On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 01:46:28AM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
Roeckx wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 9c605edd-40a5-469c-9489-cbf80ac05970
> [1] Choice 1: Andreas Tille
> [2] Choice 2: Sruthi Chandran
> [ ] Choice 3: None Of The Abov
Hi,
This is the fist call for votes for the DPL election of 2024.
Voting period starts 2024-04-06 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2024-04-19 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https
Hi Luna,
Am 1. April 2023 16:24:51 MESZ schrieb Luna Jernberg :
>Not really any point to vote as highvoltage is the only one to vote on
I beg to disagree. There is still a point in voting with just one ballot option
available. By following the rules set by our constitution, we ensure we
continu
Luna Jernberg writes:
> Alright i did not know that, thanks for the info
Also, while I guess you could think of it as just a "congratulations" to
vote when there's a single candidate, I think of it more as a "vote of
confidence". By voting, and putting the candidate above none of the
above, I'm
Alright i did not know that, thanks for the info
On 4/1/23, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le samedi, 1 avril 2023, 16.24:51 h CEST Luna Jernberg a écrit :
>> Not really any point to vote as highvoltage is the only one to vote on
>> congrats to being the Debian Project Leader for another year
>
>
Le samedi, 1 avril 2023, 16.24:51 h CEST Luna Jernberg a écrit :
> Not really any point to vote as highvoltage is the only one to vote on
> congrats to being the Debian Project Leader for another year
With Q being about 16, and quorum being 3Q, at least 48 developers need to
vote highvoltage abov
Hey!
Not really any point to vote as highvoltage is the only one to vote on
congrats to being the Debian Project Leader for another year
On 4/1/23, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This is the first call for votes on the DPL election of 2023.
>
>
,
This is the first call for votes on the DPL election of 2023.
Voting period starts 2023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2023-04-14 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the General Resolution about
non-free firmware.
Voting period starts 2022-09-18 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-10-01 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the 2022 Debian Project Leader
election.
Voting period starts 2022-04-03 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-04-16 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at
Eh, I obviously forgot to fix up the reply-to bit. Sorry for the noise.
--
Michael Lustfield
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> VOTING FORM
>
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 6acf7f89-3eb2-492c-8715-98ae65b5f9d2
> [4] Choice 1: Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote
> [1] Choice 2: Hide identities of Developer
On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 17:53:12 +0100
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A part of the ballot option in choice 2 was missing. Here is the
> corrected ballot.
>
> Voting period starts 2022-03-13 00:00:00 UTC
> Votes must be received by 2022-03-26 23:59:59 UTC
>
Hi,
A part of the ballot option in choice 2 was missing. Here is the
corrected ballot.
Voting period starts 2022-03-13 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-03-26 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on changing the resolution process.
This vote is being conducte
Hallo Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx,
13.03.22 00:43 Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx:
> This is the first call for votes on the General Resolution about voting
> secrecy.
>
> Choice 2: Amend resolution process, allow extension of discu
Hi,
I'm sorry for not noticing this yesterday, but ...
On 13/03/22 at 00:43 +0100, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Choice 1: Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote
> =
>
> Rationale
> =
>
>
Hi,
This is the first call for votes on the General Resolution about voting
secrecy.
Voting period starts 2022-03-13 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-03-26 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on changing the resolution process.
This vote is being conducted
> "Andreas" == Andreas Beckmann writes:
Andreas> What is "Russ' proposal"? My first thought was: Why is
Andreas> this making a reference to something from the previous
Andreas> discussion period without explicitly stating it?
You are correct that Russ's proposal is Choice 1.
Hi,
not having followed the discussions on debian-vote leading to the
current GR, but reading the details for the first time in the CFV email,
I was confused by an "undefined reference":
On 15/01/2022 00.53, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
[...]
Choice 2: Amend resolution proce
Hi,
This is the first call for votes on the general resolution about
changing the resolution process.
Voting period starts 2022-01-15 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-01-28 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on changing the resolution process.
This vote
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:12:33PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:53:39PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I noticed no No Last call for votes has been sent for either vote so far,
> > which is usually sent around 48 hours before the end of a vote.
> >
I noticed no No Last call for votes has been sent for either vote so far,
which is usually sent around 48 hours before the end of a vote.
Looking at graphs for past votes (e.g. [1] where one can easily see when
the second and last calls for vote were) we seem to be disenfranchising
between 20
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:53:39PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I noticed no No Last call for votes has been sent for either vote so far,
> which is usually sent around 48 hours before the end of a vote.
>
> Looking at graphs for past votes (e.g. [1] where one can easily see when
>
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> f9533fc1-129b-41db-822c-be8fe8e9faa6
> [1] Choice 1: Jonathan Carter
> [2] Choice 2: Sruthi Chandran
> [3] Choice 3: None Of The Above
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
signat
judge so quickly.
I think we have to take care.
If I miss something in the story, I am open to explanation, talk...
Thanks.
JC
On Sun, 2021-04-04 at 01:50 +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the first call for votes on the General Resolutio
o quickly.
I think we have to take care.
If I miss something in the story, I am open to explanation, talk...
Thanks.
JC
On Sun, 2021-04-04 at 01:50 +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the first call for votes on the General Resolution about
>
Hi,
This is the first call for votes on the DPL election of 2021.
Voting period starts 2021-04-04 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2021-04-17 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https
Hi,
This is the first call for votes on the General Resolution about
a statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board.
Voting period starts 2021-04-04 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2021-04-17 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting
* Russ Allbery: " Re: Call for votes on «Statement regarding Richard Stallman's
readmission to the FSF board»" (Fri, 02 Apr 2021 16:49:21 -0700):
> Mathias Behrle writes:
>
> > I consider the really great value of current option E that I can indeed
> > vote e
Mathias Behrle writes:
> I consider the really great value of current option E that I can indeed
> vote explicitely that nothing should be done on behalf of the project
> and that further discussion is *not* needed.
I consider the naming of "further discussion" a wry joke on the fact that
the ab
* Gunnar Wolf: " Re: Call for votes on «Statement regarding Richard Stallman's
readmission to the FSF board»" (Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:57:09 -0600):
Thank you Gunnar for pushing this forward.
> Nicolas Dandrimont dijo [Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:27:48PM +0200]:
> > > (...)
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 09:53:30AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx dijo [Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 09:29:06AM +0200]:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 01:06:49AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > Dear Debian Project Secretary,
> > >
> > > Given the DPL authorized a shortened discussion period, and tha
Nicolas Dandrimont dijo [Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:27:48PM +0200]:
> > (...)
> > [A] Call for the FSF board removal, as in rms-open-letter.github.io
> > (proposed by Steve Langasek, currently base proposal)
> >
> > [B] Call for Stallman's resignation from FSF all bodies
> > (proposed by Srut
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, at 17:53, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Better done with the morning coffee than late at night :-)
>
> I suggest the following options and ordering to appear on the ballot:
>
> [A] Call for the FSF board removal, as in rms-open-letter.github.io
> (proposed by Steve Langasek, curre
Kurt Roeckx dijo [Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 09:29:06AM +0200]:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 01:06:49AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Dear Debian Project Secretary,
> >
> > Given the DPL authorized a shortened discussion period, and that, while
> > said discussion period allowed for a wide range of voting
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 01:06:49AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx dijo [Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:56:33AM +0200]:
> > There is also this in 4.2:
> > 4. The minimum discussion period is 2 weeks, but may be varied by up
> >to 1 week by the Project Leader. The Project Leader has a c
Kurt Roeckx dijo [Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:56:33AM +0200]:
> There is also this in 4.2:
> 4. The minimum discussion period is 2 weeks, but may be varied by up
>to 1 week by the Project Leader. The Project Leader has a casting
>vote. There is a quorum of 3Q.
>
> The DPL changed t
Hi,
This is the first call for votes on the DPL election of 2020.
Voting period starts 2020-04-05 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2020-04-18 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the General Resolution about
init systems and systemd.
Voting period starts 2019-12-07 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2019-12-27 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on init systems and systemd.
This vote is being
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> The minimum discussion period lapsed sometime Saturday.
> So, as one of the authors of a proposal, I ask the secretary to please
> prepare a ballot and start the vote.
> As the DPL, I ask the secretary to extend the voting period by
Hi all,
just because there are some voices complaining about Sam's call for vote, I
feel the need to raise my otherwise more silent voice. All in all I concur with
Sam's assessment that all options are covered well enough to form opinions. Now
let's vote and see where we are today. And it's not
tend the voting period by a week.
This is the first time in the history of the project[1] that a call for
vote is done *while people are still actively drafting options*. Usually
we wait for discussion to die out before we call for votes.
Even if that isn't the process set out in the constit
Sam Hartman writes:
> The minimum discussion period lapsed sometime Saturday.
> So, as one of the authors of a proposal, I ask the secretary to please
> prepare a ballot and start the vote.
I think this is an error, and urge you to reconsider; there is clearly
an active process to try and refine
It was pointed out to me off-list that the constitution says that in
calling for a vote I am supposed to say what I think the options are.
That feels kind of presumptuous given the work the secretary has done.
Kurt and I discussed off list much earlier and he doesn't need me to say
what I think t
ern of disrespectful discourse.
I think we've accomplished what we have set out to accomplish: I think we have
a very good ballot.
Any future refinements come at what I believe is too high of a cost.
So I call for votes.
--Sam
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:06:16AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
Hi Adriano,
there was a recent keyring update just in time so I could vote without problems
in the meantime. Perhaps this also solved your problem or did you not set an
expiry on your master key?
Cheers
TL;DR I'm happy my vote wa
* Adriano Rafael Gomes: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
election 2019: First call for votes)" (Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:44:26 -0300):
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I have set up an expiry on
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
Hi all,
I have set up an expiry on my GPG key:
- originally set to 2019-04-07
- updated on 2019-04-08 to 2021-04-06 and pushed to various keyservers
including keyring.debian.org.
But nevertheless my ballot is rejected, because obv
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:02:58PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> If so then I think there is a clear gap in the procedures.
>
> - What about DDs being approved just during the voting period? They should
> clearly be able to vote.
For the avoidance of doubt and just for the record, we (DAMs) c
* Gunnar Wolf: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader election
2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 21:58:43 -0500):
Hi Gunnar,
>
> FWIW, I already sent Mathias a private mail about this, as he also
> asked this privately :) But this seems to be of g
f the last steps of an account creation, the first
case is basically impossible). We often did an upload on the day just
before a call for votes (we didn't this time, as we have adopted
during last year a time-based cycle which seems to work well and
reliably; keyring gets updated on the 24-25
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:55:08PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sánchez: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
> election 2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:03:43 -0400):
>
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:21:52PM +0
* Kurt Roeckx: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader election
2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:10:04 +0200):
> In my expierence, they do update the keyring during the voting
> period because each year some people run into this problem. I
> s
* Roberto C. Sánchez: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
election 2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:03:43 -0400):
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > * Joerg Jaspert: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: R
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 07:10:04PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have set up an expiry on my GPG key:
> > - originally set to 2019-04-07
> > - updated on 2019-04-08 to 2021-04-06 and pushed to various keyservers
>
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
election 2019: First call for votes)"):
> [explanations]
...
> [advice]
...
> [offer of help]
Thank you for this helpful and constructive response.
Ian.
--
Ian JacksonThese opinions are my own.
If
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have set up an expiry on my GPG key:
> - originally set to 2019-04-07
> - updated on 2019-04-08 to 2021-04-06 and pushed to various keyservers
> including keyring.debian.org.
>
> But nevertheless my ballot is reject
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Joerg Jaspert: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
> election
> 2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 09 Apr 2019 16:44:43 +0200):
>
> > On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
* Joerg Jaspert: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader election
2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 09 Apr 2019 16:44:43 +0200):
> On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> >> *Usually* they do not do that during running elections, just short befor
On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
*Usually* they do not do that during running elections, just short before
they start, so you may be out of luck.
If so then I think there is a clear gap in the procedures.
That may be, though they are like this for a long time now.
- What about DDs
* Ian Jackson: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader election
2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:13:32 +0100):
Hi Ian,
> Joerg Jaspert writes ("Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
> election 2019: First call for votes)"):
* Mattia Rizzolo: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
election 2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:16:43 +0200):
Hi Mattia,
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 12:12:10PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> &
* Joerg Jaspert: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader election
2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 09 Apr 2019 12:12:10 +0200):
Hi Joerg,
thanks for your answer.
> On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> > - originally set to 2019-04-07
> >
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 12:12:10PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
>
> > - originally set to 2019-04-07
> > - updated on 2019-04-08 to 2021-04-06 and pushed to various keyservers
> > including keyring.debian.org.
>
> That was a bit late, but the right pl
Joerg Jaspert writes ("Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
election 2019: First call for votes)"):
> *Usually* they do not do that during running elections, just short
> before they start, so you may be out of luck.
In that case I think the Secretary should make
On 15367 March 1977, Mathias Behrle wrote:
- originally set to 2019-04-07
- updated on 2019-04-08 to 2021-04-06 and pushed to various keyservers
including keyring.debian.org.
That was a bit late, but the right place to send to.
Do I have to wait for a keyring sync of the DD Keyring? When wi
.raw]
for the vote
"Debian Project Leader 2019 Election"
sent in on Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:38:59 +0200, with the subject
"Re: Debian Project Leader election 2019: First call for votes"
The message ID is <20190409093859.1fedb...@monsterix.mbehrle.de>.
The message base i
Hi,
This is the first call for votes on the DPL election of 2019.
Voting period starts 2019-04-07 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2019-04-20 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https
Hi,
This is the first call for votes on the DPL election of 2018.
Voting period starts 2018-04-03 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2018-04-16 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https
Hi,
This is the first call for votes on the DPL election of 2017.
Voting period starts 2017-04-02 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2017-04-15 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the GR about declassifying
debian-private.
Voting period starts 2016-10-09 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2016-10-22 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on declassifying debian-private.
This vote is being conducted as
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:11:32PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> [ Amazing as it might seem for this issue, I forgot to sign my
> mail. Here it is again. Apologies for the duplication ]
>
> Debian Project Secretary,
>
> It has been two weeks since I posted my GR proposal [1] to the
> debian-vote
[ Amazing as it might seem for this issue, I forgot to sign my
mail. Here it is again. Apologies for the duplication ]
Debian Project Secretary,
It has been two weeks since I posted my GR proposal [1] to the
debian-vote mailing list, containing the text that follows:
[1] Message-ID: <201609020
Debian Project Secretary,
It has been two weeks since I posted my GR proposal [1] to the
debian-vote mailing list, containing the text that follows:
[1] Message-ID: <20160902041505.gd3...@gwolf.org>
=== BEGIN GR TEXT ===
Title: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private.
1. T
Hi,
This is the first call for vote on the General Resolution about
declassifying debian-private.
Voting period starts 2016-08-07 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2016-08-20 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on declassifying parts of -private of
historical inte
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:18:04PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
>
> Dear Secretary,
>
> It has been two weeks since I accepted this amendment. I would like to call
> for
> votes on this General Resolution.
I'll let the vote start on 2016-08-07 00:00 UTC.
Kurt
his amendment under paragraph A.1.2 of our constitution.
>
> Seconds who think otherwise should feel free to submit another amendment.
Dear Secretary,
It has been two weeks since I accepted this amendment. I would like to call for
votes on this General Resolution.
Thank you,
--
Nicolas Dandrimont
BOFH excuse #430:
Mouse has out-of-cheese-error
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:38:39PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> The ballot mail has these headers:
>
> Reply-To: gr_ctte_ch...@vote.debian.org
> Mail-Followup-To: grp_ctte_ch...@vote.debian.org
>
> The latter address looks typoed. s/grp/gr/?
Yes, and I've set up an alias so both should work.
Kur
The ballot mail has these headers:
Reply-To: gr_ctte_ch...@vote.debian.org
Mail-Followup-To: grp_ctte_ch...@vote.debian.org
The latter address looks typoed. s/grp/gr/?
--
Jakub Wilk
Hi,
This is the first call for vote on the General Resolution about
changing to constitution to use Chair in stead of Chairman.
Voting period starts 2016-07-31 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2016-08-13 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on updating the standar
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 739cd7a3-8473-486c-8cbe-f54835b4b3b6
> [1 ] Choice 1: Mehdi Dogguy
> [2 ] Choice 2: None Of The Above
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
Il est sage de nous réconcilier av
Hi,
This is the last call for votes for the 2016 DPL election. There
are about 30 hour left to vote at the time of this writing.
Voting period starts 2016-04-03 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2016-04-16 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian
Sorry for top posting - but wrong year? (and thus wrong selection of
candidates ;) )
On 04/10/2016 12:48 AM, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
This is the 2nd call for votes for the DPL election.
Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
Votes must be
Hi,
This is the second call for votes, now with a correct ballot.
Voting period starts 2016-04-03 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2016-04-16 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at http
Hi,
This is the 2nd call for votes for the DPL election.
Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at http
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx writes:
> This is the 2nd call for votes for the DPL election.
> Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
> Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
This appears to have been a replay of the 2nd ballot for la
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the Debian Project Leader
Elections 2016.
Voting period starts 2016-04-03 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2016-04-16 23:59:59 UTC
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at
Hi,
This is the last call for votes. You still have about 23 hours
left to vote.
Voting period starts 2015-11-29 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2015-12-12 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on updating the standard resolution
procedure.
This vote is being
Hi,
This is the 2nd call votes.
Voting period starts 2015-11-29 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2015-12-12 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on updating the standard resolution
procedure.
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
Yo
Hi,
This is the first call for vote on the General Resolution about
changes to the standard resolution procedure.
Voting period starts 2015-11-29 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2015-12-12 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on updating the standard resolution
Hi,
This is the 2nd call for votes for the Debian Project Leader
Elections 2015. The timeline is:
Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may
[ ] Choice 1: Mehdi Dogguy
[ ] Choice 1: Gergely Nagy
Heads up: do NOT use this broken ballot.
Apparently devotee isn't (or at least wasn't yesterday) smart enough to
notice this brokenness and reject the vote; instead, it counts your vote
incorrectly.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:09:10AM +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> > There are 4 choices in the form, which you may rank with numbers between
> > 1 and 4. In the brackets next to your preferred choice, place a 1.
> > P
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
[...]
> There are 4 choices in the form, which you may rank with numbers between
> 1 and 4. In the brackets next to your preferred choice, place a 1.
> Place a 2 in the brackets next to your next choice. Continue until you
> reach your l
Hi,
The previous ballot had an error in it. Here is a fixed version:
Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at http:
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the Debian Project Leader
Elections 2015.
Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the
Le Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 07:32:36PM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
>
> This vote has currently used up about 15 hours of my time, plus the time
> to read -vote, and I really didn't want to wait up until gone midnight
> to post the CfV.
Hi Neil and everybody,
first, thank you Neil for the hard wor
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 01:30:18PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 04/11/14 at 17:53 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
> > > [ ] Ch
On 4 November 2014 21:30, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> On 04/11/14 at 17:53 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> > 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
>> > [ ] Choice 1: Packages ma
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 04/11/14 at 17:53 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
> > [ ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
> >
1 - 100 of 1185 matches
Mail list logo
