10 KDE Plasma Version: 5.14.5 Qt Version: 5.11.3 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.54.0 Kernel Version: 4.19.0-16-amd64 OS Type: 64-bit Processors: 4 × AMD FX(tm)-4350 Quad-Core Processor Memory: 15.6 GiB of RAM Thunderbird 78.10.0(64bit) For some years, I have been using Thunderbird on Debian with no problems. Over a year ago I switched to gmail.com (Imap server) for my mail server. Everything went fine until about 6 months ago . All of a sudden I had an All-Mail folder that wasn't there before. Since then all of my Emails are bypassing my InBox and my filters. I decided to sort out the All-Mail by creating a new set of filters and running them on the All-Mail box. I completely cleaned out all 4000 or so Emails. As soon as I restarted Thunderbird all of the old Emails were downloaded from the web and re-filled the All-Mail box. Nothing in the InBox. In addition, I now have multiple copies of the same messages in all of my local folders. In short I have a real mess on my hands. I have seen various solutions on the web but none seem to work. I also noted that pop servers, unlike imap servers, store all of the files on the local computer. Could switching to pop solve this problem? Are there any other solutions? Please help. Gary R. Check your server account (you may need to log in to webmail). Chances are, the ISP/mail provider added a new folder that behaves that way. Using filters on the server rather than locally might help, and as you surmised, trying POP may help. It's a feature of IMAP to keep your mail locally matching the server. Perhaps some configuration details could be changed. Mark A.
Re: A feasible method to add examples to man pages?
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:50:22PM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Mon 21 Jun 2021 at 15:25:53 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > On 06/21/2021 02:36 PM, Curt wrote: > > > curl https://cht.sh/:cht.sh > ~/bin/cht.sh > > > chmod +x ~/bin/cht.sh > > > cht.sh --standalone-install > > > > I don't understand what those 3 lines are attempting to do. > > What should I be reading? > > curl(1) > bash(1) (Redirection) > chmod(1) > less ~/bin/cht.sh Just for the record, there should be a mkdir -p ~/bin in there as well. And one might need to log out and back in to get ~/bin into one's PATH, depending on how one's dot files are set up. (Manual modification of PATH is also acceptable.)
Messed up Email
Hi all, Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 10 KDE Plasma Version: 5.14.5 Qt Version: 5.11.3 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.54.0 Kernel Version: 4.19.0-16-amd64 OS Type: 64-bit Processors: 4 × AMD FX(tm)-4350 Quad-Core Processor Memory: 15.6 GiB of RAM Thunderbird 78.10.0(64bit) For some years, I have been using Thunderbird on Debian with no problems. Over a year ago I switched to gmail.com (Imap server) for my mail server. Everything went fine until about 6 months ago . All of a sudden I had an All-Mail folder that wasn't there before. Since then all of my Emails are bypassing my InBox and my filters. I decided to sort out the All-Mail by creating a new set of filters and running them on the All-Mail box. I completely cleaned out all 4000 or so Emails. As soon as I restarted Thunderbird all of the old Emails were downloaded from the web and re-filled the All-Mail box. Nothing in the InBox. In addition, I now have multiple copies of the same messages in all of my local folders. In short I have a real mess on my hands. I have seen various solutions on the web but none seem to work. I also noted that pop servers, unlike imap servers, store all of the files on the local computer. Could switching to pop solve this problem? Are there any other solutions? Please help. Gary R.
Re: A feasible method to add examples to man pages?
On Mon 21 Jun 2021 at 15:25:53 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 06/21/2021 02:36 PM, Curt wrote: > > On 2021-06-21, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > > Many see the need for examples to be associated with man pages. > > > [...] > > > > Would it be proper/reasonable/practical/??? to add an entry of the form > > > > https://cht.sh/XXX ? > > > > > > I think it can make sense for manpages to include a link to some further > > > doc in the form of a wiki or some other webpage, but I often enough find > > > myself using `man` while trying to fix a system's network or X11/Wayland > > > config, which makes it either impossible to access the Internet at that > > > moment, or painful to browse a webpage. > > > > curl https://cht.sh/:cht.sh > ~/bin/cht.sh > > chmod +x ~/bin/cht.sh > > cht.sh --standalone-install > > > > I don't understand what those 3 lines are attempting to do. > What should I be reading? curl(1) bash(1) (Redirection) chmod(1) less ~/bin/cht.sh -- Brian.
Re: Problem with Grub
On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 10:19:57 -0600 William Lee Valentine wrote: > > I later installed Debian 10.2 in a partition on a 64-bit computer that > was otherwise running Windows 10. > > When I had finished installing Linux, Grub wanted to know whether I > wanted it installed on the master boot record. It reported seeing > "Windows Vista" in another bootable partition. I agreed. This time, > however, Grub modified the master boot record to allow only Linux to > be booted. I had to pay to have Windows 10 reinstalled. > Apart from other answers to this, anything with Win10 originally installed (and you don't say this, it might be an upgrade, perhaps from Vista) will have a recovery partition which can be triggered from a key during boot. OK, it completely nukes the original installation, returning the computer to factory-issued, but it costs nothing. Another point: buster will install dual-boot to a UEFI Win10, but on my netbook, will not dual-boot afterwards. It may still be possible to dual-boot using the startup boot menu key, not GRUB, though it isn't on my machine. -- Joe
how to let user access cell phone
i use jmtpfs to mount cell phone, only root user can access phone's memoryhow to let other user to access it ?Thanks!
Re: A feasible method to add examples to man pages?
On 06/21/2021 02:36 PM, Curt wrote: On 2021-06-21, Stefan Monnier wrote: Many see the need for examples to be associated with man pages. [...] Would it be proper/reasonable/practical/??? to add an entry of the form https://cht.sh/XXX ? I think it can make sense for manpages to include a link to some further doc in the form of a wiki or some other webpage, but I often enough find myself using `man` while trying to fix a system's network or X11/Wayland config, which makes it either impossible to access the Internet at that moment, or painful to browse a webpage. curl https://cht.sh/:cht.sh > ~/bin/cht.sh chmod +x ~/bin/cht.sh cht.sh --standalone-install I don't understand what those 3 lines are attempting to do. What should I be reading? TIA
Re: A feasible method to add examples to man pages?
> Many see the need for examples to be associated with man pages. [...] > Would it be proper/reasonable/practical/??? to add an entry of the form > https://cht.sh/XXX ? I think it can make sense for manpages to include a link to some further doc in the form of a wiki or some other webpage, but I often enough find myself using `man` while trying to fix a system's network or X11/Wayland config, which makes it either impossible to access the Internet at that moment, or painful to browse a webpage. Stefan
Re: A feasible method to add examples to man pages?
On 2021-06-21, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Many see the need for examples to be associated with man pages. > [...] >> Would it be proper/reasonable/practical/??? to add an entry of the form >> https://cht.sh/XXX ? > > I think it can make sense for manpages to include a link to some further > doc in the form of a wiki or some other webpage, but I often enough find > myself using `man` while trying to fix a system's network or X11/Wayland > config, which makes it either impossible to access the Internet at that > moment, or painful to browse a webpage. curl https://cht.sh/:cht.sh > ~/bin/cht.sh chmod +x ~/bin/cht.sh cht.sh --standalone-install > > Stefan
Re: Hi there, test only, please ignore
Hi, On 2021-06-21 3:31 p.m., David Wright wrote: > On Thu 17 Jun 2021 at 09:54:44 (-0700), James H. H. Lampert wrote: >> On 6/17/21 1:25 AM, Grzesiek wrote: >>> test >> >> I got your test message. As it happens, we just went live with DMARC, >> and have reason to do some testing ourselves. > > I need to do some testing too. For 10 months I haven't been able to > submit via my email hosting server, and since Saturday I can't submit > via my ISP. Just this email list. > Only this list sends me a huge amount of error regarding DMARC but no other email server does ! > Cheers, > David. > -- Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Hi there, test only, please ignore
On Thu 17 Jun 2021 at 09:54:44 (-0700), James H. H. Lampert wrote: > On 6/17/21 1:25 AM, Grzesiek wrote: > > test > > I got your test message. As it happens, we just went live with DMARC, > and have reason to do some testing ourselves. I need to do some testing too. For 10 months I haven't been able to submit via my email hosting server, and since Saturday I can't submit via my ISP. Just this email list. Cheers, David.
Re: A feasible method to add examples to man pages?
On 21.06.21 17:29, Richard Owlett wrote: Many see the need for examples to be associated with man pages. Sometime back a post mentioned a web page that could return examples for most(all??) Linux commands. I failed to bookmark it and have not rediscovered it since. In another forum I was pointed to https://cht.sh/ . Going to https://cht.sh/XXX will return a list of examples for XXX. Along the right side of each page of /manpages.debian.org/... there is a list of links to various topics. Would it be proper/reasonable/practical/??? to add an entry of the form https://cht.sh/XXX ? Comments? TIA For displaying examples I am using the tldr command provided by package "tldr". This client's web page is here: https://github.com/psibi/tldr-hs#readme The general tldr site is here: https://tldr.sh/ There are also several web pages which search and display the information from the tldr examples collection, like this one: https://tldr.ostera.io/ The project invites to participate by adding examples to its collection. Following for years the upcoming discussions about the wish to enhance man pages by adding examples to it but confronting the situation that man pages are usually maintained by the package maintainers and not all of them are in favor of adding examples to the man pages, I think that the normal users are best served by supporting as a community an examples collection like the above mentioned tldr project. Just my view as a user. Marco.
Re: A feasible method to add examples to man pages?
On 06/21/2021 11:49 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote: * On 2021 21 Jun 10:30 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: Many see the need for examples to be associated with man pages. My name is among the authors of a few man pages found in the Debian archive with regard to some software used primarily by radio amateurs. Part of the issue is how many examples are enough and how many are too much. I landed at the point of providing enough for the curious to get a sense of the options and how to provide them for programs. Mostly this was aimed at those more familiar with GUI programs not programs that take command line options. Manual pages that focus on library API calls have yet another challenge for providing examples. The Linux Man Pages Project seems to do a good job in sections 2 (system calls) and 3 (C library calls) with concise and useful examples and should probably serve as an example for other authors to follow, IMO. Sometime back a post mentioned a web page that could return examples for most(all??) Linux commands. I failed to bookmark it and have not rediscovered it since. That may have been me. Here is an example: $ curl cheat.sh/curl The cheat.sh site is not mine and I have no relation to it. In another forum I was pointed to https://cht.sh/ . Going to https://cht.sh/XXX will return a list of examples for XXX. It is the same site only through the Web interface. IIRC the page I saw was neither chat.sh nor cht.sh . Right now both seem to have long response times. I may have local hardware issues as some purely local operations have strange delays. Along the right side of each page of /manpages.debian.org/... there is a list of links to various topics. Would it be proper/reasonable/practical/??? to add an entry of the form https://cht.sh/XXX ? That question would be better posed to the Debian Web site team than here. I asked here as the subject had been raised here and I wanted feed back from people had raised the issue. As to discussing its implementation I was leaning to raising it on debian-doc rather than debian-www.
Re: A feasible method to add examples to man pages?
* On 2021 21 Jun 10:30 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > Many see the need for examples to be associated with man pages. My name is among the authors of a few man pages found in the Debian archive with regard to some software used primarily by radio amateurs. Part of the issue is how many examples are enough and how many are too much. I landed at the point of providing enough for the curious to get a sense of the options and how to provide them for programs. Mostly this was aimed at those more familiar with GUI programs not programs that take command line options. Manual pages that focus on library API calls have yet another challenge for providing examples. The Linux Man Pages Project seems to do a good job in sections 2 (system calls) and 3 (C library calls) with concise and useful examples and should probably serve as an example for other authors to follow, IMO. > Sometime back a post mentioned a web page that could return examples for > most(all??) Linux commands. I failed to bookmark it and have not > rediscovered it since. That may have been me. Here is an example: $ curl cheat.sh/curl The cheat.sh site is not mine and I have no relation to it. > In another forum I was pointed to https://cht.sh/ . > Going to https://cht.sh/XXX will return a list of examples for XXX. It is the same site only through the Web interface. > Along the right side of each page of /manpages.debian.org/... there is a > list of links to various topics. > > Would it be proper/reasonable/practical/??? to add an entry of the form > https://cht.sh/XXX ? That question would be better posed to the Debian Web site team than here. - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Web: https://www.n0nb.us Projects: https://github.com/N0NB GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Debain 11 Release Candidate - Screen Freeze (NVidia)
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 07:48:00PM +0200, Spongebob Schwammkopf wrote: > Dear Support Team, > > as soon as I manually switch off my 4K LG OLED 48C1 Monitor (HDMI) > connected to my NVidia GTX 1650 grafics card and on again the screen is > frozen. This means no mouse or keyboard is working. Also a console terminal > is frozen but a running compilation seems to still process in background. > > The actual NVidia driver is the 460.73.01 and was installed per > > apt-get install firmware-linux nvidia-driver nvidia-detect nvidia-settings > nvidia-xconfig > nvidia-xconfig > > What looks a bit strange but maybe could be normal is the fact that none of > the following services is installed nor could be enabled: > > sudo systemctl enable nvidia-suspend.service > sudo systemctl enable nvidia-hibernate.service > sudo systemctl enable nvidia-resume.service > > Any solutions for this problem? > > Best regards A really stupid question: have you tried resetting the LG screen to defaults? If the screen is intelligent, it may have its own power saver configuration. What connection are you using to the 4k monitor? Display port / USB-C? Do you have another monitor to check whether the situation is the same and to clarify whether it is the card sending a signal? Anything in event logs? The more information you can give, the better here: we almost certainly won't have your hardware but might spot something given more information. With every good wish Andrew Cater
Re: A feasible method to add examples to man pages?
On 06/21/2021 10:29 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: Many see the need for examples to be associated with man pages. Sometime back a post mentioned a web page that could return examples for most(all??) Linux commands. I failed to bookmark it and have not rediscovered it since. In another forum I was pointed to https://cht.sh/ . Going to https://cht.sh/XXX will return a list of examples for XXX. Along the right side of each page of /manpages.debian.org/... there is a list of links to various topics. Would it be proper/reasonable/practical/??? to add an entry of the form https://cht.sh/XXX ? Comments? TIA I just checked. That page does not explicitly address Greg Wooledge's comment[1] in another thread about handling one command with conflicting implementations. [e.g. "parallel"] [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/06/msg00496.html
A feasible method to add examples to man pages?
Many see the need for examples to be associated with man pages. Sometime back a post mentioned a web page that could return examples for most(all??) Linux commands. I failed to bookmark it and have not rediscovered it since. In another forum I was pointed to https://cht.sh/ . Going to https://cht.sh/XXX will return a list of examples for XXX. Along the right side of each page of /manpages.debian.org/... there is a list of links to various topics. Would it be proper/reasonable/practical/??? to add an entry of the form https://cht.sh/XXX ? Comments? TIA
Re: debian installation issue
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 12:54:31PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > [ Apologies, missed this last week... ] No need to apologise: I appreciate the detailed answer. > > - do you know any other alternative CA besides Microsoft [...] > I've been in a number of discussions about this over the last few > years, particularly when talking about adding arm64 Secure Boot and > *maybe* finding somebody else to act as CA for that. There's a few > important (but probably not well-understood) aspect ofs the CA role > here: > > * the entity providing the CA needs to be stable (changing things is >expensive and hard) > * they need to be trustworthy - having an existing long-term business >relationship with the OEMs is a major feature here > * they need to be *large* - if there is a major mistake that might >cause a problem on a lot of machines in production, the potential >cost liability (and lawsuits) from OEMs is *huge* This makes sense. It still feels... weird to have one company do it who has a bone to pick in the market. Watching Oracle/Java doesn't give me good feelings about that. It is even much more fundamental, because it's more or less all of the "general purpose computing devices" we are talking about here. > There are not many companies who would fit here. Intel and AMD are > both very interested in enhancing trust and security at this kind of > level, but have competing products and ideas, for example. That's why I think this shouldn't be done by "a company", but by a non-profit industry consortium, of which there are enough examples around. > > - is there any internationally legal binding of Microsoft for > > them to provide that service in the future, in a fair and non > > discriminatory way? > > That is a question I *can't* answer as I've not seen anything > personally. But I would be shocked if agreements like that have not > been made with various vendors. This can cut both ways. Vendors have interests (and be it that other competing vendors be kept out of the market). If things don't happen transparently... > Having worked with Microsoft and a number of representatives from the > Linux distros, I *can* confirm that Microsoft care about Linux and SB > working well. Hell, they're even using SB (shim, etc.) themselves for > their own small Linux distro. That's not a *guarantee* of future > goodwill, but they're not about to break things here on a whim. Winds change. The above example of Oracle/Java (as that horrible SCO saga, remember?) should teach people some care... Colour me... sceptical. Cheers - t signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: debian installation issue
[ Apologies, missed this last week... ] to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 09:20:52AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: >> On Vi, 11 iun 21, 15:07:11, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> > >> > Secure Boot (Microsoft's attempt to stop you from using Linux) relies on >> > UEFI booting, and therefore this was one of the driving forces behind it, >> > but not the *only* driving force. If your machine doesn't use Secure Boot, >> > don't worry about it. It won't affect you. >> >> While I'm not a fan of Microsoft: >> >> https://wiki.debian.org/SecureBoot#What_is_UEFI_Secure_Boot_NOT.3F > >Quoting from there: > > "Microsoft act as a Certification Authority (CA) for SB, and they will > sign programs on behalf of other trusted organisations so that their > programs will also run." > >Now two questions: > > - do you know any other alternative CA besides Microsoft who is > capable of effectively doing this? In a way that it'd "work" > with most PC vendors? I've been in a number of discussions about this over the last few years, particularly when talking about adding arm64 Secure Boot and *maybe* finding somebody else to act as CA for that. There's a few important (but probably not well-understood) aspect ofs the CA role here: * the entity providing the CA needs to be stable (changing things is expensive and hard) * they need to be trustworthy - having an existing long-term business relationship with the OEMs is a major feature here * they need to be *large* - if there is a major mistake that might cause a problem on a lot of machines in production, the potential cost liability (and lawsuits) from OEMs is *huge* There are not many companies who would fit here. Intel and AMD are both very interested in enhancing trust and security at this kind of level, but have competing products and ideas, for example. > - is there any internationally legal binding of Microsoft for > them to provide that service in the future, in a fair and non > discriminatory way? That is a question I *can't* answer as I've not seen anything personally. But I would be shocked if agreements like that have not been made with various vendors. Having worked with Microsoft and a number of representatives from the Linux distros, I *can* confirm that Microsoft care about Linux and SB working well. Hell, they're even using SB (shim, etc.) themselves for their own small Linux distro. That's not a *guarantee* of future goodwill, but they're not about to break things here on a whim. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "We're the technical experts. We were hired so that management could ignore our recommendations and tell us how to do our jobs." -- Mike Andrews
Re: A Proposal: Each of Online Debian Man pages could have a wiki (Main page / Talk Page, etc.) at its bottom, with only Example Code Lines ...
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:57:13AM +0530, Susmita/Rajib wrote: > This post is to check if I am Blocked from the List. Nobody ever suggested "blocking" you. Who could even do that? You'd have to violate the list's policy in some egregious way, such as sending commercial spam, to get the attention of the list administrators. YOU, on the other hand, have accosted at least two people and asked them to stop posting in threads that you had started. At this point, if you expect anyone to engage with you, you need to stop repeating yourself and spewing invective. Instead, focus on the tasks that people have asked you to do. Show us an example of the work that you propose to do. Create a page on the Debian wiki containing additional EXAMPLES for some man page that you consider to be in need of this enhancement. This means you will need to work out how you plan to manage the page namespace. For example, are you going to differentiate between different releases (buster/ls.1 bullseye/ls.1 and so on)? How about alternative implementations of the same command across different packages within the same release? For example, consider: https://manpages.debian.org/buster/moreutils/parallel.1.en.html https://manpages.debian.org/buster/parallel/parallel.1.en.html Two implementations of the parallel(1) command, from two separate sources. Very different. How do you plan to handle this situation? Once you've written up new EXAMPLES for a few man pages to get the ball rolling, it's possible that you'll find other people interested enough to help you out. But until then, I doubt anyone's going to step up and do your work for you.
Re: apt-key says deprecated, but not saying what else to use
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:21:52AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: This is ssh key management, not apt key management. apt key things are for trusting package repositories. ... Here's what you should do: Kindly change the Subject: when you change the subject. -- Please do not CC me for listmail. 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland ✎j...@debian.org 🔗 https://jmtd.net
