On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:05:49 +0400 Reco <recovery...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 07:21:26PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > GNU are free to express their option about 'freeness' of Debian. > > > GNU are free to make their distribution based on Debian suited to their > > > > Okay, and I am free to express my opinion about FSF's stance on > > freeness and Debian. > > > > > taste. > > > Note, that GNU approach to the software worked for 30 years, and did so > > > successfully. > > > > I freely concede that I owe the GNU / FSF a great debt. > > Sure, you do. Not sure if this is sarcasm. > > > Debian project is free to express their option about GNU. > > > Debian project may take GNU position into a consideration (removal of > > > firmware blobs from Linux kernel is a fine example of that), or ignore > > > it (invariants in GNU documentation are non-compliant with DFSG). > > > Note, that Debian approach to the software worked for 20 years, and did > > > so successfully. > > > > > > Debian uses GNU software, GNU uses Debian as a base for one of their > > > Linux distribution and a primary development platform for GNU/Hurd. Both > > > are more or less happy with this situation. > > > > > > You, for some strange reason - is not. > > > > FSF is clearly not happy about Debian's policies, and I am not happy > > about their unhappiness. Not sure why you, for some strange reason, are > > unhappy with my unhappiness. > > No, I'm merely curios about your unhappiness. Sorry, I have nothing to add. This discussion is going nowhere. Celejar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131031074858.b57423113b834f0049b14...@gmail.com
