Re: [OT] Selling beer (was: Re: Working for free [was: Offensive variable names])

2021-07-16 Thread Charlie Gibbs

On Thu Jul 15 12:42:45 2021 Andrei POPESCU 
wrote:

> On Mi, 14 iul 21, 08:02:19, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
>> On Tue Jul 13 16:50:38 2021 Michael Lange 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:25:17 +0100
>>> Joe  wrote:
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
 Back when we had TV advertisements
 for beer, it was always the rubbish beers that got the publicity.
>>>
>>> here (Germany) we still have those TV ads for beer, and I can assure
>>> you that the advertised brands (its not up to me to decide whether
>>> they are rubbish or not) are the ones that are available virtually
>>> everywhere, so I believe that it is safe to assume that they are
>>> also the brands that sell.
>>> So yes, unfortunately at least in some cases advertisements
>>> apparently pay.
>>
>> If they didn't pay, companies would have stopped sinking vast amounts
>> of effort and expense into them a century ago.
>
> You're giving (big) companies a lot of credit, possibly unwarranted:
>
> Does Advertising Actually Work? (Part 1: TV) (Ep. 440)
> https://freakonomics.com/podcast/advertising-part-1/
>
> Does Advertising Actually Work? (Part 2: Digital) (Ep. 441)
> https://freakonomics.com/podcast/advertising-part-2/
>
> (the links contain the transcripts as well, for those who prefer
> reading)

Thanks for the links (extra points for them being available as text).
Money might reign supreme, but there's nothing like a good management
fantasy to push profits into second place.

I particularly like the part where the interviewee tried to pretend
he couldn't hear the interviewer when he got backed into a corner.

--
/~\  Charlie Gibbs  |  Microsoft is a dictatorship.
\ /|  Apple is a cult.
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus |  Linux is anarchy.
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |  Pick your poison.



Re: [OT] Selling beer (was: Re: Working for free [was: Offensive variable names])

2021-07-15 Thread Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
Hi,

On 2021-07-14 11:29 a.m., Christian Groessler wrote:

> Here in Germany, near Munich, we have a beer brand (from Munich) which
> doesn't advertise but is the "standard beer" all around :-)
> 
WoW That's pretty cool, a "standard beer". Everyone get used to the same
beer and you don't risk being offered one of those bad tasting beer when
you go to a friend's house !

You go to a club and ask "the standard beer please". That will be good
for myself so I don't too much like a tourist.
> regards,
> chris
> 

-- 
Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
-Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [OT] Selling beer (was: Re: Working for free [was: Offensive variable names])

2021-07-15 Thread tomas
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 09:55:50AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 14 iul 21, 08:02:19, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

[...]

> > If they didn't pay [for ads], companies would have stopped sinking vast 
> > amounts
> > of effort and expense into them a century ago.
> 
> You're giving (big) companies a lot of credit, possibly unwarranted:
> 
> 
> Does Advertising Actually Work? (Part 1: TV) (Ep. 440)
> https://freakonomics.com/podcast/advertising-part-1/
> 
> Does Advertising Actually Work? (Part 2: Digital) (Ep. 441)
> https://freakonomics.com/podcast/advertising-part-2/

Thanks for the links :)

I always say (somewhat with tongue-in-cheek, I don't have the time
or stamina to come up with anything even resembling a proof) that
ad industry is like the rain dance [1]. Probably many doubt it helps
at all, but you allocate resources for it... just in case.

I have the hunch that much of modern economics works at this level
(heck, even their "Nobel Prize" is fake).

Cheers
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rain_dance
 - t


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [OT] Selling beer (was: Re: Working for free [was: Offensive variable names])

2021-07-15 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 14 iul 21, 08:02:19, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On Tue Jul 13 16:50:38 2021 Michael Lange  wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:25:17 +0100
> > Joe  wrote:
> >
> > (...)
> >
> >> Back when we had TV advertisements
> >> for beer, it was always the rubbish beers that got the publicity.
> >
> > here (Germany) we still have those TV ads for beer, and I can assure
> > you that the advertised brands (its not up to me to decide whether
> > they are rubbish or not) are the ones that are available virtually
> > everywhere, so I believe that it is safe to assume that they are
> > also the brands that sell.
> > So yes, unfortunately at least in some cases advertisements apparently
> > pay.
> 
> If they didn't pay, companies would have stopped sinking vast amounts
> of effort and expense into them a century ago.

You're giving (big) companies a lot of credit, possibly unwarranted:


Does Advertising Actually Work? (Part 1: TV) (Ep. 440)
https://freakonomics.com/podcast/advertising-part-1/

Does Advertising Actually Work? (Part 2: Digital) (Ep. 441)
https://freakonomics.com/podcast/advertising-part-2/

(the links contain the transcripts as well, for those who prefer 
reading)


Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [OT] Selling beer (was: Re: Working for free [was: Offensive variable names])

2021-07-14 Thread Christian Groessler

On 7/14/21 5:02 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

On Tue Jul 13 16:50:38 2021 Michael Lange  wrote:

> here (Germany) we still have those TV ads for beer, and I can assure
> you that the advertised brands (its not up to me to decide whether
> they are rubbish or not) are the ones that are available virtually
> everywhere, so I believe that it is safe to assume that they are
> also the brands that sell.
> So yes, unfortunately at least in some cases advertisements apparently
> pay.

If they didn't pay, companies would have stopped sinking vast amounts
of effort and expense into them a century ago.



In the football EM there was some advertising for some beer.

They seem to be OK-ish. But I've tasted them just once I think.

Here in Germany, near Munich, we have a beer brand (from Munich) which 
doesn't advertise but is the "standard beer" all around :-)


regards,
chris



[OT] Selling beer (was: Re: Working for free [was: Offensive variable names])

2021-07-14 Thread Charlie Gibbs

On Tue Jul 13 16:50:38 2021 Michael Lange  wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:25:17 +0100
> Joe  wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>> Back when we had TV advertisements
>> for beer, it was always the rubbish beers that got the publicity.
>
> here (Germany) we still have those TV ads for beer, and I can assure
> you that the advertised brands (its not up to me to decide whether
> they are rubbish or not) are the ones that are available virtually
> everywhere, so I believe that it is safe to assume that they are
> also the brands that sell.
> So yes, unfortunately at least in some cases advertisements apparently
> pay.

If they didn't pay, companies would have stopped sinking vast amounts
of effort and expense into them a century ago.

>> As for 'targetted advertising', I've never seen any. When I notice
>> the ads around the sides of web pages, none of them are aimed at me
>
> The same here. So maybe I have developed some skills obscuring my
> "profile" to "them", or (maybe more likely) I am just too dumb to
> realize that those ads *are* in fact targeted at me :-)

If they're targeted at me, I try to make sure they miss.

--
/~\  cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
\ /  I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
 X   Top-posted messages will probably be ignored.  See RFC1855.
/ \  "Alexa, define 'bugging'."



[OT] Selling beer (was: Re: Working for free [was: Offensive variable names])

2021-07-13 Thread Michael Lange
Hi,

On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:25:17 +0100
Joe  wrote:

(...)

> Back when we had TV advertisements
> for beer, it was always the rubbish beers that got the publicity.

here (Germany) we still have those TV ads for beer, and I can assure you
that the advertised brands (its not up to me to decide whether they are
rubbish or not) are the ones that are available virtually everywhere, so
I believe that it is safe to assume that they are also the brands that
sell.
So yes, unfortunately at least in some cases advertisements apparently
pay.
 
> As for 'targetted advertising', I've never seen any. When I notice the
> ads around the sides of web pages, none of them are aimed at me

The same here. So maybe I have developed some skills obscuring my
"profile" to "them", or (maybe more likely) I am just too dumb to realize
that those ads *are* in fact targeted at me :-)

Regards

Michael

.-.. .. ...- .   .-.. --- -. --.   .- -. -..   .--. .-. --- ... .--. . .-.

Vulcans believe peace should not depend on force.
-- Amanda, "Journey to Babel", stardate 3842.3