* Joris REHM [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-25 20:57] :
Bonjour,
Je suis en unstable et je viens de faire ma mise à jour.
J'ai le même problème avec emacs et xemacs (j'ai besoin des deux). Le
message d'erreur affiché est (le même pour les deux) :
Warning: Cannot convert string
-*-courier
Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
Tu peux regarder les rapports de bogue 362894, 363664 et 363667. La
solution indiquée devrait résoudre ton problème.
Rhaa j'avais pourtant fait une recherche ...
Merci bien cela a résolu mon problème. Si quelqu'un cherche il y avait
deux problèmes conjugés
1) faire
Bonjour,
Joris REHM [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Je suis en unstable et je viens de faire ma mise à jour.
J'ai le même problème avec emacs et xemacs (j'ai besoin des deux). Le
message d'erreur affiché est (le même pour les deux) :
emacs en xterm ? ou emacs sous x I presume...
Warning
Anders Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Finesser i xemacs som jag saknar (och inte haft tid/ork/kunskap att
implementera sjlv):
* C-g goto-line
C-g r quit i bde Emacs och XEmacs vad jag vet. Menar du M-g?
(global-set-key (kbd M-g) 'goto-line)
* Shift-piltangent fr att snabbt markera
Bonjour,
Je cherche à personnaliser les couleurs dans emacs et xemacs.
Configurer le fichier ~/.Xdefaults ne marche pas. J'ai vu paser un doc
sur internet (mais je n'arrive pas à le retrouver) expliquant que sur
une debian que le réglage n'est pas orthodoxe...
Une piste ?
Sergio
Serge Basterot [EMAIL PROTECTED] a déclaré :
Je cherche à personnaliser les couleurs dans emacs et xemacs.
Configurer le fichier ~/.Xdefaults ne marche pas. J'ai vu paser un doc
sur internet (mais je n'arrive pas à le retrouver) expliquant que sur
une debian que le réglage n'est pas
SB == Serge Basterot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bonjour,
Bonjour,
Je cherche à personnaliser les couleurs dans emacs et xemacs.
Configurer le fichier ~/.Xdefaults ne marche pas. J'ai vu paser un doc
sur internet (mais je n'arrive pas à le retrouver) expliquant que sur
une debian que le
Benoit Friry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Serge Basterot [EMAIL PROTECTED] a déclaré :
[...]
Configurer le fichier ~/.Xdefaults ne marche pas. J'ai vu paser un doc
sur internet (mais je n'arrive pas à le retrouver) expliquant que sur
une debian que le réglage n'est pas orthodoxe...
Une
On Sunday 02 December 2001 14:00, Christian Marillat wrote:
SB == Serge Basterot [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bonjour,
Bonjour,
Je cherche à personnaliser les couleurs dans emacs et xemacs.
Configurer le fichier ~/.Xdefaults ne marche pas. J'ai vu paser un
doc sur internet (mais je
From: Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
On Sat, 25 Sep 1999, Daniel Barclay wrote:
..
Bringing the Control key back from exile is much cheaper and
more productive (than reaching unnaturally and having to see
a doctor).
i've never had trouble with my control key being in exile... Then
From: Richard E. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. . . also, using emacs
on CCIE (*Control Key In Exile) keyboard, causing enough long reaches
on my little finger sthat I had to see a quack, is probably part (put a
minor part) of my avoiding either.
Bringing the Control key back from exile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 25 Sep 1999, Daniel Barclay wrote:
From: Richard E. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. . . also, using emacs
on CCIE (*Control Key In Exile) keyboard, causing enough long reaches
on my little finger sthat I had to see a quack, is probably part (put a
Jan Vroonhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even if selfishness were a proper descriptions of motivations of
previous XEmacs maintainers (which it isn't)
Perhaps that is too strong; I suspect the original problem was simply
laziness. But it still pulled a major wedgy on the emacs community.
then
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Rob Mahurin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 07:32:22PM -0400, Kristopher Johnson wrote:
I honestly don't mean to start a holy war here, but I'd like to
know: Is there anyone who prefers Emacs to XEmacs, and why?
I use emacs when I'm in a text terminal (like right now
I honestly don't mean to start a holy war here, but I'd like to
know: Is there anyone who prefers Emacs to XEmacs, and why?
On my meager Pentium 90, Xemacs takes about 20 seconds to load, and
emacs loads in about 3. I prefer emacs.
--
Thank you,
Joe Bouchard
Powered by Debian Linux
Rob Mahurin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 07:32:22PM -0400, Kristopher Johnson wrote:
I honestly don't mean to start a holy war here, but I'd like to
know: Is there anyone who prefers Emacs to XEmacs, and why?
I use emacs when I'm in a text terminal (like right now) because I
haven't
it already was in
insert mode.
Recently I have started using emacs and xemacs again. I can't
see much difference myself, so I just use xemacs, sometimes
with (-nw), sometimes without. The things I like about emacs
are:
- very customizable. However, with xemacs it is often difficult
to know what
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 11:32:42AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
- has built in news reader and mailer. Currently I am experimenting
with Gnus. I have mixed feelings about it. Sometime I may try
Mews.
Gnus and it's adaptive scoring are about the only thing that makes
most Usenet readable for me.
Kristopher Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I honestly don't mean to start a holy war here, but I'd like to
know: Is there anyone who prefers Emacs to XEmacs, and why?
I prefer Emacs To Xemacs.
I can't really give a specific reason; my early experience with Lucid
Emacs (from whence Xemacs
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 07:32:22PM -0400, Kristopher Johnson wrote:
Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
Hi all,
where can I found a document describing the differences between emacs
and xemacs ?
Thanks.
Check the XEmacs
Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I honestly don't mean to start a holy war here, but I'd like to
know: Is there anyone who prefers Emacs to XEmacs, and why?
I am trying to stay out of this thread (because discussions like this
always become holy wars) but I couldn't let this one pass
Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
Hi all,
where can I found a document describing the differences between emacs
and xemacs ?
Thanks.
Check the XEmacs web page:
http://www.xemacs.org/
You might also look at the Emacs web pages
I do. Why? Mostly don't know. Just familiar with it. At one time
it was impossible to get both to work properly on the same system.
I did not want to give up emacs for XEmacs. There were several
things that did not work in XEmacs, when I first installed and I
did not have the patience to find out
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 07:32:22PM -0400, Kristopher Johnson wrote:
I honestly don't mean to start a holy war here, but I'd like to
know: Is there anyone who prefers Emacs to XEmacs, and why?
I use emacs when I'm in a text terminal (like right now) because I
haven't figured out how to use
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 02:17:53AM -0400, Rob Mahurin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 07:32:22PM -0400, Kristopher Johnson wrote:
I honestly don't mean to start a holy war here, but I'd like to
know: Is there anyone who prefers Emacs to XEmacs, and why?
I use emacs when I'm in a text
Kris Kried,
I honestly don't mean to start a holy war here, but I'd like to
know: Is there anyone who prefers Emacs to XEmacs, and why?
If you change prefer to dislike less, then me :)
I still use emacs for some things that I haven't figured out how
to get vim to do. Xemacs has extra
Richard E. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
also, using emacs on CCIE (*Control Key In Exile) keyboard, causing
enough long reaches on my little finger sthat I had to see a quack,
is probably part (put a minor part) of my avoiding either.
You probably know this, but you can easily remap
rob rote,
Richard E. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
also, using emacs on CCIE (*Control Key In Exile) keyboard, causing
enough long reaches on my little finger sthat I had to see a quack,
is probably part (put a minor part) of my avoiding either.
You probably know this, but you can
Lisp and reading the source.
I'm not sure how to access the menus in a terminal, or why you'd even
want to, so I can't help with that. As far as the syntax highlighting
and cut-and-paste behavior go, here are the relevant snippets of my
.emacs. This tells XEmacs to always use the maximum amount
Hi all,
where can I found a document describing the differences between emacs
and xemacs ?
Thanks.
--
---
- Powered by Debian/GNU Linux -
-- Linux User 140860 Machine 61143
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
Hi all,
where can I found a document describing the differences between emacs
and xemacs ?
Thanks.
Check the XEmacs web page:
http://www.xemacs.org/
You might also look at the Emacs web pages:
Official: http://www.gnu.org/software
On Wed, 13 May 1998, Ionut Borcoman wrote:
Will Lowe wrote:
Can somebody give me a solution:
1. to make EMACS work OK with KDE
Play with the default font settings in KDE. Mine did this too, at first,
I changed the fonts around a few times, and now it's working fine. I
think it
-fix some of these, but I have a lot of .el files and it seems
absurd to me to do this for all of them. Also, I would be glad if you
can share a solution that will make the .emacs files useable for both
EMACS and XEMACS (if that's possible).
Thanks,
Ionutz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
would be glad if you
can share a solution that will make the .emacs files useable for both
EMACS and XEMACS (if that's possible).
Thanks,
Ionutz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL
Can somebody give me a solution:
1. to make EMACS work OK with KDE
Play with the default font settings in KDE. Mine did this too, at first,
I changed the fonts around a few times, and now it's working fine. I
think it has to do partially with the difference between proportional and
Will Lowe wrote:
Can somebody give me a solution:
1. to make EMACS work OK with KDE
Play with the default font settings in KDE. Mine did this too, at first,
I changed the fonts around a few times, and now it's working fine. I
think it has to do partially with the difference between
Yes, I think the same. But I've try with all the fonts from the
fontmanager with no success. What are your settings ?
Not the fontmanager. From the K^ in the lower left of the panel:
Settings-Desktop-Fonts ect.
I've got General font set to helvetica, 12 pt, iso-8859-1
and Fixed font set to
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], shaul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
By the way, how can I tell the aliases in my .bashrc to work only when I am
using X (I don't need xemacs -geometry 87x28 when I am not using X) ?
Use a function such as
xemacs() {
if [ -n
You can use xemacs in a VT.
I've got xemacs installed on my stable Debian 1.3.1, and it works just fine,
but I want to use emacs for file viewing and manipulation in a normal
console because I don't like vi. I tried to install emacs in dselect but it
tells me I have to take components of
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], shaul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
By the way, how can I tell the aliases in my .bashrc to work only when I am
using X (I don't need xemacs -geometry 87x28 when I am not using X) ?
Use a function such as
xemacs() {
if [ -n $DISPLAY ]; then
command xemacs
I've got xemacs installed on my stable Debian 1.3.1, and it works just fine,
but I want to use emacs for file viewing and manipulation in a normal
console because I don't like vi. I tried to install emacs in dselect but it
tells me I have to take components of xemacs out, because they conflict. Is
Tristan Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TD I've got xemacs installed on my stable Debian 1.3.1, and it works
TD just fine, but I want to use emacs for file viewing and
TD manipulation in a normal console because I don't like vi. I tried
TD to install emacs in dselect but it tells me I have to take
Tristan Day wrote:
I've got xemacs installed on my stable Debian 1.3.1, and it works just fine,
but I want to use emacs for file viewing and manipulation in a normal
console because I don't like vi. I tried to install emacs in dselect but it
tells me I have to take components of xemacs out,
Marcus Brinkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, you can. It depends which versions you use. But I'm not sure if it
is possible with 1.3, ...
In bo, they conflict. If you do not mind, install both with force options.
They overlap in some exec utils like ctags, etc. Not a real trouble.
Is there a way to install emacs and xemacs on debian. I can't install both
because it conflicts with each other. There must be a way to have both on my
computer.
Thanks
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL
Hi you can not install both, I think is because it uses same resources or
something like that.
On Mon, 13 Oct 1997, Chi Wong wrote:
Is there a way to install emacs and xemacs on debian. I can't install both
because it conflicts with each other. There must be a way to have both on my
wrote:
Is there a way to install emacs and xemacs on debian. I can't install both
because it conflicts with each other. There must be a way to have both on my
computer.
Thanks
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I know I have read something about the possibility of running emacs and
xemacs on the same system, but at that time I did not consider trying it
out.
Is it possible?
Yes.
If so, how do I get around dselect's refusal to install both?
Use the versions from ``unstable'', they don't
I know I have read something about the possibility of running emacs and
xemacs on the same system, but at that time I did not consider trying it
out.
Is it possible? If so, how do I get around dselect's refusal to install
both?
Johann.
Johann
On Thu, 10 Jul 1997, Paul Miller wrote:
I just installed Debian 1.3.1 and it wouldn't let me install emacs AND
xemacs... one or the other. How can I get both on my system?
Most probably you don't want both of them. XEmacs has more features than
GNU Emacs (if running under X), but hogs system
I just installed Debian 1.3.1 and it wouldn't let me install emacs AND
xemacs... one or the other. How can I get both on my system?
-Paul
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Paul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just installed Debian 1.3.1 and it wouldn't let me install emacs AND
xemacs... one or the other. How can I get both on my system?
The cleaner way is to install the new versions from hamm.
You can also install xemacs then install emacs with dpkg --force
Hi,
I'd like to use both Emacs and XEmacs at the same time. Are there
plans to allow this in the future. I have heard that people have
patched this to work.
Esa
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL
On Mon, 11 Nov 1996, Esa Turtiainen wrote:
I'd like to use both Emacs and XEmacs at the same time. Are there
plans to allow this in the future. I have heard that people have
patched this to work.
Extract the binary data files from all needed xemacs*.deb or emacs*.deb
files with
ar p
54 matches
Mail list logo
