On 7/22/2012 11:09 AM, lina wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
On Sun 22 Jul 2012 at 22:01:50 +0800, lina wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote:
Heaven above knows why you need a firewall. These services are quite
On 7/22/2012 11:19 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:58:36 +0200
Erwan David er...@rail.eu.org wrote:
However, I have noticed a tendency for things to be installed or
started that open new ports, and it's easy to overlook them. Aptitude
in particular will install extra packages that
On 7/25/2012 1:17 PM, cortman wrote:
Hi all,
I have a brand new installation of Debian Wheezy, updated to the
current weekly build installed on my Toshiba A505 laptop. I chose to
install the graphical desktop environment, laptop uitilites, and
standard system utilities at tasksel during
On 7/25/2012 3:37 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Mark Allums wrote:
cortman wrote:
Is this a bug?
No, it's dependency hell.
No. Dependency Hell[1] would require a rigidity of dependencies that
are difficult to resolve. These resolve fine. And as is they are not
causing any problems. It is just
On 7/25/2012 7:53 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
I recall an incident where I wanted to remove some cruft
(can't recall, but it was something silly, like AMOR) and apt wanted
to remove 3/4 of the packages on my system, over 700 packages.
Next time you hit a case like that it would be great if you
On 7/26/2012 3:32 PM, ricccardo wrote:
Hi, I recently updated from squeeze to wheezy and I notice some problem
with synaptic. In particular:
ric@ricmbp:~$ sudo synaptic
synaptic: error while loading shared libraries: libapt-pkg.so.4.10:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
On 7/26/2012 6:05 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 7/26/2012 3:32 PM, ricccardo wrote:
Hi, I recently updated from squeeze to wheezy and I notice some problem
with synaptic. In particular:
ric@ricmbp:~$ sudo synaptic
synaptic: error while loading shared libraries: libapt-pkg.so.4.10:
cannot open
On 7/26/2012 9:37 PM, Carl Fink wrote:
I report a problem I experienced.
I have a homebrew tower built around the AMD FX-8120 running Wheezy. 16 GB
of RAM, an 80 GB SSD for the OS and a 2 TB spinning disk drive for data.
Today I had a 30 minute Skype call. (2.2 client) After I hung up, I
On 7/27/2012 2:40 PM, ricccardo wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 18:18 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
On 7/26/2012 6:05 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 7/26/2012 3:32 PM, ricccardo wrote:
Hi, I recently updated from squeeze to wheezy and I notice some problem
with synaptic. In particular:
ric@ricmbp
On 7/29/2012 8:27 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Brian wrote:
used. But if it can be demonstrated that a twenty character password can
be forced in a time-frame which makes sense I'll stop doing it and most
On (exceedingly) rare occasions, it does happen that the
On 8/8/2012 8:25 AM, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
Hi.
I'm going to configure Debian GNU/Linux with software RAID 1 and I think
to put swap area on RAID 1 (/dev/mdX), but someone told me that if the
computer have multiple swap partition (e.g. /dev/sda2, /dev/sdb2) with
equal priorities, linux kernel
On 8/9/2012 11:09 AM, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 04:58:55PM +0100, Laurence Hurst wrote:
On 09/08/2012 16:50, Darac Marjal wrote:
Fair point. However, comparing[3] popcon results for xfce4-session[1] and
gnome-session[2], less than 4% of debian users use[4] xfce, compared to a
On 9/1/2012 3:17 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Can squeeze boot when / is on an LVM over RAID1?
Can it boot if /boot is on the LVM over RAID1?
Or when /boot is on a nonRAID nonLVM partition but / is on an LVM over
RAID?
Context: I have to remove the hard drive my / is on. The available
space to
On 9/1/2012 3:17 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Can squeeze boot when / is on an LVM over RAID1?
Can it boot if /boot is on the LVM over RAID1?
Or when /boot is on a nonRAID nonLVM partition but / is on an LVM over
RAID?
Context: I have to remove the hard drive my / is on. The available
space to
On 9/1/2012 4:46 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 16:02:54 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/1/2012 3:17 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Can squeeze boot when / is on an LVM over RAID1?
Can it boot if /boot is on the LVM over RAID1?
Or when /boot is on a nonRAID nonLVM partition
On 9/1/2012 4:58 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/1/2012 4:46 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 16:02:54 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/1/2012 3:17 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Can squeeze boot when / is on an LVM over RAID1?
Can it boot if /boot is on the LVM over RAID1?
Or when /boot
Is this normal behavior?
Is this relevant?: I'm running the 3.5-trunk kernel from experimental.
Running it on assorted VMs with no problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 9/1/2012 10:12 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:18:33 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
I would add that Squeeze probably does not write the MBR to all disks at
install time if installed using the default automated install, but with
an expert install (that you are already using since
, Sep 1, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
On 9/1/2012 4:46 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Thanks. Will try it in the next few days. Will also install grub to
the MBR of all my disks, so whichever gets picked at boot time will
work.
Is there an eaasy way to do this, so that they'll
On 9/1/2012 9:51 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:42:45 -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com
wrote:
Can squeeze boot when / is on an LVM over RAID1?
Can it boot
On 9/2/2012 12:03 AM, T o n g wrote:
Hi,
I created my VirtualBox VM using the script from
http://www.halfdog.net/Misc/TipsAndTricks/VirtualBox.html
in which it adds USB support like this:
# Add usb if needed
vboxmanage modifyvm ${_setup_vboxName} --usb on --usbehci on
However, when I
On 9/2/2012 12:44 AM, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com writes:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
(...)
According to aptitude, alsa-base
On 9/2/2012 8:46 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 19:59:08 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Re: Why is Nautilus using 38% CPU?
Is this normal behavior?
You mean while system is idle? And it happens continously?
Yes, exactly.
I have a fairly beefy system, so it should be 1% I would
On 9/2/2012 11:24 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:04:14 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/2/2012 8:46 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 19:59:08 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Re: Why is Nautilus using 38% CPU?
Is this normal behavior?
You mean while system is idle
On 9/2/2012 11:49 AM, John Hasler wrote:
The Wanderer writes:
Thus, the newest packages are always in sid. (Or, in some cases,
possibly in experimental; I've never quite gotten the exact function
of experimental figured out.)
The function of Experimental is experimentation. Packages uploaded
On 9/2/2012 11:54 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/2/2012 11:24 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:04:14 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/2/2012 8:46 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 19:59:08 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Re: Why is Nautilus using 38% CPU?
Is this normal behavior
On 9/2/2012 12:23 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:54:48 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/2/2012 11:24 AM, Camaleón wrote:
You mean while system is idle? And it happens continously?
Yes, exactly.
I have a fairly beefy system, so it should be 1% I would think.
YOu can create
On 9/2/2012 12:39 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/2/2012 12:23 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:54:48 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/2/2012 11:24 AM, Camaleón wrote:
You mean while system is idle? And it happens continously?
Yes, exactly.
I have a fairly beefy system, so it should
On 9/2/2012 12:39 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/2/2012 12:23 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:54:48 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/2/2012 11:24 AM, Camaleón wrote:
You mean while system is idle? And it happens continously?
Yes, exactly.
I have a fairly beefy system, so it should
On 9/2/2012 1:25 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 14:03 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
Based on the various Google results, I am thinking that Nautilus has a
serious set of bugs. It uses 1G of memory, which is horrendous, but
another 22G become unavailable, form memleaks or
I noticed that tracker is doing a lot . How important is it? Is it
inadvisable to disable it?
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 9/2/2012 2:29 PM, lee wrote:
Mark Allums m...@allums.com writes:
I am going to temporarily retreat to another window manager and
desktop for a while, and see if this bug gets fixed.
Fvwm-crystal is awesome.
You have icons on the desktop background? The windows cover them all the
time
In an effort to improve system stability without completely
reinstalling, how would someone pick and choose things to trim or remove
from a Desktop/Workstation? My favorite and main Linux/Debian machine
is flaky right now, and I don't want to commit the time and mental
effort to completely
On 9/3/2012 5:06 PM, Gaël DONVAL wrote:
Le dimanche 02 septembre 2012 à 12:28 -0500, Mark Allums a écrit :
I noticed a low-grade but continuous disk activity.
Check with atop or another tool like that. The two main culprits for
completely unknown and continuous IO transfers are tracker-miner
On 9/4/2012 2:48 PM, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 03:23:21PM -0700, Weaver wrote:
I find the packages 'cruft' and 'deborphan' work fairly well together.
I find Bleachbit to be a little too militant.
All of the above will find packages that are not being used. But, packages that
On 9/12/2012 6:44 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 05:26:09PM +0200, lee wrote:
Are you saying it's not possible to say that the administrator
installed disapproved software because disapproved cannot be used as
an adjective?
Yes
I would say, in American English* the
On 9/14/2012 3:22 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Vi, 14 sep 12, 17:22:36, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Which probably means building a new file system and copying all the
files. Even if it's possible to upgrade in place, it would probably
mean preserving the existing low-level structure, like 512-byte
On 9/15/2012 11:48 PM, lee wrote:
Peter Viskup skupko...@gmail.com writes:
there is something like HTML5 already out.
Try to have a look on http://www.youtube.com/html5 and then search for
HTML5 support for your favorite browser and you will get an answer.
Hmmm. They are saying I'm
On 9/15/2012 11:48 PM, lee wrote:
How do I get h.264 support in seamonkey?
It will probably happen eventually, but h.264 has patents, so it may not
happen soon. You can always add it yourself through a plugin. But you
may have to *write* the plugin yourself, and it may not be legal in some
On 9/16/2012 2:22 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/15/2012 11:48 PM, lee wrote:
Hmmm. They are saying I'm participating in a test and seamonkey
supports Video-Tag and WebM (whatever that is) and doesn't support
h.264. They are saying chromium supports all of it.
How do I get h.264 support
On 9/18/2012 4:46 PM, lee wrote:
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com writes:
On Ma, 18 sep 12, 19:24:45, lee wrote:
2) Is msdos a valid option to choose for this hard drive?
Is msdos a useful partition type for you? Try Linux, and if it
works, you can try to change it to msdos.
On 9/18/2012 5:13 PM, Martin Smith wrote:
On 18/09/2012 22:52, Lisi wrote:
Hi, Lionel,
On Tuesday 18 September 2012 22:31:21 Lionel Trésaugues wrote:
I am experiencing a physical pain whenever I am in front of my
computer running either Debian (Wheezy) or Debian-based distributions
(such as
On 9/18/2012 7:53 PM, Go Linux wrote:
--- On Sat, 9/15/12, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
From: lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de
Subject: Re: What is playing videos in web browsers?
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Saturday, September 15, 2012, 11:08 PM
Adobe says on their website: Flash
On 9/19/2012 5:33 PM, Lisi wrote:
On Wednesday 19 September 2012 22:40:30 Lionel Trésaugues wrote:
Yes. Me neither. The only parameter I couldn't check (due to my lack of
knowledge) is the horizontal refresh rate. Any idea how I can get this
value ?
I still feel that a very minor difference
On 9/19/
LCDs do not flicker.
I *explicitly* did not say flicker. I do not mean flicker. Flicker is
perceptible to the viewer.
Minitors *do* refresh. They do not all refresh at the same rate. The OP is
complaining of eye-strain and headaches. These are real, and quite
reasonably he
On 9/19/2012 6:49 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 00:03 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Wednesday 19 September 2012 23:38:48 Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/19/2012 5:33 PM, Lisi wrote:
On Wednesday 19 September 2012 22:40:30 Lionel Trésaugues wrote:
Yes. Me neither. The only parameter I
On 9/20/2012 8:59 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 20 sep 12, 07:18:58, Mark Allums wrote:
LCD do not refresh in the same sense as CRTs. They project a
continuous picture. If a pixel doesn't change, it stays lit. No
fading. OPs problem is not due to refresh, unless it is a CRT.
His problem
On 9/20/2012 9:51 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 20 September 2012 15:37:54 Mark Allums wrote:
Never had that experience or heard of it or dreamt of it.
You obviously feel that your experience is more valid than anyone else's when
it comes to monitors. But you appear to know nothing at all
On 9/20/2012 10:16 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Jo, 20 sep 12, 09:37:54, Mark Allums wrote:
I have however seen LCD monitors behave significantly different
depending on refresh rate. Entire areas were blury, but everything was
fine when I switched to another refresh rate (60Hz - 75Hz if I
On 9/20/2012 2:36 PM, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 20 September 2012 18:20:49 Mark Allums wrote:
On Thursday 20 September 2012 15:37:54 Mark Allums wrote:
Never had that experience or heard of it or dreamt of it.
You obviously feel that your experience is more valid than anyone else's
when
On 9/20/2012 3:37 PM, Lisi wrote:
On Thursday 20 September 2012 20:50:40 Mark Allums wrote:
You were obsessed with the refresh rate.
This is absurd. I mentioned it twice, amid a lot of other things. It is you
who are obsessed.
If you want to continue this absurd attack on me, may I suggest
On 9/25/2012 4:42 PM, lee wrote:
Celejar cele...@gmail.com writes:
http://www.iba.org.il/gimmel/?entity=869508type=269page=248
Clicking the little red headphone-with-emanating-sound-waves brings up
this message:
You must install the Windows Media Player Firefox Plugin.
Click here to
On 9/28/2012 1:39 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 20:27 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Try:
$clive -f best http://vimeo.com/24972836;
Does it download and convert long YouTube videos on the fly or does it
take hours?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KufCS2ad0eE
Regards,
Ralf
On 9/30/2012 12:13 AM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:30:01 +0200
Pascal Obry pas...@obry.net wrote:
A clean-up of an old driver? I would advise to uninstall everything,
exit X session and install back from a console.
Pascal.
Thanks for this suggestion, I did this, as you
On 9/30/2012 5:14 PM, Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:00:01 +0200
Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
did you run
$nvidia-xconfig
I tried your suggestion and got this:
~$ nvidia-xconfig
bash: nvidia-xconfig: command not found
and this one:
$ $nvidia-xconfig
bash: -xconfig
On 9/30/2012 7:32 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
(Mark, did you set the screen grab to give you raw images or compressed?)
'Twasn't me. I had a minor disagreement with another user over the
topic of refresh
while trying to make a suggestion, but it wasn't my problem. I wasn't
the OP.
Mark
--
On 9/30/2012 8:13 PM, m...@mylug.org wrote:
I am using Virtualbox 4.1 (non-free edition). Everything works, but for a
minor issue. To access usb drives, I am supposed to add the user to
vboxusers group. But, that group is non-existent.
I can create that group. But, to access the usb drives,
On 10/1/2012 2:37 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 9/30/2012 8:13 PM, m...@mylug.org wrote:
I am using Virtualbox 4.1 (non-free edition). Everything works, but for a
minor issue. To access usb drives, I am supposed to add the user to
vboxusers group. But, that group is non-existent.
I can create
On 10/2/2012 4:18 AM, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 09:25:16PM +0200, Dan wrote:
I would like to run a program that requires libXm.so.3 but libmotif3
has been replaced by libmotif4 and I can not find anywhere libXm.so.3.
Any idea?
I have found that symlinking LibXm.so.3 to
On 10/3/2012 10:08 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:14:51 +0200
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Hans-J. Ullrich hans.ullr...@loop.de writes:
Hi folks,
I would like to install wine on my pure 64-bit system. Wine is telling me,
that I need to add i386 architecture on it (dpkg
I am using Icedove, AKA Thunderbird, with an IMAP server. After
deleting (or marking for deletion), the messages will reappear in the
Inbox, or if in the Inbox and marked, they will become unmarked. This
happens whether I do it manually or a filter rules moves the message
to a folder. (The
On 10/17/2012 10:20 AM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I am running the 64 bit 6.0.5, but need the 32 bit canberra-gtk-module.
Where can I find it?
Do you have ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk installed? Start by installing
those.
Then go to http://packages.debian.org/ and search for
On 10/17/2012 2:29 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
On 10/17/2012 02:14 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 10/17/2012 12:58 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
On 10/17/2012 12:22 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 10/17/2012 10:20 AM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I am running the 64 bit 6.0.5, but need the 32 bit
canberra
On 10/17/2012 2:50 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 10/17/2012 2:29 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
On 10/17/2012 02:14 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 10/17/2012 12:58 PM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
On 10/17/2012 12:22 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 10/17/2012 10:20 AM, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I am running
On 10/17/2012 10:56 PM, Curt Howland wrote:
Dear Debian-user, newly installed AMD64 Squeeze.
I've decided to try installing Debian in 64bit for the first time, and
restoring my home files has exposed a 32bit legacy.
wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
So I installed all the ia32libs, but the error is
On 10/20/2012 5:02 AM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Dear package-teams,
please do not put everything to multiarch! Just let me explain, why I think
so.
As already reported here, many users (and me too) got into a lot of problems,
beccause the 32-bit nvidia drivers are now put into multiarch.
Doing
On 10/20/2012 2:09 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
Since my current box is still having random lockups with no solution in
sight I am likely to be purchasing a new computer soon. It will, in all
likelihood come with Windows 7 pre installed. I want to load Debian on
it, as well. I am familiar with
On 10/20/2012 6:10 PM, lee wrote:
John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com writes:
Lisi writes:
A bug report can, I believe, be a request for something that is not
there.
Yes. It's called a wishlist bug and it is one of the choices offered
by reportbug.
I have already sent a bug report, and it is
On 10/21/2012 9:08 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 21 oct 12, 13:00:00, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
What I do not understand: Why does skype want to install lots of new 32-bit
libs, when the package (and this is the 32-bit one) already can use either
ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk (which are also
On 10/21/2012 12:35 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Hello Mark,
Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
What some of you are missing is that the transitional package ia32-libs
in sid is uninstallable unless you allow experimental, because of some
of the dependencies. It's just not a viable option unless
On 10/21/2012 12:48 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 21 oct 12, 11:27:05, Mark Allums wrote:
What some of you are missing is that the transitional package
ia32-libs in sid is uninstallable unless you allow experimental,
because of some of the dependencies. It's just not a viable option
unless
On 10/21/2012 3:28 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
On 10/21/2012 12:35 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Hello Mark,
Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
What some of you are missing is that the transitional package ia32-libs
in sid is uninstallable unless you allow experimental, because of some
On 10/21/2012 5:00 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 21 oct 12, 21:42:45, Claudius Hubig wrote:
I have to admit I did not look into that any further, but, yes, the
dependencies are rather screwed up: ia32-libs:amd64 depends on
ia32-libs-i386, which is only available in the i386 architecture
On 10/22/2012 4:40 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 21 oct 12, 17:33:17, Mark Allums wrote:
Yes, because you have to enable multiarch before upgrading ia32-libs.
This is documented in the wheezy Release Notes:
http://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html
On 10/22/2012 8:06 AM, lee wrote:
Claudius Hubig debian_1...@chubig.net writes:
Hello lee,
lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Claudius Hubig debian_1...@chubig.net writes:
the advantage that not one big package has to be updated each time
one of the libraries it contains changes, but only one
On 10/23/2012 3:59 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 22 oct 12, 22:11:11, Mark Allums wrote:
Debian devs regard the nvidia closed source drivers anathems. They
disdain them, and pay no heed to bug reports filed against them.
They also ignore kernel bug reports if the nvidia driver is loaded
On 10/23/2012 2:30 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Mark Allums wrote:
Debian devs regard the nvidia closed source drivers anathems. They
disdain them, and pay no heed to bug reports filed against them.
They don't regard them as anathema. They regard them as Nvidia's
problem. Which they are. I've
On 10/23/2012 4:43 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Mark Allums wrote:
Debian devs regard the nvidia closed source drivers anathems.
I wrote:
They don't regard them as anathema.
They certainly *do* regard them as anathema, as they do all
closed-source and non-free software.
False. I am a Debian
On 10/28/2012 4:38 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 27 oct 12, 22:27:30, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Coming from a 2800+ which is a ~60 watt CPU, and given the fact you'll
never make use of more than 2 of those 8 cores, I recommend a dual core
AthlonII X2 @ 3.4GHz. I have the 3GHz model and the 2nd
On 5/2/2012 5:05 PM, Riccardo Romoli wrote:
Hi to all,
I'm a newbie of Debian but using the Debian-Wiky I was able to install
Debian 6 as single boot, on my MacBookPro (v.3.1). The only problem I
notice, till now, is about the Alt key. I bought the computer as
used from a German guy
On 5/13/2012 12:28 PM, Francesco Pietra wrote:
Hi
Installation of openjdk-6-jdk in wheezy i386 would lead to deletion of
much gnome, including openoffice, with reinstallation of gnome and
abiword, but not of openoffice/libreoffice, if I understand.
Otherwise, java is often useful.
Any
What with one thing and another, my GNOME 3 will only run in fallback
mode (GNOME Classic), and I have been looking at alternatives. There
are things to like about Xfce, LXDE, MATE, and others, but I have not
heard of anyone trying Cinnamon.
One issue seems to be the version of Clutter that
On 5/20/2012 6:05 AM, Camaleón wrote:
At the forums there is a success install reported:
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=6t=76039sid=5f678a70c70f1dd3106da45010681a90start=15#p424163
But carefully read the Cinnamon readme for Debian:
On 5/21/2012 3:21 AM, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 06:34:45PM -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
What with one thing and another, my GNOME 3 will only run in
fallback mode (GNOME Classic), and I have been looking at
alternatives. There are things to like about Xfce, LXDE, MATE, and
others
Synaptic has begun asking for my user password rather than the root
password. Why is this happening, and how do I make it stop? I want
only users with root privileges to use apt/aptitude/synaptic/gdebi/etc.
and I want the original behavior restored.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 6/15/2012 5:38 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 17:08 -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Synaptic has begun asking for my user password rather than the root
password. Why is this happening, and how do I make it stop? I want
only users with root privileges to use apt/aptitude/synaptic
On 6/15/2012 7:18 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 16/06/12 10:08, Mark Allums wrote:
Synaptic has begun asking for my user password rather than the root
password. Why is this happening, and how do I make it stop? I want only
users with root privileges to use apt/aptitude/synaptic/gdebi/etc. and I
On 6/15/2012 7:01 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
Synaptic has begun asking for my user password rather than the root
password. Why is this happening, and how do I make
On 6/21/2012 9:58 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
Brian wrote:
On Thu 21 Jun 2012 at 13:55:49 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:37:52AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
But ;)
The new install will not accept root password. User password is
fine.
That may be intended. I don't
On 10/28/2012 5:49 AM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi Folks,
since some time my logs are flooded with the folowwing message:
Oct 28 11:45:09 localhost kernel: [ 3395.992226] option:
option_instat_callback: error -2
Oct 28 11:45:14 localhost kernel: [ 3401.009057] option:
option_instat_callback:
On 10/28/2012 12:36 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 10/27/12 23:10, David Christensen wrote:
I finally settled on Wheezy OOTB as much as possible with LUKS, ext4,
and VirtualBox,
Correction: And Intel HD 2000 graphics support, single head.
On 10/28/12 04:32, Mark Allums wrote:
I don't
On 10/28/2012 3:14 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 28 oct 12, 06:32:45, Mark Allums wrote:
My own opinion on i3 is that it;s a bit underpowered for a modern
system, even a Linux system. If i7 seems like overkill to you, then
the obvious compromise is i5, which is what i recommend to most
non
On 10/29/2012 2:51 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 28 oct 12, 22:09:01, Mark Allums wrote:
Ah, I misunderstood your requirements quite a bit. i3 is adequate
for media center work. Some Atoms are fine for decoding 1080p, but
it's better to rely on dedicated hardware.
Do you know for sure
On 10/29/2012 1:43 PM, Worrier Poet wrote:
On 10/29/2012 02:15 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Sonntag, 28. Oktober 2012 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 10/28/2012 4:38 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 27 oct 12, 22:27:30, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Coming from a 2800+ which is a ~60 watt CPU, and
Francesco wrote:
I have installed Debian testing on a X1 Carbon, processor i5-3427U.
My problem is the following: when the `ondemand' governor is active, the
processor clock never scales up, it always stays at 800Mhz. The situation
changes when using the `conservative' or the `performance'
-Original Message-
From: Mark Allums [mailto:m...@allums.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 12:34 PM
To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: RE: CPU scaling problems
Francesco wrote:
I have installed Debian testing on a X1 Carbon, processor i5-3427U.
My problem
Hello,
Is there anyone having luck with skype 4.1 in debian ?
I have tried to install it and get the following dependency issue and
also lost my working skype 4.0
`
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
package architecture (i386) does not match
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:06:46 -0600
Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there anyone having luck with skype 4.1 in debian ?
I have tried to install it and get the following dependency issue and
also lost my working skype 4.0
`
dpkg: warning
The only fix I know short of installing 32-bit Wheezy in a chroot or
virtual
machine is to satisfy all of the dependencies, which will all need to be
i386
versions. Don't worry; both the i386 and amd64 versions can be installed
side-
by-side.
I'm sorry, please be extremely cautious about
At Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:35:37 +,
Claudius Hubig wrote:
Don’t use dpkg --force-architecture, but rather enable multi-arch as
detailed in the various how tos online. To get Skype 4.1 working via
multi-arch, you will need some packages from unstable, install them.
If dpkg complains about
1 - 100 of 923 matches
Mail list logo
