why we have GRs. But we do need,
and we do have other ways to live our democracy.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
. The
question is whether it is worth the disadvantages to our users, when we
still expect (or hope or something in between) that the files will be
released under a DFSG-free license once we manage to attract enough
attention from Donald.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD
be
comparable to Debian as it is.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
, just look at texlive's most recent RC bugs
--
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. It would be great if
the non-DD, but DM-members could make an upload in such a case.
I'm not sure, though, that *our* team members would be very open to
that. I could ask, if you like.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
the
patch is being neglected, ask about it on debian-qa.
Which could have sped up the fixing of the bug as well as removal of the
package...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
their old version, those
with new ones should probably rather learn those tools that are
currently developped. The only problem is if a long-term user gets a
new machine...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
, and they'd end up in Debian by
the next release with minimal required Debian maintainer work.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
have much time frequently
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
from) concepts I did present in a
TUG meeting at Oxford in 2000.
Interesting - is that talk available somewhere? Neither www.tug.org nor
uk.tug.org seem to have it.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
(I think), it was completely different to
that. Can you point me to the information what has changed? Or may it
be that this depends very much on the AM?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
, this is not specific to the press/news issue - in fact I
personally have never found that to be a problem, and I've found Joey
someone with whom it's generally fun to work with.)
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
happens outside. This leads to the
creation of ugly hybrids as dunc-tank.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
clear but he most certainly
| had the moral right to be involved in dunc-tank.
`
So do you think he was doing it as DPL looking for new ways, or as a DD?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX
Kalle Kivimaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm confused. In your other mail you wrote
I think you find that *I* wrote what you quoted after this.
Uups, sorry. I was really confused. Just forget about it.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single
, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
the fact that our DPL, as soon as he felt the wind
blowing in his face, turned his back on the project and founded
dunc-tank, out of the control of the project, but with unclear boundary
to it, and with him juggling with DPL, DD and personal hats.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule
-announce/2005/06/msg00012.html
I'm puzzled. The mail you cite explains a really simple way to make a
source buildable with SElinux on linux, and without on other OSes.
How can you take that as an argument for separating the archives?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule
of? Currently, the oldest one I
find on http://sam.zoy.org/blog/ is from December 11th.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
not being paid for computer work at all.
So, personally I don't have any strong feelings against funding DDs, by
whichever means. I have strong feelings, though, against dunc-tank and
our current DPL's behavior in that field.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein
with that.
I don't understand how that relates to the question. dunc-tank was not
really going outside Debian and prove them wrong, instead it was
going half-outside and forcing a problematic decision, wasn't it?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding
start wondering why is he avoiding that part?.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
it appears as if my first mail was reflowed at some point, which made
the signature go bad.
It fails again here...
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat Feb 24, 2007 at 11:21:38 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
it appears as if my first mail was reflowed at some point, which made
the signature go bad.
It fails again here
by
adding people. Even if nobody had asked so far, we should ask people
who seem capable of doing it.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
with agreements. Let's see how
long it takes until I can't stop myself from adding a but.
Thank you for that mail. I'm not going to reply now, maybe later, for
fear of not being able to be equally constructive. Or I'll just refer
to it one day.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule
that we still have something to do when etch is
released: Start making some changes in the project.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:34:38PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 20:21, Marc Haber wrote:
Judging from broad knowledge, you might send them to /dev/null for
maximum effect.
Do you
requested
these contact addresses to be added to
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 03:27:25PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error rate on requeue requests that reach me is significant, even from
people who are well-informed and involved in the process (e.g., fellow
with -vote.)
For my part, it's because a) I'm lazy, b) I'm currently not subscribed
to -project or -devel (so please Cc me if you move).
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
. And help
debugging at least when asked. My experience with that is very bad.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
-only uploads, or require bin+src, but discard
the binary packages. On the social side, the availability of buildd
admins for work and communication needs to be improved, by whatever
measures are appropriate.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst
be
allowed. Should normally means something: need not in all cases,
but really should except if there are strong reasons against.
Which seems to be just the current situation, from the point of view of
those who have the power to reject binary uploads...
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
no answer in the BTS are fixed soon, only
those that he discusses might be tricky, or he reluctant to fix them.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
, but
should take the time for talking.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
, you should back up this claim with some
| references. I have the opposite impression
`
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
. And both are different to meeting in
person or talking on the phone.
Should we found a group that collects money to pay the DPL's phone bill
if he needs to give certain fellow DDs a call?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ
by others. I repeat what I wrote:
I'm asserting nothing of the kind. Ian might be, but I'm not.
Sorry, I was confused because you answered as if you could read Ian's
mind, so I must have concluded you were the same person.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein
if I had, I don't think it would change much.
Anthony, I ask you as the DPL, please delay that decision yourself, thus
making this stupid voting process unnecessary.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
as the installer components (.udebs) used by the debian-installer.
END OF PROPOSAL
Yup. That one.
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
pgpl9FF0JEoj8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, how it comes that it is
self-contradictory, and provide a fix for the script that does that.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
-tempered. And how about
your offering him to proofread the ballot? Or just doing it, since he
actually posted it in public for that very purpose?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
.
The problem is that several people (also on -legal) have shown evidence
that some of the firmware under discussion never was intended to comply
with the GPL, for various reasons. I don't feel well with just ignoring
this evidence.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:43, Frank Küster wrote:
first of all, I wonder why so few people from the teams involved take
part in this discussion. I assume one reason might be that they prefer
IRC. However, debian-vote is the list that's supposed
in this
discussion as being not among those who [are] remotely reasonable (with
a few exceptions who are mostly forced to stay involved because of their
roles in the project) is a personal attack on Sven (and maybe others),
what else?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein
?) statements by so many people, without trying to sum up on
a web page or similar.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
List masters, this is evidence that Frans is not going to stop this, and as i
asked yesterday, i now re-iterate the demand for his ban from debian-vote.
Come on, calm down. That one was neither insulting nor attacking.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
this is at least clearly worded, unambiguous, and if it succeeds will
allow to release etch without delay (at least without delay because of
firmware problems).
It seems this is not true (qlogic), and still might be interpreted,
namely as trying
the fact that I was aware of its
existence...), how about typhoon?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
that, whether in the
particular cases there's in fact any doubt, etc.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
modification, or if there is no source
+ | available. However, we still require that the firmware has a
+ | license that, in principle, allows distribution (possibly under
+ | conditions we currently cannot fully meet).
`
What do you think?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single
.
However, see my answer to Anthony Towns.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
+ | included in the kernel. However, we still require that the
+ | firmware has a license that allows distribution.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:09:50 +0200, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
| 4. We give priority to the timely release of Etch over sorting every
- | bit out; for this reason, we will treat removal of sourceless
+ | bit out
to me as well), but there was nothing that
I could have done about that.
I don't think it's true. It has been pointed out that some of the
consequences have already been raised during the discussion, but were
overheard. And that's all Adrian and Marc were talking about.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank
, or not at all you, who is
to be blamed.
manoj
tired of being labeled as deceptive, misleading, or abusive of his postiion
Maybe that's more in your ear that in people's (my, Marc's) mouth?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ
allowed to do so, and the firmware is
| distributed upstream under a license that complies with the DFSG.
`
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
pgppuD19PhRZ0.pgp
Description
to distribute them, and that they are distributed upstream
under a license that complies with the DFSG. Hence they can be
included if this proposal passes.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
allowed to do so, and the formware is
| distributed under a DFSG free license.
`
without or, better, with the editorial changes ;-) suggested by Aníbal.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX
discussion
That looks fine to me.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
one in the first place
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
in fact count when in doubt.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
involving any of the proposals made so far. But I'd never rank a
proposal higher than further discussion in which *I* declare that I want
the SC to be reverted.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX
this poll as an indication that we should revert
the SC change, or that we have failed (in fact, we have succeeded to a
large extent, just not 100%) or that we are being hypocritical.
I also second the rest of Sven's statement ;-)
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein
, even if we do
miss our goals.
Regards, Frank
[1] and that is not only because of firmware, but also because there are
still non-free bits hidden somewhere; they have been found in the past
months and years, and they're probably going to be found in the future.
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule
of a
failure if we release etch in summer 2008, without non-free firmware in
main? I'm sure you wouldn't; just the argument would be phrased
differently (drop the repeatedly, replace meets by make a release
that meets and extended by incredibly long).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule
.
The key point seems to be that you want to renew a discussion that,
according to many's perception, has already taken place sufficiently,
while you said somewhere that it hadn't...
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
and then implement the
resulting course of action.
[...]
So, let's vote on this proposal, and then we can either continue to discuss
this without having to deal with the etch release deadlines, or delay etch
appropriately while we first discuss a solution and then implement it.
Seconded ;-)
--
Frank Küster
users and our perspective.
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
pgpHgm25o7zAm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
René van Bevern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I second this proposal independently of the presence of the D clause,
although I prefer it being not removed.
Same for me
Ah, yes, and to make things clear: While I second this proposal, I
still think
read it) does not back
Bernhard's interpretation. There's been a sensible request to give one
of the entities which this amendment talks about the opportunity to
comment. I find your reaction to this very strange.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding
occasionally,
instead of referring to the particular place where SPI is the last
resort for decisions?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
If I remember how my script works well enough to use it correctly,
the clone candidates (ones that a lot of voters rank next to each other)
were:
326 votes (77%), Ari and Ted
That's very unfair to Zeke.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single
is missing (e.g. buildd
administration).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
5. Do you see any services for our users or developers missing or
poorly maintained? If so, which and what do you plan to do to
fix this?
I'm not directly aware of anything important missing at the moment. I
know that we
?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
in the project for the past few
months. See, for instance:
[... list snipped ]
Public communication is important for people in key positions, but
personal communication, especially when an answer has been requested
explicitly, is even more.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
immediate feedback on my achievements (and not via the
BTS...), and to take it serious.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
was wrong at the time when I passed [1]?
Frank
[1] https://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=frank%40kuesterei.ch
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
machines (after the CVS corruption last year) and never got any answer.
At least one other person told me he had asked about the same, so this
would have deserved a public answer.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-05 18:48]:
I also asked the DPL a question about backups of the development
machines (after the CVS corruption last year) and never got any answer.
FWIW, there is a dedicated backup server now. I don't know
announced yet; or he had assigned one of the DPL
team members to do that.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
mean we'd rather not reelect you, because in the second year
that would be replaced by Liberté Égalité Guillotine?
;-)
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Jutta Wrage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. One of the candidates uses pictures to illustrate his platform,
but does not give an alternative description for lynx users and blind
people - accident?
I didn't see any pictures in firefox, either.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule
or not? Would the code be a
good thing, or would it necessarily be a threat to freedom of speech,
and stifle innovation? Should any kind of behavior be allowed on Debian
mailing lists?
And, do you think this code of conduct should be enforced? How?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single
of applying this test to a GFDL'ed document is that it is non-free.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:15:08 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
And then, has nobody ever raised the rumor that the purpose of this GFDL
is non-free hullaboo is just to make sure that we will have our non-free
section, for ever?
I feel it the same way
that the purpose of this
GFDL is non-free hullaboo is just to make sure that we will have our
non-free section, for ever?
I'm going to do something sensible now,
Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
_did_ you mean?
The procedure to replace the secretary is suboptimal, from a democracy
point of view.
And who do you think ought to run that vote?
Well, e.g. the TC. I don't care enough about it to propose any changes,
though.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
of GFDL will be satisfied.
With the effect that the reference card is no longer a reference card
(but maybe a couple of cards, or so).
In other words: You can't turn the manual into a reference card.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie
, leader and SPI
board is an other characteristic of a democratic organization.
If anyone wants to follow up on this, it's probably better to move to
-project, but in that case please Cc me, I'm not subscribed there.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f
.
He's open to be convinced, but for sure not if you start telling him
that he doesn't know his business at all.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
holder, to be non-free. I am not aware of
any works in Debian under such a license.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
your whims, then your modifications are usefull and
freedom 3 gives you the right to distribute them.
Removing lengthy political rants is clearly a real need if it comes to
reducing space.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ
you have been proven wrong by the example or until
nobody cares enough to further discuss your statements.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
