Le 30 juillet 2023 didier gaumet a écrit :
> Et l'environnement Handy semblait être une customisation de Xfce
Oui d'après cette vieille doc d'install
https://lea-linux.org/documentations/Installer_HandyLinux
Et comme ils disent "il vous suffit de supprimer les options
d'accessibilité pour
Bonjour, C'est plus une debian customisée pour les debutants et les
autres, qui ont un système stable et fiable dès l'installation.
https://debian-facile.org/projets:iso-debian-facile
Le 30/07/2023 à 11:26, didier gaumet a écrit :
Le 30/07/2023 à 11:12, didier gaumet a écrit :
[...]
- Handy
Le 30/07/2023 à 11:12, didier gaumet a écrit :
[...]
- Handy d'après ce que je comprends c'était le bureau d'Handylinux, qui
n'existe plus mais dont Debian Facile semble plus ou moins la
continuation(?). Debian Facile ne propose plus cet environnement, j'ai
l'impression
Et l'environnement
Michel a probablement raison: si tu veux juste une borne d'accès
internet dont toute l'activité passe par le navigateur, je suppose (j'y
connais rien) qu'un kiosque de navigation convient
Si cela ne te convient pas, il faut distinguer l'aspect android-like et
senior-friendly (y a des
- Mail original -
De: "Michel Verdier"
À: debian-user-french@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Samedi 29 Juillet 2023 21:37:10
Objet: Re: android GUI sous linux
Le 29 juillet 2023 Bernard Schoenacker a écrit :
> Je suis à la recherche d'une interface de bureau sous Linu
Le 29 juillet 2023 Bernard Schoenacker a écrit :
> Je suis à la recherche d'une interface de bureau sous Linux
> ayant des caractéristiques similaires à une tablette
> android...
Tout window manager ayant des icônes de bureau rentrent dans ça ou tu
vois d'autres caractéristiques ?
>
Le jeudi 28 avril 2022 à 12:41 +, Keith Bainbridge a écrit :
> Good Evening All
>
> I top posted last night, in error. Sorry
>
> I have asked the devs where the bottom posting setting has gone.
Hello,
(K9 Mail)
Account Settings > Sending mail > Reply after quoted text
Op 22-03-2022 om 00:16 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Hallo,
Een klant heeft een vrij nieuwe telefoon met Android 8.0. Het overzetten
van foto's ging tot nu toe prima, maar plots lukt het niet meer.
Na het inprikken van de kabel krijgt hij een melding op zijn telefoon
waarna hij de verbinding
John Hasler writes:
> Is there a simple way to run Android apps under Debian such as an
> emulator? My Starlink terminal is arriving next week and it would be
> convenient to be able to run the Starlink app. However, I do not have
> either an IOS or an Android device.
Another way is +money.
Bijan writes:
> Keep in mind the xapk/apk I saw online only had the arm64 shared
> libraries.
The one I have has x86 and x86_64 libraries as well as the arm ones.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 2022-01-30 21:54, John Hasler wrote:
I have a copy of the app. I'm not going to open a Google Play account.
Keep in mind the xapk/apk I saw online only had the arm64 shared
libraries. So you'll either need to get an apk with the x86/x86_64/amd64
shared libraries or add arm64 support to
On 2022-01-30 21:54, John Hasler wrote:
I have a copy of the app. I'm not going to open a Google Play account.
Oh ok, you can run the emulator without app store or without signing in
and use adb install the apk to the emulator, in case anbox doesn't work.
Bijan
Bijan writes:
> Hi, don't know how far you got with anbox,
I don't have it running yet due to a dbus problem. That should clear
out as soon as I reboot but I'm not ready to do that because I'm in the
midst of a project with a couple of dozen documents and tabs open.
> This will launch the
On 2022-01-29 13:29, John Hasler wrote:
Is there a simple way to run Android apps under Debian such as an
emulator? My Starlink terminal is arriving next week and it would be
convenient to be able to run the Starlink app. However, I do not have
either an IOS or an Android device.
Hi, don't
On 2022-01-29, John Hasler wrote:
> I never intend to install any app other than the Starlink one. I'm
> willing to trust it as long as what I get is in fact exactly what SpaceX
> distributes: if they are going to spy on me they will have better
> opportunities than that. I guess I'm asking if
Bijan writes:
> Seems the Starlink router has a web interface:
I know that. It evidently does not do everything the app does.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 30/01/2022 11:39, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
I think the reason it is signed by Google is that the app uses Play app
signing, where google signs the app on their servers on your behalf.
That way if you lose your private key, you can change it on your end,
without breaking app upgrades.
Play
I downloaded it from apkmirror.com and got the same numbers you did
plus "Verified using v4 scheme (APK Signature Scheme v4): false",
"Verified for SourceStamp: true", some "Source Stamp Signer" results,
and the same META-INF warnings.
Looks ok, I guess.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
On 2022-01-29 13:29, John Hasler wrote:
Is there a simple way to run Android apps under Debian such as an
emulator? My Starlink terminal is arriving next week and it would be
convenient to be able to run the Starlink app. However, I do not have
either an IOS or an Android device.
Just to go
On 2022-01-29 17:57, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
Now, find the .obb file (usually named as “com.x.obb”)
within the file and copy it into the location:
/sdcard/storage/emulated/0/Android/obb/.
Lastly, install the .apk file. Within a few minutes, you would
be able to run the
On 2022-01-29 17:38, John Hasler wrote:
Bijan writes:
I don't know if they modify the apks they host but as far as I know
the original apk (from the play store) will be signed by the app
publisher/writer. So if they haven't removed that you can just verify
the signature is from the
On 2022-01-29 17:25, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
On 2022-01-29 15:38, John Hasler wrote:
Apkpure has the Starlink app but as I had never heard of them (No reason
to, not having an Android phone) I didn't download it immediately. Are
they reliable?
I don't know if they modify the apks they host
Bijan writes:
> I don't know if they modify the apks they host but as far as I know
> the original apk (from the play store) will be signed by the app
> publisher/writer. So if they haven't removed that you can just verify
> the signature is from the publisher, etc.
Apkpure says that apps
On 2022-01-29 15:38, John Hasler wrote:
local10 writes:
First, identify the app you want to install, then download it from
apkpure ( https://apkpure.com/ ) or similar sites.
Apkpure has the Starlink app but as I had never heard of them (No reason
to, not having an Android phone) I didn't
I never intend to install any app other than the Starlink one. I'm
willing to trust it as long as what I get is in fact exactly what SpaceX
distributes: if they are going to spy on me they will have better
opportunities than that. I guess I'm asking if Apkpure can be trusted
to send me exactly
Jan 29, 2022, 21:33 by loca...@tutanota.com:
> apkpure has been around for several years, draw any conclusion you want from
> that. Google Play also isn't particularly reliable, they've hosted and
> continue to host plenty of mal/spy/crap/ad/-ware aps, so just because an app
> is hosted on
Jan 29, 2022, 20:38 by j...@sugarbit.com:
> Apkpure has the Starlink app but as I had never heard of them (No reason
> to, not having an Android phone) I didn't download it immediately. Are
> they reliable?
>
apkpure has been around for several years, draw any conclusion you want from
that.
On Sb, 29 ian 22, 14:38:50, John Hasler wrote:
> local10 writes:
> > First, identify the app you want to install, then download it from
> > apkpure ( https://apkpure.com/ ) or similar sites.
>
> Apkpure has the Starlink app but as I had never heard of them (No reason
> to, not having an Android
local10 writes:
> First, identify the app you want to install, then download it from
> apkpure ( https://apkpure.com/ ) or similar sites.
Apkpure has the Starlink app but as I had never heard of them (No reason
to, not having an Android phone) I didn't download it immediately. Are
they reliable?
Jan 29, 2022, 19:07 by j...@sugarbit.com:
> Thank you both. Now to get a copy of the ("free") app without opening a
> Google
> Play account...
>
First, identify the app you want to install, then download it from apkpure (
https://apkpure.com/ ) or similar sites. That, of course, leads to some
On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 13:07 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Thank you both. Now to get a copy of the ("free") app without
> opening a Google
> Play account...
Everything nowadays "needs" an app... I hate it.
Thank you both. Now to get a copy of the ("free") app without opening a Google
Play account...
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Le samedi 29 janvier 2022 à 12:29 -0600, John Hasler a écrit :
> Is there a simple way to run Android apps under Debian such as an
> emulator? My Starlink terminal is arriving next week and it would be
> convenient to be able to run the Starlink app. However, I do not
> have
> either an IOS
Jan 29, 2022, 18:29 by j...@sugarbit.com:
> Is there a simple way to run Android apps under Debian such as an
> emulator? My Starlink terminal is arriving next week and it would be
> convenient to be able to run the Starlink app. However, I do not have
> either an IOS or an Android device.
>
On Mon 08 Jan 2018 at 06:59:06 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/08/2018 04:52 AM, Curt wrote:
> > On 2018-01-08, SDA wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:25:50AM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Samuel
> ... where Linux (as an OS--yes, I see you coming from here)
We usually call it GNU/Linux,
Stefan
On 01/08/2018 04:52 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2018-01-08, SDA wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:25:50AM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Samuel wrote:
could you add a support for wiko
I have a wiko lenny 4 plus
Sure!
On Monday, 8 Jan 2018 at 10:52, Curt wrote:
> I was going to say a while back in yet another tangential digression
> that the trend in personal computing (outside of the work environment,
> at least) is toward mobile devices (notably smartphones) where Linux (as
> an OS--yes, I see you coming
On 2018-01-08, SDA wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:25:50AM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Samuel wrote:
>> > could you add a support for wiko
>> > I have a wiko lenny 4 plus
>>
>> Sure! Probably a small job.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 02:35:02AM +0100, arne wrote:
Debian should run on the Gemini PDA, an Android handhold device.
In dual boot.
It is not ready yet though.
Should be ready this month.
This is a very interesting device (and not a joke as other commenters
might have thought!) for the
On 18-01-08 02:35:02, arne wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 19:32:25 -0500
SDA wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:25:50AM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Samuel wrote:
> > could you add a support for wiko
> > I have a
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 19:32:25 -0500
SDA wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:25:50AM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Samuel wrote:
> > > could you add a support for wiko
> > > I have a wiko lenny 4 plus
> >
> >
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:25:50AM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Samuel wrote:
> > could you add a support for wiko
> > I have a wiko lenny 4 plus
>
> Sure! Probably a small job. I'll submit a patch tomorrow to port
> debian to android.
>
Anders Andersson wrote:
> Sure! Probably a small job. I'll submit a patch tomorrow to port
> debian to android.
hahaha, great comment!
don't forget to add "irony off" at the end
in the spirit of this: I would love to test your patch (irony off)
regards
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Samuel wrote:
> could you add a support for wiko
> I have a wiko lenny 4 plus
Sure! Probably a small job. I'll submit a patch tomorrow to port
debian to android.
could you add a support for wiko
I have a wiko lenny 4 plus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Same issue here. I literally tried every suggested fix on stack
overflow and it is not possible to use hardware acclaration on Debian
Stretch. KVM is installed and emulator -accel-check is returning
accel:
0
KVM (version 12) is installed and usable.
accel
But somehow Android Studio does not
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 03/02/17 04:52 PM, RLewis wrote:
>> Gary Dale wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/02/17 08:03 AM, RLewis wrote:
Hi Gary --
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 28/01/17 09:08 AM, RLewis wrote:
>> Hello Ken and Gary --
>>
>> ken wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/24/2017 02:38
On 03/02/17 04:52 PM, RLewis wrote:
Gary Dale wrote:
On 02/02/17 08:03 AM, RLewis wrote:
Hi Gary --
Gary Dale wrote:
On 28/01/17 09:08 AM, RLewis wrote:
Hello Ken and Gary --
ken wrote:
On 01/24/2017 02:38 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running stretch/AMD64 and I'm having extreme problems
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 02/02/17 08:03 AM, RLewis wrote:
>> Hi Gary --
>>
>> Gary Dale wrote:
>>
>>> On 28/01/17 09:08 AM, RLewis wrote:
Hello Ken and Gary --
ken wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 02:38 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
>> I'm running stretch/AMD64 and I'm having extreme
On 02/02/17 08:03 AM, RLewis wrote:
Hi Gary --
Gary Dale wrote:
On 28/01/17 09:08 AM, RLewis wrote:
Hello Ken and Gary --
ken wrote:
On 01/24/2017 02:38 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running stretch/AMD64 and I'm having extreme problems
accessing
my
Samsung S5 phone from my Plasma5
On 02/02/17 20:38, ken wrote:
> Just a quick tip for using Software Data Cable: When you fire it up
> on your android, you'll get a screen helpfully telling you the ftp
> command to run on the other end... but the command they give isn't
> right... well, maybe it is for Windows, I don't know.
On 01/26/2017 11:42 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 25/01/17 01:27 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote:
On 01/25/2017 12:58 PM, ken wrote:
On 01/24/2017 02:38 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running stretch/AMD64 and I'm having extreme problems accessing my
Samsung S5 phone from my Plasma5 desktop.
When I plug the
Hi Gary --
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 28/01/17 09:08 AM, RLewis wrote:
>> Hello Ken and Gary --
>>
>> ken wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/24/2017 02:38 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running stretch/AMD64 and I'm having extreme problems
accessing
>> my
Samsung S5 phone from my Plasma5 desktop.
On 28/01/17 09:08 AM, RLewis wrote:
Hello Ken and Gary --
ken wrote:
On 01/24/2017 02:38 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running stretch/AMD64 and I'm having extreme problems accessing
my
Samsung S5 phone from my Plasma5 desktop.
When I plug the phone in, I get the notification with 2 suggested
Hello Ken and Gary --
ken wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 02:38 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
>> I'm running stretch/AMD64 and I'm having extreme problems accessing
my
>> Samsung S5 phone from my Plasma5 desktop.
>>
>> When I plug the phone in, I get the notification with 2 suggested
>> actions. They both read
Gary Dale wrote:
> the MTP is an open specification that has been around since 2008 and
> Google is heavily involved with it.
Have you tried jmtpfs?
regards
On 25/01/17 01:27 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote:
On 01/25/2017 12:58 PM, ken wrote:
On 01/24/2017 02:38 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running stretch/AMD64 and I'm having extreme problems accessing my
Samsung S5 phone from my Plasma5 desktop.
When I plug the phone in, I get the notification with 2
On 01/25/2017 12:58 PM, ken wrote:
On 01/24/2017 02:38 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running stretch/AMD64 and I'm having extreme problems accessing my
Samsung S5 phone from my Plasma5 desktop.
When I plug the phone in, I get the notification with 2 suggested
actions. They both read "Open with
On 01/24/2017 02:38 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running stretch/AMD64 and I'm having extreme problems accessing my
Samsung S5 phone from my Plasma5 desktop.
When I plug the phone in, I get the notification with 2 suggested
actions. They both read "Open with File Manager" but the first one
opens
Eclipse on Windows was something of a usable disaster, which I
can't say for Android Studio, which is both a disk, CPU and memory hog.
It apparently needs a lot of config to work.
As far as emulator goes, I had to ditch the official emulator (rebranded
QEMU), simply because I don't have hardware
On 02/26/2016 09:03 PM, Peter Easthope wrote:
Suppose a user needs one or a few Android apps but is not
particularly interested in owning an Android device. Is
installation of Android SDK to a small laptop and app usage there
feasible? Or not worth the distraction and better to buy a tablet or
Reco wrote:
> Luckily alternatives are exist. More important is that it's free
> software alternatives.
>
> First one is http://android-x86.org. It's somewhat outdated Android
> build for x86-64, ready to be placed in any virtual machine of your
> choice. The installation and running needed apps
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:03:47 -0600
"Peter Easthope" wrote:
> https://wiki.debian.org/AndroidTools indiates
> that Android SDK is a rather complex beast.
>
> Suppose a user needs one or a few Android apps
> but is not particularly interested in owning an
> Android device.
To whom it may concern:
Has there been any movement on this "mobile Debian" movement? Tried
Ubuntu Touch on a Nexus 7 at one point, and although it had a decent UI,
it was poorly fleshed out. Would love to have a regular copy of Debian
that is touch friendly to install on mobile devices so I
Install Airdroid on your Android device and connect to it using your web
browser if you are on the same network segment.
Regards
Johann
On 2014-07-12, François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr wrote:
I don't know anything to android but I have to connect an android
device to a computer.
I run a smbd server on my desktop and ES File Explorer app on my phone.
Scanning my network with the app detects the Samba share and I
Esther Carillo ecarillo1...@gmail.com writes:
On 2014-07-12, François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr wrote:
I don't know anything to android but I have to connect an android
device to a computer.
I run a smbd server on my desktop and ES File Explorer app on my phone.
Scanning my
On Sunday 13 July 2014 00.26:00 aminos wrote:
Nautilus should work fine . Just be sure to put your device as a /Media
device(MTP)/ or a /Camera (PTP)/.
On 07/12/2014 11:06 PM, François Patte wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I don't know anything to
Nautilus should work fine . Just be sure to put your device as a /Media
device(MTP)/ or a /Camera (PTP)/.
On 07/12/2014 11:06 PM, François Patte wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I don't know anything to android but I have to connect an android
device to a
To the OP - Yes Android isn't open (most of it is) the drivers for radio modem
and video display for example aren't
neither are the Google Apps ie Gmail, Playstore etc.
There is a team working on a pure Open version called Replicant. Wired
magazine recently had a writeup that one
interested
On 10/31/2013 03:36 PM Neal Murphy wrote:
On Thursday, October 31, 2013 02:56:21 PM ken wrote:
On 10/31/2013 02:02 PM Beco wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:12, ken geb...@mousecar.com
mailto:geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
Alex,
As you can see (from this long conversation), there are a
On 10/31/2013 03:51 PM Doug wrote:
On 10/31/2013 02:56 PM, ken wrote:
On 10/31/2013 02:02 PM Beco wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:12, ken geb...@mousecar.com
mailto:geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
Alex,
When you buy a phone with android on it, you don't have root access
On Thursday 31 October 2013 21:26:05 Curt wrote:
On 2013-10-31, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
I may be wrong, but I seem to remember seeing somewhere recently
that it is illegal in the United States to jailbreak a phone.
(I don't know how they'd catch you, or what the penalty would
On 10/31/2013 05:26 PM Slavko wrote:
Hi,
Dňa Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:51:31 -0400 Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net
napísal:
I may be wrong, but I seem to remember seeing somewhere recently that
it is illegal in the United States to jailbreak a phone.
(I don't know how they'd catch you, or what the
Hi,
Dňa Fri, 01 Nov 2013 07:20:23 -0400 ken geb...@mousecar.com napísal:
what you want with it, including jailbreaking it. But doing so would
more than likely invalidate any warrantee and support agreement that
came with the phone.
I am not lawyer too, but my latest knowledge is, that this
ken writes:
...you bought it, it's yours, so you can do what you want with it,
including jailbreaking it.
This is true, but if the manufacturer has used anti-circumvention
technology to protect the firmware you might be violating the DMCA
anti-circumvention provisions. You would not be
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 07:20:23AM -0400, ken wrote:
Many years ago-- well, between ten and twenty, I believe-- there was
legislation which allowed people to install any kind of phones they
wanted in their home or business. Prior to this ATT would permit
only its own phones and phone
Carl Fink writes:
DMCA (the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) supercedes that law and
makes it illegal again.
*Only* if the manufacturer has installed anti-circumvention
technology. If they have made no attempt to prevent reading out the
firmware the DMCA does not apply.
I also don't think
-Original Message-
From: ken [mailto:geb...@mousecar.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 4:20 AM
To: Doug
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ANDROID (back to the OQ)
On 10/31/2013 03:51 PM Doug wrote:
On 10/31/2013 02:56 PM, ken wrote:
On 10/31/2013 02:02 PM Beco wrote
Mais ta hache,c'est un modèle libre ?
Le Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:21:22 +0100
honeyshell honeysh...@honeyshell.com a écrit:
Mais ta hache,c'est un modèle libre ?
OpenSource en tout cas et en partie oui: je peux la désassembler, la vendre,
la donner, et je crois que j'ai un modèle stanbdard donc je dois pouvoir la
reproduire. Donc oui
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 07:21:26PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
GNU are free to express their option about 'freeness' of Debian.
GNU are free to make their distribution based on Debian suited to their
Okay, and I am free to express my opinion about FSF's stance on
freeness and Debian.
taste.
On 10/30/2013 08:35 AM Charlie wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:40:27 -0400 Celejar cele...@gmail.com sent
this:
The point here is that the FSF, who you consider the right
kind of nuts, *discourages* you from using Debian.
Celejar
Not me. That might be your
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:05:49 +0400
Reco recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 07:21:26PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
GNU are free to express their option about 'freeness' of Debian.
GNU are free to make their distribution based on Debian suited to their
Okay, and I am free to
On 10/29/2013 10:56 AM alex.pad...@laposte.net wrote:
Hello to all,
I shall want to buy a SMARTPHONE with a free O.S (GNU).
Many of my friends say to me that ANDROID is a free system, it is LINUX!
What do you think about it?
Does it exist a SMARTPHONE with a system DEBIAN GNU LINUX
Thank you
alex.pad...@laposte.net, 29.10.2013:
I shall want to buy a SMARTPHONE with a free O.S (GNU).
Many of my friends say to me that ANDROID is a free system, it is LINUX!
What do you think about it?
Does it exist a SMARTPHONE with a system DEBIAN GNU LINUX
Check out
Andrew McGlashan, 30.10.2013:
On 30/10/2013 2:40 AM, ken wrote:
On 10/29/2013 10:56 AM alex.pad...@laposte.net wrote:
You might want to look at openmoko.org and openmoko.com. These offer
smartphones with GNU/Linux from the beginning. So of course you can get
all the source code, develop
shawn wilson, 29.10.2013:
I think the most open platform to date is the Pi - there are only
certain parts of the processor that are kept under NDA.
Not the most open, according to https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi
(They list some alternatives too.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 31 October 2013 13:12, ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
Alex,
As you can see (from this long conversation), there are a variety of
interpretations of what free means and its value to the end user. Getting
back to your original concerns, here are some observations I've made about
android
On 10/31/2013 02:02 PM Beco wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:12, ken geb...@mousecar.com
mailto:geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
Alex,
As you can see (from this long conversation), there are a variety of
interpretations of what free means and its value to the end user.
Getting back to
On Thursday, October 31, 2013 02:56:21 PM ken wrote:
On 10/31/2013 02:02 PM Beco wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:12, ken geb...@mousecar.com
mailto:geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
Alex,
As you can see (from this long conversation), there are a variety of
interpretations of
On 10/31/2013 02:56 PM, ken wrote:
On 10/31/2013 02:02 PM Beco wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:12, ken geb...@mousecar.com
mailto:geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
Alex,
As you can see (from this long conversation), there are a variety of
interpretations of what free means and its value
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 12:19 -0500, Conrad Nelson wrote:
On 10/30/2013 08:10 AM, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:35:37 +1100
Charlie aries...@skymesh.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:40:27 -0400 Celejar cele...@gmail.com sent
this:
The point here is that the FSF, who
On 2013-10-31, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
I may be wrong, but I seem to remember seeing somewhere recently that it
is illegal in the United States to jailbreak a phone.
(I don't know how they'd catch you, or what the penalty would be.)
They'd stop listening to you.
--
To
Hi,
Dňa Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:51:31 -0400 Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net
napísal:
I may be wrong, but I seem to remember seeing somewhere recently that
it is illegal in the United States to jailbreak a phone.
(I don't know how they'd catch you, or what the penalty would be.)
Perhaps, because
Le mardi 29 octobre 2013 à 18:25, alex.pad...@laposte.net a écrit :
C'est curieux pourquoi des personne sont choquées par l'espionnage de la NSA
alorsq que dans leur SMARTPHONE ils ont un OS qui peut-etre un mouchard et/ou
Big Brother.
Grande question !
Mais malheureusement l'OS ne fait pas
Le Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:25:22 +0100,
alex.pad...@laposte.net a écrit :
Merci pour le lien.
C'est curieux pourquoi des personne sont choquées par l'espionnage de
la NSA alorsq que dans leur SMARTPHONE ils ont un OS / un
mouchard et/ou Big Brother.
s/qui peut-etre/qui est/
Ce n'est pas une
Le Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:25:22 +0100
alex.pad...@laposte.net a écrit:
C'est curieux pourquoi des personne sont choquées par l'espionnage de la NSA
alorsq que dans leur SMARTPHONE ils ont un OS qui peut-etre un mouchard
et/ou Big Brother.
C'est n'est pas parce qu'on peut faire quelque chose
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:59:10 +0400 Reco recovery...@gmail.com sent
this:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:25:06PM -0400, Doug wrote:
I think these FSF guys are nuts!
May be. But they are right kind of nuts in today's crazy world.
They are definitely /not/ for
freedom--they would, if they
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo